TSTP Solution File: SWV364-2 by Beagle---0.9.51
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Beagle---0.9.51
% Problem : SWV364-2 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : java -Dfile.encoding=UTF-8 -Xms512M -Xmx4G -Xss10M -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/beagle.jar -auto -q -proof -print tff -smtsolver /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/cvc4-1.4-x86_64-linux-opt -liasolver cooper -t %d %s
% Computer : n012.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Aug 22 11:03:54 EDT 2023
% Result : Unsatisfiable 2.45s 1.58s
% Output : CNFRefutation 2.66s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 5
% Number of leaves : 22
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 31 ( 9 unt; 17 typ; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 21 ( 0 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Number of connectives : 16 ( 9 ~; 7 |; 0 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 0 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 7 ( 3 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 5 ( 2 avg)
% Number of types : 2 ( 0 usr)
% Number of type conns : 16 ( 9 >; 7 *; 0 +; 0 <<)
% Number of predicates : 2 ( 1 usr; 1 prp; 0-3 aty)
% Number of functors : 16 ( 16 usr; 8 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 12 (; 12 !; 0 ?; 0 :)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%$ c_in > c_Message_Omsg_OMPair > c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt > c_List_Oset > c_Event_Oknows > c_Event_Oevent_OGets > #nlpp > tc_List_Olist > c_Public_OshrK > c_Message_Oanalz > v_evs > v_Y > v_X > v_A > tc_Message_Omsg > tc_Event_Oevent > c_Yahalom_Oyahalom > c_Message_Oagent_OSpy
%Foreground sorts:
%Background operators:
%Foreground operators:
tff(c_Message_Omsg_OMPair,type,
c_Message_Omsg_OMPair: ( $i * $i ) > $i ).
tff(c_Event_Oknows,type,
c_Event_Oknows: ( $i * $i ) > $i ).
tff(v_X,type,
v_X: $i ).
tff(c_Public_OshrK,type,
c_Public_OshrK: $i > $i ).
tff(c_Message_Oanalz,type,
c_Message_Oanalz: $i > $i ).
tff(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,type,
c_Message_Oagent_OSpy: $i ).
tff(tc_Event_Oevent,type,
tc_Event_Oevent: $i ).
tff(c_List_Oset,type,
c_List_Oset: ( $i * $i ) > $i ).
tff(tc_List_Olist,type,
tc_List_Olist: $i > $i ).
tff(c_in,type,
c_in: ( $i * $i * $i ) > $o ).
tff(tc_Message_Omsg,type,
tc_Message_Omsg: $i ).
tff(c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt,type,
c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt: ( $i * $i ) > $i ).
tff(v_evs,type,
v_evs: $i ).
tff(v_Y,type,
v_Y: $i ).
tff(c_Event_Oevent_OGets,type,
c_Event_Oevent_OGets: ( $i * $i ) > $i ).
tff(v_A,type,
v_A: $i ).
tff(c_Yahalom_Oyahalom,type,
c_Yahalom_Oyahalom: $i ).
tff(f_29,axiom,
~ c_in(v_X,c_Message_Oanalz(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_evs)),tc_Message_Omsg),
file(unknown,unknown) ).
tff(f_27,axiom,
c_in(v_evs,c_Yahalom_Oyahalom,tc_List_Olist(tc_Event_Oevent)),
file(unknown,unknown) ).
tff(f_26,axiom,
c_in(c_Event_Oevent_OGets(v_A,c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(c_Public_OshrK(v_A),v_Y),v_X)),c_List_Oset(v_evs,tc_Event_Oevent),tc_Event_Oevent),
file(unknown,unknown) ).
tff(f_42,axiom,
! [V_evs,V_B,V_X] :
( ~ c_in(V_evs,c_Yahalom_Oyahalom,tc_List_Olist(tc_Event_Oevent))
| ~ c_in(c_Event_Oevent_OGets(V_B,V_X),c_List_Oset(V_evs,tc_Event_Oevent),tc_Event_Oevent)
| c_in(V_X,c_Message_Oanalz(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,V_evs)),tc_Message_Omsg) ),
file(unknown,unknown) ).
tff(f_34,axiom,
! [V_X,V_Y,V_H] :
( ~ c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(V_X,V_Y),c_Message_Oanalz(V_H),tc_Message_Omsg)
| c_in(V_Y,c_Message_Oanalz(V_H),tc_Message_Omsg) ),
file(unknown,unknown) ).
tff(c_6,plain,
~ c_in(v_X,c_Message_Oanalz(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_evs)),tc_Message_Omsg),
inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_29]) ).
tff(c_4,plain,
c_in(v_evs,c_Yahalom_Oyahalom,tc_List_Olist(tc_Event_Oevent)),
inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_27]) ).
