TSTP Solution File: SWV406+1 by SPASS---3.9

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SPASS---3.9
% Problem  : SWV406+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.3.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp
% Command  : run_spass %d %s

% Computer : n014.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Wed Jul 20 21:42:41 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 0.19s 0.55s
% Output   : Refutation 0.19s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.12  % Problem  : SWV406+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.3.0.
% 0.07/0.13  % Command  : run_spass %d %s
% 0.12/0.34  % Computer : n014.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.34  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.34  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.12/0.34  % DateTime : Wed Jun 15 09:42:21 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.19/0.55  
% 0.19/0.55  SPASS V 3.9 
% 0.19/0.55  SPASS beiseite: Proof found.
% 0.19/0.55  % SZS status Theorem
% 0.19/0.55  Problem: /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 
% 0.19/0.55  SPASS derived 571 clauses, backtracked 52 clauses, performed 11 splits and kept 384 clauses.
% 0.19/0.55  SPASS allocated 85825 KBytes.
% 0.19/0.55  SPASS spent	0:00:00.20 on the problem.
% 0.19/0.55  		0:00:00.04 for the input.
% 0.19/0.55  		0:00:00.04 for the FLOTTER CNF translation.
% 0.19/0.55  		0:00:00.01 for inferences.
% 0.19/0.55  		0:00:00.00 for the backtracking.
% 0.19/0.55  		0:00:00.08 for the reduction.
% 0.19/0.55  
% 0.19/0.55  
% 0.19/0.55  Here is a proof with depth 4, length 89 :
% 0.19/0.55  % SZS output start Refutation
% 0.19/0.55  10[0:Inp] ||  -> less_than(u,v)* less_than(v,u)*.
% 0.19/0.55  15[0:Inp] ||  -> pair_in_list(insert_slb(skc9,pair(skc14,skc15)),skc16,skc17)*.
% 0.19/0.55  21[0:Inp] ||  -> check_cpq(triple(u,skc9,v))* pair_in_list(skc9,skc11,skc10).
% 0.19/0.55  22[0:Inp] || less_than(skc10,skc11) -> check_cpq(triple(u,skc9,v))*.
% 0.19/0.55  27[0:Inp] || less_than(u,v) -> less_than(v,u) strictly_less_than(u,v)*.
% 0.19/0.55  35[0:Inp] || pair_in_list(u,v,w) -> pair_in_list(insert_slb(u,pair(x,y)),v,w)*.
% 0.19/0.55  36[0:Inp] || check_cpq(triple(u,skc9,v))*+ pair_in_list(skc9,w,x)* -> less_than(x,w).
% 0.19/0.55  37[0:Inp] || check_cpq(triple(skc12,insert_slb(skc9,pair(skc14,skc15)),skc13))* less_than(skc17,skc16) -> .
% 0.19/0.55  39[0:Inp] || check_cpq(triple(u,insert_slb(v,pair(w,x)),y))* strictly_less_than(w,x) -> .
% 0.19/0.55  41[0:Inp] || pair_in_list(insert_slb(u,pair(v,w)),x,y)* -> equal(v,x) pair_in_list(u,x,y).
% 0.19/0.55  42[0:Inp] || pair_in_list(insert_slb(u,pair(v,w)),x,y)* -> equal(w,y) pair_in_list(u,x,y).
% 0.19/0.55  43[0:Inp] || equal(u,v) equal(w,x) -> pair_in_list(insert_slb(y,pair(w,u)),x,v)*.
% 0.19/0.55  48[0:Inp] || check_cpq(triple(u,insert_slb(v,pair(w,x)),y))* less_than(x,w) -> check_cpq(triple(u,v,y)).
% 0.19/0.55  49[0:Inp] || check_cpq(triple(u,v,w)) less_than(x,y) -> check_cpq(triple(u,insert_slb(v,pair(y,x)),w))*.
% 0.19/0.55  51[0:Inp] || pair_in_list(insert_slb(skc9,pair(skc14,skc15)),u,v)*+ -> check_cpq(triple(skc12,insert_slb(skc9,pair(skc14,skc15)),skc13))* less_than(v,u).
% 0.19/0.55  60[0:MRR:27.0,10.0] ||  -> strictly_less_than(u,v)* less_than(v,u).
% 0.19/0.55  63[0:Res:15.0,41.0] ||  -> equal(skc16,skc14) pair_in_list(skc9,skc16,skc17)*.
% 0.19/0.55  64[0:Res:15.0,42.0] ||  -> equal(skc17,skc15) pair_in_list(skc9,skc16,skc17)*.
% 0.19/0.55  69[1:Spt:36.1,36.2] || pair_in_list(skc9,u,v)* -> less_than(v,u).
