TSTP Solution File: SWV386+1 by Vampire---4.8
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Vampire---4.8
% Problem : SWV386+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.3.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule file --schedule_file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/quickGreedyProduceRating_steal_pow3.txt --cores 8 -m 12000 -t %d %s
% Computer : n014.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Sun May 5 10:29:26 EDT 2024
% Result : Theorem 0.60s 0.80s
% Output : Refutation 0.60s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 6
% Number of leaves : 5
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 14 ( 4 unt; 1 typ; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 127 ( 0 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 6 ( 9 avg)
% Number of connectives : 35 ( 16 ~; 4 |; 10 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 5 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 9 ( 5 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 1 ( 1 avg)
% Number of FOOLs : 95 ( 95 fml; 0 var)
% Number of types : 2 ( 0 usr)
% Number of type conns : 2 ( 1 >; 1 *; 0 +; 0 <<)
% Number of predicates : 10 ( 9 usr; 5 prp; 0-3 aty)
% Number of functors : 0 ( 0 usr; 0 con; --- aty)
% Number of variables : 31 ( 20 !; 10 ?; 5 :)
% ( 1 !>; 0 ?*; 0 @-; 0 @+)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
tff(pred_def_10,type,
sQ4_eqProxy:
!>[X0: $tType] : ( ( X0 * X0 ) > $o ) ).
tff(f75,plain,
$false,
inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f74,f59]) ).
tff(f59,plain,
~ check_cpq(triple(sK0,sK1,sK2)),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f57]) ).
tff(f57,plain,
( ok(insert_cpq(triple(sK0,sK1,sK2),sK3))
& check_cpq(insert_cpq(triple(sK0,sK1,sK2),sK3))
& ~ check_cpq(triple(sK0,sK1,sK2)) ),
inference(skolemisation,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK0,sK1,sK2,sK3])],[f52,f56,f55]) ).
tff(f55,plain,
( ? [X0,X1,X2] :
( ? [X3] :
( ok(insert_cpq(triple(X0,X1,X2),X3))
& check_cpq(insert_cpq(triple(X0,X1,X2),X3)) )
& ~ check_cpq(triple(X0,X1,X2)) )
=> ( ? [X3] :
( ok(insert_cpq(triple(sK0,sK1,sK2),X3))
& check_cpq(insert_cpq(triple(sK0,sK1,sK2),X3)) )
& ~ check_cpq(triple(sK0,sK1,sK2)) ) ),
introduced(choice_axiom,[]) ).
tff(f56,plain,
( ? [X3] :
( ok(insert_cpq(triple(sK0,sK1,sK2),X3))
& check_cpq(insert_cpq(triple(sK0,sK1,sK2),X3)) )
=> ( ok(insert_cpq(triple(sK0,sK1,sK2),sK3))
& check_cpq(insert_cpq(triple(sK0,sK1,sK2),sK3)) ) ),
introduced(choice_axiom,[]) ).
tff(f52,plain,
? [X0,X1,X2] :
( ? [X3] :
( ok(insert_cpq(triple(X0,X1,X2),X3))
& check_cpq(insert_cpq(triple(X0,X1,X2),X3)) )
& ~ check_cpq(triple(X0,X1,X2)) ),
inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f44]) ).
tff(f44,negated_conjecture,
~ ! [X0,X1,X2] :
( ~ check_cpq(triple(X0,X1,X2))
=> ! [X3] :
( ~ ok(insert_cpq(triple(X0,X1,X2),X3))
| ~ check_cpq(insert_cpq(triple(X0,X1,X2),X3)) ) ),
inference(negated_conjecture,[],[f43]) ).
tff(f43,conjecture,
! [X0,X1,X2] :
( ~ check_cpq(triple(X0,X1,X2))
=> ! [X3] :
( ~ ok(insert_cpq(triple(X0,X1,X2),X3))
| ~ check_cpq(insert_cpq(triple(X0,X1,X2),X3)) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.rgtQca7Cne/Vampire---4.8_3568',l22_co) ).
tff(f74,plain,
check_cpq(triple(sK0,sK1,sK2)),
inference(resolution,[],[f58,f60]) ).
tff(f60,plain,
check_cpq(insert_cpq(triple(sK0,sK1,sK2),sK3)),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f57]) ).
tff(f58,plain,
! [X2: $i,X3: $i,X0: $i,X1: $i] :
( ~ check_cpq(insert_cpq(triple(X0,X1,X2),X3))
| check_cpq(triple(X0,X1,X2)) ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f51]) ).
tff(f51,plain,
! [X0,X1,X2] :
( ! [X3] : ~ check_cpq(insert_cpq(triple(X0,X1,X2),X3))
| check_cpq(triple(X0,X1,X2)) ),
inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f42]) ).
tff(f42,axiom,
! [X0,X1,X2] :
( ~ check_cpq(triple(X0,X1,X2))
=> ! [X3] : ~ check_cpq(insert_cpq(triple(X0,X1,X2),X3)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.rgtQca7Cne/Vampire---4.8_3568',l22_l26) ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.04/0.13 % Problem : SWV386+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.3.0.
