TSTP Solution File: SWV310-1 by Vampire---4.8

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Vampire---4.8
% Problem  : SWV310-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule file --schedule_file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/quickGreedyProduceRating_steal_pow3.txt --cores 8 -m 12000 -t %d %s

% Computer : n010.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Sun May  5 10:28:59 EDT 2024

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.62s 0.78s
% Output   : Refutation 0.62s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    4
%            Number of leaves      :    6
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   12 (   5 unt;   1 typ;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :  204 (   0 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    2 (  18 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   12 (   6   ~;   4   |;   0   &)
%                                         (   2 <=>;   0  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    3 (   2 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    1 (   1 avg)
%            Number of FOOLs       :  187 ( 187 fml;   0 var)
%            Number of types       :    2 (   0 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :    2 (   1   >;   1   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of predicates  :   21 (  20 usr;  12 prp; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    0 (   0 usr;   0 con; --- aty)
%            Number of variables   :    2 (   1   !;   0   ?;   2   :)
%                                         (   1  !>;   0  ?*;   0  @-;   0  @+)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
tff(pred_def_82,type,
    sQ0_eqProxy: 
      !>[X0: $tType] : ( ( X0 * X0 ) > $o ) ).

tff(f1559,plain,
    $false,
    inference(avatar_sat_refutation,[],[f1538,f1556,f1558]) ).

tff(f1558,plain,
    ~ spl1_1,
    inference(avatar_contradiction_clause,[],[f1557]) ).

tff(f1557,plain,
    ( $false
    | ~ spl1_1 ),
    inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f1533,f1481]) ).

tff(f1481,axiom,
    ! [X24: $i] : ~ c_in(c_Event_Oevent_OSays(v_B,c_Message_Oagent_OServer,c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(v_NA,c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(v_A),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(v_B),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(X24,c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(c_Public_OshrK(v_B),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(v_NA,c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(v_NB,c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(v_A),c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(v_B)))))))))),c_List_Oset(v_evs2,tc_Event_Oevent),tc_Event_Oevent),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.divq6j0SgB/Vampire---4.8_20325',cls_conjecture_5) ).

tff(f1533,plain,
    ( c_in(c_Event_Oevent_OSays(v_B,c_Message_Oagent_OServer,c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(v_NA,c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(v_A),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(v_B),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(v_x,c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(c_Public_OshrK(v_B),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(v_NA,c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(v_NB,c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(v_A),c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(v_B)))))))))),c_List_Oset(v_evs2,tc_Event_Oevent),tc_Event_Oevent)
    | ~ spl1_1 ),
    inference(avatar_component_clause,[],[f1531]) ).

tff(f1531,plain,
    ( spl1_1
  <=> c_in(c_Event_Oevent_OSays(v_B,c_Message_Oagent_OServer,c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(v_NA,c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(v_A),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(v_B),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(v_x,c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(c_Public_OshrK(v_B),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(v_NA,c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(v_NB,c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(v_A),c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(v_B)))))))))),c_List_Oset(v_evs2,tc_Event_Oevent),tc_Event_Oevent) ),
    introduced(avatar_definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl1_1])]) ).

tff(f1556,plain,
    spl1_2,
    inference(avatar_split_clause,[],[f1480,f1535]) ).

tff(f1535,plain,
    ( spl1_2
  <=> c_in(c_Event_Oevent_OSays(c_Message_Oagent_OServer,v_B,c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(v_NA,c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(c_Public_OshrK(v_A),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(v_NA,c_Message_Omsg_OKey(v_K))),c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(c_Public_OshrK(v_B),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(v_NB,c_Message_Omsg_OKey(v_K)))))),c_List_Oset(v_evs2,tc_Event_Oevent),tc_Event_Oevent) ),
    introduced(avatar_definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl1_2])]) ).

tff(f1480,axiom,
    c_in(c_Event_Oevent_OSays(c_Message_Oagent_OServer,v_B,c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(v_NA,c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(c_Public_OshrK(v_A),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(v_NA,c_Message_Omsg_OKey(v_K))),c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(c_Public_OshrK(v_B),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(v_NB,c_Message_Omsg_OKey(v_K)))))),c_List_Oset(v_evs2,tc_Event_Oevent),tc_Event_Oevent),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.divq6j0SgB/Vampire---4.8_20325',cls_conjecture_4) ).

tff(f1538,plain,
    ( spl1_1
    | ~ spl1_2 ),
    inference(avatar_split_clause,[],[f1482,f1535,f1531]) ).

