TSTP Solution File: SWV343-2 by Vampire---4.8
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Vampire---4.8
% Problem : SWV343-2 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule file --schedule_file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/quickGreedyProduceRating_steal_pow3.txt --cores 8 -m 12000 -t %d %s
% Computer : n018.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Tue May 21 05:55:16 EDT 2024
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.60s 0.76s
% Output : Refutation 0.60s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 8
% Number of leaves : 9
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 17 ( 11 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 23 ( 1 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of connectives : 13 ( 7 ~; 6 |; 0 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 0 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 7 ( 3 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 7 ( 2 avg)
% Number of predicates : 3 ( 1 usr; 1 prp; 0-3 aty)
% Number of functors : 21 ( 21 usr; 10 con; 0-3 aty)
% Number of variables : 18 ( 18 !; 0 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f32,plain,
$false,
inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f30,f2]) ).
fof(f2,axiom,
~ c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OKey(v_K),c_Event_Oused(v_evs3),tc_Message_Omsg),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_3) ).
fof(f30,plain,
c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OKey(v_K),c_Event_Oused(v_evs3),tc_Message_Omsg),
inference(resolution,[],[f25,f4]) ).
fof(f4,axiom,
! [X3,X4] :
( ~ c_in(X4,c_Message_Oparts(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,X3)),tc_Message_Omsg)
| c_in(X4,c_Event_Oused(X3),tc_Message_Omsg) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_Event_Oc_A_58_Aparts_A_Iknows_ASpy_Aevs1_J_A_61_61_62_Ac_A_58_Aused_Aevs1_0) ).
fof(f25,plain,
c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OKey(v_K),c_Message_Oparts(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_evs3)),tc_Message_Omsg),
inference(resolution,[],[f21,f6]) ).
fof(f6,axiom,
! [X2,X6,X5] :
( ~ c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(X2,X5),c_Message_Oparts(X6),tc_Message_Omsg)
| c_in(X5,c_Message_Oparts(X6),tc_Message_Omsg) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_Message_OMPair__parts_0) ).
fof(f21,plain,
c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(v_A),c_Message_Omsg_OKey(v_K)),c_Message_Oparts(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_evs3)),tc_Message_Omsg),
inference(resolution,[],[f17,f7]) ).
fof(f7,axiom,
! [X2,X6,X7] :
( ~ c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(X7,X2),c_Message_Oparts(X6),tc_Message_Omsg)
| c_in(X2,c_Message_Oparts(X6),tc_Message_Omsg) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_Message_Oparts_OBody__dest_0) ).
fof(f17,plain,
c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(c_Public_OshrK(v_B),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(v_A),c_Message_Omsg_OKey(v_K))),c_Message_Oparts(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_evs3)),tc_Message_Omsg),
inference(forward_demodulation,[],[f16,f9]) ).
fof(f9,axiom,
! [X6] : c_Message_Oparts(X6) = c_Message_Oparts(c_Message_Oanalz(X6)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_Message_Oparts__analz_0) ).
fof(f16,plain,
c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(c_Public_OshrK(v_B),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(v_A),c_Message_Omsg_OKey(v_K))),c_Message_Oparts(c_Message_Oanalz(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_evs3))),tc_Message_Omsg),
inference(resolution,[],[f13,f8]) ).
fof(f8,axiom,
! [X2,X6] :
( ~ c_in(X2,X6,tc_Message_Omsg)
| c_in(X2,c_Message_Oparts(X6),tc_Message_Omsg) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_Message_Oparts_OInj_0) ).
fof(f13,plain,
c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(c_Public_OshrK(v_B),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(v_A),c_Message_Omsg_OKey(v_K))),c_Message_Oanalz(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_evs3)),tc_Message_Omsg),
inference(resolution,[],[f12,f5]) ).
fof(f5,axiom,
! [X2,X6,X5] :
( ~ c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(X2,X5),c_Message_Oanalz(X6),tc_Message_Omsg)
| c_in(X5,c_Message_Oanalz(X6),tc_Message_Omsg) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_Message_OMPair__analz_0) ).
fof(f12,plain,
c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(c_Public_OshrK(v_A),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(v_B),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OKey(v_K),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(v_na,v_nb)))),c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(c_Public_OshrK(v_B),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(v_A),c_Message_Omsg_OKey(v_K)))),c_Message_Oanalz(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_evs3)),tc_Message_Omsg),
inference(resolution,[],[f3,f1]) ).
fof(f1,axiom,
c_in(c_Event_Oevent_OSays(c_Message_Oagent_OServer,v_A,c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(c_Public_OshrK(v_A),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(v_B),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OKey(v_K),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(v_na,v_nb)))),c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(c_Public_OshrK(v_B),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(v_A),c_Message_Omsg_OKey(v_K))))),c_List_Oset(v_evs3,tc_Event_Oevent),tc_Event_Oevent),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_10) ).
