TSTP Solution File: SWV317-1 by E---3.1.00
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.1.00
% Problem : SWV317-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E %s %d THM
% Computer : n003.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Sat May 4 09:43:41 EDT 2024
% Result : Unsatisfiable 2.58s 1.47s
% Output : CNFRefutation 2.58s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 5
% Number of leaves : 4
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 13 ( 11 unt; 2 nHn; 10 RR)
% Number of literals : 15 ( 3 equ; 6 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 3 ( 1 usr; 1 prp; 0-3 aty)
% Number of functors : 9 ( 9 usr; 6 con; 0-1 aty)
% Number of variables : 5 ( 5 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(cls_conjecture_3,negated_conjecture,
~ c_in(v_A,c_Event_Obad,tc_Message_Oagent),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.dqlhvTEkeM/E---3.1_30071.p',cls_conjecture_3) ).
cnf(cls_conjecture_7,negated_conjecture,
( c_Public_OshrK(v_A) = v_KAB
| c_in(v_A,c_Event_Obad,tc_Message_Oagent) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.dqlhvTEkeM/E---3.1_30071.p',cls_conjecture_7) ).
cnf(cls_conjecture_1,negated_conjecture,
~ c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OKey(v_KAB),c_Event_Oused(v_evs3),tc_Message_Omsg),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.dqlhvTEkeM/E---3.1_30071.p',cls_conjecture_1) ).
cnf(cls_Public_OshrK__in__used_0,axiom,
c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OKey(c_Public_OshrK(X1)),c_Event_Oused(X2),tc_Message_Omsg),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.dqlhvTEkeM/E---3.1_30071.p',cls_Public_OshrK__in__used_0) ).
cnf(c_0_4,negated_conjecture,
~ c_in(v_A,c_Event_Obad,tc_Message_Oagent),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[cls_conjecture_3]) ).
cnf(c_0_5,negated_conjecture,
( c_Public_OshrK(v_A) = v_KAB
| c_in(v_A,c_Event_Obad,tc_Message_Oagent) ),
cls_conjecture_7 ).
cnf(c_0_6,negated_conjecture,
~ c_in(v_A,c_Event_Obad,tc_Message_Oagent),
c_0_4 ).
cnf(c_0_7,negated_conjecture,
~ c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OKey(v_KAB),c_Event_Oused(v_evs3),tc_Message_Omsg),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[cls_conjecture_1]) ).
cnf(c_0_8,axiom,
c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OKey(c_Public_OshrK(X1)),c_Event_Oused(X2),tc_Message_Omsg),
cls_Public_OshrK__in__used_0 ).
cnf(c_0_9,negated_conjecture,
c_Public_OshrK(v_A) = v_KAB,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[c_0_5,c_0_6]) ).
cnf(c_0_10,negated_conjecture,
~ c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OKey(v_KAB),c_Event_Oused(v_evs3),tc_Message_Omsg),
c_0_7 ).
cnf(c_0_11,negated_conjecture,
c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OKey(v_KAB),c_Event_Oused(X1),tc_Message_Omsg),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_8,c_0_9]) ).
cnf(c_0_12,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_10,c_0_11])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.12/0.33 % Problem : SWV317-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.33/0.34 % Command : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.34/0.55 % Computer : n003.cluster.edu
% 0.34/0.55 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.34/0.55 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.34/0.55 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.34/0.55 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.34/0.55 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.34/0.55 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.34/0.55 % DateTime : Fri May 3 16:49:23 EDT 2024
% 0.34/0.55 % CPUTime :
% 0.53/0.97 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.53/0.97 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.dqlhvTEkeM/E---3.1_30071.p
% 2.58/1.47 # Version: 3.1.0
% 2.58/1.47 # Preprocessing class: FMLMSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 2.58/1.47 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 2.58/1.47 # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 2.58/1.47 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 2.58/1.47 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 2.58/1.47 # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 2.58/1.47 # new_bool_3 with pid 30322 completed with status 0
% 2.58/1.47 # Result found by new_bool_3
% 2.58/1.47 # Preprocessing class: FMLMSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 2.58/1.47 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 2.58/1.47 # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 2.58/1.47 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 2.58/1.47 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 2.58/1.47 # Search class: FGHSM-FSLM31-DFFFFFNN
% 2.58/1.47 # Scheduled 6 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 2.58/1.47 # Starting G-E--_208_C18C--_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 136s (1) cores
% 2.58/1.47 # G-E--_208_C18C--_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with pid 30332 completed with status 0
% 2.58/1.47 # Result found by G-E--_208_C18C--_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN
% 2.58/1.47 # Preprocessing class: FMLMSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 2.58/1.47 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 2.58/1.47 # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 2.58/1.47 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 2.58/1.47 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 2.58/1.47 # Search class: FGHSM-FSLM31-DFFFFFNN
% 2.58/1.47 # Scheduled 6 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 2.58/1.47 # Starting G-E--_208_C18C--_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 136s (1) cores
% 2.58/1.47 # Preprocessing time : 0.009 s
% 2.58/1.47 # Presaturation interreduction done
% 2.58/1.47
% 2.58/1.47 # Proof found!
