TSTP Solution File: SWV324-1 by E-SAT---3.1.00
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E-SAT---3.1.00
% Problem : SWV324-1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E %s %d THM
% Computer : n023.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Tue May 21 05:34:19 EDT 2024
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.15s 0.46s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.15s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 7
% Number of leaves : 9
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 33 ( 12 unt; 2 nHn; 33 RR)
% Number of literals : 54 ( 3 equ; 23 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 7 ( 2 avg)
% Number of predicates : 3 ( 1 usr; 1 prp; 0-3 aty)
% Number of functors : 23 ( 23 usr; 13 con; 0-3 aty)
% Number of variables : 48 ( 16 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(cls_Event_OSays__imp__analz__Spy__dest_0,axiom,
( c_in(X3,c_Message_Oanalz(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,X4)),tc_Message_Omsg)
| ~ c_in(c_Event_Oevent_OSays(X1,X2,X3),c_List_Oset(X4,tc_Event_Oevent),tc_Event_Oevent) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SWV006-2.ax',cls_Event_OSays__imp__analz__Spy__dest_0) ).
cnf(cls_Message_OMPair__analz_0,axiom,
( c_in(X2,c_Message_Oanalz(X3),tc_Message_Omsg)
| ~ c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(X1,X2),c_Message_Oanalz(X3),tc_Message_Omsg) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SWV006-0.ax',cls_Message_OMPair__analz_0) ).
cnf(cls_conjecture_1,negated_conjecture,
c_in(c_Event_Oevent_OSays(c_Message_Oagent_OServer,v_B,c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_NA),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(v_X,c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(c_Public_OshrK(v_B),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_NB),c_Message_Omsg_OKey(v_K)))))),c_List_Oset(v_evso,tc_Event_Oevent),tc_Event_Oevent),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_1) ).
cnf(cls_Message_Oparts_OBody__dest_0,axiom,
( c_in(X2,c_Message_Oparts(X3),tc_Message_Omsg)
| ~ c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(X1,X2),c_Message_Oparts(X3),tc_Message_Omsg) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SWV006-2.ax',cls_Message_Oparts_OBody__dest_0) ).
cnf(cls_Message_Oanalz__into__parts__dest_0,axiom,
( c_in(X1,c_Message_Oparts(X2),tc_Message_Omsg)
| ~ c_in(X1,c_Message_Oanalz(X2),tc_Message_Omsg) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SWV006-2.ax',cls_Message_Oanalz__into__parts__dest_0) ).
cnf(cls_conjecture_2,negated_conjecture,
~ c_in(v_A,c_Event_Obad,tc_Message_Oagent),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_2) ).
cnf(cls_conjecture_3,negated_conjecture,
( c_in(v_A,c_Event_Obad,tc_Message_Oagent)
| ~ c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OKey(c_Public_OshrK(v_A)),c_Message_Oparts(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_evso)),tc_Message_Omsg) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_3) ).
cnf(cls_conjecture_6,negated_conjecture,
( c_Public_OshrK(v_A) = v_K
| c_in(v_A,c_Event_Obad,tc_Message_Oagent) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_6) ).
cnf(cls_Message_OMPair__parts_0,axiom,
( c_in(X2,c_Message_Oparts(X3),tc_Message_Omsg)
| ~ c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(X1,X2),c_Message_Oparts(X3),tc_Message_Omsg) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SWV006-0.ax',cls_Message_OMPair__parts_0) ).
cnf(c_0_9,plain,
( c_in(X3,c_Message_Oanalz(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,X4)),tc_Message_Omsg)
| ~ c_in(c_Event_Oevent_OSays(X1,X2,X3),c_List_Oset(X4,tc_Event_Oevent),tc_Event_Oevent) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[cls_Event_OSays__imp__analz__Spy__dest_0]) ).
cnf(c_0_10,plain,
( c_in(X2,c_Message_Oanalz(X3),tc_Message_Omsg)
| ~ c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(X1,X2),c_Message_Oanalz(X3),tc_Message_Omsg) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[cls_Message_OMPair__analz_0]) ).
cnf(c_0_11,plain,
( c_in(X3,c_Message_Oanalz(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,X4)),tc_Message_Omsg)
| ~ c_in(c_Event_Oevent_OSays(X1,X2,X3),c_List_Oset(X4,tc_Event_Oevent),tc_Event_Oevent) ),
c_0_9 ).
cnf(c_0_12,negated_conjecture,
c_in(c_Event_Oevent_OSays(c_Message_Oagent_OServer,v_B,c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_NA),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(v_X,c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(c_Public_OshrK(v_B),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_NB),c_Message_Omsg_OKey(v_K)))))),c_List_Oset(v_evso,tc_Event_Oevent),tc_Event_Oevent),
cls_conjecture_1 ).