% 0.19/0.55  70[2:Spt:51.0,51.2] || pair_in_list(insert_slb(skc9,pair(skc14,skc15)),u,v)* -> less_than(v,u).
% 0.19/0.55  71[3:Spt:64.0] ||  -> equal(skc17,skc15)**.
% 0.19/0.55  72[3:Rew:71.0,37.1] || check_cpq(triple(skc12,insert_slb(skc9,pair(skc14,skc15)),skc13))* less_than(skc15,skc16) -> .
% 0.19/0.55  74[3:Rew:71.0,63.1] ||  -> equal(skc16,skc14) pair_in_list(skc9,skc16,skc15)*.
% 0.19/0.55  75[3:Rew:71.0,15.0] ||  -> pair_in_list(insert_slb(skc9,pair(skc14,skc15)),skc16,skc15)*.
% 0.19/0.55  80[4:Spt:74.0] ||  -> equal(skc16,skc14)**.
% 0.19/0.55  81[4:Rew:80.0,75.0] ||  -> pair_in_list(insert_slb(skc9,pair(skc14,skc15)),skc14,skc15)*.
% 0.19/0.55  82[4:Rew:80.0,72.1] || check_cpq(triple(skc12,insert_slb(skc9,pair(skc14,skc15)),skc13))* less_than(skc15,skc14) -> .
% 0.19/0.55  85[4:Res:81.0,70.0] ||  -> less_than(skc15,skc14)*l.
% 0.19/0.55  86[4:MRR:82.1,85.0] || check_cpq(triple(skc12,insert_slb(skc9,pair(skc14,skc15)),skc13))* -> .
% 0.19/0.55  214[2:Res:43.2,70.0] || equal(skc15,u)*+ equal(skc14,v)* -> less_than(u,v)*.
% 0.19/0.55  218[2:EqR:214.0] || equal(skc14,u)*+ -> less_than(skc15,u)*.
% 0.19/0.55  529[4:Res:49.2,86.0] || check_cpq(triple(skc12,skc9,skc13))* less_than(skc15,skc14) -> .
% 0.19/0.55  531[4:MRR:529.1,85.0] || check_cpq(triple(skc12,skc9,skc13))* -> .
% 0.19/0.55  533[4:Res:22.1,531.0] || less_than(skc10,skc11)*r -> .
% 0.19/0.55  534[4:Res:21.0,531.0] ||  -> pair_in_list(skc9,skc11,skc10)*.
% 0.19/0.55  535[4:Res:534.0,69.0] ||  -> less_than(skc10,skc11)*r.
% 0.19/0.55  536[4:MRR:535.0,533.0] ||  -> .
% 0.19/0.55  537[4:Spt:536.0,74.0,80.0] || equal(skc16,skc14)** -> .
% 0.19/0.55  538[4:Spt:536.0,74.1] ||  -> pair_in_list(skc9,skc16,skc15)*.
% 0.19/0.55  539[4:Res:538.0,69.0] ||  -> less_than(skc15,skc16)*r.
% 0.19/0.55  540[4:MRR:72.1,539.0] || check_cpq(triple(skc12,insert_slb(skc9,pair(skc14,skc15)),skc13))* -> .
% 0.19/0.55  546[4:Res:49.2,540.0] || check_cpq(triple(skc12,skc9,skc13))* less_than(skc15,skc14) -> .
% 0.19/0.55  547[2:EqR:218.0] ||  -> less_than(skc15,skc14)*l.
% 0.19/0.55  548[4:MRR:546.1,547.0] || check_cpq(triple(skc12,skc9,skc13))* -> .
% 0.19/0.55  549[4:Res:21.0,548.0] ||  -> pair_in_list(skc9,skc11,skc10)*.
% 0.19/0.55  550[4:Res:22.1,548.0] || less_than(skc10,skc11)*r -> .
% 0.19/0.55  551[4:Res:549.0,69.0] ||  -> less_than(skc10,skc11)*r.
% 0.19/0.55  552[4:MRR:551.0,550.0] ||  -> .
% 0.19/0.55  553[3:Spt:552.0,64.0,71.0] || equal(skc17,skc15)** -> .
% 0.19/0.55  554[3:Spt:552.0,64.1] ||  -> pair_in_list(skc9,skc16,skc17)*.
% 0.19/0.55  555[3:Res:554.0,69.0] ||  -> less_than(skc17,skc16)*l.
% 0.19/0.55  556[3:MRR:37.1,555.0] || check_cpq(triple(skc12,insert_slb(skc9,pair(skc14,skc15)),skc13))* -> .
% 0.19/0.55  564[0:Res:15.0,42.0] ||  -> equal(skc17,skc15) pair_in_list(skc9,skc16,skc17)*.
