TSTP Solution File: SWV376+1 by SNARK---20120808r022
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : SNARK---20120808r022
% Problem : SWV376+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.3.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run-snark %s %d
% Computer : n021.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Wed Jul 20 21:33:06 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 0.47s 0.64s
% Output : Refutation 0.47s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 5
% Number of leaves : 8
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 15 ( 11 unt; 2 nHn; 14 RR)
% Number of literals : 23 ( 3 equ; 10 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 4 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 4 ( 2 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 12 ( 12 usr; 10 con; 0-3 aty)
% Number of variables : 22 ( 6 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(37,axiom,
~ ok(triple(X,Y,bad)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SWV007+3.ax',ax40) ).
cnf(38,axiom,
( ok(triple(X,Y,Z))
| Z = bad ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SWV007+3.ax',ax41) ).
cnf(52,axiom,
( ~ ok(triple('SKOLEMAAAW4','SKOLEMAAAW5','SKOLEMAAAW6'))
| ok(triple(X,Y,Z))
| ~ succ_cpq(triple(X,Y,Z),triple(U,V,W))
| ~ ok(triple(U,V,W)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',l12_induction) ).
cnf(53,axiom,
( ok(im_succ_cpq(triple('SKOLEMAAAW4','SKOLEMAAAW5','SKOLEMAAAW6')))
| ok(triple(X,Y,Z))
| ~ succ_cpq(triple(X,Y,Z),triple(U,V,W))
| ~ ok(triple(U,V,W)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',l12_induction) ).
cnf(54,axiom,
( ok(triple(X,Y,Z))
| ~ ok(im_succ_cpq(triple(X,Y,Z))) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',l12_l13) ).
cnf(55,negated_conjecture,
~ ok(triple('SKOLEMAAAW7','SKOLEMAAAW8','SKOLEMAAAW9')),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',l12_co) ).
cnf(56,negated_conjecture,
succ_cpq(triple('SKOLEMAAAW7','SKOLEMAAAW8','SKOLEMAAAW9'),triple('SKOLEMAAAW10','SKOLEMAAAW11','SKOLEMAAAW12')),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',l12_co) ).
cnf(57,negated_conjecture,
ok(triple('SKOLEMAAAW10','SKOLEMAAAW11','SKOLEMAAAW12')),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',l12_co) ).
cnf(64,plain,
'SKOLEMAAAW9' = bad,
inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[55,38]) ).
cnf(65,plain,
succ_cpq(triple('SKOLEMAAAW7','SKOLEMAAAW8',bad),triple('SKOLEMAAAW10','SKOLEMAAAW11','SKOLEMAAAW12')),
inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[56,64,theory(equality)]) ).
cnf(87,plain,
~ ok(im_succ_cpq(triple(X,Y,bad))),
inference('UR-RESOLVE',[status(thm)],[54,37]) ).
cnf(144,plain,
~ ok(triple('SKOLEMAAAW4','SKOLEMAAAW5','SKOLEMAAAW6')),
inference('UR-RESOLVE',[status(thm)],[52,37,65,57]) ).
cnf(145,plain,
ok(im_succ_cpq(triple('SKOLEMAAAW4','SKOLEMAAAW5','SKOLEMAAAW6'))),
inference('UR-RESOLVE',[status(thm)],[53,37,65,57]) ).
cnf(169,plain,
'SKOLEMAAAW6' = bad,
inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[144,38]) ).
cnf(170,plain,
$false,
inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[145,87,169,theory(equality)]) ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.08/0.13 % Problem : SWV376+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.3.0.