tff(f1482,axiom,
    ( ~ c_in(c_Event_Oevent_OSays(c_Message_Oagent_OServer,v_B,c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(v_NA,c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(c_Public_OshrK(v_A),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(v_NA,c_Message_Omsg_OKey(v_K))),c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(c_Public_OshrK(v_B),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(v_NB,c_Message_Omsg_OKey(v_K)))))),c_List_Oset(v_evs2,tc_Event_Oevent),tc_Event_Oevent)
    | c_in(c_Event_Oevent_OSays(v_B,c_Message_Oagent_OServer,c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(v_NA,c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(v_A),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(v_B),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(v_x,c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(c_Public_OshrK(v_B),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(v_NA,c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(v_NB,c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(v_A),c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(v_B)))))))))),c_List_Oset(v_evs2,tc_Event_Oevent),tc_Event_Oevent) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.divq6j0SgB/Vampire---4.8_20325',cls_conjecture_6) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.12/0.12  % Problem    : SWV310-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.12/0.14  % Command    : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule file --schedule_file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/quickGreedyProduceRating_steal_pow3.txt --cores 8 -m 12000 -t %d %s
% 0.15/0.35  % Computer : n010.cluster.edu
% 0.15/0.35  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.15/0.35  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.15/0.35  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.15/0.35  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.15/0.35  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.15/0.35  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.15/0.35  % DateTime   : Fri May  3 20:58:38 EDT 2024
% 0.15/0.35  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.15/0.35  This is a CNF_UNS_RFO_SEQ_NHN problem
% 0.15/0.35  Running vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule file --schedule_file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/quickGreedyProduceRating_steal_pow3.txt --cores 8 -m 12000 -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.divq6j0SgB/Vampire---4.8_20325
% 0.62/0.77  % (20459)dis-1011_2:1_sil=2000:lsd=20:nwc=5.0:flr=on:mep=off:st=3.0:i=34:sd=1:ep=RS:ss=axioms_0 on Vampire---4 for (2995ds/34Mi)
% 0.62/0.77  % (20461)lrs+1011_1:1_sil=8000:sp=occurrence:nwc=10.0:i=78:ss=axioms:sgt=8_0 on Vampire---4 for (2995ds/78Mi)
% 0.62/0.77  % (20462)ott+1011_1:1_sil=2000:urr=on:i=33:sd=1:kws=inv_frequency:ss=axioms:sup=off_0 on Vampire---4 for (2995ds/33Mi)
% 0.62/0.77  % (20460)lrs+1011_461:32768_sil=16000:irw=on:sp=frequency:lsd=20:fd=preordered:nwc=10.0:s2agt=32:alpa=false:cond=fast:s2a=on:i=51:s2at=3.0:awrs=decay:awrsf=691:bd=off:nm=20:fsr=off:amm=sco:uhcvi=on:rawr=on_0 on Vampire---4 for (2995ds/51Mi)
% 0.62/0.77  % (20465)lrs+21_1:5_sil=2000:sos=on:urr=on:newcnf=on:slsq=on:i=83:slsql=off:bd=off:nm=2:ss=axioms:st=1.5:sp=const_min:gsp=on:rawr=on_0 on Vampire---4 for (2995ds/83Mi)
% 0.62/0.77  % (20466)lrs-21_1:1_to=lpo:sil=2000:sp=frequency:sos=on:lma=on:i=56:sd=2:ss=axioms:ep=R_0 on Vampire---4 for (2995ds/56Mi)
% 0.62/0.77  % (20464)lrs+1002_1:16_to=lpo:sil=32000:sp=unary_frequency:sos=on:i=45:bd=off:ss=axioms_0 on Vampire---4 for (2995ds/45Mi)
% 0.62/0.77  % (20462)Also succeeded, but the first one will report.
% 0.62/0.77  % (20459)First to succeed.
% 0.62/0.77  % (20463)lrs+2_1:1_sil=16000:fde=none:sos=all:nwc=5.0:i=34:ep=RS:s2pl=on:lma=on:afp=100000_0 on Vampire---4 for (2995ds/34Mi)
% 0.62/0.77  % (20461)Also succeeded, but the first one will report.
% 0.62/0.77  % (20466)Also succeeded, but the first one will report.
% 0.62/0.77  % (20459)Solution written to "/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/vampire-proof-20458"
% 0.62/0.78  % (20459)Refutation found. Thanks to Tanya!
% 0.62/0.78  % SZS status Unsatisfiable for Vampire---4
% 0.62/0.78  % SZS output start Proof for Vampire---4
% See solution above
% 0.62/0.78  % (20459)------------------------------
% 0.62/0.78  % (20459)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 3a798227e on 2024-05-03 07:42:47 +0200)
% 0.62/0.78  % (20459)Termination reason: Refutation
% 0.62/0.78  
% 0.62/0.78  % (20459)Memory used [KB]: 1973
% 0.62/0.78  % (20459)Time elapsed: 0.006 s
% 0.62/0.78  % (20459)Instructions burned: 11 (million)
% 0.62/0.78  % (20458)Success in time 0.416 s
% 0.62/0.78  % Vampire---4.8 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------