TSTP Solution File: SWV406+1 by SOS---2.0
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : SOS---2.0
% Problem : SWV406+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.3.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : sos-script %s
% Computer : n010.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Wed Jul 20 21:38:21 EDT 2022
% Result : Unknown 59.53s 59.70s
% Output : None
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----No solution output by system
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.12 % Problem : SWV406+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.3.0.
% 0.07/0.12 % Command : sos-script %s
% 0.12/0.34 % Computer : n010.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.34 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.12/0.34 % DateTime : Wed Jun 15 09:33:54 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.12/0.36 ----- Otter 3.2, August 2001 -----
% 0.12/0.36 The process was started by sandbox2 on n010.cluster.edu,
% 0.12/0.36 Wed Jun 15 09:33:54 2022
% 0.12/0.36 The command was "./sos". The process ID is 12188.
% 0.12/0.36
% 0.12/0.36 set(prolog_style_variables).
% 0.12/0.36 set(auto).
% 0.12/0.36 dependent: set(auto1).
% 0.12/0.36 dependent: set(process_input).
% 0.12/0.36 dependent: clear(print_kept).
% 0.12/0.36 dependent: clear(print_new_demod).
% 0.12/0.36 dependent: clear(print_back_demod).
% 0.12/0.36 dependent: clear(print_back_sub).
% 0.12/0.36 dependent: set(control_memory).
% 0.12/0.36 dependent: assign(max_mem, 12000).
% 0.12/0.36 dependent: assign(pick_given_ratio, 4).
% 0.12/0.36 dependent: assign(stats_level, 1).
% 0.12/0.36 dependent: assign(pick_semantic_ratio, 3).
% 0.12/0.36 dependent: assign(sos_limit, 5000).
% 0.12/0.36 dependent: assign(max_weight, 60).
% 0.12/0.36 clear(print_given).
% 0.12/0.36
% 0.12/0.36 formula_list(usable).
% 0.12/0.36
% 0.12/0.36 SCAN INPUT: prop=0, horn=0, equality=1, symmetry=0, max_lits=4.
% 0.12/0.36
% 0.12/0.36 This ia a non-Horn set with equality. The strategy will be
% 0.12/0.36 Knuth-Bendix, ordered hyper_res, ur_res, factoring, and
% 0.12/0.36 unit deletion, with positive clauses in sos and nonpositive
% 0.12/0.36 clauses in usable.
% 0.12/0.36
% 0.12/0.36 dependent: set(knuth_bendix).
% 0.12/0.36 dependent: set(para_from).
% 0.12/0.36 dependent: set(para_into).
% 0.12/0.36 dependent: clear(para_from_right).
% 0.12/0.36 dependent: clear(para_into_right).
% 0.12/0.36 dependent: set(para_from_vars).
% 0.12/0.36 dependent: set(eq_units_both_ways).
% 0.12/0.36 dependent: set(dynamic_demod_all).
% 0.12/0.36 dependent: set(dynamic_demod).
% 0.12/0.36 dependent: set(order_eq).
% 0.12/0.36 dependent: set(back_demod).
% 0.12/0.36 dependent: set(lrpo).
% 0.12/0.36 dependent: set(hyper_res).
% 0.12/0.37 dependent: set(unit_deletion).
% 0.12/0.37 dependent: set(factor).
% 0.12/0.37
% 0.12/0.37 ------------> process usable:
% 0.12/0.37
% 0.12/0.37 ------------> process sos:
% 0.12/0.37 Following clause subsumed by 67 during input processing: 0 [copy,67,flip.1] {-} A=A.
% 0.12/0.37 Following clause subsumed by 54 during input processing: 0 [copy,68,flip.1] {-} insert_cpq(triple(A,B,C),D)=triple(insert_pqp(A,D),insert_slb(B,pair(D,bottom)),C).
