TSTP Solution File: SWV358-2 by SOS---2.0
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : SOS---2.0
% Problem : SWV358-2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : sos-script %s
% Computer : n014.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Wed Jul 20 21:38:10 EDT 2022
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.81s 1.00s
% Output : Refutation 0.81s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.04/0.13 % Problem : SWV358-2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.04/0.14 % Command : sos-script %s
% 0.14/0.35 % Computer : n014.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.35 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.35 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.35 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.35 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.36 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.36 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.14/0.36 % DateTime : Wed Jun 15 23:35:35 EDT 2022
% 0.14/0.36 % CPUTime :
% 0.14/0.38 ----- Otter 3.2, August 2001 -----
% 0.14/0.38 The process was started by sandbox2 on n014.cluster.edu,
% 0.14/0.38 Wed Jun 15 23:35:35 2022
% 0.14/0.38 The command was "./sos". The process ID is 8767.
% 0.14/0.38
% 0.14/0.38 set(prolog_style_variables).
% 0.14/0.38 set(auto).
% 0.14/0.38 dependent: set(auto1).
% 0.14/0.38 dependent: set(process_input).
% 0.14/0.38 dependent: clear(print_kept).
% 0.14/0.38 dependent: clear(print_new_demod).
% 0.14/0.38 dependent: clear(print_back_demod).
% 0.14/0.38 dependent: clear(print_back_sub).
% 0.14/0.38 dependent: set(control_memory).
% 0.14/0.38 dependent: assign(max_mem, 12000).
% 0.14/0.38 dependent: assign(pick_given_ratio, 4).
% 0.14/0.38 dependent: assign(stats_level, 1).
% 0.14/0.38 dependent: assign(pick_semantic_ratio, 3).
% 0.14/0.38 dependent: assign(sos_limit, 5000).
% 0.14/0.38 dependent: assign(max_weight, 60).
% 0.14/0.38 clear(print_given).
% 0.14/0.38
% 0.14/0.38 list(usable).
% 0.14/0.38
% 0.14/0.38 SCAN INPUT: prop=0, horn=1, equality=0, symmetry=0, max_lits=2.
% 0.14/0.38
% 0.14/0.38 This is a Horn set without equality. The strategy will
% 0.14/0.38 be hyperresolution, with satellites in sos and nuclei
% 0.14/0.38 in usable.
% 0.14/0.38
% 0.14/0.38 dependent: set(hyper_res).
% 0.14/0.38 dependent: clear(order_hyper).
% 0.14/0.38
% 0.14/0.38 ------------> process usable:
% 0.14/0.38
% 0.14/0.38 ------------> process sos:
% 0.14/0.38
% 0.14/0.38 ======= end of input processing =======
% 0.81/1.00
% 0.81/1.00 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 0.81/1.00
% 0.81/1.00 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 0.81/1.00
% 0.81/1.00 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 0.81/1.00
% 0.81/1.00 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 0.81/1.00
% 0.81/1.00 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 0.81/1.00
% 0.81/1.00
% 0.81/1.00 Failed to model usable list: disabling FINDER
% 0.81/1.00
% 0.81/1.00
% 0.81/1.00
% 0.81/1.00 -------------- Softie stats --------------
% 0.81/1.00
% 0.81/1.00 UPDATE_STOP: 300
% 0.81/1.00 SFINDER_TIME_LIMIT: 2
% 0.81/1.00 SHORT_CLAUSE_CUTOFF: 4
% 0.81/1.00 number of clauses in intial UL: 6
% 0.81/1.00 number of clauses initially in problem: 7
% 0.81/1.00 percentage of clauses intially in UL: 85
% 0.81/1.00 percentage of distinct symbols occuring in initial UL: 70
% 0.81/1.00 percent of all initial clauses that are short: 100
% 0.81/1.00 absolute distinct symbol count: 20
% 0.81/1.00 distinct predicate count: 1
% 0.81/1.00 distinct function count: 10
% 0.81/1.00 distinct constant count: 9
% 0.81/1.00
% 0.81/1.00 ---------- no more Softie stats ----------
% 0.81/1.00
% 0.81/1.00
% 0.81/1.00
% 0.81/1.00 =========== start of search ===========
% 0.81/1.00
% 0.81/1.00 -------- PROOF --------
% 0.81/1.00 % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.81/1.00 % SZS output start Refutation
% 0.81/1.00
% 0.81/1.00 ----> UNIT CONFLICT at 0.60 sec ----> 25 [binary,24.1,6.1] {-} $F.
