TSTP Solution File: SWV402+1 by E---3.1.00
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.1.00
% Problem : SWV402+1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v3.3.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E %s %d THM
% Computer : n008.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Tue May 21 05:23:06 EDT 2024
% Result : Theorem 0.19s 0.47s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.19s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 4
% Number of leaves : 2
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 9 ( 6 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 15 ( 0 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Number of connectives : 12 ( 6 ~; 0 |; 4 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 2 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 8 ( 4 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 3 ( 2 usr; 1 prp; 0-3 aty)
% Number of functors : 5 ( 5 usr; 4 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 16 ( 4 sgn 14 !; 0 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(l38_co,conjecture,
! [X1,X2,X3,X4] :
( ( pair_in_list(create_slb,X2,X3)
& strictly_less_than(X3,X4) )
=> pair_in_list(update_slb(create_slb,X4),X2,X4) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',l38_co) ).
fof(ax22,axiom,
! [X1,X2] : ~ pair_in_list(create_slb,X1,X2),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SWV007+2.ax',ax22) ).
fof(c_0_2,negated_conjecture,
~ ! [X1,X2,X3,X4] :
( ( pair_in_list(create_slb,X2,X3)
& strictly_less_than(X3,X4) )
=> pair_in_list(update_slb(create_slb,X4),X2,X4) ),
inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[l38_co]) ).
fof(c_0_3,plain,
! [X1,X2] : ~ pair_in_list(create_slb,X1,X2),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[ax22]) ).
fof(c_0_4,negated_conjecture,
( pair_in_list(create_slb,esk1_0,esk2_0)
& strictly_less_than(esk2_0,esk3_0)
& ~ pair_in_list(update_slb(create_slb,esk3_0),esk1_0,esk3_0) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[c_0_2])])])])]) ).
fof(c_0_5,plain,
! [X9,X10] : ~ pair_in_list(create_slb,X9,X10),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[c_0_3])]) ).
cnf(c_0_6,negated_conjecture,
pair_in_list(create_slb,esk1_0,esk2_0),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_4]) ).
cnf(c_0_7,plain,
~ pair_in_list(create_slb,X1,X2),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).
cnf(c_0_8,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[c_0_6,c_0_7]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.04/0.12 % Problem : SWV402+1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v3.3.0.
% 0.04/0.13 % Command : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.12/0.33 % Computer : n008.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33 % DateTime : Sun May 19 09:03:07 EDT 2024
% 0.12/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.19/0.46 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.19/0.46 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.19/0.47 # Version: 3.1.0
% 0.19/0.47 # Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.19/0.47 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.19/0.47 # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.19/0.47 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.19/0.47 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.19/0.47 # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.19/0.47 # new_bool_3 with pid 3005 completed with status 0
% 0.19/0.47 # Result found by new_bool_3
% 0.19/0.47 # Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.19/0.47 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.19/0.47 # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.19/0.47 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.19/0.47 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.19/0.47 # Search class: FGHSS-FFSF22-MFFFFFNN
% 0.19/0.47 # partial match(1): FGUSS-FFSF22-MFFFFFNN
% 0.19/0.47 # Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.19/0.47 # Starting SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with 100s (1) cores
% 0.19/0.47 # SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with pid 3009 completed with status 0
% 0.19/0.47 # Result found by SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG
% 0.19/0.47 # Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.19/0.47 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.19/0.47 # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.19/0.47 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.19/0.47 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.19/0.47 # Search class: FGHSS-FFSF22-MFFFFFNN
% 0.19/0.47 # partial match(1): FGUSS-FFSF22-MFFFFFNN
% 0.19/0.47 # Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.19/0.47 # Starting SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with 100s (1) cores
% 0.19/0.47 # Preprocessing time : 0.001 s
% 0.19/0.47 # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.19/0.47
% 0.19/0.47 # Proof found!
% 0.19/0.47 # SZS status Theorem
% 0.19/0.47 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.19/0.47 # Parsed axioms : 19
% 0.19/0.47 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 7
% 0.19/0.47 # Initial clauses : 21
% 0.19/0.47 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.19/0.47 # Initial clauses in saturation : 21
% 0.19/0.47 # Processed clauses : 9
% 0.19/0.47 # ...of these trivial : 0
% 0.19/0.47 # ...subsumed : 0
% 0.19/0.47 # ...remaining for further processing : 9
% 0.19/0.47 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.19/0.47 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.19/0.47 # Backward-subsumed : 1
% 0.19/0.47 # Backward-rewritten : 1
% 0.19/0.47 # Generated clauses : 1
% 0.19/0.47 # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 1
% 0.19/0.47 # ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.19/0.47 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.19/0.47 # Paramodulations : 0
% 0.19/0.47 # Factorizations : 0
% 0.19/0.47 # NegExts : 0
% 0.19/0.47 # Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.19/0.47 # Disequality decompositions : 0
% 0.19/0.47 # Total rewrite steps : 1
% 0.19/0.47 # ...of those cached : 0
% 0.19/0.47 # Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.19/0.47 # Propositional check models : 0
% 0.19/0.47 # Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.19/0.47 # Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.19/0.47 # Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.19/0.47 # Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.19/0.47 # Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.19/0.47 # Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.19/0.47 # Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.19/0.47 # Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.19/0.47 # Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.19/0.47 # Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.19/0.47 # Current number of processed clauses : 6
% 0.19/0.47 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 3
% 0.19/0.47 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.19/0.47 # Negative unit clauses : 2
% 0.19/0.47 # Non-unit-clauses : 1
% 0.19/0.47 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 13
% 0.19/0.47 # ...number of literals in the above : 32
% 0.19/0.47 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.19/0.47 # Current number of archived clauses : 3
% 0.19/0.47 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 0
% 0.19/0.47 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.19/0.47 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 0
% 0.19/0.47 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 2
% 0.19/0.47 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.19/0.47 # BW rewrite match attempts : 1
% 0.19/0.47 # BW rewrite match successes : 1
% 0.19/0.47 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.19/0.47 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.19/0.47 # Termbank termtop insertions : 1129
% 0.19/0.47 # Search garbage collected termcells : 269
% 0.19/0.47
% 0.19/0.47 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.19/0.47 # User time : 0.003 s
% 0.19/0.47 # System time : 0.003 s
% 0.19/0.47 # Total time : 0.006 s
% 0.19/0.47 # Maximum resident set size: 1860 pages
% 0.19/0.47
% 0.19/0.47 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.19/0.47 # User time : 0.004 s
% 0.19/0.47 # System time : 0.005 s
% 0.19/0.47 # Total time : 0.009 s
% 0.19/0.47 # Maximum resident set size: 1716 pages
% 0.19/0.47 % E---3.1 exiting
% 0.19/0.48 % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------