TSTP Solution File: SWV287-2 by SOS---2.0

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SOS---2.0
% Problem  : SWV287-2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : sos-script %s

% Computer : n015.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Wed Jul 20 21:37:44 EDT 2022

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.13s 0.38s
% Output   : Refutation 0.13s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.12  % Problem  : SWV287-2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.07/0.12  % Command  : sos-script %s
% 0.13/0.33  % Computer : n015.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.33  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.33  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.13/0.33  % DateTime : Wed Jun 15 16:15:40 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.33  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.13/0.35  ----- Otter 3.2, August 2001 -----
% 0.13/0.35  The process was started by sandbox on n015.cluster.edu,
% 0.13/0.35  Wed Jun 15 16:15:40 2022
% 0.13/0.35  The command was "./sos".  The process ID is 1659.
% 0.13/0.35  
% 0.13/0.35  set(prolog_style_variables).
% 0.13/0.35  set(auto).
% 0.13/0.35     dependent: set(auto1).
% 0.13/0.35     dependent: set(process_input).
% 0.13/0.35     dependent: clear(print_kept).
% 0.13/0.35     dependent: clear(print_new_demod).
% 0.13/0.35     dependent: clear(print_back_demod).
% 0.13/0.35     dependent: clear(print_back_sub).
% 0.13/0.35     dependent: set(control_memory).
% 0.13/0.35     dependent: assign(max_mem, 12000).
% 0.13/0.35     dependent: assign(pick_given_ratio, 4).
% 0.13/0.35     dependent: assign(stats_level, 1).
% 0.13/0.35     dependent: assign(pick_semantic_ratio, 3).
% 0.13/0.35     dependent: assign(sos_limit, 5000).
% 0.13/0.35     dependent: assign(max_weight, 60).
% 0.13/0.35  clear(print_given).
% 0.13/0.35  
% 0.13/0.35  list(usable).
% 0.13/0.35  
% 0.13/0.35  SCAN INPUT: prop=0, horn=0, equality=0, symmetry=0, max_lits=6.
% 0.13/0.35  
% 0.13/0.35  This is a non-Horn set without equality.  The strategy
% 0.13/0.35  will be ordered hyper_res, ur_res, unit deletion, and
% 0.13/0.35  factoring, with satellites in sos and nuclei in usable.
% 0.13/0.35  
% 0.13/0.35     dependent: set(hyper_res).
% 0.13/0.35     dependent: set(factor).
% 0.13/0.35     dependent: set(unit_deletion).
% 0.13/0.35  
% 0.13/0.35  ------------> process usable:
% 0.13/0.35  
% 0.13/0.35  ------------> process sos:
% 0.13/0.35  
% 0.13/0.35  ======= end of input processing =======
% 0.13/0.38  
% 0.13/0.38  Model 1 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.13/0.38  
% 0.13/0.38  Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 0.13/0.38  
% 0.13/0.38  
% 0.13/0.38  -------------- Softie stats --------------
% 0.13/0.38  
% 0.13/0.38  UPDATE_STOP: 300
% 0.13/0.38  SFINDER_TIME_LIMIT: 2
% 0.13/0.38  SHORT_CLAUSE_CUTOFF: 4
% 0.13/0.38  number of clauses in intial UL: 6
% 0.13/0.38  number of clauses initially in problem: 10
% 0.13/0.38  percentage of clauses intially in UL: 60
% 0.13/0.38  percentage of distinct symbols occuring in initial UL: 96
% 0.13/0.38  percent of all initial clauses that are short: 80
% 0.13/0.38  absolute distinct symbol count: 26
% 0.13/0.38     distinct predicate count: 1
% 0.13/0.38     distinct function count: 12
% 0.13/0.38     distinct constant count: 13
% 0.13/0.38  
% 0.13/0.38  ---------- no more Softie stats ----------
% 0.13/0.38  
% 0.13/0.38  
% 0.13/0.38  
% 0.13/0.38  =========== start of search ===========
% 0.13/0.38  
% 0.13/0.38  -------- PROOF -------- 
% 0.13/0.38  % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.13/0.38  % SZS output start Refutation
% 0.13/0.38  
% 0.13/0.38  -----> EMPTY CLAUSE at   0.02 sec ----> 12 [hyper,10,5,9,11,unit_del,3,2,1] {-} $F.
% 0.13/0.38  
% 0.13/0.38  Length of proof is 1.  Level of proof is 1.
% 0.13/0.38  
% 0.13/0.38  ---------------- PROOF ----------------
% 0.13/0.38  % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.13/0.38  % SZS output start Refutation
% 0.13/0.38  
% 0.13/0.38  1 [] {+} -c_in(c_Event_Oevent_ONotes(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(v_NA,c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(A,c_Message_Omsg_OKey(v_K)))),c_List_Oset(v_evs,tc_Event_Oevent),tc_Event_Oevent).
% 0.13/0.38  2 [] {+} -c_in(v_A,c_Event_Obad,tc_Message_Oagent).
% 0.13/0.38  3 [] {+} -c_in(v_B,c_Event_Obad,tc_Message_Oagent).