cnf(c_0_13,plain,
( c_in(X2,c_Message_Oparts(X3),tc_Message_Omsg)
| ~ c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(X1,X2),c_Message_Oparts(X3),tc_Message_Omsg) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[cls_Message_Oparts_OBody__dest_0]) ).
cnf(c_0_14,plain,
( c_in(X1,c_Message_Oparts(X2),tc_Message_Omsg)
| ~ c_in(X1,c_Message_Oanalz(X2),tc_Message_Omsg) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[cls_Message_Oanalz__into__parts__dest_0]) ).
cnf(c_0_15,plain,
( c_in(X2,c_Message_Oanalz(X3),tc_Message_Omsg)
| ~ c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(X1,X2),c_Message_Oanalz(X3),tc_Message_Omsg) ),
c_0_10 ).
cnf(c_0_16,negated_conjecture,
c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_NA),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(v_X,c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(c_Public_OshrK(v_B),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_NB),c_Message_Omsg_OKey(v_K))))),c_Message_Oanalz(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_evso)),tc_Message_Omsg),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_11,c_0_12]) ).
cnf(c_0_17,negated_conjecture,
~ c_in(v_A,c_Event_Obad,tc_Message_Oagent),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[cls_conjecture_2]) ).
cnf(c_0_18,plain,
( c_in(X2,c_Message_Oparts(X3),tc_Message_Omsg)
| ~ c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(X1,X2),c_Message_Oparts(X3),tc_Message_Omsg) ),
c_0_13 ).
cnf(c_0_19,plain,
( c_in(X1,c_Message_Oparts(X2),tc_Message_Omsg)
| ~ c_in(X1,c_Message_Oanalz(X2),tc_Message_Omsg) ),
c_0_14 ).
cnf(c_0_20,negated_conjecture,
c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(v_X,c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(c_Public_OshrK(v_B),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_NB),c_Message_Omsg_OKey(v_K)))),c_Message_Oanalz(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_evso)),tc_Message_Omsg),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_15,c_0_16]) ).
cnf(c_0_21,negated_conjecture,
( c_in(v_A,c_Event_Obad,tc_Message_Oagent)
| ~ c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OKey(c_Public_OshrK(v_A)),c_Message_Oparts(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_evso)),tc_Message_Omsg) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[cls_conjecture_3]) ).
cnf(c_0_22,negated_conjecture,
( c_Public_OshrK(v_A) = v_K
| c_in(v_A,c_Event_Obad,tc_Message_Oagent) ),
cls_conjecture_6 ).
cnf(c_0_23,negated_conjecture,
~ c_in(v_A,c_Event_Obad,tc_Message_Oagent),
c_0_17 ).
cnf(c_0_24,plain,
( c_in(X2,c_Message_Oparts(X3),tc_Message_Omsg)
| ~ c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(X1,X2),c_Message_Oparts(X3),tc_Message_Omsg) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[cls_Message_OMPair__parts_0]) ).
cnf(c_0_25,plain,
( c_in(X1,c_Message_Oparts(X2),tc_Message_Omsg)
| ~ c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(X3,X1),c_Message_Oanalz(X2),tc_Message_Omsg) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_18,c_0_19]) ).
cnf(c_0_26,negated_conjecture,
c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(c_Public_OshrK(v_B),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_NB),c_Message_Omsg_OKey(v_K))),c_Message_Oanalz(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_evso)),tc_Message_Omsg),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_15,c_0_20]) ).
cnf(c_0_27,negated_conjecture,
( c_in(v_A,c_Event_Obad,tc_Message_Oagent)
| ~ c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OKey(c_Public_OshrK(v_A)),c_Message_Oparts(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_evso)),tc_Message_Omsg) ),
c_0_21 ).
cnf(c_0_28,negated_conjecture,
c_Public_OshrK(v_A) = v_K,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[c_0_22,c_0_23]) ).
cnf(c_0_29,plain,
( c_in(X2,c_Message_Oparts(X3),tc_Message_Omsg)
| ~ c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(X1,X2),c_Message_Oparts(X3),tc_Message_Omsg) ),
c_0_24 ).
cnf(c_0_30,negated_conjecture,
c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_NB),c_Message_Omsg_OKey(v_K)),c_Message_Oparts(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_evso)),tc_Message_Omsg),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_25,c_0_26]) ).
cnf(c_0_31,negated_conjecture,
~ c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OKey(v_K),c_Message_Oparts(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_evso)),tc_Message_Omsg),
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_27,c_0_28]),c_0_23]) ).