% 0.81/1.00
% 0.81/1.00 Length of proof is 7. Level of proof is 7.
% 0.81/1.00
% 0.81/1.00 ---------------- PROOF ----------------
% 0.81/1.00 % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.81/1.00 % SZS output start Refutation
% 0.81/1.00
% 0.81/1.00 1 [] {+} -c_in(c_Event_Oevent_OSays(A,B,C),c_List_Oset(D,tc_Event_Oevent),tc_Event_Oevent)|c_in(C,c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,D),tc_Message_Omsg).
% 0.81/1.00 2 [] {+} -c_in(A,c_Message_Oparts(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,B)),tc_Message_Omsg)|c_in(A,c_Event_Oused(B),tc_Message_Omsg).
% 0.81/1.00 3 [] {+} -c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(A,B),c_Message_Oparts(C),tc_Message_Omsg)|c_in(B,c_Message_Oparts(C),tc_Message_Omsg).
% 0.81/1.00 4 [] {+} -c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(A,B),c_Message_Oparts(C),tc_Message_Omsg)|c_in(B,c_Message_Oparts(C),tc_Message_Omsg).
% 0.81/1.00 5 [] {+} -c_in(A,B,tc_Message_Omsg)|c_in(A,c_Message_Oparts(B),tc_Message_Omsg).
% 0.81/1.00 6 [] {+} -c_in(c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_NB),c_Event_Oused(v_evs2),tc_Message_Omsg).
% 0.81/1.00 7 [] {-} c_in(c_Event_Oevent_OSays(v_B,c_Message_Oagent_OServer,c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(v_B),c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(c_Public_OshrK(v_B),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(v_A),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_NA),c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_NB)))))),c_List_Oset(v_evs2,tc_Event_Oevent),tc_Event_Oevent).
% 0.81/1.00 8 [hyper,7,1] {-} c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(v_B),c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(c_Public_OshrK(v_B),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(v_A),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_NA),c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_NB))))),c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_evs2),tc_Message_Omsg).
% 0.81/1.00 9 [hyper,8,5] {-} c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(v_B),c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(c_Public_OshrK(v_B),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(v_A),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_NA),c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_NB))))),c_Message_Oparts(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_evs2)),tc_Message_Omsg).
% 0.81/1.00 11 [hyper,9,3] {-} c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(c_Public_OshrK(v_B),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(v_A),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_NA),c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_NB)))),c_Message_Oparts(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_evs2)),tc_Message_Omsg).
% 0.81/1.00 14 [hyper,11,4] {-} c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(v_A),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_NA),c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_NB))),c_Message_Oparts(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_evs2)),tc_Message_Omsg).
% 0.81/1.00 17 [hyper,14,3] {-} c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_NA),c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_NB)),c_Message_Oparts(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_evs2)),tc_Message_Omsg).
% 0.81/1.00 21 [hyper,17,3] {-} c_in(c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_NB),c_Message_Oparts(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_evs2)),tc_Message_Omsg).
% 0.81/1.00 24 [hyper,21,2] {-} c_in(c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_NB),c_Event_Oused(v_evs2),tc_Message_Omsg).
% 0.81/1.00 25 [binary,24.1,6.1] {-} $F.
% 0.81/1.00
% 0.81/1.00 % SZS output end Refutation
% 0.81/1.00 ------------ end of proof -------------
% 0.81/1.00
% 0.81/1.00
% 0.81/1.00 Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 0.81/1.00
% 0.81/1.00
% 0.81/1.00 Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 0.81/1.00
% 0.81/1.00 ============ end of search ============
% 0.81/1.00
% 0.81/1.00 That finishes the proof of the theorem.
% 0.81/1.00
% 0.81/1.00 Process 8767 finished Wed Jun 15 23:35:36 2022
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------