TSTP Solution File: SWV384+1 by Prover9---1109a

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Prover9---1109a
% Problem  : SWV384+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.3.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : tptp2X_and_run_prover9 %d %s

% Computer : n023.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Wed Jul 20 21:12:29 EDT 2022

% Result   : Unknown 0.99s 1.30s
% Output   : None 
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----No solution output by system
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.12  % Problem  : SWV384+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.3.0.
% 0.07/0.12  % Command  : tptp2X_and_run_prover9 %d %s
% 0.12/0.33  % Computer : n023.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.12/0.33  % DateTime : Tue Jun 14 17:24:20 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.43/1.12  ============================== Prover9 ===============================
% 0.43/1.12  Prover9 (32) version 2009-11A, November 2009.
% 0.43/1.12  Process 18863 was started by sandbox2 on n023.cluster.edu,
% 0.43/1.12  Tue Jun 14 17:24:21 2022
% 0.43/1.12  The command was "/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/prover9 -t 300 -f /tmp/Prover9_18710_n023.cluster.edu".
% 0.43/1.12  ============================== end of head ===========================
% 0.43/1.12  
% 0.43/1.12  ============================== INPUT =================================
% 0.43/1.12  
% 0.43/1.12  % Reading from file /tmp/Prover9_18710_n023.cluster.edu
% 0.43/1.12  
% 0.43/1.12  set(prolog_style_variables).
% 0.43/1.12  set(auto2).
% 0.43/1.12      % set(auto2) -> set(auto).
% 0.43/1.12      % set(auto) -> set(auto_inference).
% 0.43/1.12      % set(auto) -> set(auto_setup).
% 0.43/1.12      % set(auto_setup) -> set(predicate_elim).
% 0.43/1.12      % set(auto_setup) -> assign(eq_defs, unfold).
% 0.43/1.12      % set(auto) -> set(auto_limits).
% 0.43/1.12      % set(auto_limits) -> assign(max_weight, "100.000").
% 0.43/1.12      % set(auto_limits) -> assign(sos_limit, 20000).
% 0.43/1.12      % set(auto) -> set(auto_denials).
% 0.43/1.12      % set(auto) -> set(auto_process).
% 0.43/1.12      % set(auto2) -> assign(new_constants, 1).
% 0.43/1.12      % set(auto2) -> assign(fold_denial_max, 3).
% 0.43/1.12      % set(auto2) -> assign(max_weight, "200.000").
% 0.43/1.12      % set(auto2) -> assign(max_hours, 1).
% 0.43/1.12      % assign(max_hours, 1) -> assign(max_seconds, 3600).
% 0.43/1.12      % set(auto2) -> assign(max_seconds, 0).
% 0.43/1.12      % set(auto2) -> assign(max_minutes, 5).
% 0.43/1.12      % assign(max_minutes, 5) -> assign(max_seconds, 300).
% 0.43/1.12      % set(auto2) -> set(sort_initial_sos).
% 0.43/1.12      % set(auto2) -> assign(sos_limit, -1).
% 0.43/1.12      % set(auto2) -> assign(lrs_ticks, 3000).
% 0.43/1.12      % set(auto2) -> assign(max_megs, 400).
% 0.43/1.12      % set(auto2) -> assign(stats, some).
% 0.43/1.12      % set(auto2) -> clear(echo_input).
% 0.43/1.12      % set(auto2) -> set(quiet).
% 0.43/1.12      % set(auto2) -> clear(print_initial_clauses).
% 0.43/1.12      % set(auto2) -> clear(print_given).
% 0.43/1.12  assign(lrs_ticks,-1).
% 0.43/1.12  assign(sos_limit,10000).
% 0.43/1.12  assign(order,kbo).
% 0.43/1.12  set(lex_order_vars).
% 0.43/1.12  clear(print_given).
% 0.43/1.12  
% 0.43/1.12  % formulas(sos).  % not echoed (44 formulas)
% 0.43/1.12  
% 0.43/1.12  ============================== end of input ==========================
% 0.43/1.12  
% 0.43/1.12  % From the command line: assign(max_seconds, 300).