% 0.12/0.37
% 0.12/0.37 ======= end of input processing =======
% 0.20/0.49
% 0.20/0.49
% 0.20/0.49 Failed to model usable list: disabling FINDER
% 0.20/0.49
% 0.20/0.49
% 0.20/0.49
% 0.20/0.49 -------------- Softie stats --------------
% 0.20/0.49
% 0.20/0.49 UPDATE_STOP: 300
% 0.20/0.49 SFINDER_TIME_LIMIT: 2
% 0.20/0.49 SHORT_CLAUSE_CUTOFF: 4
% 0.20/0.49 number of clauses in intial UL: 37
% 0.20/0.49 number of clauses initially in problem: 66
% 0.20/0.49 percentage of clauses intially in UL: 56
% 0.20/0.49 percentage of distinct symbols occuring in initial UL: 86
% 0.20/0.49 percent of all initial clauses that are short: 100
% 0.20/0.49 absolute distinct symbol count: 37
% 0.20/0.49 distinct predicate count: 10
% 0.20/0.49 distinct function count: 17
% 0.20/0.49 distinct constant count: 10
% 0.20/0.49
% 0.20/0.49 ---------- no more Softie stats ----------
% 0.20/0.49
% 0.20/0.49
% 0.20/0.49
% 0.20/0.49 =========== start of search ===========
% 1.04/1.22
% 1.04/1.22
% 1.04/1.22 Changing weight limit from 60 to 54.
% 1.04/1.22
% 1.04/1.22 Resetting weight limit to 54 after 130 givens.
% 1.04/1.22
% 1.16/1.37
% 1.16/1.37
% 1.16/1.37 Changing weight limit from 54 to 47.
% 1.16/1.37
% 1.16/1.37 Resetting weight limit to 47 after 135 givens.
% 1.16/1.37
% 1.34/1.52
% 1.34/1.52
% 1.34/1.52 Changing weight limit from 47 to 44.
% 1.34/1.52
% 1.34/1.52 Resetting weight limit to 44 after 140 givens.
% 1.34/1.52
% 1.37/1.61
% 1.37/1.61
% 1.37/1.61 Changing weight limit from 44 to 41.
% 1.37/1.61
% 1.37/1.61 Resetting weight limit to 41 after 145 givens.
% 1.37/1.61
% 1.46/1.68
% 1.46/1.68
% 1.46/1.68 Changing weight limit from 41 to 40.
% 1.46/1.68
% 1.46/1.68 Resetting weight limit to 40 after 150 givens.
% 1.46/1.68
% 1.60/1.78
% 1.60/1.78
% 1.60/1.78 Changing weight limit from 40 to 39.
% 1.60/1.78
% 1.60/1.78 Resetting weight limit to 39 after 155 givens.
% 1.60/1.78
% 1.67/1.87
% 1.67/1.87
% 1.67/1.87 Changing weight limit from 39 to 37.
% 1.67/1.87
% 1.67/1.87 Resetting weight limit to 37 after 160 givens.
% 1.67/1.87
% 1.75/1.96
% 1.75/1.96
% 1.75/1.96 Changing weight limit from 37 to 35.
% 1.75/1.96
% 1.75/1.96 Resetting weight limit to 35 after 165 givens.
% 1.75/1.96
% 1.81/2.05
% 1.81/2.05
% 1.81/2.05 Changing weight limit from 35 to 34.
% 1.81/2.05
% 1.81/2.05 Resetting weight limit to 34 after 170 givens.
% 1.81/2.05
% 1.91/2.11
% 1.91/2.11
% 1.91/2.11 Changing weight limit from 34 to 33.
% 1.91/2.11
% 1.91/2.11 Resetting weight limit to 33 after 175 givens.
% 1.91/2.11
% 2.22/2.40
% 2.22/2.40
% 2.22/2.40 Changing weight limit from 33 to 30.
% 2.22/2.40
% 2.22/2.40 Resetting weight limit to 30 after 180 givens.
% 2.22/2.40
% 2.33/2.53
% 2.33/2.53
% 2.33/2.53 Changing weight limit from 30 to 29.
% 2.33/2.53
% 2.33/2.53 Resetting weight limit to 29 after 185 givens.
% 2.33/2.53
% 2.40/2.65
% 2.40/2.65
% 2.40/2.65 Changing weight limit from 29 to 28.
% 2.40/2.65
% 2.40/2.65 Resetting weight limit to 28 after 190 givens.
% 2.40/2.65
% 2.55/2.74
% 2.55/2.74
% 2.55/2.74 Changing weight limit from 28 to 27.
