TSTP Solution File: SWV342-2 by Prover9---1109a
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Prover9---1109a
% Problem : SWV342-2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : tptp2X_and_run_prover9 %d %s
% Computer : n018.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Wed Jul 20 21:12:07 EDT 2022
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.71s 0.97s
% Output : Refutation 0.71s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.11/0.11 % Problem : SWV342-2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.11/0.12 % Command : tptp2X_and_run_prover9 %d %s
% 0.12/0.33 % Computer : n018.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.12/0.33 % DateTime : Thu Jun 16 01:46:30 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.33 % CPUTime :
% 0.71/0.97 ============================== Prover9 ===============================
% 0.71/0.97 Prover9 (32) version 2009-11A, November 2009.
% 0.71/0.97 Process 10456 was started by sandbox on n018.cluster.edu,
% 0.71/0.97 Thu Jun 16 01:46:31 2022
% 0.71/0.97 The command was "/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/prover9 -t 300 -f /tmp/Prover9_10303_n018.cluster.edu".
% 0.71/0.97 ============================== end of head ===========================
% 0.71/0.97
% 0.71/0.97 ============================== INPUT =================================
% 0.71/0.97
% 0.71/0.97 % Reading from file /tmp/Prover9_10303_n018.cluster.edu
% 0.71/0.97
% 0.71/0.97 set(prolog_style_variables).
% 0.71/0.97 set(auto2).
% 0.71/0.97 % set(auto2) -> set(auto).
% 0.71/0.97 % set(auto) -> set(auto_inference).
% 0.71/0.97 % set(auto) -> set(auto_setup).
% 0.71/0.97 % set(auto_setup) -> set(predicate_elim).
% 0.71/0.97 % set(auto_setup) -> assign(eq_defs, unfold).
% 0.71/0.97 % set(auto) -> set(auto_limits).
% 0.71/0.97 % set(auto_limits) -> assign(max_weight, "100.000").
% 0.71/0.97 % set(auto_limits) -> assign(sos_limit, 20000).
% 0.71/0.97 % set(auto) -> set(auto_denials).
% 0.71/0.97 % set(auto) -> set(auto_process).
% 0.71/0.97 % set(auto2) -> assign(new_constants, 1).
% 0.71/0.97 % set(auto2) -> assign(fold_denial_max, 3).
% 0.71/0.97 % set(auto2) -> assign(max_weight, "200.000").
% 0.71/0.97 % set(auto2) -> assign(max_hours, 1).
% 0.71/0.97 % assign(max_hours, 1) -> assign(max_seconds, 3600).
% 0.71/0.97 % set(auto2) -> assign(max_seconds, 0).
% 0.71/0.97 % set(auto2) -> assign(max_minutes, 5).
% 0.71/0.97 % assign(max_minutes, 5) -> assign(max_seconds, 300).
% 0.71/0.97 % set(auto2) -> set(sort_initial_sos).
% 0.71/0.97 % set(auto2) -> assign(sos_limit, -1).
% 0.71/0.97 % set(auto2) -> assign(lrs_ticks, 3000).
% 0.71/0.97 % set(auto2) -> assign(max_megs, 400).
% 0.71/0.97 % set(auto2) -> assign(stats, some).
% 0.71/0.97 % set(auto2) -> clear(echo_input).
% 0.71/0.97 % set(auto2) -> set(quiet).
% 0.71/0.97 % set(auto2) -> clear(print_initial_clauses).
% 0.71/0.97 % set(auto2) -> clear(print_given).
% 0.71/0.97 assign(lrs_ticks,-1).
% 0.71/0.97 assign(sos_limit,10000).
% 0.71/0.97 assign(order,kbo).
% 0.71/0.97 set(lex_order_vars).
% 0.71/0.97 clear(print_given).
% 0.71/0.97
% 0.71/0.97 % formulas(sos). % not echoed (9 formulas)
% 0.71/0.97
% 0.71/0.97 ============================== end of input ==========================
% 0.71/0.97
% 0.71/0.97 % From the command line: assign(max_seconds, 300).
