TSTP Solution File: SWV386+1 by Princess---230619

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Princess---230619
% Problem  : SWV386+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.3.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp
% Command  : princess -inputFormat=tptp +threads -portfolio=casc +printProof -timeoutSec=%d %s

% Computer : n019.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Aug 31 22:56:07 EDT 2023

% Result   : Theorem 10.24s 2.20s
% Output   : Proof 12.07s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.12  % Problem  : SWV386+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.3.0.
% 0.00/0.13  % Command  : princess -inputFormat=tptp +threads -portfolio=casc +printProof -timeoutSec=%d %s
% 0.12/0.34  % Computer : n019.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.34  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.34  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.12/0.34  % DateTime : Tue Aug 29 08:13:13 EDT 2023
% 0.12/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.20/0.60  ________       _____
% 0.20/0.60  ___  __ \_________(_)________________________________
% 0.20/0.60  __  /_/ /_  ___/_  /__  __ \  ___/  _ \_  ___/_  ___/
% 0.20/0.60  _  ____/_  /   _  / _  / / / /__ /  __/(__  )_(__  )
% 0.20/0.60  /_/     /_/    /_/  /_/ /_/\___/ \___//____/ /____/
% 0.20/0.60  
% 0.20/0.60  A Theorem Prover for First-Order Logic modulo Linear Integer Arithmetic
% 0.20/0.60  (2023-06-19)
% 0.20/0.60  
% 0.20/0.60  (c) Philipp Rümmer, 2009-2023
% 0.20/0.60  Contributors: Peter Backeman, Peter Baumgartner, Angelo Brillout, Zafer Esen,
% 0.20/0.60                Amanda Stjerna.
% 0.20/0.60  Free software under BSD-3-Clause.
% 0.20/0.60  
% 0.20/0.60  For more information, visit http://www.philipp.ruemmer.org/princess.shtml
% 0.20/0.60  
% 0.20/0.60  Loading /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p ...
% 0.20/0.62  Running up to 7 provers in parallel.
% 0.20/0.64  Prover 1: Options:  +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -realRatSaturationRounds=0 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-1571432423
% 0.20/0.64  Prover 0: Options:  +triggersInConjecture +genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allUni -realRatSaturationRounds=0 -ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=never -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=1042961893
% 0.20/0.64  Prover 2: Options:  +triggersInConjecture +genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple +reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allMinimalAndEmpty -realRatSaturationRounds=1 -ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=never -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-1065072994
% 0.20/0.64  Prover 4: Options:  +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allUni -realRatSaturationRounds=0 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=1868514696
% 0.20/0.64  Prover 3: Options:  +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -realRatSaturationRounds=1 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=never -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=1922548996
% 0.20/0.64  Prover 5: Options:  +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none +reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allMaximal -realRatSaturationRounds=1 -ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=never -generateTriggers=complete -randomSeed=1259561288
% 0.20/0.64  Prover 6: Options:  -triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none +reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximalOutermost -realRatSaturationRounds=0 -ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=never -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-1399714365
% 3.00/1.21  Prover 4: Preprocessing ...
% 3.00/1.21  Prover 1: Preprocessing ...
% 3.61/1.24  Prover 6: Preprocessing ...
% 3.61/1.24  Prover 2: Preprocessing ...
% 3.61/1.24  Prover 5: Preprocessing ...
% 3.61/1.24  Prover 0: Preprocessing ...
% 3.61/1.24  Prover 3: Preprocessing ...
% 7.90/1.87  Prover 1: Warning: ignoring some quantifiers
% 8.53/1.93  Prover 3: Warning: ignoring some quantifiers
% 8.53/1.97  Prover 6: Proving ...
% 8.53/1.98  Prover 3: Constructing countermodel ...
% 8.92/1.98  Prover 5: Proving ...
% 8.92/1.98  Prover 1: Constructing countermodel ...
% 8.92/2.00  Prover 4: Constructing countermodel ...
% 8.92/2.03  Prover 0: Proving ...
% 8.92/2.08  Prover 2: Proving ...
