TSTP Solution File: SWV287-1 by Gandalf---c-2.6
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Gandalf---c-2.6
% Problem : SWV287-1 : TPTP v3.4.2. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm : add_equality:r
% Format : otter:hypothesis:set(auto),clear(print_given)
% Command : gandalf-wrapper -time %d %s
% Computer : art10.cs.miami.edu
% Model : i686 i686
% CPU : Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 2.80GHz @ 2794MHz
% Memory : 1003MB
% OS : Linux 2.6.11-1.1369_FC4
% CPULimit : 600s
% Result : Unsatisfiable 84.8s
% Output : Assurance 84.8s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : None (Parsing solution fails)
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 0
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----NO SOLUTION OUTPUT BY SYSTEM
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
%
% Gandalf c-2.6 r1 starting to prove: /tmp/SystemOnTPTP9841/SWV/SWV287-1+eq_r.in
%
% Some predicates or functions were curried and renamed.
% Using automatic strategy selection.
% Time limit in seconds: 600
%
% prove-all-passes started
%
% detected problem class: neq
% detected subclass: big
%
% strategies selected:
% (hyper 28 #f 9 11)
% (binary-unit 28 #f 9 11)
% (binary-double 11 #f 9 11)
% (binary-double 17 #f)
% (binary-double 17 #t)
% (binary 87 #t 9 11)
% (binary-order 28 #f 9 11)
% (binary-posweight-order 58 #f)
% (binary-posweight-lex-big-order 28 #f)
% (binary-posweight-lex-small-order 11 #f)
% (binary-order-sos 28 #t)
% (binary-unit-uniteq 28 #f)
% (binary-weightorder 28 #f)
% (binary-weightorder-sos 17 #f)
% (binary-order 28 #f)
% (hyper-order 17 #f)
% (binary 141 #t)
%
%
% ********* EMPTY CLAUSE DERIVED *********
%
%
% timer checkpoints: c(1481,40,7,2962,0,13,283522,4,2116,284408,5,2814,284409,5,2839,284410,1,2839,284410,50,2845,284410,40,2845,285891,0,2847,341799,3,4260,356815,4,4948,359972,5,5649,359973,5,5653,359973,1,5653,359973,50,5660,359973,40,5660,361454,0,5661,388311,3,6213,399144,4,6487,401662,5,6762,401664,5,6763,401665,1,6763,401665,50,6766,401665,40,6766,403146,0,6768,436077,3,7619,453136,4,8045,456095,5,8470,456096,5,8472,456097,1,8472,456097,50,8476,456097,40,8476,457578,0,8477)
%
%
% START OF PROOF
% 457569 [] -c_in(c_^event_^oevent_^o^says(X,Y,c_^message_^omsg_^o^m^pair(Z,c_^message_^omsg_^o^m^pair(c_^message_^omsg_^o^agent(X),c_^message_^omsg_^o^m^pair(c_^message_^omsg_^o^agent(Y),c_^message_^omsg_^o^crypt(c_^public_^oshr^k(X),c_^message_^omsg_^o^m^pair(Z,c_^message_^omsg_^o^m^pair(c_^message_^omsg_^o^agent(X),c_^message_^omsg_^o^agent(Y)))))))),c_^list_^oset(U,tc_^event_^oevent),tc_^event_^oevent) | c_in(c_^event_^oevent_^o^says(c_^message_^oagent_^o^server,Y,c_^message_^omsg_^o^m^pair(Z,c_^message_^omsg_^o^m^pair(c_^message_^omsg_^o^crypt(c_^public_^oshr^k(X),c_^message_^omsg_^o^m^pair(Z,c_^message_^omsg_^o^key(V))),c_^message_^omsg_^o^crypt(c_^public_^oshr^k(Y),c_^message_^omsg_^o^m^pair($ganapfun5($ganc76,X,Y,V,Z,U),c_^message_^omsg_^o^key(V)))))),c_^list_^oset(U,tc_^event_^oevent),tc_^event_^oevent) | -c_in(c_^event_^oevent_^o^says(W,X,c_^message_^omsg_^o^m^pair(Z,c_^message_^omsg_^o^crypt(c_^public_^oshr^k(X),c_^message_^omsg_^o^m^pair(Z,c_^message_^omsg_^o^key(V))))),c_^list_^oset(U,tc_^event_^oevent),tc_^event_^oevent) | -c_in(U,c_^otway^rees_^ootway,tc_^list_^olist(tc_^event_^oevent)) | c_in(X,c_^event_^obad,tc_^message_^oagent).
