TSTP Solution File: SWV362-1 by E-SAT---3.1.00
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E-SAT---3.1.00
% Problem : SWV362-1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E %s %d THM
% Computer : n003.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Tue May 21 05:34:34 EDT 2024
% Result : Unsatisfiable 79.30s 10.62s
% Output : CNFRefutation 79.30s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 5
% Number of leaves : 7
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 20 ( 16 unt; 3 nHn; 20 RR)
% Number of literals : 33 ( 5 equ; 16 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 5 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 7 ( 2 avg)
% Number of predicates : 3 ( 1 usr; 1 prp; 0-3 aty)
% Number of functors : 26 ( 26 usr; 15 con; 0-3 aty)
% Number of variables : 44 ( 31 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(cls_Yahalom_OSays__unique__NB_1,axiom,
( c_in(X7,c_Message_Oanalz(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,X1)),tc_Message_Omsg)
| X5 = X12
| ~ c_in(X1,c_Yahalom_Oyahalom,tc_List_Olist(tc_Event_Oevent))
| ~ c_in(c_Event_Oevent_OGets(X2,c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(X3,c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(c_Public_OshrK(X4),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(X5),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(X6),X7))))),c_List_Oset(X1,tc_Event_Oevent),tc_Event_Oevent)
| ~ c_in(c_Event_Oevent_OSays(X8,X9,c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(X10,c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(c_Public_OshrK(X11),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(X12),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(X13),X7))))),c_List_Oset(X1,tc_Event_Oevent),tc_Event_Oevent) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SWV005-7.ax',cls_Yahalom_OSays__unique__NB_1) ).
cnf(cls_conjecture_8,negated_conjecture,
~ c_in(c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_NB),c_Message_Oanalz(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_evs3)),tc_Message_Omsg),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_8) ).
cnf(cls_conjecture_7,negated_conjecture,
c_in(c_Event_Oevent_OSays(v_B,c_Message_Oagent_OServer,c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(v_B),c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(c_Public_OshrK(v_B),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(v_A),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_NA),c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_NB)))))),c_List_Oset(v_evs3,tc_Event_Oevent),tc_Event_Oevent),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_7) ).
cnf(cls_conjecture_2,negated_conjecture,
c_in(v_evs3,c_Yahalom_Oyahalom,tc_List_Olist(tc_Event_Oevent)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_2) ).
cnf(cls_conjecture_0,negated_conjecture,
~ c_in(v_A,c_Event_Obad,tc_Message_Oagent),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_0) ).
cnf(cls_conjecture_5,negated_conjecture,
c_in(c_Event_Oevent_OGets(c_Message_Oagent_OServer,c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(v_Ba),c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(c_Public_OshrK(v_Ba),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(v_Aa),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_NAa),c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_NB)))))),c_List_Oset(v_evs3,tc_Event_Oevent),tc_Event_Oevent),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_5) ).
cnf(cls_conjecture_9,negated_conjecture,
c_in(v_Aa,c_Event_Obad,tc_Message_Oagent),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_9) ).
cnf(c_0_7,plain,
( c_in(X7,c_Message_Oanalz(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,X1)),tc_Message_Omsg)
| X5 = X12
| ~ c_in(X1,c_Yahalom_Oyahalom,tc_List_Olist(tc_Event_Oevent))
| ~ c_in(c_Event_Oevent_OGets(X2,c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(X3,c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(c_Public_OshrK(X4),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(X5),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(X6),X7))))),c_List_Oset(X1,tc_Event_Oevent),tc_Event_Oevent)
| ~ c_in(c_Event_Oevent_OSays(X8,X9,c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(X10,c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(c_Public_OshrK(X11),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(X12),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(X13),X7))))),c_List_Oset(X1,tc_Event_Oevent),tc_Event_Oevent) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[cls_Yahalom_OSays__unique__NB_1]) ).
cnf(c_0_8,negated_conjecture,
~ c_in(c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_NB),c_Message_Oanalz(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_evs3)),tc_Message_Omsg),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[cls_conjecture_8]) ).