% 0.13/0.38  4 [] {+} -c_in(A,c_OtwayRees_Ootway,tc_List_Olist(tc_Event_Oevent))| -c_in(c_Event_Oevent_OSays(B,C,c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(D,c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(c_Public_OshrK(C),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(D,c_Message_Omsg_OKey(E))))),c_List_Oset(A,tc_Event_Oevent),tc_Event_Oevent)| -c_in(c_Event_Oevent_OSays(C,F,c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(D,c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(C),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(F),c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(c_Public_OshrK(C),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(D,c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(C),c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(F)))))))),c_List_Oset(A,tc_Event_Oevent),tc_Event_Oevent)|c_in(C,c_Event_Obad,tc_Message_Oagent)|c_in(c_Event_Oevent_OSays(c_Message_Oagent_OServer,F,c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(D,c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(c_Public_OshrK(C),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(D,c_Message_Omsg_OKey(E))),c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(c_Public_OshrK(F),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(v_sko__u8o(C,F,E,D,A),c_Message_Omsg_OKey(E)))))),c_List_Oset(A,tc_Event_Oevent),tc_Event_Oevent).
% 0.13/0.38  5 [] {+} -c_in(A,c_OtwayRees_Ootway,tc_List_Olist(tc_Event_Oevent))| -c_in(c_Event_Oevent_OSays(c_Message_Oagent_OServer,B,c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(C,c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(c_Public_OshrK(D),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(C,c_Message_Omsg_OKey(E))),c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(c_Public_OshrK(B),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(F,c_Message_Omsg_OKey(E)))))),c_List_Oset(A,tc_Event_Oevent),tc_Event_Oevent)| -c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OKey(E),c_Message_Oanalz(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,A)),tc_Message_Omsg)|c_in(B,c_Event_Obad,tc_Message_Oagent)|c_in(D,c_Event_Obad,tc_Message_Oagent)|c_in(c_Event_Oevent_ONotes(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(C,c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(F,c_Message_Omsg_OKey(E)))),c_List_Oset(A,tc_Event_Oevent),tc_Event_Oevent).
% 0.13/0.38  7 [] {-} c_in(c_Event_Oevent_OSays(v_A,v_B,c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(v_NA,c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(v_A),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(v_B),c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(c_Public_OshrK(v_A),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(v_NA,c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(v_A),c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(v_B)))))))),c_List_Oset(v_evs,tc_Event_Oevent),tc_Event_Oevent).
% 0.13/0.38  8 [] {-} c_in(c_Event_Oevent_OSays(v_B_H,v_A,c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(v_NA,c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(c_Public_OshrK(v_A),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(v_NA,c_Message_Omsg_OKey(v_K))))),c_List_Oset(v_evs,tc_Event_Oevent),tc_Event_Oevent).
% 0.13/0.38  9 [] {-} c_in(v_evs,c_OtwayRees_Ootway,tc_List_Olist(tc_Event_Oevent)).
% 0.13/0.38  10 [] {+} c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OKey(v_K),c_Message_Oanalz(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_evs)),tc_Message_Omsg).
% 0.13/0.38  11 [hyper,8,4,9,7,unit_del,2] {-} c_in(c_Event_Oevent_OSays(c_Message_Oagent_OServer,v_B,c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(v_NA,c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(c_Public_OshrK(v_A),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(v_NA,c_Message_Omsg_OKey(v_K))),c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(c_Public_OshrK(v_B),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(v_sko__u8o(v_A,v_B,v_K,v_NA,v_evs),c_Message_Omsg_OKey(v_K)))))),c_List_Oset(v_evs,tc_Event_Oevent),tc_Event_Oevent).
% 0.13/0.38  12 [hyper,10,5,9,11,unit_del,3,2,1] {-} $F.
% 0.13/0.38  
% 0.13/0.38  % SZS output end Refutation
% 0.13/0.38  ------------ end of proof -------------
% 0.13/0.38  
% 0.13/0.38  
% 0.13/0.38  Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 0.13/0.38  
% 0.13/0.38  
% 0.13/0.38  Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 0.13/0.38  
% 0.13/0.38  ============ end of search ============
% 0.13/0.38  
% 0.13/0.38  ----------- soft-scott stats ----------
% 0.13/0.38  
% 0.13/0.38  true clauses given           1      (20.0%)
% 0.13/0.38  false clauses given          4
% 0.13/0.38  
% 0.13/0.38        FALSE     TRUE
% 0.13/0.38  tot:  0         0      (-nan% true)
% 0.13/0.38  
% 0.13/0.38  
% 0.13/0.38  Model 1 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.13/0.38  
% 0.13/0.38  That finishes the proof of the theorem.
% 0.13/0.38  
% 0.13/0.38  Process 1659 finished Wed Jun 15 16:15:40 2022
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------