TSTP Solution File: SWV335-2 by Vampire---4.8

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Vampire---4.8
% Problem  : SWV335-2 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule file --schedule_file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/quickGreedyProduceRating_steal_pow3.txt --cores 8 -m 12000 -t %d %s

% Computer : n002.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue May 21 05:55:13 EDT 2024

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.71s 0.90s
% Output   : Refutation 0.71s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    5
%            Number of leaves      :   14
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   34 (   8 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   69 (   0 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    4 (   2 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   61 (  26   ~;  30   |;   0   &)
%                                         (   5 <=>;   0  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    7 (   3 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    4 (   2 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    7 (   6 usr;   6 prp; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of functors    :   14 (  14 usr;   6 con; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   17 (  17   !;   0   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f45,plain,
    $false,
    inference(avatar_sat_refutation,[],[f24,f26,f28,f38,f42,f44]) ).

fof(f44,plain,
    ( spl0_2
    | ~ spl0_4 ),
    inference(avatar_split_clause,[],[f43,f31,f17]) ).

fof(f17,plain,
    ( spl0_2
  <=> c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(v_K,c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_NB)),c_Message_Oparts(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_evsf)),tc_Message_Omsg) ),
    introduced(avatar_definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl0_2])]) ).

fof(f31,plain,
    ( spl0_4
  <=> c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(v_K,c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_NB)),c_Message_Oanalz(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_evsf)),tc_Message_Omsg) ),
    introduced(avatar_definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl0_4])]) ).

fof(f43,plain,
    ( c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(v_K,c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_NB)),c_Message_Oparts(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_evsf)),tc_Message_Omsg)
    | ~ spl0_4 ),
    inference(resolution,[],[f33,f8]) ).

fof(f8,axiom,
    ! [X2,X5] :
      ( ~ c_in(X5,c_Message_Oanalz(X2),tc_Message_Omsg)
      | c_in(X5,c_Message_Oparts(X2),tc_Message_Omsg) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_Message_Oanalz__into__parts__dest_0) ).

fof(f33,plain,
    ( c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(v_K,c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_NB)),c_Message_Oanalz(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_evsf)),tc_Message_Omsg)
    | ~ spl0_4 ),
    inference(avatar_component_clause,[],[f31]) ).

fof(f42,plain,
    ~ spl0_5,
    inference(avatar_contradiction_clause,[],[f40]) ).

fof(f40,plain,
    ( $false
    | ~ spl0_5 ),
    inference(resolution,[],[f39,f2]) ).

fof(f2,axiom,
    ~ c_in(c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_NB),c_Message_Oanalz(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_evsf)),tc_Message_Omsg),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_2) ).

fof(f39,plain,
    ( c_in(c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_NB),c_Message_Oanalz(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_evsf)),tc_Message_Omsg)
    | ~ spl0_5 ),
    inference(resolution,[],[f37,f7]) ).

fof(f7,axiom,
    ! [X2,X4] :
      ( ~ c_in(c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(X4),c_Message_Osynth(X2),tc_Message_Omsg)
      | c_in(c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(X4),X2,tc_Message_Omsg) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_Message_ONonce__synth_0) ).

fof(f37,plain,
    ( c_in(c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_NB),c_Message_Osynth(c_Message_Oanalz(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_evsf))),tc_Message_Omsg)
    | ~ spl0_5 ),
    inference(avatar_component_clause,[],[f35]) ).

fof(f35,plain,
    ( spl0_5
  <=> c_in(c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_NB),c_Message_Osynth(c_Message_Oanalz(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_evsf))),tc_Message_Omsg) ),
    introduced(avatar_definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl0_5])]) ).

fof(f38,plain,
    ( spl0_4
    | spl0_5
    | ~ spl0_1 ),
    inference(avatar_split_clause,[],[f29,f13,f35,f31]) ).

fof(f13,plain,
    ( spl0_1
  <=> c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(v_K,c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_NB)),c_Message_Osynth(c_Message_Oanalz(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_evsf))),tc_Message_Omsg) ),
    introduced(avatar_definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl0_1])]) ).

fof(f29,plain,
    ( c_in(c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_NB),c_Message_Osynth(c_Message_Oanalz(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_evsf))),tc_Message_Omsg)
    | c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(v_K,c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_NB)),c_Message_Oanalz(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_evsf)),tc_Message_Omsg)
    | ~ spl0_1 ),
    inference(resolution,[],[f15,f5]) ).

fof(f5,axiom,
    ! [X2,X0,X1] :
      ( ~ c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(X0,X1),c_Message_Osynth(X2),tc_Message_Omsg)
      | c_in(X1,c_Message_Osynth(X2),tc_Message_Omsg)
      | c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(X0,X1),X2,tc_Message_Omsg) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_Message_OCrypt__synth_1) ).

fof(f15,plain,
    ( c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(v_K,c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_NB)),c_Message_Osynth(c_Message_Oanalz(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_evsf))),tc_Message_Omsg)
    | ~ spl0_1 ),
    inference(avatar_component_clause,[],[f13]) ).