cnf(c_0_9,plain,
( c_in(X7,c_Message_Oanalz(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,X1)),tc_Message_Omsg)
| X5 = X12
| ~ c_in(X1,c_Yahalom_Oyahalom,tc_List_Olist(tc_Event_Oevent))
| ~ c_in(c_Event_Oevent_OGets(X2,c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(X3,c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(c_Public_OshrK(X4),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(X5),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(X6),X7))))),c_List_Oset(X1,tc_Event_Oevent),tc_Event_Oevent)
| ~ c_in(c_Event_Oevent_OSays(X8,X9,c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(X10,c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(c_Public_OshrK(X11),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(X12),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(X13),X7))))),c_List_Oset(X1,tc_Event_Oevent),tc_Event_Oevent) ),
c_0_7 ).
cnf(c_0_10,negated_conjecture,
c_in(c_Event_Oevent_OSays(v_B,c_Message_Oagent_OServer,c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(v_B),c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(c_Public_OshrK(v_B),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(v_A),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_NA),c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_NB)))))),c_List_Oset(v_evs3,tc_Event_Oevent),tc_Event_Oevent),
cls_conjecture_7 ).
cnf(c_0_11,negated_conjecture,
c_in(v_evs3,c_Yahalom_Oyahalom,tc_List_Olist(tc_Event_Oevent)),
cls_conjecture_2 ).
cnf(c_0_12,negated_conjecture,
~ c_in(c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_NB),c_Message_Oanalz(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_evs3)),tc_Message_Omsg),
c_0_8 ).
cnf(c_0_13,negated_conjecture,
~ c_in(v_A,c_Event_Obad,tc_Message_Oagent),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[cls_conjecture_0]) ).
cnf(c_0_14,negated_conjecture,
( X1 = v_A
| ~ c_in(c_Event_Oevent_OGets(X2,c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(X3,c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(c_Public_OshrK(X4),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(X1),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(X5),c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_NB)))))),c_List_Oset(v_evs3,tc_Event_Oevent),tc_Event_Oevent) ),
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_9,c_0_10]),c_0_11])]),c_0_12]) ).
cnf(c_0_15,negated_conjecture,
c_in(c_Event_Oevent_OGets(c_Message_Oagent_OServer,c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(v_Ba),c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(c_Public_OshrK(v_Ba),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(v_Aa),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_NAa),c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_NB)))))),c_List_Oset(v_evs3,tc_Event_Oevent),tc_Event_Oevent),
cls_conjecture_5 ).
cnf(c_0_16,negated_conjecture,
~ c_in(v_A,c_Event_Obad,tc_Message_Oagent),
c_0_13 ).
cnf(c_0_17,negated_conjecture,
v_A = v_Aa,
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_14,c_0_15]) ).
cnf(c_0_18,negated_conjecture,
c_in(v_Aa,c_Event_Obad,tc_Message_Oagent),
cls_conjecture_9 ).
cnf(c_0_19,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_16,c_0_17]),c_0_18])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.11/0.13 % Problem : SWV362-1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.11/0.14 % Command : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.14/0.35 % Computer : n003.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.35 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.35 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.35 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.35 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.35 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.35 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.14/0.35 % DateTime : Sun May 19 08:21:23 EDT 2024
% 0.14/0.35 % CPUTime :
% 0.20/0.49 Running first-order model finding
% 0.20/0.49 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --satauto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 79.30/10.62 # Version: 3.1.0
% 79.30/10.62 # Preprocessing class: FMLMSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 79.30/10.62 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 79.30/10.62 # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 79.30/10.62 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 79.30/10.62 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 79.30/10.62 # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 79.30/10.62 # new_bool_1 with pid 26097 completed with status 0
% 79.30/10.62 # Result found by new_bool_1
% 79.30/10.62 # Preprocessing class: FMLMSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 79.30/10.62 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 79.30/10.62 # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 79.30/10.62 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 79.30/10.62 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 79.30/10.62 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 79.30/10.62 # Search class: FGHSM-FSLM31-DFFFFFNN
% 79.30/10.62 # Scheduled 6 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 79.30/10.62 # Starting G-E--_208_C18C--_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 136s (1) cores
% 79.30/10.62 # G-E--_208_C18C--_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with pid 26100 completed with status 0
% 79.30/10.62 # Result found by G-E--_208_C18C--_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN
% 79.30/10.62 # Preprocessing class: FMLMSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 79.30/10.62 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 79.30/10.62 # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 79.30/10.62 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 79.30/10.62 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 79.30/10.62 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 79.30/10.62 # Search class: FGHSM-FSLM31-DFFFFFNN
% 79.30/10.62 # Scheduled 6 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 79.30/10.62 # Starting G-E--_208_C18C--_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 136s (1) cores
% 79.30/10.62 # Preprocessing time : 0.008 s
% 79.30/10.62 # Presaturation interreduction done
% 79.30/10.62
% 79.30/10.62 # Proof found!
