TSTP Solution File: SWV281-2 by iProver---3.9

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : iProver---3.9
% Problem  : SWV281-2 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_iprover %s %d THM

% Computer : n022.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Fri May  3 03:13:57 EDT 2024

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 2.14s 1.15s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 2.14s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : ERROR: Analysing output (Could not find formula named definition)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(c_49,negated_conjecture,
    ( X0 = X1
    | c_in(c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(X0),c_Event_Oused(v_evs),tc_Message_Omsg)
    | c_in(c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(X1),c_Event_Oused(v_evs_H),tc_Message_Omsg) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_0) ).

cnf(c_50,plain,
    c_List_Olist_OCons(X0,X1,X2) != c_List_Olist_ONil,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_List_Olist_Odistinct__1_0) ).

cnf(c_51,plain,
    c_lessequals(X0,c_plus(X1,X0,tc_nat),tc_nat),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_Nat_Ole__add2_0) ).

cnf(c_52,plain,
    ( c_plus(X0,X1,tc_nat) != c_plus(X2,X1,tc_nat)
    | X0 = X2 ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_Nat_Onat__add__right__cancel_0) ).

cnf(c_53,plain,
    c_plus(c_0,X0,tc_nat) = X0,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_Nat_Oop_A_L_Oadd__0_0) ).

cnf(c_54,plain,
    ( ~ c_in(c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(X0),c_Event_Oused(X1),tc_Message_Omsg)
    | ~ c_lessequals(v_sko__urX(X1),X0,tc_nat) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_Public_ONonce__supply__lemma_0) ).

cnf(c_100,plain,
    ( c_plus(X0,X1,tc_nat) != X2
    | v_sko__urX(X3) != X1
    | tc_nat != tc_nat
    | ~ c_in(c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(X2),c_Event_Oused(X3),tc_Message_Omsg) ),
    inference(resolution_lifted,[status(thm)],[c_51,c_54]) ).

cnf(c_101,plain,
    ~ c_in(c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(c_plus(X0,v_sko__urX(X1),tc_nat)),c_Event_Oused(X1),tc_Message_Omsg),
    inference(unflattening,[status(thm)],[c_100]) ).

cnf(c_138,plain,
    c_Event_Oused(v_evs) = sP0_iProver_def,
    definition ).

cnf(c_139,plain,
    c_Event_Oused(v_evs_H) = sP1_iProver_def,
    definition ).

cnf(c_140,negated_conjecture,
    ( X0 = X1
    | c_in(c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(X0),sP0_iProver_def,tc_Message_Omsg)
    | c_in(c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(X1),sP1_iProver_def,tc_Message_Omsg) ),
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_49,c_139,c_138]) ).

cnf(c_266,plain,
    ~ c_in(c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_sko__urX(X0)),c_Event_Oused(X0),tc_Message_Omsg),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_53,c_101]) ).

cnf(c_268,plain,
    ~ c_in(c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(c_plus(X0,v_sko__urX(v_evs),tc_nat)),sP0_iProver_def,tc_Message_Omsg),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_138,c_101]) ).

cnf(c_272,plain,
    ~ c_in(c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_sko__urX(v_evs_H)),sP1_iProver_def,tc_Message_Omsg),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_139,c_266]) ).

cnf(c_273,plain,
    ~ c_in(c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_sko__urX(v_evs)),sP0_iProver_def,tc_Message_Omsg),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_138,c_266]) ).

cnf(c_274,plain,
    ( v_sko__urX(v_evs_H) = X0
    | c_in(c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(X0),sP0_iProver_def,tc_Message_Omsg) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_140,c_272]) ).

cnf(c_306,plain,
    c_plus(X0,v_sko__urX(v_evs),tc_nat) = v_sko__urX(v_evs_H),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_274,c_268]) ).

cnf(c_307,plain,
    v_sko__urX(v_evs_H) = v_sko__urX(v_evs),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_274,c_273]) ).

cnf(c_321,plain,
    c_plus(X0,v_sko__urX(v_evs_H),tc_nat) = v_sko__urX(v_evs_H),
    inference(light_normalisation,[status(thm)],[c_306,c_307]) ).

cnf(c_323,plain,
    ( c_plus(X0,v_sko__urX(v_evs_H),tc_nat) != v_sko__urX(v_evs_H)
    | X0 = X1 ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_321,c_52]) ).

cnf(c_327,plain,
    X0 = X1,
    inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[c_323,c_321]) ).

cnf(c_328,plain,
    $false,
    inference(backward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[c_50,c_327]) ).