% 0.04/0.15 % Command : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule file --schedule_file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/quickGreedyProduceRating_steal_pow3.txt --cores 8 -m 12000 -t %d %s
% 0.15/0.36 % Computer : n014.cluster.edu
% 0.15/0.36 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.15/0.36 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.15/0.36 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.15/0.36 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.15/0.36 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.15/0.36 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.15/0.36 % DateTime : Fri May 3 21:10:53 EDT 2024
% 0.15/0.36 % CPUTime :
% 0.15/0.36 This is a FOF_THM_RFO_SEQ problem
% 0.15/0.36 Running vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule file --schedule_file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/quickGreedyProduceRating_steal_pow3.txt --cores 8 -m 12000 -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.rgtQca7Cne/Vampire---4.8_3568
% 0.60/0.79 % (3752)lrs+1011_461:32768_sil=16000:irw=on:sp=frequency:lsd=20:fd=preordered:nwc=10.0:s2agt=32:alpa=false:cond=fast:s2a=on:i=51:s2at=3.0:awrs=decay:awrsf=691:bd=off:nm=20:fsr=off:amm=sco:uhcvi=on:rawr=on_0 on Vampire---4 for (2995ds/51Mi)
% 0.60/0.79 % (3751)dis-1011_2:1_sil=2000:lsd=20:nwc=5.0:flr=on:mep=off:st=3.0:i=34:sd=1:ep=RS:ss=axioms_0 on Vampire---4 for (2995ds/34Mi)
% 0.60/0.79 % (3755)lrs+2_1:1_sil=16000:fde=none:sos=all:nwc=5.0:i=34:ep=RS:s2pl=on:lma=on:afp=100000_0 on Vampire---4 for (2995ds/34Mi)
% 0.60/0.79 % (3753)lrs+1011_1:1_sil=8000:sp=occurrence:nwc=10.0:i=78:ss=axioms:sgt=8_0 on Vampire---4 for (2995ds/78Mi)
% 0.60/0.79 % (3754)ott+1011_1:1_sil=2000:urr=on:i=33:sd=1:kws=inv_frequency:ss=axioms:sup=off_0 on Vampire---4 for (2995ds/33Mi)
% 0.60/0.79 % (3759)lrs-21_1:1_to=lpo:sil=2000:sp=frequency:sos=on:lma=on:i=56:sd=2:ss=axioms:ep=R_0 on Vampire---4 for (2995ds/56Mi)
% 0.60/0.79 % (3756)lrs+1002_1:16_to=lpo:sil=32000:sp=unary_frequency:sos=on:i=45:bd=off:ss=axioms_0 on Vampire---4 for (2995ds/45Mi)
% 0.60/0.79 % (3751)First to succeed.
% 0.60/0.79 % (3754)Also succeeded, but the first one will report.
% 0.60/0.79 % (3759)Also succeeded, but the first one will report.
% 0.60/0.80 % (3751)Solution written to "/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/vampire-proof-3709"
% 0.60/0.80 % (3752)Also succeeded, but the first one will report.
% 0.60/0.80 % (3756)Also succeeded, but the first one will report.
% 0.60/0.80 % (3755)Also succeeded, but the first one will report.
% 0.60/0.80 % (3751)Refutation found. Thanks to Tanya!
% 0.60/0.80 % SZS status Theorem for Vampire---4
% 0.60/0.80 % SZS output start Proof for Vampire---4
% See solution above
% 0.60/0.80 % (3751)------------------------------
% 0.60/0.80 % (3751)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 3a798227e on 2024-05-03 07:42:47 +0200)
% 0.60/0.80 % (3751)Termination reason: Refutation
% 0.60/0.80
% 0.60/0.80 % (3751)Memory used [KB]: 1077
% 0.60/0.80 % (3751)Time elapsed: 0.003 s
% 0.60/0.80 % (3751)Instructions burned: 3 (million)
% 0.60/0.80 % (3709)Success in time 0.431 s
% 0.60/0.80 % Vampire---4.8 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------