TSTP Solution File: SWV310-2 by SOS---2.0

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SOS---2.0
% Problem  : SWV310-2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : sos-script %s

% Computer : n016.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Wed Jul 20 21:37:52 EDT 2022

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.19s 0.38s
% Output   : Refutation 0.19s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.12  % Problem  : SWV310-2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.12/0.13  % Command  : sos-script %s
% 0.12/0.33  % Computer : n016.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.12/0.33  % DateTime : Wed Jun 15 16:02:17 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.19/0.35  ----- Otter 3.2, August 2001 -----
% 0.19/0.35  The process was started by sandbox2 on n016.cluster.edu,
% 0.19/0.35  Wed Jun 15 16:02:17 2022
% 0.19/0.35  The command was "./sos".  The process ID is 30765.
% 0.19/0.35  
% 0.19/0.35  set(prolog_style_variables).
% 0.19/0.35  set(auto).
% 0.19/0.35     dependent: set(auto1).
% 0.19/0.35     dependent: set(process_input).
% 0.19/0.35     dependent: clear(print_kept).
% 0.19/0.35     dependent: clear(print_new_demod).
% 0.19/0.35     dependent: clear(print_back_demod).
% 0.19/0.35     dependent: clear(print_back_sub).
% 0.19/0.35     dependent: set(control_memory).
% 0.19/0.35     dependent: assign(max_mem, 12000).
% 0.19/0.35     dependent: assign(pick_given_ratio, 4).
% 0.19/0.35     dependent: assign(stats_level, 1).
% 0.19/0.35     dependent: assign(pick_semantic_ratio, 3).
% 0.19/0.35     dependent: assign(sos_limit, 5000).
% 0.19/0.35     dependent: assign(max_weight, 60).
% 0.19/0.35  clear(print_given).
% 0.19/0.35  
% 0.19/0.35  list(usable).
% 0.19/0.35  
% 0.19/0.35  SCAN INPUT: prop=0, horn=1, equality=0, symmetry=0, max_lits=2.
% 0.19/0.35  
% 0.19/0.35  This is a Horn set without equality.  The strategy will
% 0.19/0.35  be hyperresolution, with satellites in sos and nuclei
% 0.19/0.35  in usable.
% 0.19/0.35  
% 0.19/0.35     dependent: set(hyper_res).
% 0.19/0.35     dependent: clear(order_hyper).
% 0.19/0.35  
% 0.19/0.35  ------------> process usable:
% 0.19/0.35  
% 0.19/0.35  ------------> process sos:
% 0.19/0.35  
% 0.19/0.35  ======= end of input processing =======
% 0.19/0.38  
% 0.19/0.38  Model 1 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.19/0.38  
% 0.19/0.38  Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 0.19/0.38  
% 0.19/0.38  
% 0.19/0.38  -------------- Softie stats --------------
% 0.19/0.38  
% 0.19/0.38  UPDATE_STOP: 300
% 0.19/0.38  SFINDER_TIME_LIMIT: 2
% 0.19/0.38  SHORT_CLAUSE_CUTOFF: 4
% 0.19/0.38  number of clauses in intial UL: 2
% 0.19/0.38  number of clauses initially in problem: 3
% 0.19/0.38  percentage of clauses intially in UL: 66
% 0.19/0.38  percentage of distinct symbols occuring in initial UL: 100
% 0.19/0.38  percent of all initial clauses that are short: 66
% 0.19/0.38  absolute distinct symbol count: 17
% 0.19/0.38     distinct predicate count: 1
% 0.19/0.38     distinct function count: 7
% 0.19/0.38     distinct constant count: 9
% 0.19/0.38  
% 0.19/0.38  ---------- no more Softie stats ----------
% 0.19/0.38  
% 0.19/0.38  
% 0.19/0.38  
% 0.19/0.38  =========== start of search ===========
% 0.19/0.38  
% 0.19/0.38  -------- PROOF -------- 
% 0.19/0.38  % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.19/0.38  % SZS output start Refutation
% 0.19/0.38  
% 0.19/0.38  ----> UNIT CONFLICT at   0.01 sec ----> 5 [binary,4.1,1.1] {-} $F.
% 0.19/0.38  
% 0.19/0.38  Length of proof is 1.  Level of proof is 1.
% 0.19/0.38  
% 0.19/0.38  ---------------- PROOF ----------------
% 0.19/0.38  % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.19/0.38  % SZS output start Refutation
% 0.19/0.38  
