TSTP Solution File: SWV342-1 by E---3.1.00
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.1.00
% Problem : SWV342-1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E %s %d THM
% Computer : n022.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Tue May 21 05:22:45 EDT 2024
% Result : Unsatisfiable 1.20s 0.70s
% Output : CNFRefutation 1.20s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 8
% Number of leaves : 11
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 37 ( 14 unt; 0 nHn; 33 RR)
% Number of literals : 60 ( 4 equ; 26 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 7 ( 2 avg)
% Number of predicates : 3 ( 1 usr; 1 prp; 0-3 aty)
% Number of functors : 21 ( 21 usr; 10 con; 0-3 aty)
% Number of variables : 67 ( 17 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(cls_Message_OMPair__analz_0,axiom,
( c_in(X2,c_Message_Oanalz(X3),tc_Message_Omsg)
| ~ c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(X1,X2),c_Message_Oanalz(X3),tc_Message_Omsg) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SWV005-2.ax',cls_Message_OMPair__analz_0) ).
cnf(cls_Message_Oanalz_OInj_0,axiom,
( c_in(X1,c_Message_Oanalz(X2),tc_Message_Omsg)
| ~ c_in(X1,X2,tc_Message_Omsg) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SWV005-2.ax',cls_Message_Oanalz_OInj_0) ).
cnf(cls_Message_Oparts_OInj_0,axiom,
( c_in(X1,c_Message_Oparts(X2),tc_Message_Omsg)
| ~ c_in(X1,X2,tc_Message_Omsg) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SWV005-0.ax',cls_Message_Oparts_OInj_0) ).
cnf(cls_Event_OSays__imp__analz__Spy__dest_0,axiom,
( c_in(X3,c_Message_Oanalz(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,X4)),tc_Message_Omsg)
| ~ c_in(c_Event_Oevent_OSays(X1,X2,X3),c_List_Oset(X4,tc_Event_Oevent),tc_Event_Oevent) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SWV005-4.ax',cls_Event_OSays__imp__analz__Spy__dest_0) ).
cnf(cls_Message_Oanalz__parts_0,axiom,
c_Message_Oanalz(c_Message_Oparts(X1)) = c_Message_Oparts(X1),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SWV005-2.ax',cls_Message_Oanalz__parts_0) ).
cnf(cls_conjecture_9,negated_conjecture,
c_in(c_Event_Oevent_OSays(c_Message_Oagent_OServer,v_A,c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(c_Public_OshrK(v_A),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(v_B),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OKey(v_K),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(v_na,v_nb)))),c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(c_Public_OshrK(v_B),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(v_A),c_Message_Omsg_OKey(v_K))))),c_List_Oset(v_evs3,tc_Event_Oevent),tc_Event_Oevent),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_9) ).
cnf(cls_Message_Oparts_OBody__dest_0,axiom,
( c_in(X2,c_Message_Oparts(X3),tc_Message_Omsg)
| ~ c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(X1,X2),c_Message_Oparts(X3),tc_Message_Omsg) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SWV005-4.ax',cls_Message_Oparts_OBody__dest_0) ).
cnf(cls_Message_Oparts__analz_0,axiom,
c_Message_Oparts(c_Message_Oanalz(X1)) = c_Message_Oparts(X1),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SWV005-2.ax',cls_Message_Oparts__analz_0) ).
cnf(cls_Event_Oc_A_58_Aparts_A_Iknows_ASpy_Aevs1_J_A_61_61_62_Ac_A_58_Aused_Aevs1_0,axiom,
( c_in(X1,c_Event_Oused(X2),tc_Message_Omsg)
| ~ c_in(X1,c_Message_Oparts(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,X2)),tc_Message_Omsg) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SWV005-2.ax',cls_Event_Oc_A_58_Aparts_A_Iknows_ASpy_Aevs1_J_A_61_61_62_Ac_A_58_Aused_Aevs1_0) ).
