TSTP Solution File: SWV386+1 by Vampire-SAT---4.8
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Vampire-SAT---4.8
% Problem : SWV386+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.3.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : vampire --mode casc_sat -m 16384 --cores 7 -t %d %s
% Computer : n028.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Sun May 5 10:51:37 EDT 2024
% Result : Theorem 0.17s 0.34s
% Output : Refutation 0.17s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 6
% Number of leaves : 4
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 13 ( 4 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 32 ( 0 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 6 ( 2 avg)
% Number of connectives : 35 ( 16 ~; 4 |; 10 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 5 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 9 ( 5 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 3 ( 2 usr; 1 prp; 0-1 aty)
% Number of functors : 6 ( 6 usr; 4 con; 0-3 aty)
% Number of variables : 30 ( 20 !; 10 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f161,plain,
$false,
inference(resolution,[],[f160,f94]) ).
fof(f94,plain,
~ check_cpq(triple(sK0,sK1,sK2)),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f87]) ).
fof(f87,plain,
( ok(insert_cpq(triple(sK0,sK1,sK2),sK3))
& check_cpq(insert_cpq(triple(sK0,sK1,sK2),sK3))
& ~ check_cpq(triple(sK0,sK1,sK2)) ),
inference(skolemisation,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK0,sK1,sK2,sK3])],[f54,f86,f85]) ).
fof(f85,plain,
( ? [X0,X1,X2] :
( ? [X3] :
( ok(insert_cpq(triple(X0,X1,X2),X3))
& check_cpq(insert_cpq(triple(X0,X1,X2),X3)) )
& ~ check_cpq(triple(X0,X1,X2)) )
=> ( ? [X3] :
( ok(insert_cpq(triple(sK0,sK1,sK2),X3))
& check_cpq(insert_cpq(triple(sK0,sK1,sK2),X3)) )
& ~ check_cpq(triple(sK0,sK1,sK2)) ) ),
introduced(choice_axiom,[]) ).
fof(f86,plain,
( ? [X3] :
( ok(insert_cpq(triple(sK0,sK1,sK2),X3))
& check_cpq(insert_cpq(triple(sK0,sK1,sK2),X3)) )
=> ( ok(insert_cpq(triple(sK0,sK1,sK2),sK3))
& check_cpq(insert_cpq(triple(sK0,sK1,sK2),sK3)) ) ),
introduced(choice_axiom,[]) ).
fof(f54,plain,
? [X0,X1,X2] :
( ? [X3] :
( ok(insert_cpq(triple(X0,X1,X2),X3))
& check_cpq(insert_cpq(triple(X0,X1,X2),X3)) )
& ~ check_cpq(triple(X0,X1,X2)) ),
inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f44]) ).
fof(f44,negated_conjecture,
~ ! [X0,X1,X2] :
( ~ check_cpq(triple(X0,X1,X2))
=> ! [X3] :
( ~ ok(insert_cpq(triple(X0,X1,X2),X3))
| ~ check_cpq(insert_cpq(triple(X0,X1,X2),X3)) ) ),
inference(negated_conjecture,[],[f43]) ).
fof(f43,conjecture,
! [X0,X1,X2] :
( ~ check_cpq(triple(X0,X1,X2))
=> ! [X3] :
( ~ ok(insert_cpq(triple(X0,X1,X2),X3))
| ~ check_cpq(insert_cpq(triple(X0,X1,X2),X3)) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',l22_co) ).
fof(f160,plain,
check_cpq(triple(sK0,sK1,sK2)),
inference(resolution,[],[f97,f95]) ).
fof(f95,plain,
check_cpq(insert_cpq(triple(sK0,sK1,sK2),sK3)),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f87]) ).
fof(f97,plain,
! [X2,X3,X0,X1] :
( ~ check_cpq(insert_cpq(triple(X0,X1,X2),X3))
| check_cpq(triple(X0,X1,X2)) ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f55]) ).
fof(f55,plain,
! [X0,X1,X2] :
( ! [X3] : ~ check_cpq(insert_cpq(triple(X0,X1,X2),X3))
| check_cpq(triple(X0,X1,X2)) ),
inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f42]) ).
fof(f42,axiom,
! [X0,X1,X2] :
( ~ check_cpq(triple(X0,X1,X2))
=> ! [X3] : ~ check_cpq(insert_cpq(triple(X0,X1,X2),X3)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',l22_l26) ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.09/0.10 % Problem : SWV386+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.3.0.