% 0.71/0.97
% 0.71/0.97 ============================== PROCESS NON-CLAUSAL FORMULAS ==========
% 0.71/0.97
% 0.71/0.97 % Formulas that are not ordinary clauses:
% 0.71/0.97
% 0.71/0.97 ============================== end of process non-clausal formulas ===
% 0.71/0.97
% 0.71/0.97 ============================== PROCESS INITIAL CLAUSES ===============
% 0.71/0.97
% 0.71/0.97 ============================== PREDICATE ELIMINATION =================
% 0.71/0.97
% 0.71/0.97 ============================== end predicate elimination =============
% 0.71/0.97
% 0.71/0.97 Auto_denials:
% 0.71/0.97 % copying label cls_conjecture_3 to answer in negative clause
% 0.71/0.97
% 0.71/0.97 Term ordering decisions:
% 0.71/0.97 Function symbol KB weights: tc_Message_Omsg=1. tc_Event_Oevent=1. v_A=1. c_Message_Oagent_OSpy=1. v_B=1. v_K=1. c_Message_Oagent_OServer=1. v_evs3=1. v_na=1. v_nb=1. c_Message_Omsg_OMPair=1. c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt=1. c_Event_Oknows=1. c_List_Oset=1. c_Message_Oparts=1. c_Message_Oanalz=1. c_Message_Omsg_OAgent=1. c_Message_Omsg_OKey=1. c_Public_OshrK=1. c_Event_Oused=1. c_Event_Oevent_OSays=1.
% 0.71/0.97
% 0.71/0.97 ============================== end of process initial clauses ========
% 0.71/0.97
% 0.71/0.97 ============================== CLAUSES FOR SEARCH ====================
% 0.71/0.97
% 0.71/0.97 ============================== end of clauses for search =============
% 0.71/0.97
% 0.71/0.97 ============================== SEARCH ================================
% 0.71/0.97
% 0.71/0.97 % Starting search at 0.01 seconds.
% 0.71/0.97
% 0.71/0.97 ============================== PROOF =================================
% 0.71/0.97 % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.71/0.97 % SZS output start Refutation
% 0.71/0.97
% 0.71/0.97 % Proof 1 at 0.01 (+ 0.00) seconds: cls_conjecture_3.
% 0.71/0.97 % Length of proof is 16.
% 0.71/0.97 % Level of proof is 4.
% 0.71/0.97 % Maximum clause weight is 29.000.
% 0.71/0.97 % Given clauses 16.
% 0.71/0.97
% 0.71/0.97 1 c_Message_Oparts(c_Message_Oanalz(A)) = c_Message_Oparts(A) # label(cls_Message_Oparts__analz_0) # label(axiom). [assumption].
% 0.71/0.97 2 c_in(c_Event_Oevent_OSays(c_Message_Oagent_OServer,v_A,c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(c_Public_OshrK(v_A),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(v_B),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OKey(v_K),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(v_na,v_nb)))),c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(c_Public_OshrK(v_B),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(v_A),c_Message_Omsg_OKey(v_K))))),c_List_Oset(v_evs3,tc_Event_Oevent),tc_Event_Oevent) # label(cls_conjecture_9) # label(negated_conjecture). [assumption].
% 0.71/0.97 3 -c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OKey(v_K),c_Event_Oused(v_evs3),tc_Message_Omsg) # label(cls_conjecture_3) # label(negated_conjecture) # answer(cls_conjecture_3). [assumption].
% 0.71/0.97 4 -c_in(A,B,tc_Message_Omsg) | c_in(A,c_Message_Oparts(B),tc_Message_Omsg) # label(cls_Message_Oparts_OInj_0) # label(axiom). [assumption].
% 0.71/0.97 5 -c_in(A,c_Message_Oparts(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,B)),tc_Message_Omsg) | c_in(A,c_Event_Oused(B),tc_Message_Omsg) # label(cls_Event_Oc_A_58_Aparts_A_Iknows_ASpy_Aevs1_J_A_61_61_62_Ac_A_58_Aused_Aevs1_0) # label(axiom). [assumption].