% 79.30/10.62 # SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 79.30/10.62 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 79.30/10.62 # Parsed axioms : 2977
% 79.30/10.62 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 2358
% 79.30/10.62 # Initial clauses : 619
% 79.30/10.62 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 79.30/10.62 # Initial clauses in saturation : 619
% 79.30/10.62 # Processed clauses : 42808
% 79.30/10.62 # ...of these trivial : 863
% 79.30/10.62 # ...subsumed : 34540
% 79.30/10.62 # ...remaining for further processing : 7405
% 79.30/10.62 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 3838
% 79.30/10.62 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 79.30/10.62 # Backward-subsumed : 562
% 79.30/10.62 # Backward-rewritten : 555
% 79.30/10.62 # Generated clauses : 346231
% 79.30/10.62 # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 303103
% 79.30/10.62 # ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 79.30/10.62 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 32
% 79.30/10.62 # Paramodulations : 342318
% 79.30/10.62 # Factorizations : 1
% 79.30/10.62 # NegExts : 0
% 79.30/10.62 # Equation resolutions : 3912
% 79.30/10.62 # Disequality decompositions : 0
% 79.30/10.62 # Total rewrite steps : 220689
% 79.30/10.62 # ...of those cached : 199681
% 79.30/10.62 # Propositional unsat checks : 1
% 79.30/10.62 # Propositional check models : 0
% 79.30/10.62 # Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 79.30/10.62 # Propositional clauses : 0
% 79.30/10.62 # Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 79.30/10.62 # Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 79.30/10.62 # Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 79.30/10.62 # Propositional encoding time : 0.309
% 79.30/10.62 # Propositional solver time : 0.196
% 79.30/10.62 # Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 79.30/10.62 # Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 79.30/10.62 # Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 79.30/10.62 # Current number of processed clauses : 5744
% 79.30/10.62 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 1163
% 79.30/10.62 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 22
% 79.30/10.62 # Negative unit clauses : 968
% 79.30/10.62 # Non-unit-clauses : 3591
% 79.30/10.62 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 259636
% 79.30/10.62 # ...number of literals in the above : 650523
% 79.30/10.62 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 79.30/10.62 # Current number of archived clauses : 1661
% 79.30/10.62 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 1704039
% 79.30/10.62 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 897104
% 79.30/10.62 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 8802
% 79.30/10.62 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 179233
% 79.30/10.62 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 79.30/10.62 # BW rewrite match attempts : 6835
% 79.30/10.62 # BW rewrite match successes : 390
% 79.30/10.62 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 79.30/10.62 # Condensation successes : 0
% 79.30/10.62 # Termbank termtop insertions : 7299729
% 79.30/10.62 # Search garbage collected termcells : 7784
% 79.30/10.62
% 79.30/10.62 # -------------------------------------------------
% 79.30/10.62 # User time : 9.166 s
% 79.30/10.62 # System time : 0.273 s
% 79.30/10.62 # Total time : 9.439 s
% 79.30/10.62 # Maximum resident set size: 4696 pages
% 79.30/10.62
% 79.30/10.62 # -------------------------------------------------
% 79.30/10.62 # User time : 9.237 s
% 79.30/10.62 # System time : 0.279 s
% 79.30/10.62 # Total time : 9.516 s
% 79.30/10.62 # Maximum resident set size: 3652 pages
% 79.30/10.62 % E---3.1 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------