% 2.58/1.47 # SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 2.58/1.47 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 2.58/1.47 # Parsed axioms : 2945
% 2.58/1.47 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 2348
% 2.58/1.47 # Initial clauses : 597
% 2.58/1.47 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 2.58/1.47 # Initial clauses in saturation : 597
% 2.58/1.47 # Processed clauses : 631
% 2.58/1.47 # ...of these trivial : 13
% 2.58/1.47 # ...subsumed : 59
% 2.58/1.47 # ...remaining for further processing : 559
% 2.58/1.47 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 2.58/1.47 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 2.58/1.47 # Backward-subsumed : 1
% 2.58/1.47 # Backward-rewritten : 7
% 2.58/1.47 # Generated clauses : 4
% 2.58/1.47 # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 2
% 2.58/1.47 # ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 2.58/1.47 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 1
% 2.58/1.47 # Paramodulations : 4
% 2.58/1.47 # Factorizations : 0
% 2.58/1.47 # NegExts : 0
% 2.58/1.47 # Equation resolutions : 0
% 2.58/1.47 # Disequality decompositions : 0
% 2.58/1.47 # Total rewrite steps : 49
% 2.58/1.47 # ...of those cached : 21
% 2.58/1.47 # Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 2.58/1.47 # Propositional check models : 0
% 2.58/1.47 # Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 2.58/1.47 # Propositional clauses : 0
% 2.58/1.47 # Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 2.58/1.47 # Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 2.58/1.47 # Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 2.58/1.47 # Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 2.58/1.47 # Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 2.58/1.47 # Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 2.58/1.47 # Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 2.58/1.47 # Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 2.58/1.47 # Current number of processed clauses : 32
% 2.58/1.47 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 15
% 2.58/1.47 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 2.58/1.47 # Negative unit clauses : 15
% 2.58/1.47 # Non-unit-clauses : 2
% 2.58/1.47 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 487
% 2.58/1.47 # ...number of literals in the above : 1088
% 2.58/1.47 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 2.58/1.47 # Current number of archived clauses : 527
% 2.58/1.47 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 46736
% 2.58/1.47 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 20265
% 2.58/1.47 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 37
% 2.58/1.47 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 1030
% 2.58/1.47 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 2.58/1.47 # BW rewrite match attempts : 36
% 2.58/1.47 # BW rewrite match successes : 7
% 2.58/1.47 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 2.58/1.47 # Condensation successes : 0
% 2.58/1.47 # Termbank termtop insertions : 39601
% 2.58/1.47 # Search garbage collected termcells : 7629
% 2.58/1.47
% 2.58/1.47 # -------------------------------------------------
% 2.58/1.47 # User time : 0.068 s
% 2.58/1.47 # System time : 0.009 s
% 2.58/1.47 # Total time : 0.077 s
% 2.58/1.47 # Maximum resident set size: 4636 pages
% 2.58/1.47
% 2.58/1.47 # -------------------------------------------------
% 2.58/1.47 # User time : 0.101 s
% 2.58/1.47 # System time : 0.010 s
% 2.58/1.47 # Total time : 0.111 s
% 2.58/1.47 # Maximum resident set size: 3644 pages
% 2.58/1.47 % E---3.1 exiting
% 2.58/1.47 % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------