TSTP Solution File: SWV340-2 by Etableau---0.67
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Etableau---0.67
% Problem : SWV340-2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : etableau --auto --tsmdo --quicksat=10000 --tableau=1 --tableau-saturation=1 -s -p --tableau-cores=8 --cpu-limit=%d %s
% Computer : n004.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Wed Jul 20 18:20:32 EDT 2022
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.14s 0.40s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.14s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.13/0.14 % Problem : SWV340-2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.13/0.14 % Command : etableau --auto --tsmdo --quicksat=10000 --tableau=1 --tableau-saturation=1 -s -p --tableau-cores=8 --cpu-limit=%d %s
% 0.14/0.36 % Computer : n004.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.36 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.36 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.36 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.36 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.36 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.36 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.14/0.36 % DateTime : Wed Jun 15 18:15:53 EDT 2022
% 0.14/0.36 % CPUTime :
% 0.14/0.39 # No SInE strategy applied
% 0.14/0.39 # Auto-Mode selected heuristic G_E___208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN
% 0.14/0.39 # and selection function SelectComplexExceptUniqMaxHorn.
% 0.14/0.39 #
% 0.14/0.39 # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.14/0.39 # Number of axioms: 11 Number of unprocessed: 11
% 0.14/0.39 # Tableaux proof search.
% 0.14/0.39 # APR header successfully linked.
% 0.14/0.39 # Hello from C++
% 0.14/0.40 # The folding up rule is enabled...
% 0.14/0.40 # Local unification is enabled...
% 0.14/0.40 # Any saturation attempts will use folding labels...
% 0.14/0.40 # 11 beginning clauses after preprocessing and clausification
% 0.14/0.40 # Creating start rules for all 4 conjectures.
% 0.14/0.40 # There are 4 start rule candidates:
% 0.14/0.40 # Found 5 unit axioms.
% 0.14/0.40 # Unsuccessfully attempted saturation on 1 start tableaux, moving on.
% 0.14/0.40 # 4 start rule tableaux created.
% 0.14/0.40 # 6 extension rule candidate clauses
% 0.14/0.40 # 5 unit axiom clauses
% 0.14/0.40
% 0.14/0.40 # Requested 8, 32 cores available to the main process.
% 0.14/0.40 # There are not enough tableaux to fork, creating more from the initial 4
% 0.14/0.40 # There were 1 total branch saturation attempts.
% 0.14/0.40 # There were 0 of these attempts blocked.
% 0.14/0.40 # There were 0 deferred branch saturation attempts.
% 0.14/0.40 # There were 0 free duplicated saturations.
% 0.14/0.40 # There were 1 total successful branch saturations.
% 0.14/0.40 # There were 0 successful branch saturations in interreduction.
% 0.14/0.40 # There were 0 successful branch saturations on the branch.
% 0.14/0.40 # There were 1 successful branch saturations after the branch.
% 0.14/0.40 # SZS status Unsatisfiable for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.14/0.40 # SZS output start for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.14/0.40 # Begin clausification derivation
% 0.14/0.40
% 0.14/0.40 # End clausification derivation
% 0.14/0.40 # Begin listing active clauses obtained from FOF to CNF conversion
% 0.14/0.40 cnf(i_0_15, negated_conjecture, (v_K=v_Ka)).
% 0.14/0.40 cnf(i_0_12, negated_conjecture, (c_in(v_evs4,c_Yahalom_Oyahalom,tc_List_Olist(tc_Event_Oevent)))).
% 0.14/0.40 cnf(i_0_13, negated_conjecture, (c_in(c_Event_Oevent_OGets(v_A,c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(c_Public_OshrK(v_A),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(v_B),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OKey(v_Ka),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_NA),c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_NB))))),v_X)),c_List_Oset(v_evs4,tc_Event_Oevent),tc_Event_Oevent))).