fof(f28,plain,
    spl0_3,
    inference(avatar_contradiction_clause,[],[f27]) ).

fof(f27,plain,
    ( $false
    | spl0_3 ),
    inference(resolution,[],[f23,f1]) ).

fof(f1,axiom,
    c_in(v_X,c_Message_Osynth(c_Message_Oanalz(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_evsf))),tc_Message_Omsg),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_1) ).

fof(f23,plain,
    ( ~ c_in(v_X,c_Message_Osynth(c_Message_Oanalz(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_evsf))),tc_Message_Omsg)
    | spl0_3 ),
    inference(avatar_component_clause,[],[f21]) ).

fof(f21,plain,
    ( spl0_3
  <=> c_in(v_X,c_Message_Osynth(c_Message_Oanalz(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_evsf))),tc_Message_Omsg) ),
    introduced(avatar_definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl0_3])]) ).

fof(f26,plain,
    ~ spl0_2,
    inference(avatar_contradiction_clause,[],[f25]) ).

fof(f25,plain,
    ( $false
    | ~ spl0_2 ),
    inference(resolution,[],[f19,f4]) ).

fof(f4,axiom,
    ~ c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(v_K,c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_NB)),c_Message_Oparts(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_evsf)),tc_Message_Omsg),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_4) ).

fof(f19,plain,
    ( c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(v_K,c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_NB)),c_Message_Oparts(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_evsf)),tc_Message_Omsg)
    | ~ spl0_2 ),
    inference(avatar_component_clause,[],[f17]) ).

fof(f24,plain,
    ( spl0_1
    | spl0_2
    | ~ spl0_3 ),
    inference(avatar_split_clause,[],[f11,f21,f17,f13]) ).

fof(f11,plain,
    ( ~ c_in(v_X,c_Message_Osynth(c_Message_Oanalz(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_evsf))),tc_Message_Omsg)
    | c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(v_K,c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_NB)),c_Message_Oparts(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_evsf)),tc_Message_Omsg)
    | c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(v_K,c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_NB)),c_Message_Osynth(c_Message_Oanalz(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_evsf))),tc_Message_Omsg) ),
    inference(resolution,[],[f10,f3]) ).

fof(f3,axiom,
    c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(v_K,c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_NB)),c_Message_Oparts(c_insert(v_X,c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_evsf),tc_Message_Omsg)),tc_Message_Omsg),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_3) ).

fof(f10,plain,
    ! [X2,X0,X1] :
      ( ~ c_in(X2,c_Message_Oparts(c_insert(X0,X1,tc_Message_Omsg)),tc_Message_Omsg)
      | ~ c_in(X0,c_Message_Osynth(c_Message_Oanalz(X1)),tc_Message_Omsg)
      | c_in(X2,c_Message_Oparts(X1),tc_Message_Omsg)
      | c_in(X2,c_Message_Osynth(c_Message_Oanalz(X1)),tc_Message_Omsg) ),
    inference(resolution,[],[f6,f9]) ).

fof(f9,axiom,
    ! [X8,X6,X7,X5] :
      ( ~ c_in(X5,c_union(X6,X7,X8),X8)
      | c_in(X5,X7,X8)
      | c_in(X5,X6,X8) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_Set_OUnE_0) ).