% 457571 [] -c_in(c_^event_^oevent_^o^says(c_^message_^oagent_^o^server,X,c_^message_^omsg_^o^m^pair(Y,c_^message_^omsg_^o^m^pair(c_^message_^omsg_^o^crypt(c_^public_^oshr^k(Z),c_^message_^omsg_^o^m^pair(Y,c_^message_^omsg_^o^key(U))),c_^message_^omsg_^o^crypt(c_^public_^oshr^k(X),c_^message_^omsg_^o^m^pair(V,c_^message_^omsg_^o^key(U)))))),c_^list_^oset(W,tc_^event_^oevent),tc_^event_^oevent) | c_in(c_^event_^oevent_^o^notes(c_^message_^oagent_^o^spy,c_^message_^omsg_^o^m^pair(Y,c_^message_^omsg_^o^m^pair(V,c_^message_^omsg_^o^key(U)))),c_^list_^oset(W,tc_^event_^oevent),tc_^event_^oevent) | -c_in(c_^message_^omsg_^o^key(U),c_^message_^oanalz(c_^event_^oknows(c_^message_^oagent_^o^spy,W)),tc_^message_^omsg) | -c_in(W,c_^otway^rees_^ootway,tc_^list_^olist(tc_^event_^oevent)) | c_in(Z,c_^event_^obad,tc_^message_^oagent) | c_in(X,c_^event_^obad,tc_^message_^oagent).
% 457572 [] c_in(c_^event_^oevent_^o^says(v_^a,v_^b,c_^message_^omsg_^o^m^pair(v_^n^a,c_^message_^omsg_^o^m^pair(c_^message_^omsg_^o^agent(v_^a),c_^message_^omsg_^o^m^pair(c_^message_^omsg_^o^agent(v_^b),c_^message_^omsg_^o^crypt(c_^public_^oshr^k(v_^a),c_^message_^omsg_^o^m^pair(v_^n^a,c_^message_^omsg_^o^m^pair(c_^message_^omsg_^o^agent(v_^a),c_^message_^omsg_^o^agent(v_^b)))))))),c_^list_^oset(v_evs,tc_^event_^oevent),tc_^event_^oevent).
% 457573 [] c_in(c_^event_^oevent_^o^says(v_^b_^h,v_^a,c_^message_^omsg_^o^m^pair(v_^n^a,c_^message_^omsg_^o^crypt(c_^public_^oshr^k(v_^a),c_^message_^omsg_^o^m^pair(v_^n^a,c_^message_^omsg_^o^key(v_^k))))),c_^list_^oset(v_evs,tc_^event_^oevent),tc_^event_^oevent).
% 457574 [] -c_in(c_^event_^oevent_^o^notes(c_^message_^oagent_^o^spy,c_^message_^omsg_^o^m^pair(v_^n^a,c_^message_^omsg_^o^m^pair(X,c_^message_^omsg_^o^key(v_^k)))),c_^list_^oset(v_evs,tc_^event_^oevent),tc_^event_^oevent).
% 457575 [] -c_in(v_^a,c_^event_^obad,tc_^message_^oagent).
% 457576 [] -c_in(v_^b,c_^event_^obad,tc_^message_^oagent).
% 457577 [] c_in(v_evs,c_^otway^rees_^ootway,tc_^list_^olist(tc_^event_^oevent)).
% 457578 [] c_in(c_^message_^omsg_^o^key(v_^k),c_^message_^oanalz(c_^event_^oknows(c_^message_^oagent_^o^spy,v_evs)),tc_^message_^omsg).
