TSTP Solution File: SWV357-1 by E-SAT---3.1.00
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E-SAT---3.1.00
% Problem : SWV357-1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E %s %d THM
% Computer : n023.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Tue May 21 05:34:32 EDT 2024
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.86s 0.67s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.86s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 4
% Number of leaves : 7
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 21 ( 11 unt; 0 nHn; 19 RR)
% Number of literals : 34 ( 2 equ; 16 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 4 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 3 ( 1 usr; 1 prp; 0-3 aty)
% Number of functors : 16 ( 16 usr; 8 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 29 ( 7 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(cls_Message_OMPair__analz_0,axiom,
( c_in(X2,c_Message_Oanalz(X3),tc_Message_Omsg)
| ~ c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(X1,X2),c_Message_Oanalz(X3),tc_Message_Omsg) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SWV005-2.ax',cls_Message_OMPair__analz_0) ).
cnf(cls_Message_Oanalz_OInj_0,axiom,
( c_in(X1,c_Message_Oanalz(X2),tc_Message_Omsg)
| ~ c_in(X1,X2,tc_Message_Omsg) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SWV005-2.ax',cls_Message_Oanalz_OInj_0) ).
cnf(cls_Yahalom_OGets__imp__analz__Spy__dest_0,axiom,
( c_in(X3,c_Message_Oanalz(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,X1)),tc_Message_Omsg)
| ~ c_in(X1,c_Yahalom_Oyahalom,tc_List_Olist(tc_Event_Oevent))
| ~ c_in(c_Event_Oevent_OGets(X2,X3),c_List_Oset(X1,tc_Event_Oevent),tc_Event_Oevent) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SWV005-4.ax',cls_Yahalom_OGets__imp__analz__Spy__dest_0) ).
cnf(cls_conjecture_4,negated_conjecture,
c_in(c_Event_Oevent_OGets(v_Ba,c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(v_Aa),c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_NB))),c_List_Oset(v_evs2,tc_Event_Oevent),tc_Event_Oevent),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_4) ).
cnf(cls_conjecture_2,negated_conjecture,
c_in(v_evs2,c_Yahalom_Oyahalom,tc_List_Olist(tc_Event_Oevent)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_2) ).
cnf(cls_conjecture_6,negated_conjecture,
~ c_in(c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_NB),c_Message_Oanalz(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_evs2)),tc_Message_Omsg),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_6) ).
cnf(cls_Message_Oanalz__idem_0,axiom,
c_Message_Oanalz(c_Message_Oanalz(X1)) = c_Message_Oanalz(X1),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SWV005-2.ax',cls_Message_Oanalz__idem_0) ).
cnf(c_0_7,plain,
( c_in(X2,c_Message_Oanalz(X3),tc_Message_Omsg)
| ~ c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(X1,X2),c_Message_Oanalz(X3),tc_Message_Omsg) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[cls_Message_OMPair__analz_0]) ).
cnf(c_0_8,plain,
( c_in(X1,c_Message_Oanalz(X2),tc_Message_Omsg)
| ~ c_in(X1,X2,tc_Message_Omsg) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[cls_Message_Oanalz_OInj_0]) ).
cnf(c_0_9,plain,
( c_in(X3,c_Message_Oanalz(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,X1)),tc_Message_Omsg)
| ~ c_in(X1,c_Yahalom_Oyahalom,tc_List_Olist(tc_Event_Oevent))
| ~ c_in(c_Event_Oevent_OGets(X2,X3),c_List_Oset(X1,tc_Event_Oevent),tc_Event_Oevent) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[cls_Yahalom_OGets__imp__analz__Spy__dest_0]) ).
cnf(c_0_10,plain,
( c_in(X2,c_Message_Oanalz(X3),tc_Message_Omsg)
| ~ c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(X1,X2),c_Message_Oanalz(X3),tc_Message_Omsg) ),
c_0_7 ).
cnf(c_0_11,plain,
( c_in(X1,c_Message_Oanalz(X2),tc_Message_Omsg)
| ~ c_in(X1,X2,tc_Message_Omsg) ),
c_0_8 ).
cnf(c_0_12,plain,
( c_in(X3,c_Message_Oanalz(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,X1)),tc_Message_Omsg)
| ~ c_in(X1,c_Yahalom_Oyahalom,tc_List_Olist(tc_Event_Oevent))
| ~ c_in(c_Event_Oevent_OGets(X2,X3),c_List_Oset(X1,tc_Event_Oevent),tc_Event_Oevent) ),
c_0_9 ).
cnf(c_0_13,negated_conjecture,
c_in(c_Event_Oevent_OGets(v_Ba,c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(v_Aa),c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_NB))),c_List_Oset(v_evs2,tc_Event_Oevent),tc_Event_Oevent),
cls_conjecture_4 ).
cnf(c_0_14,negated_conjecture,
c_in(v_evs2,c_Yahalom_Oyahalom,tc_List_Olist(tc_Event_Oevent)),
cls_conjecture_2 ).
cnf(c_0_15,negated_conjecture,
~ c_in(c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_NB),c_Message_Oanalz(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_evs2)),tc_Message_Omsg),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[cls_conjecture_6]) ).
cnf(c_0_16,plain,
( c_in(X1,c_Message_Oanalz(X2),tc_Message_Omsg)
| ~ c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(X3,X1),X2,tc_Message_Omsg) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_10,c_0_11]) ).