% 2.55/2.74
% 2.55/2.74 Resetting weight limit to 27 after 195 givens.
% 2.55/2.74
% 2.64/2.83
% 2.64/2.83
% 2.64/2.83 Changing weight limit from 27 to 26.
% 2.64/2.83
% 2.64/2.83 Resetting weight limit to 26 after 200 givens.
% 2.64/2.83
% 2.72/2.91
% 2.72/2.91
% 2.72/2.91 Changing weight limit from 26 to 25.
% 2.72/2.91
% 2.72/2.91 Resetting weight limit to 25 after 205 givens.
% 2.72/2.91
% 2.82/2.99
% 2.82/2.99
% 2.82/2.99 Changing weight limit from 25 to 24.
% 2.82/2.99
% 2.82/2.99 Resetting weight limit to 24 after 210 givens.
% 2.82/2.99
% 2.93/3.17
% 2.93/3.17
% 2.93/3.17 Changing weight limit from 24 to 23.
% 2.93/3.17
% 2.93/3.17 Resetting weight limit to 23 after 225 givens.
% 2.93/3.17
% 3.15/3.33
% 3.15/3.33
% 3.15/3.33 Changing weight limit from 23 to 22.
% 3.15/3.33
% 3.15/3.33 Resetting weight limit to 22 after 235 givens.
% 3.15/3.33
% 3.54/3.78
% 3.54/3.78
% 3.54/3.78 Changing weight limit from 22 to 21.
% 3.54/3.78
% 3.54/3.78 Resetting weight limit to 21 after 290 givens.
% 3.54/3.78
% 4.16/4.36
% 4.16/4.36
% 4.16/4.36 Changing weight limit from 21 to 20.
% 4.16/4.36
% 4.16/4.36 Modelling stopped after 300 given clauses and 0.00 seconds
% 4.16/4.36
% 4.16/4.36
% 4.16/4.36 Resetting weight limit to 20 after 335 givens.
% 4.16/4.36
% 4.56/4.74
% 4.56/4.74
% 4.56/4.74 Changing weight limit from 20 to 19.
% 4.56/4.74
% 4.56/4.74 Resetting weight limit to 19 after 380 givens.
% 4.56/4.74
% 4.86/5.08
% 4.86/5.08
% 4.86/5.08 Changing weight limit from 19 to 18.
% 4.86/5.08
% 4.86/5.08 Resetting weight limit to 18 after 460 givens.
% 4.86/5.08
% 5.80/5.99
% 5.80/5.99
% 5.80/5.99 Changing weight limit from 18 to 17.
% 5.80/5.99
% 5.80/5.99 Resetting weight limit to 17 after 690 givens.
% 5.80/5.99
% 8.71/8.89
% 8.71/8.89
% 8.71/8.89 Changing weight limit from 17 to 16.
% 8.71/8.89
% 8.71/8.89 Resetting weight limit to 16 after 2045 givens.
% 8.71/8.89
% 32.94/33.11
% 32.94/33.11
% 32.94/33.11 Changing weight limit from 16 to 17.
% 32.94/33.11
% 32.94/33.11 Resetting weight limit to 17 after 8850 givens.
% 32.94/33.11
% 32.94/33.12
% 32.94/33.12
% 32.94/33.12 Changing weight limit from 17 to 18.
% 32.94/33.12
% 32.94/33.12 Resetting weight limit to 18 after 8855 givens.
% 32.94/33.12
% 59.52/59.70 lookup_slb(insert_slb(insert_slb(A,pair(create_slb,B)),pair(insert_slb(C,pair(findmin_pqp_res(D),E)),F)),create_slb)=B.
% 59.52/59.70
% 59.52/59.70 ------------- memory usage ------------
% 59.52/59.70 814 mallocs of 32700 bytes each, 25993.9 K.
