TSTP Solution File: SWV367+1 by SnakeForV-SAT---1.0
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : SnakeForV-SAT---1.0
% Problem : SWV367+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.3.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule snake_tptp_sat --cores 0 -t %d %s
% Computer : n014.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Aug 31 18:56:37 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 0.21s 0.51s
% Output : Refutation 0.21s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 8
% Number of leaves : 4
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 14 ( 7 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 23 ( 10 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 4 ( 1 avg)
% Number of connectives : 18 ( 9 ~; 0 |; 5 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 4 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 7 ( 4 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 4 ( 2 avg)
% Number of predicates : 3 ( 1 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 9 ( 9 usr; 5 con; 0-3 aty)
% Number of variables : 24 ( 15 !; 9 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f283,plain,
$false,
inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f279,f216]) ).
fof(f216,plain,
! [X0] : ~ contains_pq(create_pq,X0),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f8]) ).
fof(f8,axiom,
! [X0] : ~ contains_pq(create_pq,X0),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',ax8) ).
fof(f279,plain,
contains_pq(create_pq,sK3),
inference(backward_demodulation,[],[f244,f237]) ).
fof(f237,plain,
! [X0,X1] : create_pq = i(triple(X0,create_slb,X1)),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f54]) ).
fof(f54,axiom,
! [X0,X1] : create_pq = i(triple(X0,create_slb,X1)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',ax54) ).
fof(f244,plain,
contains_pq(i(triple(sK2,create_slb,sK1)),sK3),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f187]) ).
fof(f187,plain,
( i(remove_cpq(triple(sK2,create_slb,sK1),sK3)) != remove_pq(i(triple(sK2,create_slb,sK1)),sK3)
& contains_pq(i(triple(sK2,create_slb,sK1)),sK3) ),
inference(skolemisation,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK1,sK2,sK3])],[f185,f186]) ).
fof(f186,plain,
( ? [X0,X1,X2] :
( remove_pq(i(triple(X1,create_slb,X0)),X2) != i(remove_cpq(triple(X1,create_slb,X0),X2))
& contains_pq(i(triple(X1,create_slb,X0)),X2) )
=> ( i(remove_cpq(triple(sK2,create_slb,sK1),sK3)) != remove_pq(i(triple(sK2,create_slb,sK1)),sK3)
& contains_pq(i(triple(sK2,create_slb,sK1)),sK3) ) ),
introduced(choice_axiom,[]) ).
fof(f185,plain,
? [X0,X1,X2] :
( remove_pq(i(triple(X1,create_slb,X0)),X2) != i(remove_cpq(triple(X1,create_slb,X0),X2))
& contains_pq(i(triple(X1,create_slb,X0)),X2) ),
inference(rectify,[],[f143]) ).
fof(f143,plain,
? [X2,X1,X0] :
( remove_pq(i(triple(X1,create_slb,X2)),X0) != i(remove_cpq(triple(X1,create_slb,X2),X0))
& contains_pq(i(triple(X1,create_slb,X2)),X0) ),
inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f86]) ).
fof(f86,plain,
~ ! [X2,X0,X1] :
( contains_pq(i(triple(X1,create_slb,X2)),X0)
=> remove_pq(i(triple(X1,create_slb,X2)),X0) = i(remove_cpq(triple(X1,create_slb,X2),X0)) ),
inference(rectify,[],[f64]) ).
fof(f64,negated_conjecture,
~ ! [X2,X0,X1] :
( contains_pq(i(triple(X0,create_slb,X1)),X2)
=> i(remove_cpq(triple(X0,create_slb,X1),X2)) = remove_pq(i(triple(X0,create_slb,X1)),X2) ),
inference(negated_conjecture,[],[f63]) ).
fof(f63,conjecture,
! [X2,X0,X1] :
( contains_pq(i(triple(X0,create_slb,X1)),X2)
=> i(remove_cpq(triple(X0,create_slb,X1),X2)) = remove_pq(i(triple(X0,create_slb,X1)),X2) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',l3_co) ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.12 % Problem : SWV367+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.3.0.
% 0.13/0.13 % Command : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule snake_tptp_sat --cores 0 -t %d %s
% 0.14/0.34 % Computer : n014.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.35 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.35 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.14/0.35 % DateTime : Tue Aug 30 19:23:18 EDT 2022
% 0.14/0.35 % CPUTime :
% 0.21/0.50 % (23238)dis+21_1:1_av=off:er=filter:slsq=on:slsqc=0:slsqr=1,1:sp=frequency:to=lpo:i=498:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/498Mi)
% 0.21/0.50 % (23230)ins+10_1:1_awrs=decay:awrsf=30:bsr=unit_only:foolp=on:igrr=8/457:igs=10:igwr=on:nwc=1.5:sp=weighted_frequency:to=lpo:uhcvi=on:i=68:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/68Mi)
% 0.21/0.50 % (23222)fmb+10_1:1_fmbsr=2.0:nm=4:skr=on:i=51:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/51Mi)
% 0.21/0.50 % (23238)First to succeed.
% 0.21/0.51 % (23220)ott+33_1:4_s2a=on:tgt=ground:i=51:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/51Mi)
% 0.21/0.51 % (23219)ott+10_1:32_bd=off:fsr=off:newcnf=on:tgt=full:i=51:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/51Mi)
% 0.21/0.51 % (23238)Refutation found. Thanks to Tanya!
% 0.21/0.51 % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 0.21/0.51 % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
% See solution above
% 0.21/0.51 % (23238)------------------------------
% 0.21/0.51 % (23238)Version: Vampire 4.7 (commit 807e37dd9 on 2022-08-23 09:55:27 +0200)
% 0.21/0.51 % (23238)Linked with Z3 4.8.13.0 f03d756e086f81f2596157241e0decfb1c982299 z3-4.8.4-5390-gf03d756e0
% 0.21/0.51 % (23238)Termination reason: Refutation
% 0.21/0.51
% 0.21/0.51 % (23238)Memory used [KB]: 1151
% 0.21/0.51 % (23238)Time elapsed: 0.067 s
% 0.21/0.51 % (23238)Instructions burned: 5 (million)
% 0.21/0.51 % (23238)------------------------------
% 0.21/0.51 % (23238)------------------------------
% 0.21/0.51 % (23215)Success in time 0.155 s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------