TSTP Solution File: SWV331-1 by E---3.1.00
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.1.00
% Problem : SWV331-1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E %s %d THM
% Computer : n012.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Tue May 21 05:22:42 EDT 2024
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.15s 0.59s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.15s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 4
% Number of leaves : 6
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 17 ( 11 unt; 0 nHn; 17 RR)
% Number of literals : 32 ( 0 equ; 18 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 4 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 4 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 2 ( 1 usr; 1 prp; 0-3 aty)
% Number of functors : 17 ( 17 usr; 9 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 15 ( 3 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(cls_Public_OCrypt__imp__keysFor_0,axiom,
( c_in(X1,c_Message_OkeysFor(X3),tc_nat)
| ~ c_in(X1,c_Message_OsymKeys,tc_nat)
| ~ c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(X1,X2),X3,tc_Message_Omsg) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SWV005-6.ax',cls_Public_OCrypt__imp__keysFor_0) ).
cnf(cls_Yahalom_Onew__keys__not__used_0,axiom,
( c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OKey(X1),c_Event_Oused(X2),tc_Message_Omsg)
| ~ c_in(X1,c_Message_OkeysFor(c_Message_Oparts(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,X2))),tc_nat)
| ~ c_in(X1,c_Message_OsymKeys,tc_nat)
| ~ c_in(X2,c_Yahalom_Oyahalom,tc_List_Olist(tc_Event_Oevent)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SWV005-5.ax',cls_Yahalom_Onew__keys__not__used_0) ).
cnf(cls_conjecture_5,negated_conjecture,
c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(v_K,c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_NB)),c_Message_Oparts(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_evs3)),tc_Message_Omsg),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_5) ).
cnf(cls_conjecture_2,negated_conjecture,
c_in(v_K,c_Message_OsymKeys,tc_nat),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_2) ).
cnf(cls_conjecture_1,negated_conjecture,
~ c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OKey(v_K),c_Event_Oused(v_evs3),tc_Message_Omsg),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_1) ).
cnf(cls_conjecture_0,negated_conjecture,
c_in(v_evs3,c_Yahalom_Oyahalom,tc_List_Olist(tc_Event_Oevent)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_0) ).
cnf(c_0_6,plain,
( c_in(X1,c_Message_OkeysFor(X3),tc_nat)
| ~ c_in(X1,c_Message_OsymKeys,tc_nat)
| ~ c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(X1,X2),X3,tc_Message_Omsg) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[cls_Public_OCrypt__imp__keysFor_0]) ).
cnf(c_0_7,plain,
( c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OKey(X1),c_Event_Oused(X2),tc_Message_Omsg)
| ~ c_in(X1,c_Message_OkeysFor(c_Message_Oparts(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,X2))),tc_nat)
| ~ c_in(X1,c_Message_OsymKeys,tc_nat)
| ~ c_in(X2,c_Yahalom_Oyahalom,tc_List_Olist(tc_Event_Oevent)) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[cls_Yahalom_Onew__keys__not__used_0]) ).
cnf(c_0_8,plain,
( c_in(X1,c_Message_OkeysFor(X3),tc_nat)
| ~ c_in(X1,c_Message_OsymKeys,tc_nat)
| ~ c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(X1,X2),X3,tc_Message_Omsg) ),
c_0_6 ).
cnf(c_0_9,negated_conjecture,
c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(v_K,c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_NB)),c_Message_Oparts(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_evs3)),tc_Message_Omsg),
cls_conjecture_5 ).
cnf(c_0_10,negated_conjecture,
c_in(v_K,c_Message_OsymKeys,tc_nat),
cls_conjecture_2 ).
cnf(c_0_11,negated_conjecture,
~ c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OKey(v_K),c_Event_Oused(v_evs3),tc_Message_Omsg),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[cls_conjecture_1]) ).
cnf(c_0_12,plain,
( c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OKey(X1),c_Event_Oused(X2),tc_Message_Omsg)
| ~ c_in(X1,c_Message_OkeysFor(c_Message_Oparts(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,X2))),tc_nat)
| ~ c_in(X1,c_Message_OsymKeys,tc_nat)
| ~ c_in(X2,c_Yahalom_Oyahalom,tc_List_Olist(tc_Event_Oevent)) ),
c_0_7 ).
cnf(c_0_13,negated_conjecture,
c_in(v_K,c_Message_OkeysFor(c_Message_Oparts(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_evs3))),tc_nat),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_8,c_0_9]),c_0_10])]) ).
cnf(c_0_14,negated_conjecture,
c_in(v_evs3,c_Yahalom_Oyahalom,tc_List_Olist(tc_Event_Oevent)),
cls_conjecture_0 ).
cnf(c_0_15,negated_conjecture,
~ c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OKey(v_K),c_Event_Oused(v_evs3),tc_Message_Omsg),
c_0_11 ).
