TSTP Solution File: SWV358-2 by Vampire---4.8

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Vampire---4.8
% Problem  : SWV358-2 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule file --schedule_file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/quickGreedyProduceRating_steal_pow3.txt --cores 8 -m 12000 -t %d %s

% Computer : n009.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue May 21 05:55:22 EDT 2024

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.54s 0.74s
% Output   : Refutation 0.54s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    7
%            Number of leaves      :    7
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   15 (   9 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   21 (   0 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   13 (   7   ~;   6   |;   0   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   0  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    7 (   3 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    7 (   2 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    2 (   1 usr;   1 prp; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of functors    :   19 (  19 usr;   9 con; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   17 (  17   !;   0   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f38,plain,
    $false,
    inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f37,f6]) ).

fof(f6,axiom,
    ~ c_in(c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_NB),c_Event_Oused(v_evs2),tc_Message_Omsg),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_3) ).

fof(f37,plain,
    c_in(c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_NB),c_Event_Oused(v_evs2),tc_Message_Omsg),
    inference(resolution,[],[f31,f2]) ).

fof(f2,axiom,
    ! [X3,X4] :
      ( ~ c_in(X4,c_Message_Oparts(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,X3)),tc_Message_Omsg)
      | c_in(X4,c_Event_Oused(X3),tc_Message_Omsg) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_Event_Oc_A_58_Aparts_A_Iknows_ASpy_Aevs1_J_A_61_61_62_Ac_A_58_Aused_Aevs1_0) ).

fof(f31,plain,
    c_in(c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_NB),c_Message_Oparts(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_evs2)),tc_Message_Omsg),
    inference(resolution,[],[f20,f3]) ).

fof(f3,axiom,
    ! [X2,X6,X5] :
      ( ~ c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(X2,X5),c_Message_Oparts(X6),tc_Message_Omsg)
      | c_in(X5,c_Message_Oparts(X6),tc_Message_Omsg) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_Message_OMPair__parts_0) ).

fof(f20,plain,
    c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_NA),c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_NB)),c_Message_Oparts(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_evs2)),tc_Message_Omsg),
    inference(resolution,[],[f15,f3]) ).

fof(f15,plain,
    c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(v_A),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_NA),c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_NB))),c_Message_Oparts(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_evs2)),tc_Message_Omsg),
    inference(resolution,[],[f13,f4]) ).

fof(f4,axiom,
    ! [X2,X6,X7] :
      ( ~ c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(X7,X2),c_Message_Oparts(X6),tc_Message_Omsg)
      | c_in(X2,c_Message_Oparts(X6),tc_Message_Omsg) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_Message_Oparts_OBody__dest_0) ).

fof(f13,plain,
    c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(c_Public_OshrK(v_B),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(v_A),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_NA),c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_NB)))),c_Message_Oparts(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_evs2)),tc_Message_Omsg),
    inference(resolution,[],[f12,f9]) ).

fof(f9,plain,
    ! [X2,X0,X1] :
      ( ~ c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(X2,X0),X1,tc_Message_Omsg)
      | c_in(X0,c_Message_Oparts(X1),tc_Message_Omsg) ),
    inference(resolution,[],[f3,f5]) ).

fof(f5,axiom,
    ! [X2,X6] :
      ( c_in(X2,c_Message_Oparts(X6),tc_Message_Omsg)
      | ~ c_in(X2,X6,tc_Message_Omsg) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_Message_Oparts_OInj_0) ).

fof(f12,plain,
    c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(v_B),c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(c_Public_OshrK(v_B),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(v_A),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_NA),c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_NB))))),c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_evs2),tc_Message_Omsg),
    inference(resolution,[],[f1,f7]) ).

fof(f7,axiom,
    c_in(c_Event_Oevent_OSays(v_B,c_Message_Oagent_OServer,c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(v_B),c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(c_Public_OshrK(v_B),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(v_A),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_NA),c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_NB)))))),c_List_Oset(v_evs2,tc_Event_Oevent),tc_Event_Oevent),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_7) ).