cnf(c_0_32,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_29,c_0_30]),c_0_31]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.09 % Problem : SWV324-1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.00/0.10 % Command : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.09/0.30 % Computer : n023.cluster.edu
% 0.09/0.30 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.09/0.30 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.09/0.30 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.09/0.30 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.09/0.30 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.09/0.30 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.09/0.30 % DateTime : Sun May 19 07:04:08 EDT 2024
% 0.09/0.30 % CPUTime :
% 0.15/0.40 Running first-order model finding
% 0.15/0.40 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --satauto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.15/0.46 # Version: 3.1.0
% 0.15/0.46 # Preprocessing class: FMLMSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.15/0.46 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.15/0.46 # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.15/0.46 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.46 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.46 # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.46 # new_bool_3 with pid 20841 completed with status 0
% 0.15/0.46 # Result found by new_bool_3
% 0.15/0.46 # Preprocessing class: FMLMSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.15/0.46 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.15/0.46 # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.15/0.46 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.46 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.15/0.46 # Search class: FGHSM-FFLS31-DFFFFFNN
% 0.15/0.46 # Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.15/0.46 # Starting G-E--_208_C02---_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 150s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.46 # G-E--_208_C02---_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with pid 20844 completed with status 0
% 0.15/0.46 # Result found by G-E--_208_C02---_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN
% 0.15/0.46 # Preprocessing class: FMLMSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.15/0.46 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.15/0.46 # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.15/0.46 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.46 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.15/0.46 # Search class: FGHSM-FFLS31-DFFFFFNN
% 0.15/0.46 # Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.15/0.46 # Starting G-E--_208_C02---_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 150s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.46 # Preprocessing time : 0.003 s
% 0.15/0.46 # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.15/0.46
% 0.15/0.46 # Proof found!
% 0.15/0.46 # SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.15/0.46 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.15/0.46 # Parsed axioms : 1477
% 0.15/0.46 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 1306
% 0.15/0.46 # Initial clauses : 171
% 0.15/0.46 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.15/0.46 # Initial clauses in saturation : 171
% 0.15/0.46 # Processed clauses : 392
% 0.15/0.46 # ...of these trivial : 5
% 0.15/0.46 # ...subsumed : 38
% 0.15/0.46 # ...remaining for further processing : 349
% 0.15/0.46 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.15/0.46 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.15/0.46 # Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.15/0.46 # Backward-rewritten : 3
% 0.15/0.46 # Generated clauses : 487
% 0.15/0.46 # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 390
% 0.15/0.46 # ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.15/0.46 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.15/0.46 # Paramodulations : 460
% 0.15/0.46 # Factorizations : 0
% 0.15/0.46 # NegExts : 0
% 0.15/0.46 # Equation resolutions : 27
% 0.15/0.46 # Disequality decompositions : 0
% 0.15/0.46 # Total rewrite steps : 47
% 0.15/0.46 # ...of those cached : 9
% 0.15/0.46 # Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.15/0.46 # Propositional check models : 0
% 0.15/0.46 # Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.15/0.46 # Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.15/0.46 # Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.15/0.46 # Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.15/0.46 # Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.15/0.46 # Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.15/0.46 # Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.15/0.46 # Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.15/0.46 # Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.15/0.46 # Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.15/0.46 # Current number of processed clauses : 207
% 0.15/0.46 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 55
% 0.15/0.46 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.15/0.46 # Negative unit clauses : 27
% 0.15/0.46 # Non-unit-clauses : 125
% 0.15/0.46 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 288
% 0.15/0.46 # ...number of literals in the above : 543
% 0.15/0.46 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.15/0.46 # Current number of archived clauses : 142
% 0.15/0.46 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 9611
% 0.15/0.46 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 8052
% 0.15/0.46 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 16
% 0.15/0.46 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 309
% 0.15/0.46 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.15/0.46 # BW rewrite match attempts : 53
% 0.15/0.46 # BW rewrite match successes : 3
% 0.15/0.46 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.15/0.46 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.15/0.46 # Termbank termtop insertions : 19586
% 0.15/0.46 # Search garbage collected termcells : 2835
% 0.15/0.46
% 0.15/0.46 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.15/0.46 # User time : 0.026 s
% 0.15/0.46 # System time : 0.004 s
% 0.15/0.46 # Total time : 0.030 s
% 0.15/0.46 # Maximum resident set size: 3048 pages
% 0.15/0.46
% 0.15/0.46 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.15/0.46 # User time : 0.048 s
% 0.15/0.46 # System time : 0.006 s
% 0.15/0.46 # Total time : 0.054 s
% 0.15/0.46 # Maximum resident set size: 2496 pages
% 0.15/0.46 % E---3.1 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------