TSTP Solution File: SWV338-2 by Otter---3.3

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Otter---3.3
% Problem  : SWV338-2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : otter-tptp-script %s

% Computer : n021.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Jul 27 13:20:32 EDT 2022

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 1.75s 1.93s
% Output   : Refutation 1.75s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    4
%            Number of leaves      :    9
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   14 (  10 unt;   1 nHn;  13 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   20 (   3 equ;   7 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    4 (   1 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    5 (   2 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    3 (   1 usr;   1 prp; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of functors    :   17 (  17 usr;   7 con; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of variables   :    9 (   1 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(1,axiom,
    ( ~ c_in(A,c_Message_Oparts(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,B)),tc_Message_Omsg)
    | c_in(A,c_Event_Oused(B),tc_Message_Omsg) ),
    file('SWV338-2.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(2,axiom,
    ( ~ c_in(A,c_Message_OkeysFor(c_Message_Oparts(c_insert(B,C,tc_Message_Omsg))),tc_nat)
    | ~ c_in(B,c_Message_Osynth(c_Message_Oanalz(D)),tc_Message_Omsg)
    | c_in(A,c_Message_OkeysFor(c_Message_Oparts(c_union(C,D,tc_Message_Omsg))),tc_nat)
    | c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OKey(c_Message_OinvKey(A)),c_Message_Oparts(D),tc_Message_Omsg) ),
    file('SWV338-2.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(3,axiom,
    ( ~ c_in(A,c_Message_OsymKeys,tc_nat)
    | c_Message_OinvKey(A) = A ),
    file('SWV338-2.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(4,axiom,
    ~ c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OKey(v_K),c_Event_Oused(v_evsf),tc_Message_Omsg),
    file('SWV338-2.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(5,axiom,
    ( ~ c_in(v_K,c_Message_OkeysFor(c_Message_Oparts(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_evsf))),tc_nat)
    | c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OKey(v_K),c_Event_Oused(v_evsf),tc_Message_Omsg) ),
    file('SWV338-2.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(6,plain,
    ~ c_in(v_K,c_Message_OkeysFor(c_Message_Oparts(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_evsf))),tc_nat),
    inference(unit_del,[status(thm)],[inference(copy,[status(thm)],[5]),4]),
    [iquote('copy,5,unit_del,4')] ).

cnf(9,axiom,
    c_union(A,A,B) = A,
    file('SWV338-2.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(10,axiom,
    c_in(v_K,c_Message_OsymKeys,tc_nat),
    file('SWV338-2.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(11,axiom,
    c_in(v_X,c_Message_Osynth(c_Message_Oanalz(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_evsf))),tc_Message_Omsg),
    file('SWV338-2.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(12,axiom,
    c_in(v_K,c_Message_OkeysFor(c_Message_Oparts(c_insert(v_X,c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_evsf),tc_Message_Omsg))),tc_nat),
    file('SWV338-2.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(14,plain,
    c_Message_OinvKey(v_K) = v_K,
    inference(hyper,[status(thm)],[10,3]),
    [iquote('hyper,10,3')] ).

cnf(17,plain,
    c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OKey(v_K),c_Message_Oparts(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_evsf)),tc_Message_Omsg),
    inference(unit_del,[status(thm)],[inference(demod,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[inference(hyper,[status(thm)],[12,2,11]),9,14]),6]),
    [iquote('hyper,12,2,11,demod,9,14,unit_del,6')] ).

cnf(18,plain,
    c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OKey(v_K),c_Event_Oused(v_evsf),tc_Message_Omsg),
    inference(hyper,[status(thm)],[17,1]),
    [iquote('hyper,17,1')] ).