% 0.43/1.12  
% 0.43/1.12  ============================== PROCESS NON-CLAUSAL FORMULAS ==========
% 0.43/1.12  
% 0.43/1.12  % Formulas that are not ordinary clauses:
% 0.43/1.12  1 (all U all V all W (less_than(U,V) & less_than(V,W) -> less_than(U,W))) # label(transitivity) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 0.43/1.12  2 (all U all V (less_than(U,V) | less_than(V,U))) # label(totality) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 0.43/1.12  3 (all U less_than(U,U)) # label(reflexivity) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 0.43/1.12  4 (all U all V (strictly_less_than(U,V) <-> less_than(U,V) & -less_than(V,U))) # label(stricly_smaller_definition) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 0.43/1.12  5 (all U less_than(bottom,U)) # label(bottom_smallest) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 0.43/1.12  6 (all U all V all W isnonempty_slb(insert_slb(U,pair(V,W)))) # label(ax19) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 0.43/1.12  7 (all U -contains_slb(create_slb,U)) # label(ax20) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 0.43/1.12  8 (all U all V all W all X (contains_slb(insert_slb(U,pair(V,X)),W) <-> contains_slb(U,W) | V = W)) # label(ax21) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 0.43/1.12  9 (all U all V -pair_in_list(create_slb,U,V)) # label(ax22) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 0.43/1.12  10 (all U all V all W all X all Y (pair_in_list(insert_slb(U,pair(V,X)),W,Y) <-> pair_in_list(U,W,Y) | V = W & X = Y)) # label(ax23) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 0.43/1.12  11 (all U all V all W remove_slb(insert_slb(U,pair(V,W)),V) = U) # label(ax24) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 0.43/1.12  12 (all U all V all W all X (V != W & contains_slb(U,W) -> remove_slb(insert_slb(U,pair(V,X)),W) = insert_slb(remove_slb(U,W),pair(V,X)))) # label(ax25) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 0.43/1.12  13 (all U all V all W lookup_slb(insert_slb(U,pair(V,W)),V) = W) # label(ax26) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 0.43/1.12  14 (all U all V all W all X (V != W & contains_slb(U,W) -> lookup_slb(insert_slb(U,pair(V,X)),W) = lookup_slb(U,W))) # label(ax27) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 0.43/1.12  15 (all U update_slb(create_slb,U) = create_slb) # label(ax28) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 0.43/1.12  16 (all U all V all W all X (strictly_less_than(X,W) -> update_slb(insert_slb(U,pair(V,X)),W) = insert_slb(update_slb(U,W),pair(V,W)))) # label(ax29) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 0.43/1.12  17 (all U all V all W all X (less_than(W,X) -> update_slb(insert_slb(U,pair(V,X)),W) = insert_slb(update_slb(U,W),pair(V,X)))) # label(ax30) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 0.43/1.12  18 (all U succ_cpq(U,U)) # label(ax31) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 0.43/1.12  19 (all U all V all W (succ_cpq(U,V) -> succ_cpq(U,insert_cpq(V,W)))) # label(ax32) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 0.43/1.12  20 (all U all V all W (succ_cpq(U,V) -> succ_cpq(U,remove_cpq(V,W)))) # label(ax33) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 0.43/1.12  21 (all U all V (succ_cpq(U,V) -> succ_cpq(U,findmin_cpq_eff(V)))) # label(ax34) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 0.43/1.12  22 (all U all V (succ_cpq(U,V) -> succ_cpq(U,removemin_cpq_eff(V)))) # label(ax35) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 0.43/1.12  23 (all U all V check_cpq(triple(U,create_slb,V))) # label(ax36) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 0.43/1.12  24 (all U all V all W all X all Y (less_than(Y,X) -> (check_cpq(triple(U,insert_slb(V,pair(X,Y)),W)) <-> check_cpq(triple(U,V,W))))) # label(ax37) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 0.43/1.12  25 (all U all V all W all X all Y (strictly_less_than(X,Y) -> (check_cpq(triple(U,insert_slb(V,pair(X,Y)),W)) <-> $F))) # label(ax38) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 0.43/1.12  26 (all U all V all W all X (contains_cpq(triple(U,V,W),X) <-> contains_slb(V,X))) # label(ax39) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 0.43/1.12  27 (all U all V (ok(triple(U,V,bad)) <-> $F)) # label(ax40) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 0.43/1.12  28 (all U all V all W (-ok(triple(U,V,W)) -> W = bad)) # label(ax41) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 0.43/1.12  29 (all U all V all W all X insert_cpq(triple(U,V,W),X) = triple(insert_pqp(U,X),insert_slb(V,pair(X,bottom)),W)) # label(ax42) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 0.43/1.12  30 (all U all V all W all X (-contains_slb(V,X) -> remove_cpq(triple(U,V,W),X) = triple(U,V,bad))) # label(ax43) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 