tff(c_2,plain,
c_in(c_Event_Oevent_OGets(v_A,c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(c_Public_OshrK(v_A),v_Y),v_X)),c_List_Oset(v_evs,tc_Event_Oevent),tc_Event_Oevent),
inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_26]) ).
tff(c_12,plain,
! [V_X_10,V_evs_11,V_B_12] :
( c_in(V_X_10,c_Message_Oanalz(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,V_evs_11)),tc_Message_Omsg)
| ~ c_in(c_Event_Oevent_OGets(V_B_12,V_X_10),c_List_Oset(V_evs_11,tc_Event_Oevent),tc_Event_Oevent)
| ~ c_in(V_evs_11,c_Yahalom_Oyahalom,tc_List_Olist(tc_Event_Oevent)) ),
inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_42]) ).
tff(c_15,plain,
( c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(c_Public_OshrK(v_A),v_Y),v_X),c_Message_Oanalz(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_evs)),tc_Message_Omsg)
| ~ c_in(v_evs,c_Yahalom_Oyahalom,tc_List_Olist(tc_Event_Oevent)) ),
inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_2,c_12]) ).
tff(c_18,plain,
c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(c_Public_OshrK(v_A),v_Y),v_X),c_Message_Oanalz(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_evs)),tc_Message_Omsg),
inference(demodulation,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_4,c_15]) ).
tff(c_8,plain,
! [V_Y_2,V_H_3,V_X_1] :
( c_in(V_Y_2,c_Message_Oanalz(V_H_3),tc_Message_Omsg)
| ~ c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(V_X_1,V_Y_2),c_Message_Oanalz(V_H_3),tc_Message_Omsg) ),
inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_34]) ).
tff(c_21,plain,
c_in(v_X,c_Message_Oanalz(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_evs)),tc_Message_Omsg),
inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_18,c_8]) ).
tff(c_25,plain,
$false,
inference(negUnitSimplification,[status(thm)],[c_6,c_21]) ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.13 % Problem : SWV364-2 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.00/0.14 % Command : java -Dfile.encoding=UTF-8 -Xms512M -Xmx4G -Xss10M -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/beagle.jar -auto -q -proof -print tff -smtsolver /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/cvc4-1.4-x86_64-linux-opt -liasolver cooper -t %d %s
% 0.15/0.35 % Computer : n012.cluster.edu
% 0.15/0.35 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.15/0.35 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.15/0.35 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.15/0.35 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.15/0.35 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.15/0.35 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.15/0.35 % DateTime : Thu Aug 3 22:23:07 EDT 2023
% 0.15/0.36 % CPUTime :
% 2.45/1.58 % SZS status Unsatisfiable for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 2.45/1.59
% 2.45/1.59 % SZS output start CNFRefutation for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 2.66/1.63
% 2.66/1.63 Inference rules
% 2.66/1.63 ----------------------
% 2.66/1.63 #Ref : 0
% 2.66/1.63 #Sup : 2
% 2.66/1.63 #Fact : 0
% 2.66/1.63 #Define : 0
% 2.66/1.63 #Split : 0
% 2.66/1.63 #Chain : 0
% 2.66/1.63 #Close : 0
% 2.66/1.63
% 2.66/1.63 Ordering : KBO
% 2.66/1.63
% 2.66/1.63 Simplification rules
% 2.66/1.63 ----------------------
% 2.66/1.63 #Subsume : 0
% 2.66/1.63 #Demod : 1
% 2.66/1.63 #Tautology : 0
% 2.66/1.63 #SimpNegUnit : 1
% 2.66/1.63 #BackRed : 0
% 2.66/1.63
% 2.66/1.63 #Partial instantiations: 0
% 2.66/1.63 #Strategies tried : 1
% 2.66/1.63
% 2.66/1.63 Timing (in seconds)
% 2.66/1.63 ----------------------
% 2.66/1.64 Preprocessing : 0.41
% 2.66/1.64 Parsing : 0.23
% 2.66/1.64 CNF conversion : 0.02
% 2.66/1.64 Main loop : 0.14
% 2.66/1.64 Inferencing : 0.06
% 2.66/1.64 Reduction : 0.03
% 2.66/1.64 Demodulation : 0.02
% 2.66/1.64 BG Simplification : 0.01
% 2.66/1.64 Subsumption : 0.02
% 2.66/1.64 Abstraction : 0.01
% 2.66/1.64 MUC search : 0.00
% 2.66/1.64 Cooper : 0.00
% 2.66/1.64 Total : 0.62
% 2.66/1.64 Index Insertion : 0.00
% 2.66/1.64 Index Deletion : 0.00
% 2.66/1.64 Index Matching : 0.00
% 2.66/1.64 BG Taut test : 0.00
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------