% 0.08/0.14 % Command : run-snark %s %d
% 0.13/0.35 % Computer : n021.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.35 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.35 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.35 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.35 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.35 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.35 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.13/0.35 % DateTime : Wed Jun 15 20:38:29 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.35 % CPUTime :
% 0.21/0.48 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.21/0.49 *
% 0.21/0.49 *
% 0.21/0.50 #<PACKAGE "SNARK-USER">
% 0.21/0.50 *
% 0.21/0.50 SNARK-TPTP-OPTIONS
% 0.21/0.50 *
% 0.21/0.50 ((AGENDA-LENGTH-LIMIT NIL) (AGENDA-LENGTH-BEFORE-SIMPLIFICATION-LIMIT NIL)
% 0.21/0.50 (USE-HYPERRESOLUTION T) (USE-UR-RESOLUTION T) (USE-PARAMODULATION T)
% 0.21/0.50 (USE-FACTORING :POS)
% 0.21/0.50 (USE-LITERAL-ORDERING-WITH-HYPERRESOLUTION 'LITERAL-ORDERING-P)
% 0.21/0.50 (USE-LITERAL-ORDERING-WITH-PARAMODULATION 'LITERAL-ORDERING-P)
% 0.21/0.50 (ORDERING-FUNCTIONS>CONSTANTS T) (ASSERT-CONTEXT :CURRENT)
% 0.21/0.50 (RUN-TIME-LIMIT 300) (LISTEN-FOR-COMMANDS NIL)
% 0.21/0.50 (USE-CLOSURE-WHEN-SATISFIABLE T) (PRINT-ROWS-WHEN-GIVEN NIL)
% 0.21/0.50 (PRINT-ROWS-WHEN-DERIVED NIL) (PRINT-UNORIENTABLE-ROWS NIL)
% 0.21/0.50 (PRINT-ROW-WFFS-PRETTILY NIL) (PRINT-FINAL-ROWS :TPTP)
% 0.21/0.50 (PRINT-OPTIONS-WHEN-STARTING NIL) (USE-VARIABLE-NAME-SORTS NIL)
% 0.21/0.50 (USE-PURITY-TEST T) (USE-RELEVANCE-TEST T) (DECLARE-TPTP-SYMBOLS1)
% 0.21/0.50 (DECLARE-TPTP-SYMBOLS2))
% 0.21/0.50 *
% 0.21/0.50 "."
% 0.21/0.50 *
% 0.21/0.50 ; Begin refute-file /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 2022-06-15T20:38:29
% 0.21/0.50 ; Running SNARK from /davis/home/graph/tptp/Systems/SNARK---20120808r022/Source/snark-system.lisp in SBCL 1.0.12 on n021.cluster.edu at 2022-06-15T20:38:29
% 0.47/0.64
% 0.47/0.64
% 0.47/0.64 #||
% 0.47/0.64 % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.47/0.64 % SZS output start Refutation
% See solution above
% 0.47/0.64 ||#
% 0.47/0.64
% 0.47/0.64 ; Summary of computation:
% 0.47/0.64 ; 1487 formulas have been input or derived (from 66 formulas).
% 0.47/0.64 ; 170 (11%) were retained. Of these,
% 0.47/0.64 ; 10 ( 6%) were simplified or subsumed later,
% 0.47/0.64 ; 160 (94%) are still being kept.
% 0.47/0.65 ;
% 0.47/0.65 ; Run time in seconds excluding printing time:
% 0.47/0.65 ; 0.013 9% Read assertion file (1 call)
% 0.47/0.65 ; 0.001 1% Assert (44 calls)
% 0.47/0.65 ; 0.020 14% Process new row (1,457 calls)
% 0.47/0.65 ; 0.013 9% Resolution (130 calls)
% 0.47/0.65 ; 0.002 1% Paramodulation (65 calls)
% 0.47/0.65 ; 0.000 0% Factoring (5 calls)
% 0.47/0.65 ; 0.003 2% Condensing (181 calls)
% 0.47/0.65 ; 0.007 5% Forward subsumption (181 calls)
% 0.47/0.65 ; 0.003 2% Backward subsumption (85 calls)
% 0.47/0.65 ; 0.001 1% Clause clause subsumption (207 calls)
% 0.47/0.65 ; 0.045 31% Forward simplification (1,429 calls)
% 0.47/0.65 ; 0.001 1% Backward simplification (170 calls)
% 0.47/0.65 ; 0.004 3% Ordering (594 calls)
% 0.47/0.65 ; 0.000 0% Sortal reasoning (32 calls)
% 0.47/0.65 ; 0.001 1% Purity testing (1 call)
% 0.47/0.65 ; 0.031 21% Other
% 0.47/0.65 ; 0.145 Total
% 0.47/0.65 ; 0.148 Real time
% 0.47/0.65 ;
% 0.47/0.65 ; Term-hash-array has 478 terms in all.