fof(f3,axiom,
! [X2,X3,X0,X1] :
( ~ c_in(c_Event_Oevent_OSays(X0,X1,X2),c_List_Oset(X3,tc_Event_Oevent),tc_Event_Oevent)
| c_in(X2,c_Message_Oanalz(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,X3)),tc_Message_Omsg) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_Event_OSays__imp__analz__Spy__dest_0) ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.13 % Problem : SWV343-2 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.14/0.14 % Command : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule file --schedule_file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/quickGreedyProduceRating_steal_pow3.txt --cores 8 -m 12000 -t %d %s
% 0.15/0.36 % Computer : n018.cluster.edu
% 0.15/0.36 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.15/0.36 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.15/0.36 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.15/0.36 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.15/0.36 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.15/0.36 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.15/0.36 % DateTime : Sun May 19 07:57:53 EDT 2024
% 0.15/0.36 % CPUTime :
% 0.15/0.36 This is a CNF_UNS_RFO_SEQ_HRN problem
% 0.22/0.36 Running vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule file --schedule_file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/quickGreedyProduceRating_steal_pow3.txt --cores 8 -m 12000 -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.57/0.75 % (11184)lrs+21_1:5_sil=2000:sos=on:urr=on:newcnf=on:slsq=on:i=83:slsql=off:bd=off:nm=2:ss=axioms:st=1.5:sp=const_min:gsp=on:rawr=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2996ds/83Mi)
% 0.57/0.75 % (11178)dis-1011_2:1_sil=2000:lsd=20:nwc=5.0:flr=on:mep=off:st=3.0:i=34:sd=1:ep=RS:ss=axioms_0 on theBenchmark for (2996ds/34Mi)
% 0.57/0.75 % (11179)lrs+1011_461:32768_sil=16000:irw=on:sp=frequency:lsd=20:fd=preordered:nwc=10.0:s2agt=32:alpa=false:cond=fast:s2a=on:i=51:s2at=3.0:awrs=decay:awrsf=691:bd=off:nm=20:fsr=off:amm=sco:uhcvi=on:rawr=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2996ds/51Mi)
% 0.57/0.75 % (11181)ott+1011_1:1_sil=2000:urr=on:i=33:sd=1:kws=inv_frequency:ss=axioms:sup=off_0 on theBenchmark for (2996ds/33Mi)
% 0.57/0.75 % (11180)lrs+1011_1:1_sil=8000:sp=occurrence:nwc=10.0:i=78:ss=axioms:sgt=8_0 on theBenchmark for (2996ds/78Mi)
% 0.57/0.75 % (11182)lrs+2_1:1_sil=16000:fde=none:sos=all:nwc=5.0:i=34:ep=RS:s2pl=on:lma=on:afp=100000_0 on theBenchmark for (2996ds/34Mi)
% 0.57/0.75 % (11183)lrs+1002_1:16_to=lpo:sil=32000:sp=unary_frequency:sos=on:i=45:bd=off:ss=axioms_0 on theBenchmark for (2996ds/45Mi)
% 0.57/0.76 % (11183)Refutation not found, incomplete strategy% (11183)------------------------------
% 0.57/0.76 % (11183)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 3a798227e on 2024-05-03 07:42:47 +0200)
% 0.57/0.76 % (11183)Termination reason: Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
% 0.57/0.76
% 0.57/0.76 % (11183)Memory used [KB]: 964
% 0.57/0.76 % (11183)Time elapsed: 0.002 s
% 0.57/0.76 % (11182)Refutation not found, incomplete strategy% (11182)------------------------------
% 0.57/0.76 % (11182)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 3a798227e on 2024-05-03 07:42:47 +0200)
% 0.57/0.76 % (11183)Instructions burned: 2 (million)
% 0.57/0.76 % (11182)Termination reason: Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
% 0.57/0.76
% 0.57/0.76 % (11182)Memory used [KB]: 967
% 0.57/0.76 % (11182)Time elapsed: 0.002 s
% 0.57/0.76 % (11182)Instructions burned: 2 (million)
% 0.57/0.76 % (11182)------------------------------
% 0.57/0.76 % (11182)------------------------------
% 0.57/0.76 % (11183)------------------------------
% 0.57/0.76 % (11183)------------------------------
% 0.57/0.76 % (11180)First to succeed.
% 0.57/0.76 % (11180)Solution written to "/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/vampire-proof-11177"
% 0.57/0.76 % (11179)Also succeeded, but the first one will report.
% 0.60/0.76 % (11180)Refutation found. Thanks to Tanya!
% 0.60/0.76 % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark
% 0.60/0.76 % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
% See solution above
% 0.60/0.76 % (11180)------------------------------
% 0.60/0.76 % (11180)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 3a798227e on 2024-05-03 07:42:47 +0200)
% 0.60/0.76 % (11180)Termination reason: Refutation
% 0.60/0.76
% 0.60/0.76 % (11180)Memory used [KB]: 1048
% 0.60/0.76 % (11180)Time elapsed: 0.005 s
% 0.60/0.76 % (11180)Instructions burned: 6 (million)
% 0.60/0.76 % (11177)Success in time 0.386 s
% 0.60/0.76 % Vampire---4.8 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------