cnf(19,plain,
    $false,
    inference(binary,[status(thm)],[18,4]),
    [iquote('binary,18.1,4.1')] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.12  % Problem  : SWV338-2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.07/0.13  % Command  : otter-tptp-script %s
% 0.14/0.34  % Computer : n021.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.34  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.34  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.14/0.34  % DateTime : Wed Jul 27 05:51:53 EDT 2022
% 0.14/0.35  % CPUTime  : 
% 1.75/1.93  ----- Otter 3.3f, August 2004 -----
% 1.75/1.93  The process was started by sandbox on n021.cluster.edu,
% 1.75/1.93  Wed Jul 27 05:51:53 2022
% 1.75/1.93  The command was "./otter".  The process ID is 7147.
% 1.75/1.93  
% 1.75/1.93  set(prolog_style_variables).
% 1.75/1.93  set(auto).
% 1.75/1.93     dependent: set(auto1).
% 1.75/1.93     dependent: set(process_input).
% 1.75/1.93     dependent: clear(print_kept).
% 1.75/1.93     dependent: clear(print_new_demod).
% 1.75/1.93     dependent: clear(print_back_demod).
% 1.75/1.93     dependent: clear(print_back_sub).
% 1.75/1.93     dependent: set(control_memory).
% 1.75/1.93     dependent: assign(max_mem, 12000).
% 1.75/1.93     dependent: assign(pick_given_ratio, 4).
% 1.75/1.93     dependent: assign(stats_level, 1).
% 1.75/1.93     dependent: assign(max_seconds, 10800).
% 1.75/1.93  clear(print_given).
% 1.75/1.93  
% 1.75/1.93  list(usable).
% 1.75/1.93  0 [] A=A.
% 1.75/1.93  0 [] -c_in(V_c,c_Message_Oparts(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,V_evs)),tc_Message_Omsg)|c_in(V_c,c_Event_Oused(V_evs),tc_Message_Omsg).
% 1.75/1.93  0 [] -c_in(V_K,c_Message_OkeysFor(c_Message_Oparts(c_insert(V_X,V_G,tc_Message_Omsg))),tc_nat)| -c_in(V_X,c_Message_Osynth(c_Message_Oanalz(V_H)),tc_Message_Omsg)|c_in(V_K,c_Message_OkeysFor(c_Message_Oparts(c_union(V_G,V_H,tc_Message_Omsg))),tc_nat)|c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OKey(c_Message_OinvKey(V_K)),c_Message_Oparts(V_H),tc_Message_Omsg).
% 1.75/1.93  0 [] -c_in(V_y,c_Message_OsymKeys,tc_nat)|c_Message_OinvKey(V_y)=V_y.
% 1.75/1.93  0 [] c_union(V_y,V_y,T_a)=V_y.
% 1.75/1.93  0 [] c_in(v_K,c_Message_OsymKeys,tc_nat).
% 1.75/1.93  0 [] c_in(v_X,c_Message_Osynth(c_Message_Oanalz(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_evsf))),tc_Message_Omsg).
% 1.75/1.93  0 [] -c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OKey(v_K),c_Event_Oused(v_evsf),tc_Message_Omsg).
% 1.75/1.93  0 [] c_in(v_K,c_Message_OkeysFor(c_Message_Oparts(c_insert(v_X,c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_evsf),tc_Message_Omsg))),tc_nat).
% 1.75/1.93  0 [] -c_in(v_K,c_Message_OkeysFor(c_Message_Oparts(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_evsf))),tc_nat)|c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OKey(v_K),c_Event_Oused(v_evsf),tc_Message_Omsg).
% 1.75/1.93  end_of_list.
% 1.75/1.93  
% 1.75/1.93  SCAN INPUT: prop=0, horn=0, equality=1, symmetry=0, max_lits=4.
% 1.75/1.93  
% 1.75/1.93  This ia a non-Horn set with equality.  The strategy will be
% 1.75/1.93  Knuth-Bendix, ordered hyper_res, factoring, and unit
% 1.75/1.93  deletion, with positive clauses in sos and nonpositive
% 1.75/1.93  clauses in usable.
% 1.75/1.93  
% 1.75/1.93     dependent: set(knuth_bendix).
% 1.75/1.93     dependent: set(anl_eq).
% 1.75/1.93     dependent: set(para_from).
% 1.75/1.93     dependent: set(para_into).
% 1.75/1.93     dependent: clear(para_from_right).
% 1.75/1.93     dependent: clear(para_into_right).
% 1.75/1.93     dependent: set(para_from_vars).
% 1.75/1.93     dependent: set(eq_units_both_ways).
% 1.75/1.93     dependent: set(dynamic_demod_all).
% 1.75/1.93     dependent: set(dynamic_demod).
% 1.75/1.93     dependent: set(order_eq).