cnf(cls_Public_OMPair__used_0,axiom,
( c_in(X2,c_Event_Oused(X3),tc_Message_Omsg)
| ~ c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(X1,X2),c_Event_Oused(X3),tc_Message_Omsg) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SWV005-3.ax',cls_Public_OMPair__used_0) ).
cnf(cls_conjecture_3,negated_conjecture,
~ c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OKey(v_K),c_Event_Oused(v_evs3),tc_Message_Omsg),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_3) ).
cnf(c_0_11,plain,
( c_in(X2,c_Message_Oanalz(X3),tc_Message_Omsg)
| ~ c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(X1,X2),c_Message_Oanalz(X3),tc_Message_Omsg) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[cls_Message_OMPair__analz_0]) ).
cnf(c_0_12,plain,
( c_in(X1,c_Message_Oanalz(X2),tc_Message_Omsg)
| ~ c_in(X1,X2,tc_Message_Omsg) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[cls_Message_Oanalz_OInj_0]) ).
cnf(c_0_13,plain,
( c_in(X2,c_Message_Oanalz(X3),tc_Message_Omsg)
| ~ c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(X1,X2),c_Message_Oanalz(X3),tc_Message_Omsg) ),
c_0_11 ).
cnf(c_0_14,plain,
( c_in(X1,c_Message_Oanalz(X2),tc_Message_Omsg)
| ~ c_in(X1,X2,tc_Message_Omsg) ),
c_0_12 ).
cnf(c_0_15,plain,
( c_in(X1,c_Message_Oparts(X2),tc_Message_Omsg)
| ~ c_in(X1,X2,tc_Message_Omsg) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[cls_Message_Oparts_OInj_0]) ).
cnf(c_0_16,plain,
( c_in(X3,c_Message_Oanalz(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,X4)),tc_Message_Omsg)
| ~ c_in(c_Event_Oevent_OSays(X1,X2,X3),c_List_Oset(X4,tc_Event_Oevent),tc_Event_Oevent) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[cls_Event_OSays__imp__analz__Spy__dest_0]) ).
cnf(c_0_17,plain,
( c_in(X1,c_Message_Oanalz(X2),tc_Message_Omsg)
| ~ c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(X3,X1),X2,tc_Message_Omsg) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_13,c_0_14]) ).
cnf(c_0_18,plain,
( c_in(X1,c_Message_Oparts(X2),tc_Message_Omsg)
| ~ c_in(X1,X2,tc_Message_Omsg) ),
c_0_15 ).
cnf(c_0_19,axiom,
c_Message_Oanalz(c_Message_Oparts(X1)) = c_Message_Oparts(X1),
cls_Message_Oanalz__parts_0 ).
cnf(c_0_20,plain,
( c_in(X3,c_Message_Oanalz(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,X4)),tc_Message_Omsg)
| ~ c_in(c_Event_Oevent_OSays(X1,X2,X3),c_List_Oset(X4,tc_Event_Oevent),tc_Event_Oevent) ),
c_0_16 ).
cnf(c_0_21,negated_conjecture,
c_in(c_Event_Oevent_OSays(c_Message_Oagent_OServer,v_A,c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(c_Public_OshrK(v_A),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(v_B),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OKey(v_K),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(v_na,v_nb)))),c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(c_Public_OshrK(v_B),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(v_A),c_Message_Omsg_OKey(v_K))))),c_List_Oset(v_evs3,tc_Event_Oevent),tc_Event_Oevent),
cls_conjecture_9 ).
cnf(c_0_22,plain,
( c_in(X2,c_Message_Oparts(X3),tc_Message_Omsg)
| ~ c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(X1,X2),c_Message_Oparts(X3),tc_Message_Omsg) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[cls_Message_Oparts_OBody__dest_0]) ).
cnf(c_0_23,plain,
( c_in(X1,c_Message_Oparts(X2),tc_Message_Omsg)
| ~ c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(X3,X1),X2,tc_Message_Omsg) ),
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_17,c_0_18]),c_0_19]) ).
