TSTP Solution File: SWV306-2 by Prover9---1109a
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Prover9---1109a
% Problem : SWV306-2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : tptp2X_and_run_prover9 %d %s
% Computer : n007.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Wed Jul 20 21:11:43 EDT 2022
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.43s 0.99s
% Output : Refutation 0.43s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.12 % Problem : SWV306-2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.03/0.13 % Command : tptp2X_and_run_prover9 %d %s
% 0.12/0.34 % Computer : n007.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.34 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.12/0.34 % DateTime : Wed Jun 15 00:34:25 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.43/0.99 ============================== Prover9 ===============================
% 0.43/0.99 Prover9 (32) version 2009-11A, November 2009.
% 0.43/0.99 Process 26470 was started by sandbox on n007.cluster.edu,
% 0.43/0.99 Wed Jun 15 00:34:26 2022
% 0.43/0.99 The command was "/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/prover9 -t 300 -f /tmp/Prover9_26317_n007.cluster.edu".
% 0.43/0.99 ============================== end of head ===========================
% 0.43/0.99
% 0.43/0.99 ============================== INPUT =================================
% 0.43/0.99
% 0.43/0.99 % Reading from file /tmp/Prover9_26317_n007.cluster.edu
% 0.43/0.99
% 0.43/0.99 set(prolog_style_variables).
% 0.43/0.99 set(auto2).
% 0.43/0.99 % set(auto2) -> set(auto).
% 0.43/0.99 % set(auto) -> set(auto_inference).
% 0.43/0.99 % set(auto) -> set(auto_setup).
% 0.43/0.99 % set(auto_setup) -> set(predicate_elim).
% 0.43/0.99 % set(auto_setup) -> assign(eq_defs, unfold).
% 0.43/0.99 % set(auto) -> set(auto_limits).
% 0.43/0.99 % set(auto_limits) -> assign(max_weight, "100.000").
% 0.43/0.99 % set(auto_limits) -> assign(sos_limit, 20000).
% 0.43/0.99 % set(auto) -> set(auto_denials).
% 0.43/0.99 % set(auto) -> set(auto_process).
% 0.43/0.99 % set(auto2) -> assign(new_constants, 1).
% 0.43/0.99 % set(auto2) -> assign(fold_denial_max, 3).
% 0.43/0.99 % set(auto2) -> assign(max_weight, "200.000").
% 0.43/0.99 % set(auto2) -> assign(max_hours, 1).
% 0.43/0.99 % assign(max_hours, 1) -> assign(max_seconds, 3600).
% 0.43/0.99 % set(auto2) -> assign(max_seconds, 0).
% 0.43/0.99 % set(auto2) -> assign(max_minutes, 5).
% 0.43/0.99 % assign(max_minutes, 5) -> assign(max_seconds, 300).
% 0.43/0.99 % set(auto2) -> set(sort_initial_sos).
% 0.43/0.99 % set(auto2) -> assign(sos_limit, -1).
% 0.43/0.99 % set(auto2) -> assign(lrs_ticks, 3000).
% 0.43/0.99 % set(auto2) -> assign(max_megs, 400).
% 0.43/0.99 % set(auto2) -> assign(stats, some).
% 0.43/0.99 % set(auto2) -> clear(echo_input).
% 0.43/0.99 % set(auto2) -> set(quiet).
% 0.43/0.99 % set(auto2) -> clear(print_initial_clauses).
% 0.43/0.99 % set(auto2) -> clear(print_given).
% 0.43/0.99 assign(lrs_ticks,-1).
% 0.43/0.99 assign(sos_limit,10000).
% 0.43/0.99 assign(order,kbo).
% 0.43/0.99 set(lex_order_vars).
% 0.43/0.99 clear(print_given).
% 0.43/0.99
% 0.43/0.99 % formulas(sos). % not echoed (7 formulas)
% 0.43/0.99
% 0.43/0.99 ============================== end of input ==========================
% 0.43/0.99
% 0.43/0.99 % From the command line: assign(max_seconds, 300).
% 0.43/0.99
% 0.43/0.99 ============================== PROCESS NON-CLAUSAL FORMULAS ==========
% 0.43/0.99
% 0.43/0.99 % Formulas that are not ordinary clauses:
% 0.43/0.99
% 0.43/0.99 ============================== end of process non-clausal formulas ===
% 0.43/0.99
% 0.43/0.99 ============================== PROCESS INITIAL CLAUSES ===============
% 0.43/0.99
% 0.43/0.99 ============================== PREDICATE ELIMINATION =================
% 0.43/0.99
% 0.43/0.99 ============================== end predicate elimination =============
% 0.43/0.99
% 0.43/0.99 Auto_denials:
% 0.43/0.99 % copying label cls_conjecture_2 to answer in negative clause
% 0.43/0.99
% 0.43/0.99 Term ordering decisions:
% 0.43/0.99 Function symbol KB weights: tc_Message_Omsg=1. c_Message_Oagent_OSpy=1. v_Aa=1. v_NAa=1. v_A_H=1. v_NA=1. v_NA_H=1. v_evs1=1. c_Message_Omsg_OMPair=1. c_Event_Oknows=1. c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt=1. c_Message_Oparts=1. c_Message_Omsg_OAgent=1. c_Message_Omsg_ONonce=1. c_Event_Oused=1. c_Public_OshrK=1.