fof(f6,axiom,
    ! [X2,X3,X1] :
      ( c_in(X3,c_union(c_Message_Osynth(c_Message_Oanalz(X2)),c_Message_Oparts(X2),tc_Message_Omsg),tc_Message_Omsg)
      | ~ c_in(X1,c_Message_Osynth(c_Message_Oanalz(X2)),tc_Message_Omsg)
      | ~ c_in(X3,c_Message_Oparts(c_insert(X1,X2,tc_Message_Omsg)),tc_Message_Omsg) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_Message_OFake__parts__insert__in__Un__dest_0) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.13  % Problem    : SWV335-2 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.07/0.15  % Command    : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule file --schedule_file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/quickGreedyProduceRating_steal_pow3.txt --cores 8 -m 12000 -t %d %s
% 0.15/0.38  % Computer : n002.cluster.edu
% 0.15/0.38  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.15/0.38  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.15/0.38  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.15/0.38  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.15/0.39  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.15/0.39  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.15/0.39  % DateTime   : Sun May 19 08:18:53 EDT 2024
% 0.15/0.39  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.15/0.39  This is a CNF_UNS_RFO_NEQ_NHN problem
% 0.15/0.39  Running vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule file --schedule_file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/quickGreedyProduceRating_steal_pow3.txt --cores 8 -m 12000 -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.71/0.89  % (9574)lrs+1011_1:1_sil=8000:sp=occurrence:nwc=10.0:i=78:ss=axioms:sgt=8_0 on theBenchmark for (2995ds/78Mi)
% 0.71/0.89  % (9575)ott+1011_1:1_sil=2000:urr=on:i=33:sd=1:kws=inv_frequency:ss=axioms:sup=off_0 on theBenchmark for (2995ds/33Mi)
% 0.71/0.89  % (9572)dis-1011_2:1_sil=2000:lsd=20:nwc=5.0:flr=on:mep=off:st=3.0:i=34:sd=1:ep=RS:ss=axioms_0 on theBenchmark for (2995ds/34Mi)
% 0.71/0.89  % (9576)lrs+2_1:1_sil=16000:fde=none:sos=all:nwc=5.0:i=34:ep=RS:s2pl=on:lma=on:afp=100000_0 on theBenchmark for (2995ds/34Mi)
% 0.71/0.89  % (9573)lrs+1011_461:32768_sil=16000:irw=on:sp=frequency:lsd=20:fd=preordered:nwc=10.0:s2agt=32:alpa=false:cond=fast:s2a=on:i=51:s2at=3.0:awrs=decay:awrsf=691:bd=off:nm=20:fsr=off:amm=sco:uhcvi=on:rawr=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2995ds/51Mi)
% 0.71/0.89  % (9577)lrs+1002_1:16_to=lpo:sil=32000:sp=unary_frequency:sos=on:i=45:bd=off:ss=axioms_0 on theBenchmark for (2995ds/45Mi)
% 0.71/0.89  % (9579)lrs-21_1:1_to=lpo:sil=2000:sp=frequency:sos=on:lma=on:i=56:sd=2:ss=axioms:ep=R_0 on theBenchmark for (2995ds/56Mi)
% 0.71/0.89  % (9578)lrs+21_1:5_sil=2000:sos=on:urr=on:newcnf=on:slsq=on:i=83:slsql=off:bd=off:nm=2:ss=axioms:st=1.5:sp=const_min:gsp=on:rawr=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2995ds/83Mi)
% 0.71/0.89  % (9577)Refutation not found, incomplete strategy% (9577)------------------------------
% 0.71/0.89  % (9577)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 3a798227e on 2024-05-03 07:42:47 +0200)
% 0.71/0.89  % (9577)Termination reason: Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
% 0.71/0.89  
% 0.71/0.89  % (9577)Memory used [KB]: 950
% 0.71/0.89  % (9577)Time elapsed: 0.003 s
% 0.71/0.89  % (9576)Refutation not found, incomplete strategy% (9576)------------------------------
% 0.71/0.89  % (9576)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 3a798227e on 2024-05-03 07:42:47 +0200)
% 0.71/0.89  % (9577)Instructions burned: 2 (million)
% 0.71/0.89  % (9572)Refutation not found, incomplete strategy% (9572)------------------------------
% 0.71/0.89  % (9572)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 3a798227e on 2024-05-03 07:42:47 +0200)
% 0.71/0.89  % (9572)Termination reason: Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
% 0.71/0.89  
% 0.71/0.89  % (9572)Memory used [KB]: 951
% 0.71/0.89  % (9572)Time elapsed: 0.003 s
% 0.71/0.89  % (9572)Instructions burned: 2 (million)
% 0.71/0.89  % (9579)Refutation not found, incomplete strategy% (9579)------------------------------
% 0.71/0.89  % (9579)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 3a798227e on 2024-05-03 07:42:47 +0200)
% 0.71/0.89  % (9576)Termination reason: Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
% 0.71/0.89  
% 0.71/0.89  % (9576)Memory used [KB]: 953
% 0.71/0.89  % (9576)Time elapsed: 0.003 s
% 0.71/0.89  % (9576)Instructions burned: 2 (million)
% 0.71/0.89  % (9579)Termination reason: Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
% 0.71/0.89  
% 0.71/0.89  % (9579)Memory used [KB]: 950
% 0.71/0.89  % (9579)Time elapsed: 0.002 s
% 0.71/0.89  % (9579)Instructions burned: 2 (million)
% 0.71/0.89  % (9572)------------------------------
% 0.71/0.89  % (9572)------------------------------
% 0.71/0.89  % (9576)------------------------------
% 0.71/0.89  % (9576)------------------------------
% 0.71/0.89  % (9577)------------------------------
% 0.71/0.89  % (9577)------------------------------
% 0.71/0.89  % (9579)------------------------------
% 0.71/0.89  % (9579)------------------------------
% 0.71/0.89  % (9573)First to succeed.
% 0.71/0.89  % (9574)Also succeeded, but the first one will report.
% 0.71/0.89  % (9578)Also succeeded, but the first one will report.
% 0.71/0.89  % (9573)Solution written to "/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/vampire-proof-9571"
% 0.71/0.90  % (9573)Refutation found. Thanks to Tanya!
% 0.71/0.90  % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark
% 0.71/0.90  % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
% See solution above
% 0.71/0.90  % (9573)------------------------------
% 0.71/0.90  % (9573)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 3a798227e on 2024-05-03 07:42:47 +0200)
% 0.71/0.90  % (9573)Termination reason: Refutation
% 0.71/0.90  
% 0.71/0.90  % (9573)Memory used [KB]: 982
% 0.71/0.90  % (9573)Time elapsed: 0.004 s
% 0.71/0.90  % (9573)Instructions burned: 3 (million)
% 0.71/0.90  % (9571)Success in time 0.501 s
% 0.71/0.90  % Vampire---4.8 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------