TSTP Solution File: SWV326-2 by SATCoP---0.1
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : SATCoP---0.1
% Problem : SWV326-2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : satcop --statistics %s
% Computer : n025.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Wed Jul 20 21:28:32 EDT 2022
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.14s 0.37s
% Output : Proof 0.14s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : ERROR: Analysing output (MakeTreeStats fails)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(g0,plain,
~ c_in(c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_NAa),c_Event_Oused(v_evs1),tc_Message_Omsg),
inference(ground_cnf,[],[file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_2)]) ).
cnf(g1,plain,
( sPE(v_C,v_Ba)
| c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(c_Public_OshrK(v_A),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(v_NA,c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(v_A),c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(v_C)))),c_Message_Oparts(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_evs1)),tc_Message_Omsg) ),
inference(ground_cnf,[],[file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_21)]) ).
cnf(g2,plain,
( ~ sPE(v_Ba,v_C)
| c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(c_Public_OshrK(v_Aa),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_NAa),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(v_Aa),c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(v_B)))),c_Message_Oparts(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_evs1)),tc_Message_Omsg) ),
inference(ground_cnf,[],[file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_32)]) ).
cnf(g3,plain,
sPE(v_NA,c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_NAa)),
inference(ground_cnf,[],[file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_5)]) ).
cnf(g4,plain,
( ~ c_in(c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_NAa),c_Message_Oparts(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_evs1)),tc_Message_Omsg)
| c_in(c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_NAa),c_Event_Oused(v_evs1),tc_Message_Omsg) ),
inference(ground_cnf,[],[file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_Event_Oc_A_58_Aparts_A_Iknows_ASpy_Aevs1_J_A_61_61_62_Ac_A_58_Aused_Aevs1_0)]) ).
cnf(g5,plain,
( ~ c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(c_Public_OshrK(v_A),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(v_NA,c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(v_A),c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(v_C)))),c_Message_Oparts(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_evs1)),tc_Message_Omsg)
| c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(v_NA,c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(v_A),c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(v_C))),c_Message_Oparts(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_evs1)),tc_Message_Omsg) ),
inference(ground_cnf,[],[file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_Message_Oparts_OBody__dest_0)]) ).
cnf(g6,plain,
( ~ sPE(v_C,v_Ba)
| sPE(v_Ba,v_C) ),
inference(ground_cnf,[],[theory(equality)]) ).
cnf(g7,plain,
( ~ c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(c_Public_OshrK(v_Aa),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_NAa),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(v_Aa),c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(v_B)))),c_Message_Oparts(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_evs1)),tc_Message_Omsg)
| c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_NAa),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(v_Aa),c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(v_B))),c_Message_Oparts(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_evs1)),tc_Message_Omsg) ),
inference(ground_cnf,[],[file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_Message_Oparts_OBody__dest_0)]) ).
cnf(g8,plain,
sPE(tc_Message_Omsg,tc_Message_Omsg),
inference(ground_cnf,[],[theory(equality)]) ).
cnf(g9,plain,
sPE(c_Event_Oused(v_evs1),c_Event_Oused(v_evs1)),
inference(ground_cnf,[],[theory(equality)]) ).
cnf(g10,plain,
( ~ sPE(v_NA,c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_NAa))
| ~ sPE(c_Event_Oused(v_evs1),c_Event_Oused(v_evs1))
| ~ sPE(tc_Message_Omsg,tc_Message_Omsg)
| ~ c_in(v_NA,c_Event_Oused(v_evs1),tc_Message_Omsg)
| c_in(c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_NAa),c_Event_Oused(v_evs1),tc_Message_Omsg) ),
inference(ground_cnf,[],[theory(equality)]) ).
cnf(g11,plain,
( ~ c_in(v_NA,c_Message_Oparts(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_evs1)),tc_Message_Omsg)
| c_in(v_NA,c_Event_Oused(v_evs1),tc_Message_Omsg) ),
inference(ground_cnf,[],[file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_Event_Oc_A_58_Aparts_A_Iknows_ASpy_Aevs1_J_A_61_61_62_Ac_A_58_Aused_Aevs1_0)]) ).
cnf(g12,plain,
( ~ c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(v_NA,c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(v_A),c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(v_C))),c_Message_Oparts(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_evs1)),tc_Message_Omsg)
| c_in(v_NA,c_Message_Oparts(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_evs1)),tc_Message_Omsg) ),
inference(ground_cnf,[],[file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_Message_OMPair__parts_1)]) ).
cnf(g13,plain,
( ~ c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_NAa),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(v_Aa),c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(v_B))),c_Message_Oparts(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_evs1)),tc_Message_Omsg)
| c_in(c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_NAa),c_Message_Oparts(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_evs1)),tc_Message_Omsg) ),
inference(ground_cnf,[],[file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_Message_OMPair__parts_1)]) ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.12 % Problem : SWV326-2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.07/0.13 % Command : satcop --statistics %s
% 0.14/0.34 % Computer : n025.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.34 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.14/0.34 % DateTime : Wed Jun 15 01:44:10 EDT 2022
% 0.14/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.14/0.37 % symbols: 21
% 0.14/0.37 % clauses: 20
% 0.14/0.37 % start clauses: 5
% 0.14/0.37 % iterative deepening steps: 52
% 0.14/0.37 % maximum path limit: 2
% 0.14/0.37 % literal attempts: 12257
% 0.14/0.37 % depth failures: 7501
% 0.14/0.37 % regularity failures: 38
% 0.14/0.37 % tautology failures: 232
% 0.14/0.37 % reductions: 3819
% 0.14/0.37 % extensions: 8328
% 0.14/0.37 % SAT variables: 5847
% 0.14/0.37 % SAT clauses: 4811
% 0.14/0.37 % WalkSAT solutions: 4812
% 0.14/0.37 % CDCL solutions: 0
% 0.14/0.37 % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark
% 0.14/0.37 % SZS output start ListOfCNF for theBenchmark
% See solution above
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------