fof(f1,axiom,
    ! [X2,X3,X0,X1] :
      ( ~ c_in(c_Event_Oevent_OSays(X0,X1,X2),c_List_Oset(X3,tc_Event_Oevent),tc_Event_Oevent)
      | c_in(X2,c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,X3),tc_Message_Omsg) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_Event_OSays__imp__spies_0) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.12  % Problem    : SWV358-2 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.07/0.13  % Command    : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule file --schedule_file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/quickGreedyProduceRating_steal_pow3.txt --cores 8 -m 12000 -t %d %s
% 0.14/0.34  % Computer : n009.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.34  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.14/0.34  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.14/0.34  % DateTime   : Sun May 19 08:54:08 EDT 2024
% 0.14/0.35  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.14/0.35  This is a CNF_UNS_RFO_NEQ_HRN problem
% 0.14/0.35  Running vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule file --schedule_file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/quickGreedyProduceRating_steal_pow3.txt --cores 8 -m 12000 -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.54/0.73  % (10823)lrs-21_1:1_to=lpo:sil=2000:sp=frequency:sos=on:lma=on:i=56:sd=2:ss=axioms:ep=R_0 on theBenchmark for (2996ds/56Mi)
% 0.54/0.73  % (10823)Refutation not found, incomplete strategy% (10823)------------------------------
% 0.54/0.73  % (10823)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 3a798227e on 2024-05-03 07:42:47 +0200)
% 0.54/0.73  % (10823)Termination reason: Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
% 0.54/0.73  
% 0.54/0.73  % (10823)Memory used [KB]: 964
% 0.54/0.73  % (10823)Time elapsed: 0.002 s
% 0.54/0.73  % (10823)Instructions burned: 2 (million)
% 0.54/0.73  % (10816)dis-1011_2:1_sil=2000:lsd=20:nwc=5.0:flr=on:mep=off:st=3.0:i=34:sd=1:ep=RS:ss=axioms_0 on theBenchmark for (2996ds/34Mi)
% 0.54/0.73  % (10823)------------------------------
% 0.54/0.73  % (10823)------------------------------
% 0.54/0.73  % (10819)ott+1011_1:1_sil=2000:urr=on:i=33:sd=1:kws=inv_frequency:ss=axioms:sup=off_0 on theBenchmark for (2996ds/33Mi)
% 0.54/0.73  % (10817)lrs+1011_461:32768_sil=16000:irw=on:sp=frequency:lsd=20:fd=preordered:nwc=10.0:s2agt=32:alpa=false:cond=fast:s2a=on:i=51:s2at=3.0:awrs=decay:awrsf=691:bd=off:nm=20:fsr=off:amm=sco:uhcvi=on:rawr=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2996ds/51Mi)
% 0.54/0.73  % (10820)lrs+2_1:1_sil=16000:fde=none:sos=all:nwc=5.0:i=34:ep=RS:s2pl=on:lma=on:afp=100000_0 on theBenchmark for (2996ds/34Mi)
% 0.54/0.73  % (10821)lrs+1002_1:16_to=lpo:sil=32000:sp=unary_frequency:sos=on:i=45:bd=off:ss=axioms_0 on theBenchmark for (2996ds/45Mi)
% 0.54/0.73  % (10818)lrs+1011_1:1_sil=8000:sp=occurrence:nwc=10.0:i=78:ss=axioms:sgt=8_0 on theBenchmark for (2996ds/78Mi)
% 0.54/0.73  % (10821)Refutation not found, incomplete strategy% (10821)------------------------------
% 0.54/0.73  % (10821)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 3a798227e on 2024-05-03 07:42:47 +0200)
% 0.54/0.73  % (10821)Termination reason: Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
% 0.54/0.73  
% 0.54/0.73  % (10820)Refutation not found, incomplete strategy% (10820)------------------------------
% 0.54/0.73  % (10820)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 3a798227e on 2024-05-03 07:42:47 +0200)
% 0.54/0.73  % (10820)Termination reason: Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
% 0.54/0.73  
% 0.54/0.73  % (10820)Memory used [KB]: 952
% 0.54/0.73  % (10820)Time elapsed: 0.002 s
% 0.54/0.73  % (10820)Instructions burned: 2 (million)
% 0.54/0.73  % (10821)Memory used [KB]: 951
% 0.54/0.73  % (10821)Time elapsed: 0.002 s
% 0.54/0.73  % (10821)Instructions burned: 2 (million)
% 0.54/0.73  % (10820)------------------------------
% 0.54/0.73  % (10820)------------------------------
% 0.54/0.73  % (10821)------------------------------
% 0.54/0.73  % (10821)------------------------------
% 0.54/0.73  % (10817)Also succeeded, but the first one will report.
% 0.54/0.73  % (10818)Also succeeded, but the first one will report.
% 0.54/0.73  % (10816)First to succeed.
% 0.54/0.74  % (10822)lrs+21_1:5_sil=2000:sos=on:urr=on:newcnf=on:slsq=on:i=83:slsql=off:bd=off:nm=2:ss=axioms:st=1.5:sp=const_min:gsp=on:rawr=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2996ds/83Mi)
% 0.54/0.74  % (10816)Solution written to "/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/vampire-proof-10815"
% 0.54/0.74  % (10816)Refutation found. Thanks to Tanya!
% 0.54/0.74  % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark
% 0.54/0.74  % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
% See solution above
% 0.54/0.74  % (10816)------------------------------
% 0.54/0.74  % (10816)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 3a798227e on 2024-05-03 07:42:47 +0200)
% 0.54/0.74  % (10816)Termination reason: Refutation
% 0.54/0.74  
% 0.54/0.74  % (10816)Memory used [KB]: 978
% 0.54/0.74  % (10816)Time elapsed: 0.004 s
% 0.54/0.74  % (10816)Instructions burned: 4 (million)
% 0.54/0.74  % (10815)Success in time 0.38 s
% 0.54/0.74  % Vampire---4.8 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------