TSTP Solution File: SWV349-1 by E-SAT---3.1.00

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : E-SAT---3.1.00
% Problem  : SWV349-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_E %s %d THM

% Computer : n012.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Sat May  4 09:52:47 EDT 2024

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.53s 0.75s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.53s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    3
%            Number of leaves      :    2
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :    6 (   6 unt;   0 nHn;   6 RR)
%            Number of literals    :    6 (   0 equ;   3 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    1 (   1 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    5 (   2 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    2 (   1 usr;   1 prp; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of functors    :   10 (  10 usr;   6 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :    3 (   3 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(cls_conjecture_4,negated_conjecture,
    ~ c_in(c_Event_Oevent_ONotes(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_NA),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_NB),X1))),c_List_Oset(v_evso,tc_Event_Oevent),tc_Event_Oevent),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.AWQ50g3ypP/E---3.1_13574.p',cls_conjecture_4) ).

cnf(cls_conjecture_6,negated_conjecture,
    c_in(c_Event_Oevent_ONotes(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_NA),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_NB),v_k))),c_List_Oset(v_evso,tc_Event_Oevent),tc_Event_Oevent),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.AWQ50g3ypP/E---3.1_13574.p',cls_conjecture_6) ).

cnf(c_0_2,negated_conjecture,
    ~ c_in(c_Event_Oevent_ONotes(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_NA),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_NB),X1))),c_List_Oset(v_evso,tc_Event_Oevent),tc_Event_Oevent),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[cls_conjecture_4]) ).

cnf(c_0_3,negated_conjecture,
    c_in(c_Event_Oevent_ONotes(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_NA),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_NB),v_k))),c_List_Oset(v_evso,tc_Event_Oevent),tc_Event_Oevent),
    cls_conjecture_6 ).

cnf(c_0_4,negated_conjecture,
    ~ c_in(c_Event_Oevent_ONotes(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_NA),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_NB),X1))),c_List_Oset(v_evso,tc_Event_Oevent),tc_Event_Oevent),
    c_0_2 ).

cnf(c_0_5,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[c_0_3,c_0_4]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.12  % Problem    : SWV349-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.03/0.13  % Command    : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.13/0.34  % Computer : n012.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.35  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.13/0.35  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.13/0.35  % DateTime   : Fri May  3 16:32:53 EDT 2024
% 0.13/0.35  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.48/0.68  Running first-order model finding
% 0.48/0.68  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --satauto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.AWQ50g3ypP/E---3.1_13574.p
% 0.53/0.74  # Version: 3.1.0
% 0.53/0.74  # Preprocessing class: FMLMSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.53/0.74  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.53/0.74  # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.53/0.74  # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.53/0.74  # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.53/0.74  # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.53/0.74  # new_bool_1 with pid 13656 completed with status 0
% 0.53/0.74  # Result found by new_bool_1
% 0.53/0.74  # Preprocessing class: FMLMSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.53/0.74  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.53/0.74  # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.53/0.74  # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.53/0.74  # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.53/0.74  # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.53/0.74  # Search class: FGHSM-FSLM31-DFFFFFNN
% 0.53/0.74  # Scheduled 6 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.53/0.74  # Starting G-E--_208_C18C--_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 136s (1) cores
% 0.53/0.74  # G-E--_208_C18C--_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with pid 13658 completed with status 0
% 0.53/0.74  # Result found by G-E--_208_C18C--_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN
% 0.53/0.75  # Preprocessing class: FMLMSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.53/0.75  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.53/0.75  # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.53/0.75  # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.53/0.75  # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.53/0.75  # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.53/0.75  # Search class: FGHSM-FSLM31-DFFFFFNN
% 0.53/0.75  # Scheduled 6 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.53/0.75  # Starting G-E--_208_C18C--_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 136s (1) cores
% 0.53/0.75  # Preprocessing time       : 0.008 s
% 0.53/0.75  # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.53/0.75  
% 0.53/0.75  # Proof found!
% 0.53/0.75  # SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.53/0.75  # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.53/0.75  # Parsed axioms                        : 2974
% 0.53/0.75  # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 2365
% 0.53/0.75  # Initial clauses                      : 609
% 0.53/0.75  # Removed in clause preprocessing      : 0
% 0.53/0.75  # Initial clauses in saturation        : 609
% 0.53/0.75  # Processed clauses                    : 25
% 0.53/0.75  # ...of these trivial                  : 0
% 0.53/0.75  # ...subsumed                          : 2
% 0.53/0.75  # ...remaining for further processing  : 23
% 0.53/0.75  # Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 1
% 0.53/0.75  # Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 0.53/0.75  # Backward-subsumed                    : 0
% 0.53/0.75  # Backward-rewritten                   : 0
% 0.53/0.75  # Generated clauses                    : 2
% 0.53/0.75  # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 1
% 0.53/0.75  # ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
% 0.53/0.75  # Contextual simplify-reflections      : 0
% 0.53/0.75  # Paramodulations                      : 0
% 0.53/0.75  # Factorizations                       : 0
% 0.53/0.75  # NegExts                              : 0
% 0.53/0.75  # Equation resolutions                 : 1
% 0.53/0.75  # Disequality decompositions           : 0
% 0.53/0.75  # Total rewrite steps                  : 0
% 0.53/0.75  # ...of those cached                   : 0
% 0.53/0.75  # Propositional unsat checks           : 0
% 0.53/0.75  #    Propositional check models        : 0
% 0.53/0.75  #    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.53/0.75  #    Propositional clauses             : 0
% 0.53/0.75  #    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.53/0.75  #    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
% 0.53/0.75  #    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
% 0.53/0.75  #    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
% 0.53/0.75  #    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
% 0.53/0.75  #    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
% 0.53/0.75  #    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
% 0.53/0.75  #    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
% 0.53/0.75  # Current number of processed clauses  : 21
% 0.53/0.75  #    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 7
% 0.53/0.75  #    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.53/0.75  #    Negative unit clauses             : 11
% 0.53/0.75  #    Non-unit-clauses                  : 3
% 0.53/0.75  # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 585
% 0.53/0.75  # ...number of literals in the above   : 1296
% 0.53/0.75  # Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 0.53/0.75  # Current number of archived clauses   : 1
% 0.53/0.75  # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 1
% 0.53/0.75  # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 1
% 0.53/0.75  # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 0
% 0.53/0.75  # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 5
% 0.53/0.75  # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 0.53/0.75  # BW rewrite match attempts            : 0
% 0.53/0.75  # BW rewrite match successes           : 0
% 0.53/0.75  # Condensation attempts                : 0
% 0.53/0.75  # Condensation successes               : 0
% 0.53/0.75  # Termbank termtop insertions          : 34844
% 0.53/0.75  # Search garbage collected termcells   : 7797
% 0.53/0.75  
% 0.53/0.75  # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.53/0.75  # User time                : 0.021 s
% 0.53/0.75  # System time              : 0.005 s
% 0.53/0.75  # Total time               : 0.026 s
% 0.53/0.75  # Maximum resident set size: 4748 pages
% 0.53/0.75  
% 0.53/0.75  # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.53/0.75  # User time                : 0.052 s
% 0.53/0.75  # System time              : 0.007 s
% 0.53/0.75  # Total time               : 0.059 s
% 0.53/0.75  # Maximum resident set size: 3684 pages
% 0.53/0.75  % E---3.1 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------