TSTP Solution File: SWV386+1 by ET---2.0
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : ET---2.0
% Problem : SWV386+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.3.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_ET %s %d
% Computer : n018.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Wed Jul 20 18:16:25 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 0.27s 1.45s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.27s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 4
% Number of leaves : 2
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 9 ( 3 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 18 ( 0 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 3 ( 2 avg)
% Number of connectives : 22 ( 13 ~; 4 |; 2 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 3 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 9 ( 5 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 3 ( 2 usr; 1 prp; 0-1 aty)
% Number of functors : 6 ( 6 usr; 4 con; 0-3 aty)
% Number of variables : 20 ( 1 sgn 16 !; 0 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(l22_co,conjecture,
! [X1,X2,X3] :
( ~ check_cpq(triple(X1,X2,X3))
=> ! [X4] :
( ~ check_cpq(insert_cpq(triple(X1,X2,X3),X4))
| ~ ok(insert_cpq(triple(X1,X2,X3),X4)) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',l22_co) ).
fof(l22_l26,lemma,
! [X1,X2,X3] :
( ~ check_cpq(triple(X1,X2,X3))
=> ! [X4] : ~ check_cpq(insert_cpq(triple(X1,X2,X3),X4)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',l22_l26) ).
fof(c_0_2,negated_conjecture,
~ ! [X1,X2,X3] :
( ~ check_cpq(triple(X1,X2,X3))
=> ! [X4] :
( ~ check_cpq(insert_cpq(triple(X1,X2,X3),X4))
| ~ ok(insert_cpq(triple(X1,X2,X3),X4)) ) ),
inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[l22_co]) ).
fof(c_0_3,lemma,
! [X5,X6,X7,X8] :
( check_cpq(triple(X5,X6,X7))
| ~ check_cpq(insert_cpq(triple(X5,X6,X7),X8)) ),
inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[l22_l26])])])])])]) ).
fof(c_0_4,negated_conjecture,
( ~ check_cpq(triple(esk1_0,esk2_0,esk3_0))
& check_cpq(insert_cpq(triple(esk1_0,esk2_0,esk3_0),esk4_0))
& ok(insert_cpq(triple(esk1_0,esk2_0,esk3_0),esk4_0)) ),
inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[c_0_2])])])])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_5,lemma,
( check_cpq(triple(X1,X2,X3))
| ~ check_cpq(insert_cpq(triple(X1,X2,X3),X4)) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_3]) ).
cnf(c_0_6,negated_conjecture,
check_cpq(insert_cpq(triple(esk1_0,esk2_0,esk3_0),esk4_0)),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_4]) ).
cnf(c_0_7,negated_conjecture,
~ check_cpq(triple(esk1_0,esk2_0,esk3_0)),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_4]) ).
cnf(c_0_8,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_5,c_0_6]),c_0_7]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.05/0.14 % Problem : SWV386+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.3.0.
% 0.05/0.15 % Command : run_ET %s %d
% 0.16/0.36 % Computer : n018.cluster.edu
% 0.16/0.36 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.16/0.36 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.16/0.36 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.16/0.36 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.16/0.36 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.16/0.36 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.16/0.36 % DateTime : Wed Jun 15 17:34:45 EDT 2022
% 0.16/0.36 % CPUTime :
% 0.27/1.45 # Running protocol protocol_eprover_4a02c828a8cc55752123edbcc1ad40e453c11447 for 23 seconds:
% 0.27/1.45 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.4,,04,100,1.0)
% 0.27/1.45 # Preprocessing time : 0.018 s
% 0.27/1.45
% 0.27/1.45 # Proof found!
% 0.27/1.45 # SZS status Theorem
% 0.27/1.45 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.27/1.45 # Proof object total steps : 9
% 0.27/1.45 # Proof object clause steps : 4
% 0.27/1.45 # Proof object formula steps : 5
% 0.27/1.45 # Proof object conjectures : 6
% 0.27/1.45 # Proof object clause conjectures : 3
% 0.27/1.45 # Proof object formula conjectures : 3
% 0.27/1.45 # Proof object initial clauses used : 3
% 0.27/1.45 # Proof object initial formulas used : 2
% 0.27/1.45 # Proof object generating inferences : 1
% 0.27/1.45 # Proof object simplifying inferences : 1
% 0.27/1.45 # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 0.27/1.45 # Parsed axioms : 43
% 0.27/1.45 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 14
% 0.27/1.45 # Initial clauses : 36
% 0.27/1.45 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.27/1.45 # Initial clauses in saturation : 36
% 0.27/1.45 # Processed clauses : 14
% 0.27/1.45 # ...of these trivial : 0
% 0.27/1.45 # ...subsumed : 0
% 0.27/1.45 # ...remaining for further processing : 14
% 0.27/1.45 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.27/1.45 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.27/1.45 # Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.27/1.45 # Backward-rewritten : 0
% 0.27/1.45 # Generated clauses : 3
% 0.27/1.45 # ...of the previous two non-trivial : 0
% 0.27/1.45 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.27/1.45 # Paramodulations : 1
% 0.27/1.45 # Factorizations : 2
% 0.27/1.45 # Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.27/1.45 # Current number of processed clauses : 14
% 0.27/1.45 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 8
% 0.27/1.45 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.27/1.45 # Negative unit clauses : 3
% 0.27/1.45 # Non-unit-clauses : 3
% 0.27/1.45 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 22
% 0.27/1.45 # ...number of literals in the above : 54
% 0.27/1.45 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.27/1.45 # Current number of archived clauses : 0
% 0.27/1.45 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 1
% 0.27/1.45 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 1
% 0.27/1.45 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 0
% 0.27/1.45 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 1
% 0.27/1.45 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.27/1.45 # BW rewrite match attempts : 0
% 0.27/1.45 # BW rewrite match successes : 0
% 0.27/1.45 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.27/1.45 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.27/1.45 # Termbank termtop insertions : 2497
% 0.27/1.45
% 0.27/1.45 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.27/1.45 # User time : 0.013 s
% 0.27/1.45 # System time : 0.005 s
% 0.27/1.45 # Total time : 0.018 s
% 0.27/1.45 # Maximum resident set size: 2796 pages
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------