% 0.47/0.65 ; Feature-vector-row-index has 81 entries (81 at peak, 85 added, 4 deleted).
% 0.47/0.65 ; Feature-vector-row-index has 632 nodes (632 at peak, 683 added, 51 deleted).
% 0.47/0.65 ; Retrieved 262 possibly forward subsuming rows in 181 calls.
% 0.47/0.65 ; Retrieved 11 possibly backward subsumed rows in 85 calls.
% 0.47/0.65 ; Path-index has 476 entries (485 at peak, 497 added, 21 deleted).
% 0.47/0.65 ; Path-index has 1,269 nodes (1,293 at peak, 1,317 added, 48 deleted).
% 0.47/0.65 ; Trie-index has 476 entries (485 at peak, 497 added, 21 deleted).
% 0.47/0.65 ; Trie-index has 1,470 nodes (1,495 at peak, 1,526 added, 56 deleted).
% 0.47/0.65 ; Retrieved 4,748 generalization terms in 7,847 calls.
% 0.47/0.65 ; Retrieved 105 instance terms in 88 calls.
% 0.47/0.65 ; Retrieved 3,998 unifiable terms in 470 calls.
% 0.47/0.65 ;
% 0.47/0.65 ; The agenda of backward simplifiable rows to process has 1 entry:
% 0.47/0.65 ; 1 with value 0
% 0.47/0.65 ; The agenda of rows to process has 1 entry:
% 0.47/0.65 ; 1 with value 11
% 0.47/0.65 ; The agenda of rows to give has 100 entries:
% 0.47/0.65 ; 1 with value (4 6) 5 with value (4 20) 3 with value (4 32)
% 0.47/0.65 ; 3 with value (4 9) 4 with value (4 21) 2 with value (4 33)
% 0.47/0.65 ; 7 with value (4 10) 4 with value (4 22) 1 with value (4 34)
% 0.47/0.65 ; 11 with value (4 11) 5 with value (4 23) 1 with value (4 35)
% 0.47/0.65 ; 6 with value (4 12) 1 with value (4 24) 1 with value (4 38)
% 0.47/0.65 ; 3 with value (4 13) 1 with value (4 25) 1 with value (4 40)
% 0.47/0.65 ; 5 with value (4 14) 4 with value (4 27) 1 with value (4 45)
% 0.47/0.65 ; 5 with value (4 15) 3 with value (4 28) 1 with value (4 47)
% 0.47/0.65 ; 1 with value (4 17) 2 with value (4 29) 2 with value (4 48)
% 0.47/0.65 ; 3 with value (4 18) 6 with value (4 30) 3 with value (4 49)
% 0.47/0.65 ; 1 with value (4 19) 2 with value (4 31) 1 with value (4 54)
% 0.47/0.65 Evaluation took:
% 0.47/0.65 0.148 seconds of real time
% 0.47/0.65 0.130976 seconds of user run time
% 0.47/0.65 0.01678 seconds of system run time
% 0.47/0.65 0 calls to %EVAL
% 0.47/0.65 0 page faults and
% 0.47/0.65 8,652,320 bytes consed.
% 0.47/0.65 :PROOF-FOUND
% 0.47/0.65 ; End refute-file /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 2022-06-15T20:38:29
% 0.47/0.65 :PROOF-FOUND
% 0.47/0.65 *
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------