% 10.24/2.19  Prover 3: proved (1549ms)
% 10.24/2.20  
% 10.24/2.20  % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 10.24/2.20  
% 10.24/2.20  Prover 0: proved (1574ms)
% 10.24/2.20  
% 10.24/2.20  % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 10.24/2.20  
% 10.24/2.20  Prover 2: proved (1574ms)
% 10.24/2.20  
% 10.24/2.20  % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 10.24/2.20  
% 10.24/2.20  Prover 6: stopped
% 10.24/2.20  Prover 7: Options:  +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple +reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allUni -realRatSaturationRounds=1 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-236303470
% 10.24/2.20  Prover 8: Options:  +triggersInConjecture +genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -realRatSaturationRounds=0 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-200781089
% 10.24/2.20  Prover 10: Options:  +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -realRatSaturationRounds=1 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=919308125
% 10.24/2.20  Prover 11: Options:  +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allUni -realRatSaturationRounds=1 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-1509710984
% 10.24/2.20  Prover 5: stopped
% 10.24/2.20  Prover 13: Options:  +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -realRatSaturationRounds=0 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=complete -randomSeed=1138197443
% 10.60/2.23  Prover 4: Found proof (size 14)
% 10.60/2.23  Prover 4: proved (1604ms)
% 10.60/2.24  Prover 1: Found proof (size 16)
% 10.60/2.24  Prover 1: proved (1612ms)
% 10.71/2.26  Prover 8: Preprocessing ...
% 10.71/2.27  Prover 11: Preprocessing ...
% 10.71/2.27  Prover 7: Preprocessing ...
% 10.71/2.27  Prover 10: Preprocessing ...
% 10.71/2.27  Prover 13: Preprocessing ...
% 10.71/2.31  Prover 7: stopped
% 11.22/2.32  Prover 11: stopped
% 11.22/2.32  Prover 10: stopped
% 11.22/2.33  Prover 13: stopped
% 11.49/2.39  Prover 8: Warning: ignoring some quantifiers
% 11.49/2.40  Prover 8: Constructing countermodel ...
% 11.49/2.41  Prover 8: stopped
% 11.49/2.42  
% 11.49/2.42  % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 11.49/2.42  
% 11.49/2.42  % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
% 11.49/2.43  Assumptions after simplification:
% 11.49/2.43  ---------------------------------
% 11.49/2.43  
% 11.49/2.43    (l22_co)
% 11.91/2.46     ? [v0: $i] :  ? [v1: $i] :  ? [v2: $i] :  ? [v3: $i] :  ? [v4: int] :  ? [v5:
% 11.91/2.46      $i] :  ? [v6: $i] : ( ~ (v4 = 0) & ok(v6) = 0 & triple(v0, v1, v2) = v3 &
% 11.91/2.46      check_cpq(v6) = 0 & check_cpq(v3) = v4 & insert_cpq(v3, v5) = v6 & $i(v6) &
% 11.91/2.46      $i(v5) & $i(v3) & $i(v2) & $i(v1) & $i(v0))
% 11.91/2.46  
% 11.91/2.46    (l22_l26)
% 11.91/2.46     ! [v0: $i] :  ! [v1: $i] :  ! [v2: $i] :  ! [v3: $i] :  ! [v4: $i] :  ! [v5:
% 11.91/2.46      $i] : ( ~ (triple(v0, v1, v2) = v3) |  ~ (insert_cpq(v3, v4) = v5) |  ~
% 11.91/2.46      $i(v4) |  ~ $i(v2) |  ~ $i(v1) |  ~ $i(v0) |  ? [v6: int] : ((v6 = 0 &
% 11.91/2.47          check_cpq(v3) = 0) | ( ~ (v6 = 0) & check_cpq(v5) = v6)))
% 11.91/2.47  
% 11.91/2.47    (function-axioms)
% 11.91/2.48     ! [v0: $i] :  ! [v1: $i] :  ! [v2: $i] :  ! [v3: $i] :  ! [v4: $i] : (v1 = v0
% 11.91/2.48      |  ~ (triple(v4, v3, v2) = v1) |  ~ (triple(v4, v3, v2) = v0)) &  ! [v0:
% 11.91/2.48      MultipleValueBool] :  ! [v1: MultipleValueBool] :  ! [v2: $i] :  ! [v3: $i]
% 11.91/2.48    :  ! [v4: $i] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (pair_in_list(v4, v3, v2) = v1) |  ~
% 11.91/2.48      (pair_in_list(v4, v3, v2) = v0)) &  ! [v0: $i] :  ! [v1: $i] :  ! [v2: $i] :
% 11.91/2.48     ! [v3: $i] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (remove_pqp(v3, v2) = v1) |  ~ (remove_pqp(v3, v2)
% 11.91/2.48        = v0)) &  ! [v0: $i] :  ! [v1: $i] :  ! [v2: $i] :  ! [v3: $i] : (v1 = v0
% 11.91/2.48      |  ~ (insert_pqp(v3, v2) = v1) |  ~ (insert_pqp(v3, v2) = v0)) &  ! [v0:
% 11.91/2.48      MultipleValueBool] :  ! [v1: MultipleValueBool] :  ! [v2: $i] :  ! [v3: $i]
% 11.91/2.48    : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (contains_cpq(v3, v2) = v1) |  ~ (contains_cpq(v3, v2) = v0))
% 11.91/2.48    &  ! [v0: $i] :  ! [v1: $i] :  ! [v2: $i] :  ! [v3: $i] : (v1 = v0 |  ~
% 11.91/2.48      (remove_cpq(v3, v2) = v1) |  ~ (remove_cpq(v3, v2) = v0)) &  ! [v0: $i] :  !
% 11.91/2.48    [v1: $i] :  ! [v2: $i] :  ! [v3: $i] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (insert_cpq(v3, v2) = v1)
% 11.91/2.48      |  ~ (insert_cpq(v3, v2) = v0)) &  ! [v0: MultipleValueBool] :  ! [v1:
% 11.91/2.48      MultipleValueBool] :  ! [v2: $i] :  ! [v3: $i] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (succ_cpq(v3,
% 11.91/2.48          v2) = v1) |  ~ (succ_cpq(v3, v2) = v0)) &  ! [v0: $i] :  ! [v1: $i] :  !
% 11.91/2.48    [v2: $i] :  ! [v3: $i] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (update_slb(v3, v2) = v1) |  ~
% 11.91/2.48      (update_slb(v3, v2) = v0)) &  ! [v0: $i] :  ! [v1: $i] :  ! [v2: $i] :  !
% 11.91/2.48    [v3: $i] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (lookup_slb(v3, v2) = v1) |  ~ (lookup_slb(v3, v2) =
% 11.91/2.48        v0)) &  ! [v0: $i] :  ! [v1: $i] :  ! [v2: $i] :  ! [v3: $i] : (v1 = v0 | 
% 11.91/2.48      ~ (remove_slb(v3, v2) = v1) |  ~ (remove_slb(v3, v2) = v0)) &  ! [v0:
% 11.91/2.48      MultipleValueBool] :  ! [v1: MultipleValueBool] :  ! [v2: $i] :  ! [v3: $i]
% 11.91/2.48    : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (contains_slb(v3, v2) = v1) |  ~ (contains_slb(v3, v2) = v0))
% 11.91/2.48    &  ! [v0: $i] :  ! [v1: $i] :  ! [v2: $i] :  ! [v3: $i] : (v1 = v0 |  ~
% 11.91/2.48      (pair(v3, v2) = v1) |  ~ (pair(v3, v2) = v0)) &  ! [v0: $i] :  ! [v1: $i] : 
% 11.91/2.48    ! [v2: $i] :  ! [v3: $i] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (insert_slb(v3, v2) = v1) |  ~
% 11.91/2.48      (insert_slb(v3, v2) = v0)) &  ! [v0: MultipleValueBool] :  ! [v1:
% 11.91/2.48      MultipleValueBool] :  ! [v2: $i] :  ! [v3: $i] : (v1 = v0 |  ~
% 11.91/2.48      (strictly_less_than(v3, v2) = v1) |  ~ (strictly_less_than(v3, v2) = v0)) & 
% 11.91/2.48    ! [v0: MultipleValueBool] :  ! [v1: MultipleValueBool] :  ! [v2: $i] :  ! [v3:
% 11.91/2.48      $i] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (less_than(v3, v2) = v1) |  ~ (less_than(v3, v2) = v0))
% 11.91/2.48    &  ! [v0: $i] :  ! [v1: $i] :  ! [v2: $i] : (v1 = v0 |  ~
% 11.91/2.48      (removemin_cpq_res(v2) = v1) |  ~ (removemin_cpq_res(v2) = v0)) &  ! [v0:
% 11.91/2.48      $i] :  ! [v1: $i] :  ! [v2: $i] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (findmin_cpq_res(v2) = v1) |
% 11.91/2.48       ~ (findmin_cpq_res(v2) = v0)) &  ! [v0: $i] :  ! [v1: $i] :  ! [v2: $i] :
% 11.91/2.48    (v1 = v0 |  ~ (findmin_pqp_res(v2) = v1) |  ~ (findmin_pqp_res(v2) = v0)) &  !
