TSTP Solution File: SWV339-1 by E---3.1.00

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : E---3.1.00
% Problem  : SWV339-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_E %s %d THM

% Computer : n015.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Sat May  4 09:43:48 EDT 2024

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.38s 1.06s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.38s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    5
%            Number of leaves      :    3
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   11 (   8 unt;   3 nHn;   7 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   14 (   6 equ;   3 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    3 (   1 usr;   1 prp; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    8 (   8 usr;   5 con; 0-1 aty)
%            Number of variables   :    6 (   6 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(cls_conjecture_6,negated_conjecture,
    ~ c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OKey(v_K),c_Event_Oused(v_evs3),tc_Message_Omsg),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.y7BGXEBJt9/E---3.1_18858.p',cls_conjecture_6) ).

cnf(cls_Public_OshrK__in__used_0,axiom,
    c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OKey(c_Public_OshrK(X1)),c_Event_Oused(X2),tc_Message_Omsg),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.y7BGXEBJt9/E---3.1_18858.p',cls_Public_OshrK__in__used_0) ).

cnf(cls_conjecture_8,negated_conjecture,
    ( v_K = c_Public_OshrK(v_B)
    | v_K = c_Public_OshrK(v_A) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.y7BGXEBJt9/E---3.1_18858.p',cls_conjecture_8) ).

cnf(c_0_3,negated_conjecture,
    ~ c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OKey(v_K),c_Event_Oused(v_evs3),tc_Message_Omsg),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[cls_conjecture_6]) ).

cnf(c_0_4,axiom,
    c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OKey(c_Public_OshrK(X1)),c_Event_Oused(X2),tc_Message_Omsg),
    cls_Public_OshrK__in__used_0 ).

cnf(c_0_5,negated_conjecture,
    ( v_K = c_Public_OshrK(v_B)
    | v_K = c_Public_OshrK(v_A) ),
    cls_conjecture_8 ).

cnf(c_0_6,negated_conjecture,
    ~ c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OKey(v_K),c_Event_Oused(v_evs3),tc_Message_Omsg),
    c_0_3 ).

cnf(c_0_7,negated_conjecture,
    ( c_Public_OshrK(v_B) = v_K
    | c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OKey(v_K),c_Event_Oused(X1),tc_Message_Omsg) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_4,c_0_5]) ).

cnf(c_0_8,negated_conjecture,
    c_Public_OshrK(v_B) = v_K,
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_6,c_0_7]) ).

cnf(c_0_9,negated_conjecture,
    c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OKey(v_K),c_Event_Oused(X1),tc_Message_Omsg),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_4,c_0_8]) ).