% 0.19/0.55  570[3:Res:49.2,556.0] || check_cpq(triple(skc12,skc9,skc13))* less_than(skc15,skc14) -> .
% 0.19/0.55  571[3:MRR:570.1,547.0] || check_cpq(triple(skc12,skc9,skc13))* -> .
% 0.19/0.55  572[3:Res:21.0,571.0] ||  -> pair_in_list(skc9,skc11,skc10)*.
% 0.19/0.55  573[3:Res:572.0,69.0] ||  -> less_than(skc10,skc11)*r.
% 0.19/0.55  574[3:MRR:22.0,573.0] ||  -> check_cpq(triple(u,skc9,v))*.
% 0.19/0.55  575[3:UnC:574.0,571.0] ||  -> .
% 0.19/0.55  576[2:Spt:575.0,51.1] ||  -> check_cpq(triple(skc12,insert_slb(skc9,pair(skc14,skc15)),skc13))*.
% 0.19/0.55  577[2:MRR:37.0,576.0] || less_than(skc17,skc16)*l -> .
% 0.19/0.55  578[2:Res:576.0,39.0] || strictly_less_than(skc14,skc15)* -> .
% 0.19/0.55  579[3:Spt:63.0] ||  -> equal(skc16,skc14)**.
% 0.19/0.55  581[3:Rew:579.0,564.1] ||  -> equal(skc17,skc15) pair_in_list(skc9,skc14,skc17)*.
% 0.19/0.55  582[3:Rew:579.0,577.0] || less_than(skc17,skc14)*l -> .
% 0.19/0.55  586[2:Res:60.0,578.0] ||  -> less_than(skc15,skc14)*l.
% 0.19/0.55  587[4:Spt:581.0] ||  -> equal(skc17,skc15)**.
% 0.19/0.55  589[4:Rew:587.0,582.0] || less_than(skc15,skc14)*l -> .
% 0.19/0.55  590[4:MRR:589.0,586.0] ||  -> .
% 0.19/0.55  591[4:Spt:590.0,581.0,587.0] || equal(skc17,skc15)** -> .
% 0.19/0.55  592[4:Spt:590.0,581.1] ||  -> pair_in_list(skc9,skc14,skc17)*.
% 0.19/0.55  593[4:Res:592.0,69.0] ||  -> less_than(skc17,skc14)*l.
% 0.19/0.55  594[4:MRR:593.0,582.0] ||  -> .
% 0.19/0.55  595[3:Spt:594.0,63.0,579.0] || equal(skc16,skc14)** -> .
% 0.19/0.55  596[3:Spt:594.0,63.1] ||  -> pair_in_list(skc9,skc16,skc17)*.
% 0.19/0.55  597[3:Res:596.0,69.0] ||  -> less_than(skc17,skc16)*l.
% 0.19/0.55  598[3:MRR:597.0,577.0] ||  -> .
% 0.19/0.55  599[1:Spt:598.0,36.0] || check_cpq(triple(u,skc9,v))* -> .
% 0.19/0.55  600[1:MRR:21.0,599.0] ||  -> pair_in_list(skc9,skc11,skc10)*.
% 0.19/0.55  601[1:MRR:22.1,599.0] || less_than(skc10,skc11)*r -> .
% 0.19/0.55  602[2:Spt:51.0,51.2] || pair_in_list(insert_slb(skc9,pair(skc14,skc15)),u,v)* -> less_than(v,u).
% 0.19/0.55  604[2:Res:35.1,602.0] || pair_in_list(skc9,u,v)* -> less_than(v,u).
% 0.19/0.55  653[2:Res:600.0,604.0] ||  -> less_than(skc10,skc11)*r.
% 0.19/0.55  654[2:MRR:653.0,601.0] ||  -> .
% 0.19/0.55  655[2:Spt:654.0,51.1] ||  -> check_cpq(triple(skc12,insert_slb(skc9,pair(skc14,skc15)),skc13))*.
% 0.19/0.55  657[2:Res:655.0,39.0] || strictly_less_than(skc14,skc15)* -> .
% 0.19/0.55  665[2:Res:60.0,657.0] ||  -> less_than(skc15,skc14)*l.
% 0.19/0.55  702[2:Res:655.0,48.0] || less_than(skc15,skc14) -> check_cpq(triple(skc12,skc9,skc13))*.
% 0.19/0.55  703[2:MRR:702.0,702.1,665.0,599.0] ||  -> .
% 0.19/0.55  % SZS output end Refutation
% 0.19/0.55  Formulae used in the proof : totality l42_co ax24 ax23 stricly_smaller_definition ax38 ax37
% 0.19/0.55  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------