% 11.91/2.48    [v0: MultipleValueBool] :  ! [v1: MultipleValueBool] :  ! [v2: $i] : (v1 = v0
% 11.91/2.48      |  ~ (ok(v2) = v1) |  ~ (ok(v2) = v0)) &  ! [v0: MultipleValueBool] :  !
% 11.91/2.48    [v1: MultipleValueBool] :  ! [v2: $i] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (check_cpq(v2) = v1) | 
% 11.91/2.48      ~ (check_cpq(v2) = v0)) &  ! [v0: $i] :  ! [v1: $i] :  ! [v2: $i] : (v1 = v0
% 11.91/2.48      |  ~ (removemin_cpq_eff(v2) = v1) |  ~ (removemin_cpq_eff(v2) = v0)) &  !
% 11.91/2.48    [v0: $i] :  ! [v1: $i] :  ! [v2: $i] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (findmin_cpq_eff(v2) =
% 11.91/2.48        v1) |  ~ (findmin_cpq_eff(v2) = v0)) &  ! [v0: MultipleValueBool] :  !
% 11.91/2.48    [v1: MultipleValueBool] :  ! [v2: $i] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (isnonempty_slb(v2) =
% 11.91/2.48        v1) |  ~ (isnonempty_slb(v2) = v0))
% 11.91/2.48  
% 11.91/2.48  Further assumptions not needed in the proof:
% 11.91/2.48  --------------------------------------------
% 11.91/2.48  ax18, ax19, ax20, ax21, ax22, ax23, ax24, ax25, ax26, ax27, ax28, ax29, ax30,
% 11.91/2.48  ax31, ax32, ax33, ax34, ax35, ax36, ax37, ax38, ax39, ax40, ax41, ax42, ax43,
% 11.91/2.48  ax44, ax45, ax46, ax47, ax48, ax49, ax50, ax51, ax52, ax53, bottom_smallest,
% 11.91/2.48  reflexivity, stricly_smaller_definition, totality, transitivity
% 11.91/2.48  
% 11.91/2.48  Those formulas are unsatisfiable:
% 11.91/2.48  ---------------------------------
% 11.91/2.48  
% 11.91/2.48  Begin of proof
% 11.91/2.48  | 
% 12.07/2.48  | ALPHA: (function-axioms) implies:
% 12.07/2.48  |   (1)   ! [v0: MultipleValueBool] :  ! [v1: MultipleValueBool] :  ! [v2: $i] :
% 12.07/2.48  |        (v1 = v0 |  ~ (check_cpq(v2) = v1) |  ~ (check_cpq(v2) = v0))
% 12.07/2.48  | 
% 12.07/2.48  | DELTA: instantiating (l22_co) with fresh symbols all_47_0, all_47_1, all_47_2,
% 12.07/2.48  |        all_47_3, all_47_4, all_47_5, all_47_6 gives:
% 12.07/2.48  |   (2)   ~ (all_47_2 = 0) & ok(all_47_0) = 0 & triple(all_47_6, all_47_5,
% 12.07/2.48  |          all_47_4) = all_47_3 & check_cpq(all_47_0) = 0 & check_cpq(all_47_3)
% 12.07/2.48  |        = all_47_2 & insert_cpq(all_47_3, all_47_1) = all_47_0 & $i(all_47_0) &
% 12.07/2.48  |        $i(all_47_1) & $i(all_47_3) & $i(all_47_4) & $i(all_47_5) &
% 12.07/2.48  |        $i(all_47_6)
% 12.07/2.48  | 
% 12.07/2.48  | ALPHA: (2) implies:
% 12.07/2.48  |   (3)   ~ (all_47_2 = 0)
% 12.07/2.48  |   (4)  $i(all_47_6)
% 12.07/2.48  |   (5)  $i(all_47_5)
