TSTP Solution File: SWV395+1 by Enigma---0.5.1

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Enigma---0.5.1
% Problem  : SWV395+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.3.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1

% Computer : n016.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Wed Jul 20 17:47:05 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 10.22s 3.82s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 10.22s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    2
%            Number of leaves      :    2
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :    5 (   5 unt;   0 nHn;   5 RR)
%            Number of literals    :    5 (   0 equ;   2 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    1 (   1 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    1 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    2 (   1 usr;   1 prp; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    3 (   3 usr;   3 con; 0-0 aty)
%            Number of variables   :    4 (   4 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(i_0_48,negated_conjecture,
    pair_in_list(create_slb,esk3_0,esk4_0),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-cfhyt4n_/lgb.p',i_0_48) ).

cnf(i_0_7,plain,
    ~ pair_in_list(create_slb,X1,X2),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-cfhyt4n_/lgb.p',i_0_7) ).

cnf(c_0_51,negated_conjecture,
    pair_in_list(create_slb,esk3_0,esk4_0),
    i_0_48 ).

cnf(c_0_52,plain,
    ~ pair_in_list(create_slb,X1,X2),
    i_0_7 ).

cnf(c_0_53,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[c_0_51,c_0_52]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.10  % Problem  : SWV395+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.3.0.
% 0.09/0.10  % Command  : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% 0.09/0.30  % Computer : n016.cluster.edu
% 0.09/0.30  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.09/0.30  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.09/0.30  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.09/0.30  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.09/0.31  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.09/0.31  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.09/0.31  % DateTime : Tue Jun 14 18:02:48 EDT 2022
% 0.09/0.31  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.14/0.40  # ENIGMATIC: Selected SinE mode:
% 0.14/0.41  # Parsing /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.14/0.41  # Filter: axfilter_auto   0 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto   0.p
% 0.14/0.41  # Filter: axfilter_auto   1 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto   1.p
% 0.14/0.41  # Filter: axfilter_auto   2 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto   2.p
% 10.22/3.82  # ENIGMATIC: Solved by autoschedule-lgb:
% 10.22/3.82  # No SInE strategy applied
% 10.22/3.82  # Trying AutoSched0 for 150 seconds
% 10.22/3.82  # AutoSched0-Mode selected heuristic G_E___208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN
% 10.22/3.82  # and selection function SelectComplexExceptUniqMaxHorn.
% 10.22/3.82  #
% 10.22/3.82  # Preprocessing time       : 0.022 s
% 10.22/3.82  # Presaturation interreduction done
% 10.22/3.82  
% 10.22/3.82  # Proof found!
% 10.22/3.82  # SZS status Theorem
% 10.22/3.82  # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 10.22/3.82  # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 10.22/3.82  
% 10.22/3.82  # -------------------------------------------------
% 10.22/3.83  # User time                : 0.024 s
% 10.22/3.83  # System time              : 0.004 s
% 10.22/3.83  # Total time               : 0.028 s
% 10.22/3.83  # Maximum resident set size: 7128 pages
% 10.22/3.83  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------