% 0.43/0.99
% 0.43/0.99 ============================== end of process initial clauses ========
% 0.43/0.99
% 0.43/0.99 ============================== CLAUSES FOR SEARCH ====================
% 0.43/0.99
% 0.43/0.99 ============================== end of clauses for search =============
% 0.43/0.99
% 0.43/0.99 ============================== SEARCH ================================
% 0.43/0.99
% 0.43/0.99 % Starting search at 0.01 seconds.
% 0.43/0.99
% 0.43/0.99 ============================== PROOF =================================
% 0.43/0.99 % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.43/0.99 % SZS output start Refutation
% 0.43/0.99
% 0.43/0.99 % Proof 1 at 0.01 (+ 0.00) seconds: cls_conjecture_2.
% 0.43/0.99 % Length of proof is 15.
% 0.43/0.99 % Level of proof is 6.
% 0.43/0.99 % Maximum clause weight is 18.000.
% 0.43/0.99 % Given clauses 11.
% 0.43/0.99
% 0.43/0.99 1 v_NA = c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_NAa) # label(cls_conjecture_4) # label(negated_conjecture). [assumption].
% 0.43/0.99 2 c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_NAa) = v_NA. [copy(1),flip(a)].
% 0.43/0.99 3 c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(c_Public_OshrK(v_Aa),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(v_NA_H,c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_NAa),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(v_A_H),c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(v_Aa))))),c_Message_Oparts(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_evs1)),tc_Message_Omsg) # label(cls_conjecture_7) # label(negated_conjecture). [assumption].
% 0.43/0.99 4 c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(c_Public_OshrK(v_Aa),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(v_NA_H,c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(v_NA,c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(v_A_H),c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(v_Aa))))),c_Message_Oparts(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_evs1)),tc_Message_Omsg). [copy(3),rewrite([2(5)])].
% 0.43/0.99 5 -c_in(c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_NAa),c_Event_Oused(v_evs1),tc_Message_Omsg) # label(cls_conjecture_2) # label(negated_conjecture) # answer(cls_conjecture_2). [assumption].
% 0.43/0.99 6 -c_in(v_NA,c_Event_Oused(v_evs1),tc_Message_Omsg) # answer(cls_conjecture_2). [copy(5),rewrite([2(2)])].
% 0.43/0.99 7 -c_in(A,c_Message_Oparts(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,B)),tc_Message_Omsg) | c_in(A,c_Event_Oused(B),tc_Message_Omsg) # label(cls_Event_Oc_A_58_Aparts_A_Iknows_ASpy_Aevs1_J_A_61_61_62_Ac_A_58_Aused_Aevs1_0) # label(axiom). [assumption].
% 0.43/0.99 8 -c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(A,B),c_Message_Oparts(C),tc_Message_Omsg) | c_in(B,c_Message_Oparts(C),tc_Message_Omsg) # label(cls_Message_OMPair__parts_0) # label(axiom). [assumption].
% 0.43/0.99 9 -c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(A,B),c_Message_Oparts(C),tc_Message_Omsg) | c_in(A,c_Message_Oparts(C),tc_Message_Omsg) # label(cls_Message_OMPair__parts_1) # label(axiom). [assumption].
% 0.43/0.99 10 -c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(A,B),c_Message_Oparts(C),tc_Message_Omsg) | c_in(B,c_Message_Oparts(C),tc_Message_Omsg) # label(cls_Message_Oparts_OBody__dest_0) # label(axiom). [assumption].
% 0.43/0.99 12 -c_in(v_NA,c_Message_Oparts(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_evs1)),tc_Message_Omsg) # answer(cls_conjecture_2). [ur(7,b,6,a)].
% 0.43/0.99 13 c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(v_NA_H,c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(v_NA,c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(v_A_H),c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(v_Aa)))),c_Message_Oparts(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_evs1)),tc_Message_Omsg). [hyper(10,a,4,a)].
% 0.43/0.99 15 -c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(v_NA,A),c_Message_Oparts(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_evs1)),tc_Message_Omsg) # answer(cls_conjecture_2). [ur(9,b,12,a)].
% 0.43/0.99 22 -c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(A,c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(v_NA,B)),c_Message_Oparts(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_evs1)),tc_Message_Omsg) # answer(cls_conjecture_2). [ur(8,b,15,a)].
% 0.43/0.99 23 $F # answer(cls_conjecture_2). [resolve(22,a,13,a)].
% 0.43/0.99
% 0.43/0.99 % SZS output end Refutation
% 0.43/0.99 ============================== end of proof ==========================
% 0.43/0.99
% 0.43/0.99 ============================== STATISTICS ============================
% 0.43/0.99
% 0.43/0.99 Given=11. Generated=20. Kept=19. proofs=1.
% 0.43/0.99 Usable=11. Sos=5. Demods=1. Limbo=2, Disabled=7. Hints=0.
% 0.43/0.99 Megabytes=0.05.
% 0.43/0.99 User_CPU=0.01, System_CPU=0.00, Wall_clock=0.
% 0.43/0.99
% 0.43/0.99 ============================== end of statistics =====================
% 0.43/0.99
% 0.43/0.99 ============================== end of search =========================
% 0.43/0.99
% 0.43/0.99 THEOREM PROVED
% 0.43/0.99 % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.43/0.99
% 0.43/0.99 Exiting with 1 proof.
% 0.43/0.99
% 0.43/0.99 Process 26470 exit (max_proofs) Wed Jun 15 00:34:26 2022
% 0.43/0.99 Prover9 interrupted
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------