% 0.71/0.97 6 -c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(A,B),c_Message_Oanalz(C),tc_Message_Omsg) | c_in(B,c_Message_Oanalz(C),tc_Message_Omsg) # label(cls_Message_OMPair__analz_0) # label(axiom). [assumption].
% 0.71/0.97 7 -c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(A,B),c_Message_Oparts(C),tc_Message_Omsg) | c_in(B,c_Message_Oparts(C),tc_Message_Omsg) # label(cls_Message_OMPair__parts_0) # label(axiom). [assumption].
% 0.71/0.97 8 -c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(A,B),c_Message_Oparts(C),tc_Message_Omsg) | c_in(B,c_Message_Oparts(C),tc_Message_Omsg) # label(cls_Message_Oparts_OBody__dest_0) # label(axiom). [assumption].
% 0.71/0.97 9 -c_in(c_Event_Oevent_OSays(A,B,C),c_List_Oset(D,tc_Event_Oevent),tc_Event_Oevent) | c_in(C,c_Message_Oanalz(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,D)),tc_Message_Omsg) # label(cls_Event_OSays__imp__analz__Spy__dest_0) # label(axiom). [assumption].
% 0.71/0.97 10 -c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OKey(v_K),c_Message_Oparts(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_evs3)),tc_Message_Omsg) # answer(cls_conjecture_3). [ur(5,b,3,a)].
% 0.71/0.97 11 c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(c_Public_OshrK(v_A),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(v_B),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OKey(v_K),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(v_na,v_nb)))),c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(c_Public_OshrK(v_B),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(v_A),c_Message_Omsg_OKey(v_K)))),c_Message_Oanalz(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_evs3)),tc_Message_Omsg). [hyper(9,a,2,a)].
% 0.71/0.97 13 -c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(A,c_Message_Omsg_OKey(v_K)),c_Message_Oparts(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_evs3)),tc_Message_Omsg) # answer(cls_conjecture_3). [ur(7,b,10,a)].
% 0.71/0.97 18 -c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(A,c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(B,c_Message_Omsg_OKey(v_K))),c_Message_Oparts(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_evs3)),tc_Message_Omsg) # answer(cls_conjecture_3). [ur(8,b,13,a)].
% 0.71/0.97 21 c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(c_Public_OshrK(v_B),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(v_A),c_Message_Omsg_OKey(v_K))),c_Message_Oanalz(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_evs3)),tc_Message_Omsg). [hyper(6,a,11,a)].
% 0.71/0.97 23 c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(c_Public_OshrK(v_B),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(v_A),c_Message_Omsg_OKey(v_K))),c_Message_Oparts(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_evs3)),tc_Message_Omsg). [hyper(4,a,21,a),rewrite([1(13)])].
% 0.71/0.97 24 $F # answer(cls_conjecture_3). [resolve(23,a,18,a)].
% 0.71/0.97
% 0.71/0.97 % SZS output end Refutation
% 0.71/0.97 ============================== end of proof ==========================
% 0.71/0.97
% 0.71/0.97 ============================== STATISTICS ============================
% 0.71/0.97
% 0.71/0.97 Given=16. Generated=28. Kept=23. proofs=1.
% 0.71/0.97 Usable=16. Sos=6. Demods=1. Limbo=0, Disabled=9. Hints=0.
% 0.71/0.97 Megabytes=0.07.
% 0.71/0.97 User_CPU=0.01, System_CPU=0.00, Wall_clock=0.
% 0.71/0.97
% 0.71/0.97 ============================== end of statistics =====================
% 0.71/0.97
% 0.71/0.97 ============================== end of search =========================
% 0.71/0.97
% 0.71/0.97 THEOREM PROVED
% 0.71/0.97 % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.71/0.97
% 0.71/0.97 Exiting with 1 proof.
% 0.71/0.97
% 0.71/0.97 Process 10456 exit (max_proofs) Thu Jun 16 01:46:31 2022
% 0.71/0.97 Prover9 interrupted
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------