% 1.75/1.93     dependent: set(back_demod).
% 1.75/1.93     dependent: set(lrpo).
% 1.75/1.93     dependent: set(hyper_res).
% 1.75/1.93     dependent: set(unit_deletion).
% 1.75/1.93     dependent: set(factor).
% 1.75/1.93  
% 1.75/1.93  ------------> process usable:
% 1.75/1.93  ** KEPT (pick-wt=12): 1 [] -c_in(A,c_Message_Oparts(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,B)),tc_Message_Omsg)|c_in(A,c_Event_Oused(B),tc_Message_Omsg).
% 1.75/1.93  ** KEPT (pick-wt=31): 2 [] -c_in(A,c_Message_OkeysFor(c_Message_Oparts(c_insert(B,C,tc_Message_Omsg))),tc_nat)| -c_in(B,c_Message_Osynth(c_Message_Oanalz(D)),tc_Message_Omsg)|c_in(A,c_Message_OkeysFor(c_Message_Oparts(c_union(C,D,tc_Message_Omsg))),tc_nat)|c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OKey(c_Message_OinvKey(A)),c_Message_Oparts(D),tc_Message_Omsg).
% 1.75/1.93  ** KEPT (pick-wt=8): 3 [] -c_in(A,c_Message_OsymKeys,tc_nat)|c_Message_OinvKey(A)=A.
% 1.75/1.93  ** KEPT (pick-wt=6): 4 [] -c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OKey(v_K),c_Event_Oused(v_evsf),tc_Message_Omsg).
% 1.75/1.93  ** KEPT (pick-wt=8): 6 [copy,5,unit_del,4] -c_in(v_K,c_Message_OkeysFor(c_Message_Oparts(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_evsf))),tc_nat).
% 1.75/1.93  
% 1.75/1.93  ------------> process sos:
% 1.75/1.93  ** KEPT (pick-wt=3): 7 [] A=A.
% 1.75/1.93  ** KEPT (pick-wt=6): 8 [] c_union(A,A,B)=A.
% 1.75/1.93  ---> New Demodulator: 9 [new_demod,8] c_union(A,A,B)=A.
% 1.75/1.93  ** KEPT (pick-wt=4): 10 [] c_in(v_K,c_Message_OsymKeys,tc_nat).
% 1.75/1.93  ** KEPT (pick-wt=8): 11 [] c_in(v_X,c_Message_Osynth(c_Message_Oanalz(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_evsf))),tc_Message_Omsg).
% 1.75/1.93  ** KEPT (pick-wt=11): 12 [] c_in(v_K,c_Message_OkeysFor(c_Message_Oparts(c_insert(v_X,c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_evsf),tc_Message_Omsg))),tc_nat).
% 1.75/1.93    Following clause subsumed by 7 during input processing: 0 [copy,7,flip.1] A=A.
% 1.75/1.93  >>>> Starting back demodulation with 9.
% 1.75/1.93  
% 1.75/1.93  ======= end of input processing =======
% 1.75/1.93  
% 1.75/1.93  =========== start of search ===========
% 1.75/1.93  
% 1.75/1.93  -------- PROOF -------- 
% 1.75/1.93  
% 1.75/1.93  ----> UNIT CONFLICT at   0.00 sec ----> 19 [binary,18.1,4.1] $F.
% 1.75/1.93  
% 1.75/1.93  Length of proof is 4.  Level of proof is 3.
% 1.75/1.93  
% 1.75/1.93  ---------------- PROOF ----------------
% 1.75/1.93  % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 1.75/1.93  % SZS output start Refutation
% See solution above
% 1.75/1.93  ------------ end of proof -------------
% 1.75/1.93  
% 1.75/1.93  
% 1.75/1.93  Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 1.75/1.93  
% 1.75/1.93  
% 1.75/1.93  Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 1.75/1.93  
% 1.75/1.93  ============ end of search ============
% 1.75/1.93  
% 1.75/1.93  -------------- statistics -------------
% 1.75/1.93  clauses given                  7
% 1.75/1.93  clauses generated             11
% 1.75/1.93  clauses kept                  15
% 1.75/1.93  clauses forward subsumed       7
% 1.75/1.93  clauses back subsumed          0
% 1.75/1.93  Kbytes malloced              976
% 1.75/1.93  
% 1.75/1.93  ----------- times (seconds) -----------
% 1.75/1.93  user CPU time          0.00          (0 hr, 0 min, 0 sec)
% 1.75/1.93  system CPU time        0.00          (0 hr, 0 min, 0 sec)
% 1.75/1.93  wall-clock time        1             (0 hr, 0 min, 1 sec)
% 1.75/1.93  
% 1.75/1.93  That finishes the proof of the theorem.
% 1.75/1.93  
% 1.75/1.93  Process 7147 finished Wed Jul 27 05:51:54 2022
% 1.75/1.93  Otter interrupted
% 1.75/1.93  PROOF FOUND
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------