TSTP Solution File: SWV334-1 by E-SAT---3.1.00

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : E-SAT---3.1.00
% Problem  : SWV334-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_E %s %d THM

% Computer : n006.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Sat May  4 09:52:42 EDT 2024

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.62s 0.69s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.62s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    3
%            Number of leaves      :    2
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :    6 (   6 unt;   0 nHn;   6 RR)
%            Number of literals    :    6 (   0 equ;   3 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    1 (   1 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    5 (   2 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    2 (   1 usr;   1 prp; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of functors    :   12 (  12 usr;   7 con; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of variables   :    3 (   3 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(cls_conjecture_11,negated_conjecture,
    ~ c_in(c_Event_Oevent_OSays(v_A,v_B,c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(X1,c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(v_K,c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_NB)))),c_List_Oset(v_evs4,tc_Event_Oevent),tc_Event_Oevent),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.wel6HBVgRb/E---3.1_14680.p',cls_conjecture_11) ).

cnf(cls_conjecture_7,negated_conjecture,
    c_in(c_Event_Oevent_OSays(v_A,v_B,c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(v_Xa,c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(v_K,c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_NB)))),c_List_Oset(v_evs4,tc_Event_Oevent),tc_Event_Oevent),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.wel6HBVgRb/E---3.1_14680.p',cls_conjecture_7) ).

cnf(c_0_2,negated_conjecture,
    ~ c_in(c_Event_Oevent_OSays(v_A,v_B,c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(X1,c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(v_K,c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_NB)))),c_List_Oset(v_evs4,tc_Event_Oevent),tc_Event_Oevent),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[cls_conjecture_11]) ).

cnf(c_0_3,negated_conjecture,
    c_in(c_Event_Oevent_OSays(v_A,v_B,c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(v_Xa,c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(v_K,c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_NB)))),c_List_Oset(v_evs4,tc_Event_Oevent),tc_Event_Oevent),
    cls_conjecture_7 ).

cnf(c_0_4,negated_conjecture,
    ~ c_in(c_Event_Oevent_OSays(v_A,v_B,c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(X1,c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(v_K,c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_NB)))),c_List_Oset(v_evs4,tc_Event_Oevent),tc_Event_Oevent),
    c_0_2 ).