cnf(c_0_17,negated_conjecture,
c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(v_Aa),c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_NB)),c_Message_Oanalz(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_evs2)),tc_Message_Omsg),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_12,c_0_13]),c_0_14])]) ).
cnf(c_0_18,axiom,
c_Message_Oanalz(c_Message_Oanalz(X1)) = c_Message_Oanalz(X1),
cls_Message_Oanalz__idem_0 ).
cnf(c_0_19,negated_conjecture,
~ c_in(c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_NB),c_Message_Oanalz(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_evs2)),tc_Message_Omsg),
c_0_15 ).
cnf(c_0_20,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_16,c_0_17]),c_0_18]),c_0_19]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.11/0.12 % Problem : SWV357-1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.11/0.13 % Command : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.13/0.34 % Computer : n023.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34 % DateTime : Sun May 19 08:53:23 EDT 2024
% 0.13/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.20/0.47 Running first-order model finding
% 0.20/0.47 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --satauto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.86/0.67 # Version: 3.1.0
% 0.86/0.67 # Preprocessing class: FMLMSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.86/0.67 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.86/0.67 # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.86/0.67 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.86/0.67 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.86/0.67 # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.86/0.67 # new_bool_3 with pid 3630 completed with status 0
% 0.86/0.67 # Result found by new_bool_3
% 0.86/0.67 # Preprocessing class: FMLMSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.86/0.67 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.86/0.67 # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.86/0.67 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.86/0.67 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.86/0.67 # Search class: FGHSM-FSLM31-DFFFFFNN
% 0.86/0.67 # Scheduled 6 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.86/0.67 # Starting G-E--_208_C18C--_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 136s (1) cores
% 0.86/0.67 # G-E--_208_C18C--_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with pid 3633 completed with status 0
% 0.86/0.67 # Result found by G-E--_208_C18C--_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN
% 0.86/0.67 # Preprocessing class: FMLMSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.86/0.67 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.86/0.67 # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.86/0.67 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.86/0.67 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.86/0.67 # Search class: FGHSM-FSLM31-DFFFFFNN
% 0.86/0.67 # Scheduled 6 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.86/0.67 # Starting G-E--_208_C18C--_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 136s (1) cores
% 0.86/0.67 # Preprocessing time : 0.009 s
% 0.86/0.67 # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.86/0.67
% 0.86/0.67 # Proof found!
% 0.86/0.67 # SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.86/0.67 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.86/0.67 # Parsed axioms : 2975
% 0.86/0.67 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 2365
% 0.86/0.67 # Initial clauses : 610
% 0.86/0.67 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.86/0.67 # Initial clauses in saturation : 610
% 0.86/0.67 # Processed clauses : 1564
% 0.86/0.67 # ...of these trivial : 68
% 0.86/0.67 # ...subsumed : 398
% 0.86/0.67 # ...remaining for further processing : 1098
% 0.86/0.67 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 12
% 0.86/0.67 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.86/0.67 # Backward-subsumed : 2
% 0.86/0.67 # Backward-rewritten : 13
% 0.86/0.67 # Generated clauses : 2340
% 0.86/0.67 # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 1736
% 0.86/0.67 # ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.86/0.67 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 1
% 0.86/0.67 # Paramodulations : 2296
% 0.86/0.67 # Factorizations : 0
% 0.86/0.67 # NegExts : 0
% 0.86/0.67 # Equation resolutions : 44
% 0.86/0.67 # Disequality decompositions : 0
% 0.86/0.67 # Total rewrite steps : 1261
% 0.86/0.67 # ...of those cached : 782
% 0.86/0.67 # Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.86/0.67 # Propositional check models : 0
% 0.86/0.67 # Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.86/0.67 # Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.86/0.67 # Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.86/0.67 # Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.86/0.67 # Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.86/0.67 # Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.86/0.67 # Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.86/0.67 # Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.86/0.67 # Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.86/0.67 # Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.86/0.67 # Current number of processed clauses : 547
% 0.86/0.67 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 238
% 0.86/0.67 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 3
% 0.86/0.67 # Negative unit clauses : 134
% 0.86/0.67 # Non-unit-clauses : 172
% 0.86/0.67 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 1315
% 0.86/0.67 # ...number of literals in the above : 2292
% 0.86/0.67 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.86/0.67 # Current number of archived clauses : 551
% 0.86/0.67 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 47490
% 0.86/0.67 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 22518
% 0.86/0.67 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 111
% 0.86/0.67 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 3997
% 0.86/0.67 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.86/0.67 # BW rewrite match attempts : 171
% 0.86/0.67 # BW rewrite match successes : 13
% 0.86/0.67 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.86/0.67 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.86/0.67 # Termbank termtop insertions : 68405
% 0.86/0.67 # Search garbage collected termcells : 7793
% 0.86/0.67
% 0.86/0.67 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.86/0.67 # User time : 0.115 s
% 0.86/0.67 # System time : 0.012 s
% 0.86/0.67 # Total time : 0.127 s
% 0.86/0.67 # Maximum resident set size: 4684 pages
% 0.86/0.67
% 0.86/0.67 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.86/0.67 # User time : 0.173 s
% 0.86/0.67 # System time : 0.016 s
% 0.86/0.67 # Total time : 0.188 s
% 0.86/0.67 # Maximum resident set size: 3648 pages
% 0.86/0.67 % E---3.1 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------