cnf(c_0_10,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_6,c_0_9])]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.09/0.33  % Problem    : SWV339-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.09/0.34  % Command    : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.35/0.54  % Computer : n015.cluster.edu
% 0.35/0.54  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.35/0.54  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.35/0.54  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.35/0.54  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.35/0.54  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.35/0.54  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.35/0.54  % DateTime   : Fri May  3 16:53:38 EDT 2024
% 0.35/0.54  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.38/0.94  Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.38/0.94  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.y7BGXEBJt9/E---3.1_18858.p
% 0.38/1.06  # Version: 3.1.0
% 0.38/1.06  # Preprocessing class: FMLMSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.38/1.06  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.38/1.06  # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.38/1.06  # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.38/1.06  # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.38/1.06  # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.38/1.06  # new_bool_3 with pid 18937 completed with status 0
% 0.38/1.06  # Result found by new_bool_3
% 0.38/1.06  # Preprocessing class: FMLMSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.38/1.06  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.38/1.06  # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.38/1.06  # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.38/1.06  # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.38/1.06  # Search class: FGHSM-FSLM31-DFFFFFNN
% 0.38/1.06  # Scheduled 6 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.38/1.06  # Starting G-E--_208_C18C--_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 136s (1) cores
% 0.38/1.06  # G-E--_208_C18C--_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with pid 18941 completed with status 0
% 0.38/1.06  # Result found by G-E--_208_C18C--_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN
% 0.38/1.06  # Preprocessing class: FMLMSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.38/1.06  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.38/1.06  # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.38/1.06  # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.38/1.06  # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.38/1.06  # Search class: FGHSM-FSLM31-DFFFFFNN
% 0.38/1.06  # Scheduled 6 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.38/1.06  # Starting G-E--_208_C18C--_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 136s (1) cores
% 0.38/1.06  # Preprocessing time       : 0.007 s
% 0.38/1.06  # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.38/1.06  
% 0.38/1.06  # Proof found!
% 0.38/1.06  # SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.38/1.06  # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.38/1.06  # Parsed axioms                        : 2950
% 0.38/1.06  # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 2341
% 0.38/1.06  # Initial clauses                      : 609
% 0.38/1.06  # Removed in clause preprocessing      : 0
% 0.38/1.06  # Initial clauses in saturation        : 609
% 0.38/1.06  # Processed clauses                    : 673
% 0.38/1.06  # ...of these trivial                  : 13
% 0.38/1.06  # ...subsumed                          : 57
% 0.38/1.06  # ...remaining for further processing  : 603
% 0.38/1.06  # Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 0
% 0.38/1.06  # Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 0.38/1.06  # Backward-subsumed                    : 1
% 0.38/1.06  # Backward-rewritten                   : 10
% 0.38/1.06  # Generated clauses                    : 23
% 0.38/1.06  # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 9
% 0.38/1.06  # ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
% 0.38/1.06  # Contextual simplify-reflections      : 1
% 0.38/1.06  # Paramodulations                      : 23
% 0.38/1.06  # Factorizations                       : 0
% 0.38/1.06  # NegExts                              : 0
% 0.38/1.06  # Equation resolutions                 : 0
% 0.38/1.06  # Disequality decompositions           : 0
% 0.38/1.06  # Total rewrite steps                  : 64
% 0.38/1.06  # ...of those cached                   : 30
% 0.38/1.06  # Propositional unsat checks           : 0
% 0.38/1.06  #    Propositional check models        : 0
% 0.38/1.06  #    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.38/1.06  #    Propositional clauses             : 0
% 0.38/1.06  #    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.38/1.06  #    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
% 0.38/1.06  #    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
% 0.38/1.06  #    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
% 0.38/1.06  #    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
% 0.38/1.06  #    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
% 0.38/1.06  #    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
% 0.38/1.06  #    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
% 0.38/1.06  # Current number of processed clauses  : 59
% 0.38/1.06  #    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 26
% 0.38/1.06  #    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.38/1.06  #    Negative unit clauses             : 30
% 0.38/1.06  #    Non-unit-clauses                  : 3
% 0.38/1.06  # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 478
% 0.38/1.06  # ...number of literals in the above   : 1094
% 0.38/1.06  # Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 0.38/1.06  # Current number of archived clauses   : 544
% 0.38/1.06  # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 40775
% 0.38/1.06  # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 22245
% 0.38/1.06  # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 37
% 0.38/1.06  # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 1530
% 0.38/1.06  # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 0.38/1.06  # BW rewrite match attempts            : 42
% 0.38/1.06  # BW rewrite match successes           : 9
% 0.38/1.06  # Condensation attempts                : 0
% 0.38/1.06  # Condensation successes               : 0
% 0.38/1.06  # Termbank termtop insertions          : 40262
% 0.38/1.06  # Search garbage collected termcells   : 7631
% 0.38/1.06  
% 0.38/1.06  # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.38/1.06  # User time                : 0.057 s
% 0.38/1.06  # System time              : 0.011 s
% 0.38/1.06  # Total time               : 0.068 s
% 0.38/1.06  # Maximum resident set size: 4652 pages
% 0.38/1.06  
% 0.38/1.06  # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.38/1.06  # User time                : 0.099 s
% 0.38/1.06  # System time              : 0.016 s
% 0.38/1.06  # Total time               : 0.115 s
% 0.38/1.06  # Maximum resident set size: 3648 pages
% 0.38/1.06  % E---3.1 exiting
% 0.38/1.06  % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------