TSTP Solution File: SWV360-1 by iProver---3.9
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : iProver---3.9
% Problem : SWV360-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_iprover %s %d THM
% Computer : n008.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Fri May 3 03:14:14 EDT 2024
% Result : Unsatisfiable 28.97s 4.69s
% Output : CNFRefutation 28.97s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 6
% Number of leaves : 7
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 13 ( 9 unt; 2 nHn; 13 RR)
% Number of literals : 22 ( 5 equ; 9 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 5 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 7 ( 2 avg)
% Number of predicates : 3 ( 1 usr; 1 prp; 0-3 aty)
% Number of functors : 26 ( 26 usr; 15 con; 0-3 aty)
% Number of variables : 28 ( 21 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(c_50,negated_conjecture,
~ c_in(v_B,c_Event_Obad,tc_Message_Oagent),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_1) ).
cnf(c_52,negated_conjecture,
c_in(v_evs3,c_Yahalom_Oyahalom,tc_List_Olist(tc_Event_Oevent)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_2) ).
cnf(c_55,negated_conjecture,
c_in(c_Event_Oevent_OGets(c_Message_Oagent_OServer,c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(v_Ba),c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(c_Public_OshrK(v_Ba),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(v_Aa),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_NAa),c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_NB)))))),c_List_Oset(v_evs3,tc_Event_Oevent),tc_Event_Oevent),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_5) ).
cnf(c_57,negated_conjecture,
c_in(c_Event_Oevent_OSays(v_B,c_Message_Oagent_OServer,c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(v_B),c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(c_Public_OshrK(v_B),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(v_A),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_NA),c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_NB)))))),c_List_Oset(v_evs3,tc_Event_Oevent),tc_Event_Oevent),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_7) ).
cnf(c_58,negated_conjecture,
~ c_in(c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_NB),c_Message_Oanalz(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_evs3)),tc_Message_Omsg),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_8) ).
cnf(c_59,negated_conjecture,
c_in(v_Ba,c_Event_Obad,tc_Message_Oagent),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_9) ).
cnf(c_65,plain,
( ~ c_in(c_Event_Oevent_OSays(X0,X1,c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(X2,c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(c_Public_OshrK(X3),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(X4),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(X5),X6))))),c_List_Oset(X7,tc_Event_Oevent),tc_Event_Oevent)
| ~ c_in(c_Event_Oevent_OGets(X8,c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(X9,c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(c_Public_OshrK(X10),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(X11),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(X12),X6))))),c_List_Oset(X7,tc_Event_Oevent),tc_Event_Oevent)
| ~ c_in(X7,c_Yahalom_Oyahalom,tc_List_Olist(tc_Event_Oevent))
| X3 = X10
| c_in(X6,c_Message_Oanalz(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,X7)),tc_Message_Omsg) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SWV005-7.ax',cls_Yahalom_OSays__unique__NB_2) ).
cnf(c_56896,plain,
( ~ c_in(c_Event_Oevent_OGets(X0,c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(X1,c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(c_Public_OshrK(X2),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(X3),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(X4),c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_NB)))))),c_List_Oset(v_evs3,tc_Event_Oevent),tc_Event_Oevent)
| ~ c_in(v_evs3,c_Yahalom_Oyahalom,tc_List_Olist(tc_Event_Oevent))
| X2 = v_B
| c_in(c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_NB),c_Message_Oanalz(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_evs3)),tc_Message_Omsg) ),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_57,c_65]) ).
cnf(c_59117,plain,
( X2 = v_B
| ~ c_in(c_Event_Oevent_OGets(X0,c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(X1,c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(c_Public_OshrK(X2),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(X3),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(X4),c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_NB)))))),c_List_Oset(v_evs3,tc_Event_Oevent),tc_Event_Oevent) ),
inference(global_subsumption_just,[status(thm)],[c_56896,c_52,c_58,c_56896]) ).
cnf(c_59118,plain,
( ~ c_in(c_Event_Oevent_OGets(X0,c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(X1,c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(c_Public_OshrK(X2),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(X3),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(X4),c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_NB)))))),c_List_Oset(v_evs3,tc_Event_Oevent),tc_Event_Oevent)
| X2 = v_B ),
inference(renaming,[status(thm)],[c_59117]) ).
cnf(c_59124,plain,
v_B = v_Ba,
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_55,c_59118]) ).
cnf(c_59128,plain,
c_in(v_B,c_Event_Obad,tc_Message_Oagent),
inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_59,c_59124]) ).
cnf(c_59129,plain,
$false,
inference(backward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[c_50,c_59128]) ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.06/0.12 % Problem : SWV360-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.06/0.12 % Command : run_iprover %s %d THM
% 0.12/0.33 % Computer : n008.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33 % DateTime : Fri May 3 00:10:58 EDT 2024
% 0.12/0.33 % CPUTime :
% 0.18/0.45 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.18/0.45 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/run_problem --schedule fof_schedule --heuristic_context casc_unsat --no_cores 8 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300
% 28.97/4.69 % SZS status Started for theBenchmark.p
% 28.97/4.69 % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark.p
% 28.97/4.69
% 28.97/4.69 %---------------- iProver v3.9 (pre CASC 2024/SMT-COMP 2024) ----------------%
% 28.97/4.69
% 28.97/4.69 ------ iProver source info
% 28.97/4.69
% 28.97/4.69 git: date: 2024-05-02 19:28:25 +0000
% 28.97/4.69 git: sha1: a33b5eb135c74074ba803943bb12f2ebd971352f
% 28.97/4.69 git: non_committed_changes: false
% 28.97/4.69
% 28.97/4.69 ------ Parsing...successful
% 28.97/4.69
% 28.97/4.69
% 28.97/4.69
% 28.97/4.69 ------ Preprocessing... sup_sim: 115 sf_s rm: 609 0s sf_e pe_s pe:1:0s pe:2:0s pe:4:0s pe:8:0s pe:16:0s pe_e
% 28.97/4.69
% 28.97/4.69 ------ Preprocessing... gs_s sp: 0 0s gs_e snvd_s sp: 0 0s snvd_e
% 28.97/4.69
% 28.97/4.69 ------ Preprocessing... sf_s rm: 1 0s sf_e
% 28.97/4.69 ------ Proving...
% 28.97/4.69 ------ Problem Properties
% 28.97/4.69
% 28.97/4.69
% 28.97/4.69 clauses 1891
% 28.97/4.69 conjectures 11
% 28.97/4.69 EPR 315
% 28.97/4.69 Horn 1690
% 28.97/4.69 unary 644
% 28.97/4.69 binary 794
% 28.97/4.69 lits 3833
% 28.97/4.69 lits eq 1204
% 28.97/4.69 fd_pure 0
% 28.97/4.69 fd_pseudo 0
% 28.97/4.69 fd_cond 97
% 28.97/4.69 fd_pseudo_cond 94
% 28.97/4.69 AC symbols 0
% 28.97/4.69
% 28.97/4.69 ------ Input Options Time Limit: Unbounded
% 28.97/4.69
% 28.97/4.69
% 28.97/4.69 ------
% 28.97/4.69 Current options:
% 28.97/4.69 ------
% 28.97/4.69
% 28.97/4.69
% 28.97/4.69
% 28.97/4.69
% 28.97/4.69 ------ Proving...
% 28.97/4.69
% 28.97/4.69
% 28.97/4.69 % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark.p
% 28.97/4.69
% 28.97/4.69 % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 28.97/4.69
% 28.97/4.69
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------