cnf(c_0_24,negated_conjecture,
c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(c_Public_OshrK(v_A),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(v_B),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OKey(v_K),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(v_na,v_nb)))),c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(c_Public_OshrK(v_B),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(v_A),c_Message_Omsg_OKey(v_K)))),c_Message_Oanalz(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_evs3)),tc_Message_Omsg),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_20,c_0_21]) ).
cnf(c_0_25,axiom,
c_Message_Oparts(c_Message_Oanalz(X1)) = c_Message_Oparts(X1),
cls_Message_Oparts__analz_0 ).
cnf(c_0_26,plain,
( c_in(X1,c_Event_Oused(X2),tc_Message_Omsg)
| ~ c_in(X1,c_Message_Oparts(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,X2)),tc_Message_Omsg) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[cls_Event_Oc_A_58_Aparts_A_Iknows_ASpy_Aevs1_J_A_61_61_62_Ac_A_58_Aused_Aevs1_0]) ).
cnf(c_0_27,plain,
( c_in(X2,c_Message_Oparts(X3),tc_Message_Omsg)
| ~ c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(X1,X2),c_Message_Oparts(X3),tc_Message_Omsg) ),
c_0_22 ).
cnf(c_0_28,negated_conjecture,
c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(c_Public_OshrK(v_B),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(v_A),c_Message_Omsg_OKey(v_K))),c_Message_Oparts(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_evs3)),tc_Message_Omsg),
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_23,c_0_24]),c_0_25]) ).
cnf(c_0_29,plain,
( c_in(X2,c_Event_Oused(X3),tc_Message_Omsg)
| ~ c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(X1,X2),c_Event_Oused(X3),tc_Message_Omsg) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[cls_Public_OMPair__used_0]) ).
cnf(c_0_30,plain,
( c_in(X1,c_Event_Oused(X2),tc_Message_Omsg)
| ~ c_in(X1,c_Message_Oparts(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,X2)),tc_Message_Omsg) ),
c_0_26 ).
cnf(c_0_31,negated_conjecture,
c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(v_A),c_Message_Omsg_OKey(v_K)),c_Message_Oparts(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_evs3)),tc_Message_Omsg),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_27,c_0_28]) ).
cnf(c_0_32,negated_conjecture,
~ c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OKey(v_K),c_Event_Oused(v_evs3),tc_Message_Omsg),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[cls_conjecture_3]) ).
cnf(c_0_33,plain,
( c_in(X2,c_Event_Oused(X3),tc_Message_Omsg)
| ~ c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(X1,X2),c_Event_Oused(X3),tc_Message_Omsg) ),
c_0_29 ).
cnf(c_0_34,negated_conjecture,
c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(v_A),c_Message_Omsg_OKey(v_K)),c_Event_Oused(v_evs3),tc_Message_Omsg),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_30,c_0_31]) ).
cnf(c_0_35,negated_conjecture,
~ c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OKey(v_K),c_Event_Oused(v_evs3),tc_Message_Omsg),
c_0_32 ).
cnf(c_0_36,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_33,c_0_34]),c_0_35]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.12 % Problem : SWV342-1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.07/0.13 % Command : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.14/0.34 % Computer : n022.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.34 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.14/0.34 % DateTime : Sun May 19 07:40:53 EDT 2024
% 0.14/0.35 % CPUTime :
% 0.21/0.48 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.21/0.48 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 1.20/0.70 # Version: 3.1.0
% 1.20/0.70 # Preprocessing class: FMLMSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 1.20/0.70 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 1.20/0.70 # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 1.20/0.70 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 1.20/0.70 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 1.20/0.70 # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 1.20/0.70 # new_bool_1 with pid 10240 completed with status 0
% 1.20/0.70 # Result found by new_bool_1
% 1.20/0.70 # Preprocessing class: FMLMSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 1.20/0.70 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 1.20/0.70 # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 1.20/0.70 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 1.20/0.70 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 1.20/0.70 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 1.20/0.70 # Search class: FGHSM-FSLM31-DFFFFFNN
% 1.20/0.70 # Scheduled 6 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 1.20/0.70 # Starting G-E--_208_C18C--_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 136s (1) cores
% 1.20/0.70 # G-E--_208_C18C--_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with pid 10242 completed with status 0
% 1.20/0.70 # Result found by G-E--_208_C18C--_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN
% 1.20/0.70 # Preprocessing class: FMLMSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 1.20/0.70 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 1.20/0.70 # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 1.20/0.70 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 1.20/0.70 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 1.20/0.70 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 1.20/0.70 # Search class: FGHSM-FSLM31-DFFFFFNN
% 1.20/0.70 # Scheduled 6 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 1.20/0.70 # Starting G-E--_208_C18C--_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 136s (1) cores
% 1.20/0.70 # Preprocessing time : 0.009 s
% 1.20/0.70 # Presaturation interreduction done
% 1.20/0.70
% 1.20/0.70 # Proof found!