0.43/1.12  31 (all U all V all W all X (contains_slb(V,X) & less_than(lookup_slb(V,X),X) -> remove_cpq(triple(U,V,W),X) = triple(remove_pqp(U,X),remove_slb(V,X),W))) # label(ax44) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 0.43/1.12  32 (all U all V all W all X (contains_slb(V,X) & strictly_less_than(X,lookup_slb(V,X)) -> remove_cpq(triple(U,V,W),X) = triple(remove_pqp(U,X),remove_slb(V,X),bad))) # label(ax45) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 0.43/1.12  33 (all U all V findmin_cpq_eff(triple(U,create_slb,V)) = triple(U,create_slb,bad)) # label(ax46) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 0.43/1.12  34 (all U all V all W all X (V != create_slb & -contains_slb(V,findmin_pqp_res(U)) -> findmin_cpq_eff(triple(U,V,W)) = triple(U,update_slb(V,findmin_pqp_res(U)),bad))) # label(ax47) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 0.43/1.12  35 (all U all V all W all X (V != create_slb & contains_slb(V,findmin_pqp_res(U)) & strictly_less_than(findmin_pqp_res(U),lookup_slb(V,findmin_pqp_res(U))) -> findmin_cpq_eff(triple(U,V,W)) = triple(U,update_slb(V,findmin_pqp_res(U)),bad))) # label(ax48) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 0.43/1.12  36 (all U all V all W all X (V != create_slb & contains_slb(V,findmin_pqp_res(U)) & less_than(lookup_slb(V,findmin_pqp_res(U)),findmin_pqp_res(U)) -> findmin_cpq_eff(triple(U,V,W)) = triple(U,update_slb(V,findmin_pqp_res(U)),W))) # label(ax49) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 0.43/1.12  37 (all U all V findmin_cpq_res(triple(U,create_slb,V)) = bottom) # label(ax50) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 0.43/1.12  38 (all U all V all W all X (V != create_slb -> findmin_cpq_res(triple(U,V,W)) = findmin_pqp_res(U))) # label(ax51) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 0.99/1.30  Fatal error:  renum_vars_recurse: too many variables
% 0.99/1.30  
% 0.99/1.30  
% 0.99/1.30  39 (all U removemin_cpq_eff(U) = remove_cpq(findmin_cpq_eff(U),findmin_cpq_res(U))) # label(ax52) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 0.99/1.30  40 (all U removemin_cpq_res(U) = findmin_cpq_res(U)) # label(ax53) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 0.99/1.30  41 (all U all V all W all X all Y all Z (succ_cpq(triple(U,V,W),triple(X,Y,Z)) -> (-check_cpq(triple(X,Y,Z)) | -ok(triple(X,Y,Z)) -> -check_cpq(im_succ_cpq(triple(X,Y,Z))) | -ok(im_succ_cpq(triple(X,Y,Z)))))) -> (all X1 all X2 all X3 (-check_cpq(triple(X1,X2,X3)) | -ok(triple(X1,X2,X3)) -> (all X4 all X5 all X6 (succ_cpq(triple(X1,X2,X3),triple(X4,X5,X6)) -> -ok(triple(X4,X5,X6)) | -check_cpq(triple(X4,X5,X6)))))) # label(l20_induction) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 0.99/1.30  42 (all U all V all W (-check_cpq(triple(U,V,W)) | -ok(triple(U,V,W)) -> -check_cpq(im_succ_cpq(triple(U,V,W))) | -ok(im_succ_cpq(triple(U,V,W))))) # label(l12_l13) # label(lemma) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 0.99/1.30  43 -(all U all V all W (-check_cpq(triple(U,V,W)) | -ok(triple(U,V,W)) -> (all X all Y all Z (succ_cpq(triple(U,V,W),triple(X,Y,Z)) -> -ok(triple(X,Y,Z)) | -check_cpq(triple(X,Y,Z)))))) # label(l20_co) # label(negated_conjecture) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 0.99/1.30  
% 0.99/1.30  ============================== end of process non-clausal formulas ===
% 0.99/1.30  
% 0.99/1.30  ============================== PROCESS INITIAL CLAUSES ===============
% 0.99/1.30  
% 0.99/1.30  ============================== PREDICATE ELIMINATION =================
% 0.99/1.30  
% 0.99/1.30  ============================== end predicate elimination =============
% 0.99/1.30  
% 0.99/1.30  Auto_denials:  (non-Horn, no changes).
% 0.99/1.30  
% 0.99/1.30  Term ordering decisions:
% 0.99/1.30  Function symbol KB weights:  create_slb=1. bad=1. bottom=1. c1=1. c2=1. c3=1. c4=1. c5=1. c6=1. c7=1. c8=1. c9=1. c10=1. c11=1. c12=1. insert_slb=1. pair=1. update_slb=1. lookup_slb=1. remove_cpq=1. remove_slb=1. insert_cpq=1. remove_pqp=1. insert_pqp=1. findmin_pqp_res=1. im_succ_cpq=1. findmin_cpq_eff=1. findmin_cpq_res=1. removemin_cpq_eff=1. removemin_cpq_res=1. triple=1.
% 0.99/1.30  
% 0.99/1.30  ============================== end of process initial clauses ========
% 0.99/1.30  
% 0.99/1.30  ============================== CLAUSES FOR SEARCH ====================
% 0.99/1.30  
% 0.99/1.30  ============================== end of clauses for search =============
% 0.99/1.30  
% 0.99/1.30  ============================== SEARCH ================================
% 0.99/1.30  
% 0.99/1.30  % Starting search at 0.02 seconds.
% 0.99/1.30  
% 0.99/1.30  Fatal error:  renum_vars_recurse: too many variables
% 0.99/1.30  
% 0.99/1.30  Prover9 interrupted
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------