%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.11  % Problem  : SWV281-2 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.03/0.12  % Command  : run_iprover %s %d THM
% 0.11/0.32  % Computer : n022.cluster.edu
% 0.11/0.32  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.11/0.32  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.11/0.32  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.11/0.32  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.11/0.32  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.11/0.32  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.11/0.32  % DateTime : Fri May  3 00:11:27 EDT 2024
% 0.11/0.32  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.17/0.44  Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.17/0.44  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/run_problem --schedule fof_schedule --heuristic_context casc_unsat --no_cores 8 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300
% 2.14/1.15  % SZS status Started for theBenchmark.p
% 2.14/1.15  % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark.p
% 2.14/1.15  
% 2.14/1.15  %---------------- iProver v3.9 (pre CASC 2024/SMT-COMP 2024) ----------------%
% 2.14/1.15  
% 2.14/1.15  ------  iProver source info
% 2.14/1.15  
% 2.14/1.15  git: date: 2024-05-02 19:28:25 +0000
% 2.14/1.15  git: sha1: a33b5eb135c74074ba803943bb12f2ebd971352f
% 2.14/1.15  git: non_committed_changes: false
% 2.14/1.15  
% 2.14/1.15  ------ Parsing...successful
% 2.14/1.15  
% 2.14/1.15  
% 2.14/1.15  
% 2.14/1.15  ------ Preprocessing... sup_sim: 0  sf_s  rm: 1 0s  sf_e  pe_s  pe:1:0s pe_e  sup_sim: 0  sf_s  rm: 2 0s  sf_e  pe_s  pe_e 
% 2.14/1.15  
% 2.14/1.15  ------ Preprocessing... gs_s  sp: 0 0s  gs_e  snvd_s sp: 0 0s snvd_e 
% 2.14/1.15  
% 2.14/1.15  ------ Preprocessing... sf_s  rm: 1 0s  sf_e  sf_s  rm: 0 0s  sf_e 
% 2.14/1.15  ------ Proving...
% 2.14/1.15  ------ Problem Properties 
% 2.14/1.15  
% 2.14/1.15  
% 2.14/1.15  clauses                                 7
% 2.14/1.15  conjectures                             1
% 2.14/1.15  EPR                                     0
% 2.14/1.15  Horn                                    6
% 2.14/1.15  unary                                   5
% 2.14/1.15  binary                                  1
% 2.14/1.15  lits                                    10
% 2.14/1.15  lits eq                                 7
% 2.14/1.15  fd_pure                                 0
% 2.14/1.15  fd_pseudo                               0
% 2.14/1.15  fd_cond                                 0
% 2.14/1.15  fd_pseudo_cond                          2
% 2.14/1.15  AC symbols                              0
% 2.14/1.15  
% 2.14/1.15  ------ Schedule dynamic 5 is on 
% 2.14/1.15  
% 2.14/1.15  ------ Input Options "--resolution_flag false --inst_lit_sel_side none" Time Limit: 10.
% 2.14/1.15  
% 2.14/1.15  
% 2.14/1.15  ------ 
% 2.14/1.15  Current options:
% 2.14/1.15  ------ 
% 2.14/1.15  
% 2.14/1.15  
% 2.14/1.15  
% 2.14/1.15  
% 2.14/1.15  ------ Proving...
% 2.14/1.15  
% 2.14/1.15  
% 2.14/1.15  % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark.p
% 2.14/1.15  
% 2.14/1.15  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 2.14/1.15  
% 2.14/1.15  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------