% 0.14/0.40 cnf(i_0_21, plain, (c_Message_Oparts(c_Message_Oanalz(X1))=c_Message_Oparts(X1))).
% 0.14/0.40 cnf(i_0_14, negated_conjecture, (~c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OKey(v_Ka),c_Event_Oused(v_evs4),tc_Message_Omsg))).
% 0.14/0.40 cnf(i_0_20, plain, (c_in(X1,c_Message_Oparts(X2),tc_Message_Omsg)|~c_in(X1,X2,tc_Message_Omsg))).
% 0.14/0.40 cnf(i_0_17, plain, (c_in(X1,c_Message_Oparts(X2),tc_Message_Omsg)|~c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(X3,X1),c_Message_Oparts(X2),tc_Message_Omsg))).
% 0.14/0.40 cnf(i_0_19, plain, (c_in(X1,c_Message_Oparts(X2),tc_Message_Omsg)|~c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(X3,X1),c_Message_Oparts(X2),tc_Message_Omsg))).
% 0.14/0.40 cnf(i_0_18, plain, (c_in(X1,c_Message_Oparts(X2),tc_Message_Omsg)|~c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(X1,X3),c_Message_Oparts(X2),tc_Message_Omsg))).
% 0.14/0.40 cnf(i_0_16, plain, (c_in(X1,c_Event_Oused(X2),tc_Message_Omsg)|~c_in(X1,c_Message_Oparts(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,X2)),tc_Message_Omsg))).
% 0.14/0.40 cnf(i_0_22, plain, (c_in(X1,c_Message_Oanalz(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,X2)),tc_Message_Omsg)|~c_in(c_Event_Oevent_OGets(X3,X1),c_List_Oset(X2,tc_Event_Oevent),tc_Event_Oevent)|~c_in(X2,c_Yahalom_Oyahalom,tc_List_Olist(tc_Event_Oevent)))).
% 0.14/0.40 # End listing active clauses. There is an equivalent clause to each of these in the clausification!
% 0.14/0.40 # Begin printing tableau
% 0.14/0.40 # Found 5 steps
% 0.14/0.40 cnf(i_0_12, negated_conjecture, (c_in(v_evs4,c_Yahalom_Oyahalom,tc_List_Olist(tc_Event_Oevent))), inference(start_rule)).
% 0.14/0.40 cnf(i_0_25, plain, (c_in(v_evs4,c_Yahalom_Oyahalom,tc_List_Olist(tc_Event_Oevent))), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_22])).
% 0.14/0.40 cnf(i_0_64, plain, (~c_in(c_Event_Oevent_OGets(v_A,c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(c_Public_OshrK(v_A),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(v_B),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OKey(v_Ka),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_NA),c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_NB))))),v_X)),c_List_Oset(v_evs4,tc_Event_Oevent),tc_Event_Oevent)), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_13])).
% 0.14/0.40 cnf(i_0_63, plain, (c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(c_Public_OshrK(v_A),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(v_B),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OKey(v_Ka),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_NA),c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_NB))))),v_X),c_Message_Oanalz(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_evs4)),tc_Message_Omsg)), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_20])).
% 0.14/0.40 cnf(i_0_79, plain, (c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(c_Public_OshrK(v_A),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(v_B),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OKey(v_Ka),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_NA),c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_NB))))),v_X),c_Message_Oparts(c_Message_Oanalz(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_evs4))),tc_Message_Omsg)), inference(etableau_closure_rule, [i_0_79, ...])).
% 0.14/0.40 # End printing tableau
% 0.14/0.40 # SZS output end
% 0.14/0.40 # Branches closed with saturation will be marked with an "s"
% 0.14/0.40 # Returning from population with 3 new_tableaux and 0 remaining starting tableaux.
% 0.14/0.40 # We now have 3 tableaux to operate on
% 0.14/0.40 # Found closed tableau during pool population.
% 0.14/0.40 # Proof search is over...
% 0.14/0.40 # Freeing feature tree
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------