TSTP Solution File: SWV295-2 by SnakeForV---1.0

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SnakeForV---1.0
% Problem  : SWV295-2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule snake_tptp_uns --cores 0 -t %d %s

% Computer : n011.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Aug 31 18:44:55 EDT 2022

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.20s 0.51s
% Output   : Refutation 0.20s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    5
%            Number of leaves      :    6
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   12 (   9 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   15 (   1 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :    8 (   5   ~;   3   |;   0   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   0  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    6 (   2 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    4 (   2 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    3 (   1 usr;   1 prp; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of functors    :   15 (  15 usr;   7 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :    8 (   8   !;   0   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f14,plain,
    $false,
    inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f13,f8]) ).

fof(f8,plain,
    ~ c_in(v_NA,c_Event_Oused(v_evs1),tc_Message_Omsg),
    inference(forward_demodulation,[],[f2,f3]) ).

fof(f3,axiom,
    c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_NAa) = v_NA,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_5) ).

fof(f2,axiom,
    ~ c_in(c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_NAa),c_Event_Oused(v_evs1),tc_Message_Omsg),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_2) ).

fof(f13,plain,
    c_in(v_NA,c_Event_Oused(v_evs1),tc_Message_Omsg),
    inference(resolution,[],[f11,f4]) ).

fof(f4,axiom,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( ~ c_in(X0,c_Message_Oparts(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,X1)),tc_Message_Omsg)
      | c_in(X0,c_Event_Oused(X1),tc_Message_Omsg) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_Event_Oc_A_58_Aparts_A_Iknows_ASpy_Aevs1_J_A_61_61_62_Ac_A_58_Aused_Aevs1_0) ).

fof(f11,plain,
    c_in(v_NA,c_Message_Oparts(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_evs1)),tc_Message_Omsg),
    inference(resolution,[],[f9,f5]) ).

fof(f5,axiom,
    ! [X2,X3,X4] :
      ( ~ c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(X2,X3),c_Message_Oparts(X4),tc_Message_Omsg)
      | c_in(X2,c_Message_Oparts(X4),tc_Message_Omsg) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_Message_OMPair__parts_1) ).

fof(f9,plain,
    c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(v_NA,c_Message_Omsg_OKey(v_K)),c_Message_Oparts(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_evs1)),tc_Message_Omsg),
    inference(resolution,[],[f7,f6]) ).

fof(f6,axiom,
    ! [X2,X4,X5] :
      ( ~ c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(X5,X2),c_Message_Oparts(X4),tc_Message_Omsg)
      | c_in(X2,c_Message_Oparts(X4),tc_Message_Omsg) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_Message_Oparts_OBody__dest_0) ).

fof(f7,plain,
    c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(c_Public_OshrK(v_Aa),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(v_NA,c_Message_Omsg_OKey(v_K))),c_Message_Oparts(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_evs1)),tc_Message_Omsg),
    inference(backward_demodulation,[],[f1,f3]) ).

fof(f1,axiom,
    c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(c_Public_OshrK(v_Aa),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_NAa),c_Message_Omsg_OKey(v_K))),c_Message_Oparts(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_evs1)),tc_Message_Omsg),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_12) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.12  % Problem    : SWV295-2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.07/0.13  % Command    : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule snake_tptp_uns --cores 0 -t %d %s
% 0.14/0.34  % Computer : n011.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.34  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.14/0.34  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.14/0.34  % DateTime   : Tue Aug 30 19:11:10 EDT 2022
% 0.14/0.34  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.20/0.50  % (4714)lrs+1010_1:1_bd=off:fsr=off:sd=1:sos=on:ss=axioms:i=67:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/67Mi)
% 0.20/0.50  % (4705)lrs+10_1:1_drc=off:sp=reverse_frequency:spb=goal:to=lpo:i=5:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/5Mi)
% 0.20/0.50  % (4695)lrs+10_1:16_awrs=converge:awrsf=40:br=off:ep=RSTC:flr=on:gsp=on:nwc=3.0:sos=on:urr=on:i=4:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/4Mi)
% 0.20/0.51  % (4722)lrs+1010_1:1_bd=off:fd=off:fde=none:ins=3:sac=on:sos=on:spb=goal:to=lpo:i=100:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/100Mi)
% 0.20/0.51  % (4705)First to succeed.
% 0.20/0.51  % (4695)Instruction limit reached!
% 0.20/0.51  % (4695)------------------------------
% 0.20/0.51  % (4695)Version: Vampire 4.7 (commit 807e37dd9 on 2022-08-23 09:55:27 +0200)
% 0.20/0.51  % (4705)Refutation found. Thanks to Tanya!
% 0.20/0.51  % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark
% 0.20/0.51  % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
% See solution above
% 0.20/0.51  % (4705)------------------------------
% 0.20/0.51  % (4705)Version: Vampire 4.7 (commit 807e37dd9 on 2022-08-23 09:55:27 +0200)
% 0.20/0.51  % (4705)Linked with Z3 4.8.13.0 f03d756e086f81f2596157241e0decfb1c982299 z3-4.8.4-5390-gf03d756e0
% 0.20/0.51  % (4705)Termination reason: Refutation
% 0.20/0.51  
% 0.20/0.51  % (4705)Memory used [KB]: 5756
% 0.20/0.51  % (4705)Time elapsed: 0.103 s
% 0.20/0.51  % (4705)Instructions burned: 2 (million)
% 0.20/0.51  % (4705)------------------------------
% 0.20/0.51  % (4705)------------------------------
% 0.20/0.51  % (4692)Success in time 0.163 s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------