% 12.07/2.48  |   (6)  $i(all_47_4)
% 12.07/2.48  |   (7)  $i(all_47_1)
% 12.07/2.49  |   (8)  insert_cpq(all_47_3, all_47_1) = all_47_0
% 12.07/2.49  |   (9)  check_cpq(all_47_3) = all_47_2
% 12.07/2.49  |   (10)  check_cpq(all_47_0) = 0
% 12.07/2.49  |   (11)  triple(all_47_6, all_47_5, all_47_4) = all_47_3
% 12.07/2.49  | 
% 12.07/2.49  | GROUND_INST: instantiating (l22_l26) with all_47_6, all_47_5, all_47_4,
% 12.07/2.49  |              all_47_3, all_47_1, all_47_0, simplifying with (4), (5), (6),
% 12.07/2.49  |              (7), (8), (11) gives:
% 12.07/2.49  |   (12)   ? [v0: int] : ((v0 = 0 & check_cpq(all_47_3) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) &
% 12.07/2.49  |             check_cpq(all_47_0) = v0))
% 12.07/2.49  | 
% 12.07/2.49  | DELTA: instantiating (12) with fresh symbol all_54_0 gives:
% 12.07/2.49  |   (13)  (all_54_0 = 0 & check_cpq(all_47_3) = 0) | ( ~ (all_54_0 = 0) &
% 12.07/2.49  |           check_cpq(all_47_0) = all_54_0)
% 12.07/2.49  | 
% 12.07/2.49  | BETA: splitting (13) gives:
% 12.07/2.49  | 
% 12.07/2.49  | Case 1:
% 12.07/2.49  | | 
% 12.07/2.49  | |   (14)  all_54_0 = 0 & check_cpq(all_47_3) = 0
% 12.07/2.49  | | 
% 12.07/2.49  | | ALPHA: (14) implies:
% 12.07/2.49  | |   (15)  check_cpq(all_47_3) = 0
% 12.07/2.49  | | 
% 12.07/2.49  | | GROUND_INST: instantiating (1) with all_47_2, 0, all_47_3, simplifying with
% 12.07/2.49  | |              (9), (15) gives:
% 12.07/2.49  | |   (16)  all_47_2 = 0
% 12.07/2.49  | | 
% 12.07/2.49  | | REDUCE: (3), (16) imply:
% 12.07/2.49  | |   (17)  $false
% 12.07/2.49  | | 
% 12.07/2.49  | | CLOSE: (17) is inconsistent.
% 12.07/2.49  | | 
% 12.07/2.49  | Case 2:
% 12.07/2.49  | | 
% 12.07/2.49  | |   (18)   ~ (all_54_0 = 0) & check_cpq(all_47_0) = all_54_0
% 12.07/2.49  | | 
% 12.07/2.49  | | ALPHA: (18) implies:
% 12.07/2.49  | |   (19)   ~ (all_54_0 = 0)
% 12.07/2.49  | |   (20)  check_cpq(all_47_0) = all_54_0
% 12.07/2.49  | | 
% 12.07/2.49  | | GROUND_INST: instantiating (1) with 0, all_54_0, all_47_0, simplifying with
% 12.07/2.49  | |              (10), (20) gives:
% 12.07/2.49  | |   (21)  all_54_0 = 0
% 12.07/2.49  | | 
% 12.07/2.49  | | REDUCE: (19), (21) imply:
% 12.07/2.49  | |   (22)  $false
% 12.07/2.49  | | 
% 12.07/2.49  | | CLOSE: (22) is inconsistent.
% 12.07/2.49  | | 
% 12.07/2.49  | End of split
% 12.07/2.49  | 
% 12.07/2.49  End of proof
% 12.07/2.49  % SZS output end Proof for theBenchmark
% 12.07/2.49  
% 12.07/2.49  1887ms
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------