TSTP Solution File: SWV284-1 by Vampire-SAT---4.8
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Vampire-SAT---4.8
% Problem : SWV284-1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : vampire --mode casc_sat -m 16384 --cores 7 -t %d %s
% Computer : n011.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Tue May 21 06:15:41 EDT 2024
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.14s 0.41s
% Output : Refutation 0.14s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 4
% Number of leaves : 6
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 14 ( 7 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 21 ( 0 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of connectives : 17 ( 10 ~; 7 |; 0 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 0 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 6 ( 4 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 5 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 3 ( 2 usr; 1 prp; 0-3 aty)
% Number of functors : 13 ( 13 usr; 6 con; 0-3 aty)
% Number of variables : 25 ( 25 !; 0 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f4924,plain,
$false,
inference(resolution,[],[f4904,f1908]) ).
fof(f1908,plain,
! [X2,X3,X0,X1] : c_lessequals(X0,v_x(c_plus(c_plus(X1,c_plus(X2,X0,tc_nat),tc_nat),X3,tc_nat)),tc_nat),
inference(resolution,[],[f1895,f1438]) ).
fof(f1438,axiom,
! [X21,X16,X15] :
( ~ c_lessequals(c_plus(X15,X16,tc_nat),X21,tc_nat)
| c_lessequals(X16,X21,tc_nat) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_Nat_Oadd__leE_0) ).
fof(f1895,plain,
! [X2,X0,X1] : c_lessequals(X0,v_x(c_plus(c_plus(X1,X0,tc_nat),X2,tc_nat)),tc_nat),
inference(resolution,[],[f1885,f1438]) ).
fof(f1885,plain,
! [X0,X1] : c_lessequals(X0,v_x(c_plus(X0,X1,tc_nat)),tc_nat),
inference(resolution,[],[f1439,f1446]) ).
fof(f1446,axiom,
! [X24] : c_lessequals(X24,v_x(X24),tc_nat),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_0) ).
fof(f1439,axiom,
! [X21,X16,X15] :
( ~ c_lessequals(c_plus(X15,X16,tc_nat),X21,tc_nat)
| c_lessequals(X15,X21,tc_nat) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_Nat_Oadd__leE_1) ).
fof(f4904,plain,
! [X0] : ~ c_lessequals(v_N,v_x(c_plus(X0,v_sko__upX(v_msg),tc_nat)),tc_nat),
inference(resolution,[],[f4902,f1871]) ).
fof(f1871,plain,
! [X0,X1] : c_lessequals(X0,v_x(c_plus(X1,X0,tc_nat)),tc_nat),
inference(resolution,[],[f1438,f1446]) ).
fof(f4902,plain,
! [X0] :
( ~ c_lessequals(v_sko__upX(v_msg),v_x(X0),tc_nat)
| ~ c_lessequals(v_N,v_x(X0),tc_nat) ),
inference(resolution,[],[f4857,f1447]) ).
fof(f1447,axiom,
! [X24] :
( ~ c_in(c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(X24),c_Event_Oused(v_list),tc_Message_Omsg)
| ~ c_lessequals(v_N,X24,tc_nat) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_1) ).
fof(f4857,plain,
! [X0] :
( c_in(c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_x(X0)),c_Event_Oused(v_list),tc_Message_Omsg)
| ~ c_lessequals(v_sko__upX(v_msg),v_x(X0),tc_nat) ),
inference(resolution,[],[f1437,f1448]) ).
fof(f1448,axiom,
! [X24] :
( c_in(c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_x(X24)),c_Message_Oparts(c_insert(v_msg,c_emptyset,tc_Message_Omsg)),tc_Message_Omsg)
| c_in(c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_x(X24)),c_Event_Oused(v_list),tc_Message_Omsg) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_2) ).
fof(f1437,axiom,
! [X57,X24] :
( ~ c_in(c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(X24),c_Message_Oparts(c_insert(X57,c_emptyset,tc_Message_Omsg)),tc_Message_Omsg)
| ~ c_lessequals(v_sko__upX(X57),X24,tc_nat) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_Message_Omsg__Nonce__supply_0) ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.02/0.08 % Problem : SWV284-1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.02/0.09 % Command : vampire --mode casc_sat -m 16384 --cores 7 -t %d %s
% 0.09/0.29 % Computer : n011.cluster.edu
% 0.09/0.29 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.09/0.29 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.09/0.29 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.09/0.29 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.09/0.29 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.09/0.29 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.09/0.29 % DateTime : Sun May 19 08:41:38 EDT 2024
% 0.09/0.29 % CPUTime :
% 0.09/0.30 % (28541)Running in auto input_syntax mode. Trying TPTP
% 0.14/0.34 % (28548)fmb+10_1_bce=on:fmbas=function:fmbsr=1.2:fde=unused:nm=0_846 on theBenchmark for (846ds/0Mi)
% 0.14/0.34 % (28555)ott+1_64_av=off:bd=off:bce=on:fsd=off:fde=unused:gsp=on:irw=on:lcm=predicate:lma=on:nm=2:nwc=1.1:sims=off:urr=on_497 on theBenchmark for (497ds/0Mi)
% 0.14/0.34 % (28553)ott-10_8_av=off:bd=preordered:bs=on:fsd=off:fsr=off:fde=unused:irw=on:lcm=predicate:lma=on:nm=4:nwc=1.7:sp=frequency_522 on theBenchmark for (522ds/0Mi)
% 0.14/0.34 % (28549)fmb+10_1_bce=on:fmbdsb=on:fmbes=contour:fmbswr=3:fde=none:nm=0_793 on theBenchmark for (793ds/0Mi)
% 0.14/0.34 % (28551)fmb+10_1_bce=on:fmbsr=1.5:nm=32_533 on theBenchmark for (533ds/0Mi)
% 0.14/0.34 % (28552)ott+10_10:1_add=off:afr=on:amm=off:anc=all:bd=off:bs=on:fsr=off:irw=on:lma=on:msp=off:nm=4:nwc=4.0:sac=on:sp=reverse_frequency_531 on theBenchmark for (531ds/0Mi)
% 0.14/0.35 % (28550)WARNING: value z3 for option sas not known
% 0.14/0.35 % (28550)dis+2_11_add=large:afr=on:amm=off:bd=off:bce=on:fsd=off:fde=none:gs=on:gsaa=full_model:gsem=off:irw=on:msp=off:nm=4:nwc=1.3:sas=z3:sims=off:sac=on:sp=reverse_arity_569 on theBenchmark for (569ds/0Mi)
% 0.14/0.39 TRYING [1]
% 0.14/0.39 TRYING [2]
% 0.14/0.41 % (28550)First to succeed.
% 0.14/0.41 % (28550)Solution written to "/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/vampire-proof-28541"
% 0.14/0.41 % (28550)Refutation found. Thanks to Tanya!
% 0.14/0.41 % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark
% 0.14/0.41 % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
% See solution above
% 0.14/0.41 % (28550)------------------------------
% 0.14/0.41 % (28550)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 3a798227e on 2024-05-03 07:42:47 +0200)
% 0.14/0.41 % (28550)Termination reason: Refutation
% 0.14/0.41
% 0.14/0.41 % (28550)Memory used [KB]: 2775
% 0.14/0.41 % (28550)Time elapsed: 0.057 s
% 0.14/0.41 % (28550)Instructions burned: 164 (million)
% 0.14/0.41 % (28541)Success in time 0.11 s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------