% 1.20/0.70 # SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 1.20/0.70 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 1.20/0.70 # Parsed axioms : 2956
% 1.20/0.70 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 2347
% 1.20/0.70 # Initial clauses : 609
% 1.20/0.70 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 1.20/0.70 # Initial clauses in saturation : 609
% 1.20/0.70 # Processed clauses : 1796
% 1.20/0.70 # ...of these trivial : 53
% 1.20/0.70 # ...subsumed : 583
% 1.20/0.70 # ...remaining for further processing : 1160
% 1.20/0.70 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 14
% 1.20/0.70 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 1.20/0.70 # Backward-subsumed : 5
% 1.20/0.70 # Backward-rewritten : 20
% 1.20/0.70 # Generated clauses : 2965
% 1.20/0.70 # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 2273
% 1.20/0.70 # ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 1.20/0.70 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 1
% 1.20/0.70 # Paramodulations : 2919
% 1.20/0.70 # Factorizations : 0
% 1.20/0.70 # NegExts : 0
% 1.20/0.70 # Equation resolutions : 46
% 1.20/0.70 # Disequality decompositions : 0
% 1.20/0.70 # Total rewrite steps : 1755
% 1.20/0.70 # ...of those cached : 1218
% 1.20/0.70 # Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 1.20/0.70 # Propositional check models : 0
% 1.20/0.70 # Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 1.20/0.70 # Propositional clauses : 0
% 1.20/0.70 # Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 1.20/0.70 # Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 1.20/0.70 # Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 1.20/0.70 # Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 1.20/0.70 # Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 1.20/0.70 # Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 1.20/0.70 # Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 1.20/0.70 # Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 1.20/0.70 # Current number of processed clauses : 600
% 1.20/0.70 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 245
% 1.20/0.70 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 3
% 1.20/0.70 # Negative unit clauses : 156
% 1.20/0.70 # Non-unit-clauses : 196
% 1.20/0.70 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 1597
% 1.20/0.70 # ...number of literals in the above : 2740
% 1.20/0.70 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 1.20/0.70 # Current number of archived clauses : 560
% 1.20/0.70 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 48527
% 1.20/0.70 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 24027
% 1.20/0.70 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 128
% 1.20/0.70 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 7336
% 1.20/0.70 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 1.20/0.70 # BW rewrite match attempts : 149
% 1.20/0.70 # BW rewrite match successes : 13
% 1.20/0.70 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 1.20/0.70 # Condensation successes : 0
% 1.20/0.70 # Termbank termtop insertions : 74764
% 1.20/0.70 # Search garbage collected termcells : 7647
% 1.20/0.70
% 1.20/0.70 # -------------------------------------------------
% 1.20/0.70 # User time : 0.131 s
% 1.20/0.70 # System time : 0.011 s
% 1.20/0.70 # Total time : 0.142 s
% 1.20/0.70 # Maximum resident set size: 4644 pages
% 1.20/0.70
% 1.20/0.70 # -------------------------------------------------
% 1.20/0.70 # User time : 0.189 s
% 1.20/0.70 # System time : 0.015 s
% 1.20/0.70 # Total time : 0.204 s
% 1.20/0.70 # Maximum resident set size: 3620 pages
% 1.20/0.70 % E---3.1 exiting
% 1.20/0.70 % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------