cnf(c_0_16,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_12,c_0_13]),c_0_14]),c_0_10])]),c_0_15]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.10 % Problem : SWV331-1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.10/0.10 % Command : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.10/0.31 % Computer : n012.cluster.edu
% 0.10/0.31 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.10/0.31 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.10/0.31 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.10/0.31 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.10/0.31 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.10/0.31 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.10/0.31 % DateTime : Sun May 19 09:14:38 EDT 2024
% 0.10/0.31 % CPUTime :
% 0.15/0.41 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.15/0.41 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.15/0.59 # Version: 3.1.0
% 0.15/0.59 # Preprocessing class: FMLMSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.15/0.59 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.15/0.59 # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.15/0.59 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.59 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.59 # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.59 # new_bool_1 with pid 1108 completed with status 0
% 0.15/0.59 # Result found by new_bool_1
% 0.15/0.59 # Preprocessing class: FMLMSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.15/0.59 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.15/0.59 # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.15/0.59 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.59 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.59 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.15/0.59 # Search class: FGHSM-FSLM31-DFFFFFNN
% 0.15/0.59 # Scheduled 6 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.15/0.59 # Starting G-E--_208_C18C--_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 136s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.59 # G-E--_208_C18C--_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with pid 1110 completed with status 0
% 0.15/0.59 # Result found by G-E--_208_C18C--_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN
% 0.15/0.59 # Preprocessing class: FMLMSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.15/0.59 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.15/0.59 # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.15/0.59 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.59 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.59 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.15/0.59 # Search class: FGHSM-FSLM31-DFFFFFNN
% 0.15/0.59 # Scheduled 6 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.15/0.59 # Starting G-E--_208_C18C--_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 136s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.59 # Preprocessing time : 0.007 s
% 0.15/0.59 # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.15/0.59
% 0.15/0.59 # Proof found!
% 0.15/0.59 # SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.15/0.59 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.15/0.59 # Parsed axioms : 2969
% 0.15/0.59 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 2350
% 0.15/0.59 # Initial clauses : 619
% 0.15/0.59 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.15/0.59 # Initial clauses in saturation : 619
% 0.15/0.59 # Processed clauses : 1723
% 0.15/0.59 # ...of these trivial : 33
% 0.15/0.59 # ...subsumed : 572
% 0.15/0.59 # ...remaining for further processing : 1118
% 0.15/0.59 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 14
% 0.15/0.59 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.15/0.59 # Backward-subsumed : 3
% 0.15/0.59 # Backward-rewritten : 11
% 0.15/0.59 # Generated clauses : 2520
% 0.15/0.59 # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 2006
% 0.15/0.59 # ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.15/0.59 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 1
% 0.15/0.59 # Paramodulations : 2474
% 0.15/0.59 # Factorizations : 0
% 0.15/0.59 # NegExts : 0
% 0.15/0.59 # Equation resolutions : 46
% 0.15/0.59 # Disequality decompositions : 0
% 0.15/0.59 # Total rewrite steps : 1247
% 0.15/0.59 # ...of those cached : 787
% 0.15/0.59 # Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.15/0.59 # Propositional check models : 0
% 0.15/0.59 # Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.15/0.59 # Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.15/0.59 # Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.15/0.59 # Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.15/0.59 # Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.15/0.59 # Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.15/0.59 # Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.15/0.59 # Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.15/0.59 # Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.15/0.59 # Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.15/0.59 # Current number of processed clauses : 560
% 0.15/0.59 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 209
% 0.15/0.59 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 3
% 0.15/0.59 # Negative unit clauses : 147
% 0.15/0.59 # Non-unit-clauses : 201
% 0.15/0.59 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 1445
% 0.15/0.59 # ...number of literals in the above : 2545
% 0.15/0.59 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.15/0.59 # Current number of archived clauses : 558
% 0.15/0.59 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 53253
% 0.15/0.59 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 26785
% 0.15/0.59 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 175
% 0.15/0.59 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 5894
% 0.15/0.59 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.15/0.59 # BW rewrite match attempts : 116
% 0.15/0.59 # BW rewrite match successes : 11
% 0.15/0.59 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.15/0.59 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.15/0.59 # Termbank termtop insertions : 69422
% 0.15/0.59 # Search garbage collected termcells : 7712
% 0.15/0.59
% 0.15/0.59 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.15/0.59 # User time : 0.102 s
% 0.15/0.59 # System time : 0.012 s
% 0.15/0.59 # Total time : 0.115 s
% 0.15/0.59 # Maximum resident set size: 4680 pages
% 0.15/0.59
% 0.15/0.59 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.15/0.59 # User time : 0.151 s
% 0.15/0.59 # System time : 0.015 s
% 0.15/0.59 # Total time : 0.165 s
% 0.15/0.59 # Maximum resident set size: 3636 pages
% 0.15/0.59 % E---3.1 exiting
% 0.15/0.59 % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------