% 0.09/0.11 % Command : vampire --mode casc_sat -m 16384 --cores 7 -t %d %s
% 0.11/0.31 % Computer : n028.cluster.edu
% 0.11/0.31 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.11/0.31 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.11/0.31 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.11/0.31 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.11/0.31 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.11/0.31 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.11/0.31 % DateTime : Fri May 3 21:10:53 EDT 2024
% 0.11/0.31 % CPUTime :
% 0.17/0.31 % (6989)Running in auto input_syntax mode. Trying TPTP
% 0.17/0.33 % (6992)WARNING: value z3 for option sas not known
% 0.17/0.33 % (6991)fmb+10_1_bce=on:fmbdsb=on:fmbes=contour:fmbswr=3:fde=none:nm=0_793 on theBenchmark for (793ds/0Mi)
% 0.17/0.33 % (6990)fmb+10_1_bce=on:fmbas=function:fmbsr=1.2:fde=unused:nm=0_846 on theBenchmark for (846ds/0Mi)
% 0.17/0.33 % (6995)ott-10_8_av=off:bd=preordered:bs=on:fsd=off:fsr=off:fde=unused:irw=on:lcm=predicate:lma=on:nm=4:nwc=1.7:sp=frequency_522 on theBenchmark for (522ds/0Mi)
% 0.17/0.33 % (6993)fmb+10_1_bce=on:fmbsr=1.5:nm=32_533 on theBenchmark for (533ds/0Mi)
% 0.17/0.33 % (6994)ott+10_10:1_add=off:afr=on:amm=off:anc=all:bd=off:bs=on:fsr=off:irw=on:lma=on:msp=off:nm=4:nwc=4.0:sac=on:sp=reverse_frequency_531 on theBenchmark for (531ds/0Mi)
% 0.17/0.33 % (6992)dis+2_11_add=large:afr=on:amm=off:bd=off:bce=on:fsd=off:fde=none:gs=on:gsaa=full_model:gsem=off:irw=on:msp=off:nm=4:nwc=1.3:sas=z3:sims=off:sac=on:sp=reverse_arity_569 on theBenchmark for (569ds/0Mi)
% 0.17/0.33 % (6996)ott+1_64_av=off:bd=off:bce=on:fsd=off:fde=unused:gsp=on:irw=on:lcm=predicate:lma=on:nm=2:nwc=1.1:sims=off:urr=on_497 on theBenchmark for (497ds/0Mi)
% 0.17/0.33 % (6995)First to succeed.
% 0.17/0.33 % (6995)Solution written to "/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/vampire-proof-6989"
% 0.17/0.34 % (6994)Also succeeded, but the first one will report.
% 0.17/0.34 % (6992)Also succeeded, but the first one will report.
% 0.17/0.34 % (6995)Refutation found. Thanks to Tanya!
% 0.17/0.34 % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 0.17/0.34 % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
% See solution above
% 0.17/0.34 % (6995)------------------------------
% 0.17/0.34 % (6995)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 3a798227e on 2024-05-03 07:42:47 +0200)
% 0.17/0.34 % (6995)Termination reason: Refutation
% 0.17/0.34
% 0.17/0.34 % (6995)Memory used [KB]: 949
% 0.17/0.34 % (6995)Time elapsed: 0.005 s
% 0.17/0.34 % (6995)Instructions burned: 7 (million)
% 0.17/0.34 % (6989)Success in time 0.021 s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------