% 0.19/0.38  1 [] {+} -c_in(c_Event_Oevent_OSays(v_B,c_Message_Oagent_OServer,c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(v_NA,c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(v_A),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(v_B),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(A,c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(c_Public_OshrK(v_B),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(v_NA,c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(v_NB,c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(v_A),c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(v_B)))))))))),c_List_Oset(v_evs2,tc_Event_Oevent),tc_Event_Oevent).
% 0.19/0.38  2 [] {+} c_in(c_Event_Oevent_OSays(v_B,c_Message_Oagent_OServer,c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(v_NA,c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(v_A),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(v_B),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(v_x,c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(c_Public_OshrK(v_B),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(v_NA,c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(v_NB,c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(v_A),c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(v_B)))))))))),c_List_Oset(v_evs2,tc_Event_Oevent),tc_Event_Oevent)| -c_in(c_Event_Oevent_OSays(c_Message_Oagent_OServer,v_B,c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(v_NA,c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(c_Public_OshrK(v_A),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(v_NA,c_Message_Omsg_OKey(v_K))),c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(c_Public_OshrK(v_B),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(v_NB,c_Message_Omsg_OKey(v_K)))))),c_List_Oset(v_evs2,tc_Event_Oevent),tc_Event_Oevent).
% 0.19/0.38  3 [] {-} c_in(c_Event_Oevent_OSays(c_Message_Oagent_OServer,v_B,c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(v_NA,c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(c_Public_OshrK(v_A),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(v_NA,c_Message_Omsg_OKey(v_K))),c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(c_Public_OshrK(v_B),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(v_NB,c_Message_Omsg_OKey(v_K)))))),c_List_Oset(v_evs2,tc_Event_Oevent),tc_Event_Oevent).
% 0.19/0.38  4 [hyper,3,2] {-} c_in(c_Event_Oevent_OSays(v_B,c_Message_Oagent_OServer,c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(v_NA,c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(v_A),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(v_B),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(v_x,c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(c_Public_OshrK(v_B),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(v_NA,c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(v_NB,c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(v_A),c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(v_B)))))))))),c_List_Oset(v_evs2,tc_Event_Oevent),tc_Event_Oevent).
% 0.19/0.38  5 [binary,4.1,1.1] {-} $F.
% 0.19/0.38  
% 0.19/0.38  % SZS output end Refutation
% 0.19/0.38  ------------ end of proof -------------
% 0.19/0.38  
% 0.19/0.38  
% 0.19/0.38  Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 0.19/0.38  
% 0.19/0.38  
% 0.19/0.38  Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 0.19/0.38  
% 0.19/0.38  ============ end of search ============
% 0.19/0.38  
% 0.19/0.38  ----------- soft-scott stats ----------
% 0.19/0.38  
% 0.19/0.38  true clauses given           0      (0.0%)
% 0.19/0.38  false clauses given          1
% 0.19/0.38  
% 0.19/0.38        FALSE     TRUE
% 0.19/0.38  tot:  0         0      (-nan% true)
% 0.19/0.38  
% 0.19/0.38  
% 0.19/0.38  Model 1 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.19/0.38  
% 0.19/0.38  That finishes the proof of the theorem.
% 0.19/0.38  
% 0.19/0.38  Process 30765 finished Wed Jun 15 16:02:18 2022
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------