cnf(c_0_5,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[c_0_3,c_0_4]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.06/0.11  % Problem    : SWV334-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.06/0.12  % Command    : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.11/0.33  % Computer : n006.cluster.edu
% 0.11/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.11/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.11/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.11/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.11/0.33  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.11/0.33  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.11/0.33  % DateTime   : Fri May  3 16:40:53 EDT 2024
% 0.11/0.33  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.47/0.62  Running first-order model finding
% 0.47/0.62  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --satauto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.wel6HBVgRb/E---3.1_14680.p
% 0.62/0.69  # Version: 3.1.0
% 0.62/0.69  # Preprocessing class: FMLMSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.62/0.69  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.62/0.69  # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.62/0.69  # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.62/0.69  # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.62/0.69  # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.62/0.69  # new_bool_1 with pid 14759 completed with status 0
% 0.62/0.69  # Result found by new_bool_1
% 0.62/0.69  # Preprocessing class: FMLMSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.62/0.69  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.62/0.69  # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.62/0.69  # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.62/0.69  # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.62/0.69  # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.62/0.69  # Search class: FGHSM-FSLM31-DFFFFFNN
% 0.62/0.69  # Scheduled 6 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.62/0.69  # Starting G-E--_208_C18C--_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 136s (1) cores
% 0.62/0.69  # G-E--_208_C18C--_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with pid 14761 completed with status 0
% 0.62/0.69  # Result found by G-E--_208_C18C--_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN
% 0.62/0.69  # Preprocessing class: FMLMSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.62/0.69  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.62/0.69  # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.62/0.69  # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.62/0.69  # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.62/0.69  # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.62/0.69  # Search class: FGHSM-FSLM31-DFFFFFNN
% 0.62/0.69  # Scheduled 6 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.62/0.69  # Starting G-E--_208_C18C--_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 136s (1) cores
% 0.62/0.69  # Preprocessing time       : 0.008 s
% 0.62/0.69  # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.62/0.69  
% 0.62/0.69  # Proof found!
% 0.62/0.69  # SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.62/0.69  # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.62/0.69  # Parsed axioms                        : 2973
% 0.62/0.69  # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 2350
% 0.62/0.69  # Initial clauses                      : 623
% 0.62/0.69  # Removed in clause preprocessing      : 0
% 0.62/0.69  # Initial clauses in saturation        : 623
% 0.62/0.69  # Processed clauses                    : 47
% 0.62/0.69  # ...of these trivial                  : 0
% 0.62/0.69  # ...subsumed                          : 7
% 0.62/0.69  # ...remaining for further processing  : 40
% 0.62/0.69  # Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 1
% 0.62/0.69  # Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 0.62/0.69  # Backward-subsumed                    : 0
% 0.62/0.69  # Backward-rewritten                   : 0
% 0.62/0.69  # Generated clauses                    : 2
% 0.62/0.69  # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 1
% 0.62/0.69  # ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
% 0.62/0.69  # Contextual simplify-reflections      : 0
% 0.62/0.69  # Paramodulations                      : 0
% 0.62/0.69  # Factorizations                       : 0
% 0.62/0.69  # NegExts                              : 0
% 0.62/0.69  # Equation resolutions                 : 1
% 0.62/0.69  # Disequality decompositions           : 0
% 0.62/0.69  # Total rewrite steps                  : 1
% 0.62/0.69  # ...of those cached                   : 0
% 0.62/0.69  # Propositional unsat checks           : 0
% 0.62/0.69  #    Propositional check models        : 0
% 0.62/0.69  #    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.62/0.69  #    Propositional clauses             : 0
% 0.62/0.69  #    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.62/0.69  #    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
% 0.62/0.69  #    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
% 0.62/0.69  #    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
% 0.62/0.69  #    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
% 0.62/0.69  #    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
% 0.62/0.69  #    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
% 0.62/0.69  #    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
% 0.62/0.69  # Current number of processed clauses  : 38
% 0.62/0.69  #    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 19
% 0.62/0.69  #    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.62/0.69  #    Negative unit clauses             : 16
% 0.62/0.69  #    Non-unit-clauses                  : 3
% 0.62/0.69  # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 577
% 0.62/0.69  # ...number of literals in the above   : 1281
% 0.62/0.69  # Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 0.62/0.69  # Current number of archived clauses   : 1
% 0.62/0.69  # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 1
% 0.62/0.69  # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 1
% 0.62/0.69  # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 0
% 0.62/0.69  # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 27
% 0.62/0.69  # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 0.62/0.69  # BW rewrite match attempts            : 0
% 0.62/0.69  # BW rewrite match successes           : 0
% 0.62/0.69  # Condensation attempts                : 0
% 0.62/0.69  # Condensation successes               : 0
% 0.62/0.69  # Termbank termtop insertions          : 34577
% 0.62/0.69  # Search garbage collected termcells   : 7724
% 0.62/0.69  
% 0.62/0.69  # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.62/0.69  # User time                : 0.019 s
% 0.62/0.69  # System time              : 0.007 s
% 0.62/0.69  # Total time               : 0.027 s
% 0.62/0.69  # Maximum resident set size: 4720 pages
% 0.62/0.69  
% 0.62/0.69  # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.62/0.69  # User time                : 0.051 s
% 0.62/0.69  # System time              : 0.010 s
% 0.62/0.69  # Total time               : 0.060 s
% 0.62/0.69  # Maximum resident set size: 3672 pages
% 0.62/0.69  % E---3.1 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------