% 59.52/59.70 type (bytes each) gets frees in use avail bytes
% 59.52/59.70 sym_ent ( 304) 157 0 157 0 46.6 K
% 59.52/59.70 term ( 32) 132921018 132881756 39262 99 1230.0 K
% 59.52/59.70 rel ( 40) 119267082 119202062 65020 115 2544.3 K
% 59.52/59.70 term_ptr ( 16) 1773204 1070288 702916 310 10987.9 K
% 59.52/59.70 formula_ptr_2 ( 56) 0 0 0 0 0.0 K
% 59.52/59.70 fpa_head ( 24) 105519 34791 70728 40 1658.6 K
% 59.52/59.70 fpa_tree ( 56) 723686 723686 0 32099 1755.4 K
% 59.52/59.70 context (1288) 13194258 13194258 0 5 6.3 K
% 59.52/59.70 trail ( 24) 21724014 21724014 0 15 0.4 K
% 59.52/59.70 imd_tree ( 32) 65 5 60 5 2.0 K
% 59.52/59.70 imd_pos (4024) 3629412 3629412 0 6 23.6 K
% 59.52/59.70 is_tree ( 24) 165418 82948 82470 90 1935.0 K
% 59.52/59.70 is_pos (2424) 113343874 113343874 0 19 45.0 K
% 59.52/59.70 fsub_pos ( 16) 12766796 12766796 0 1 0.0 K
% 59.52/59.70 literal ( 32) 13858719 13837682 21037 15 657.9 K
% 59.52/59.70 clause ( 88) 4419274 4403169 16105 12 1385.1 K
% 59.52/59.70 list ( 272) 53 46 7 2 2.4 K
% 59.52/59.70 clash_nd ( 80) 5921 5921 0 2 0.2 K
% 59.52/59.70 clause_ptr ( 16) 34805 18755 16050 10 250.9 K
% 59.52/59.70 int_ptr ( 16) 47822429 47746624 75805 48 1185.2 K
% 59.52/59.70 ci_ptr ( 24) 0 0 0 0 0.0 K
% 59.52/59.70 link_node ( 120) 0 0 0 0 0.0 K
% 59.52/59.70 ans_lit_node( 24) 0 0 0 0 0.0 K
% 59.52/59.70 formula_box( 168) 0 0 0 0 0.0 K
% 59.52/59.70 formula( 40) 424 424 0 279 10.9 K
% 59.52/59.70 formula_ptr( 16) 43 43 0 43 0.7 K
% 59.52/59.70 cl_attribute( 24) 0 0 0 0 0.0 K
% 59.52/59.70
% 59.52/59.70 ********** is_delete, can't find end.
% 59.52/59.70 00
% 59.52/59.70 post_process time 0.00
% 59.52/59.70 back demod time 0.00
% 59.52/59.70 back subsume 0.00
% 59.52/59.70 factor time 0.00
% 59.52/59.70 FINDER time 0.00
% 59.52/59.70 unindex time 0.00
% 59.52/59.70
% 59.52/59.70 Forward subsumption counts, subsumer:number_subsumed.
% 59.52/59.70 1:0 2:2 3:12 4:0 5:73 6:66 7:7 8:0 9:0 10:43
% 59.52/59.70 11:5 12:5 13:0 14:0 15:4 16:5 17:0 18:0 19:0 20:2
% 59.52/59.70 21:1 22:0 23:0 24:0 25:0 26:1 27:0 28:0 29:0 30:28
% 59.52/59.70 31:0 32:0 33:6 34:6 35:0 36:0 37:0 38:0 39:0 40:0
% 59.52/59.70 41:39 42:131 43:208 44:21 45:0 46:0 47:0 48:0 49:0 50:0
% 59.52/59.70 51:98 52:243 53:402 54:1 55:1 56:0 57:0 58:8 59:0 60:0
% 59.52/59.70 61:37 62:0 63:0 64:0 65:0 66:13 67:6987 68:0 69:0 70:23
% 59.52/59.70 71:6 72:1 73:40 74:0 75:0 76:0 77:0 78:14 79:14 80:2
% 59.52/59.70 81:2 82:2 83:2 84:3 85:66 86:40 87:42 88:0 89:530 90:2205
% 59.52/59.70 91:8 92:8 93:6 94:4 95:4 96:4 97:6 98:10 99:10
% 59.52/59.70 All others: 37068.
% 59.52/59.70
% 59.52/59.70 ********** ABNORMAL END **********
% 59.52/59.70
% 59.52/59.70 ********** is_delete, can't find end.
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------