% 457610 [binary:457571.6,457576] -c_in(c_^event_^oevent_^o^says(c_^message_^oagent_^o^server,v_^b,c_^message_^omsg_^o^m^pair(X,c_^message_^omsg_^o^m^pair(c_^message_^omsg_^o^crypt(c_^public_^oshr^k(Y),c_^message_^omsg_^o^m^pair(X,c_^message_^omsg_^o^key(Z))),c_^message_^omsg_^o^crypt(c_^public_^oshr^k(v_^b),c_^message_^omsg_^o^m^pair(U,c_^message_^omsg_^o^key(Z)))))),c_^list_^oset(V,tc_^event_^oevent),tc_^event_^oevent) | c_in(c_^event_^oevent_^o^notes(c_^message_^oagent_^o^spy,c_^message_^omsg_^o^m^pair(X,c_^message_^omsg_^o^m^pair(U,c_^message_^omsg_^o^key(Z)))),c_^list_^oset(V,tc_^event_^oevent),tc_^event_^oevent) | -c_in(c_^message_^omsg_^o^key(Z),c_^message_^oanalz(c_^event_^oknows(c_^message_^oagent_^o^spy,V)),tc_^message_^omsg) | -c_in(V,c_^otway^rees_^ootway,tc_^list_^olist(tc_^event_^oevent)) | c_in(Y,c_^event_^obad,tc_^message_^oagent).
% 457685 [binary:457569,457572,cut:457577,cut:457575] c_in(c_^event_^oevent_^o^says(c_^message_^oagent_^o^server,v_^b,c_^message_^omsg_^o^m^pair(v_^n^a,c_^message_^omsg_^o^m^pair(c_^message_^omsg_^o^crypt(c_^public_^oshr^k(v_^a),c_^message_^omsg_^o^m^pair(v_^n^a,c_^message_^omsg_^o^key(X))),c_^message_^omsg_^o^crypt(c_^public_^oshr^k(v_^b),c_^message_^omsg_^o^m^pair($ganapfun5($ganc76,v_^a,v_^b,X,v_^n^a,v_evs),c_^message_^omsg_^o^key(X)))))),c_^list_^oset(v_evs,tc_^event_^oevent),tc_^event_^oevent) | -c_in(c_^event_^oevent_^o^says(Y,v_^a,c_^message_^omsg_^o^m^pair(v_^n^a,c_^message_^omsg_^o^crypt(c_^public_^oshr^k(v_^a),c_^message_^omsg_^o^m^pair(v_^n^a,c_^message_^omsg_^o^key(X))))),c_^list_^oset(v_evs,tc_^event_^oevent),tc_^event_^oevent).
% 460957 [binary:457574,457610.2,cut:457578,cut:457577] -c_in(c_^event_^oevent_^o^says(c_^message_^oagent_^o^server,v_^b,c_^message_^omsg_^o^m^pair(v_^n^a,c_^message_^omsg_^o^m^pair(c_^message_^omsg_^o^crypt(c_^public_^oshr^k(X),c_^message_^omsg_^o^m^pair(v_^n^a,c_^message_^omsg_^o^key(v_^k))),c_^message_^omsg_^o^crypt(c_^public_^oshr^k(v_^b),c_^message_^omsg_^o^m^pair(Y,c_^message_^omsg_^o^key(v_^k)))))),c_^list_^oset(v_evs,tc_^event_^oevent),tc_^event_^oevent) | c_in(X,c_^event_^obad,tc_^message_^oagent).
% 471331 [binary:457573,457685.2,binarydemod:460957,cut:457575] contradiction
% END OF PROOF
%
% Proof found by the following strategy:
%
% using binary resolution
% using sos strategy
% using double strategy
% using dynamic demodulation
% using ordered paramodulation
% using kb ordering for equality
% preferring bigger arities for lex ordering
% using clause demodulation
% seconds given: 17
%
%
% ***GANDALF_FOUND_A_REFUTATION***
%
% Global statistics over all passes:
%
% given clauses: 9752
% derived clauses: 571013
% kept clauses: 242810
% kept size sum: 311982
% kept mid-nuclei: 19053
% kept new demods: 136
% forw unit-subs: 82031
% forw double-subs: 23766
% forw overdouble-subs: 3181
% backward subs: 67
% fast unit cutoff: 2164
% full unit cutoff: 1172
% dbl unit cutoff: 4
% real runtime : 88.53
% process. runtime: 88.28
% specific non-discr-tree subsumption statistics:
% tried: 92155
% length fails: 4025
% strength fails: 8013
% predlist fails: 18072
% aux str. fails: 1932
% by-lit fails: 4650
% full subs tried: 47547
% full subs fail: 44361
%
% ; program args: ("/home/graph/tptp/Systems/Gandalf---c-2.6/gandalf" "-time" "600" "/tmp/SystemOnTPTP9841/SWV/SWV287-1+eq_r.in")
% WARNING: TreeLimitedRun lost 84.83s, total lost is 84.83s
%
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------