TSTP Solution File: SWV278-1 by E-SAT---3.1.00
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E-SAT---3.1.00
% Problem : SWV278-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E %s %d THM
% Computer : n015.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Sat May 4 09:52:24 EDT 2024
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.46s 0.70s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.46s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 4
% Number of leaves : 4
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 12 ( 9 unt; 0 nHn; 10 RR)
% Number of literals : 15 ( 2 equ; 7 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 4 ( 2 avg)
% Number of predicates : 3 ( 1 usr; 1 prp; 0-3 aty)
% Number of functors : 7 ( 7 usr; 3 con; 0-1 aty)
% Number of variables : 8 ( 0 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(cls_conjecture_1,negated_conjecture,
~ c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OKey(c_Message_OinvKey(c_Message_OinvKey(v_K_H))),c_Message_Oparts(v_H),tc_Message_Omsg),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.JBJRFHe9Hh/E---3.1_14277.p',cls_conjecture_1) ).
cnf(cls_Message_OinvKey_A_IinvKey_Ay_J_A_61_61_Ay_0,axiom,
c_Message_OinvKey(c_Message_OinvKey(X1)) = X1,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.JBJRFHe9Hh/E---3.1_14277.p',cls_Message_OinvKey_A_IinvKey_Ay_J_A_61_61_Ay_0) ).
cnf(cls_Message_Oanalz__conj__parts_0,axiom,
( c_in(X1,c_Message_Oparts(X2),tc_Message_Omsg)
| ~ c_in(X1,c_Message_Oanalz(X2),tc_Message_Omsg) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.JBJRFHe9Hh/E---3.1_14277.p',cls_Message_Oanalz__conj__parts_0) ).
cnf(cls_conjecture_3,negated_conjecture,
c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OKey(v_K_H),c_Message_Oanalz(v_H),tc_Message_Omsg),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.JBJRFHe9Hh/E---3.1_14277.p',cls_conjecture_3) ).
cnf(c_0_4,negated_conjecture,
~ c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OKey(c_Message_OinvKey(c_Message_OinvKey(v_K_H))),c_Message_Oparts(v_H),tc_Message_Omsg),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[cls_conjecture_1]) ).
cnf(c_0_5,negated_conjecture,
~ c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OKey(c_Message_OinvKey(c_Message_OinvKey(v_K_H))),c_Message_Oparts(v_H),tc_Message_Omsg),
c_0_4 ).
cnf(c_0_6,axiom,
c_Message_OinvKey(c_Message_OinvKey(X1)) = X1,
cls_Message_OinvKey_A_IinvKey_Ay_J_A_61_61_Ay_0 ).
cnf(c_0_7,plain,
( c_in(X1,c_Message_Oparts(X2),tc_Message_Omsg)
| ~ c_in(X1,c_Message_Oanalz(X2),tc_Message_Omsg) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[cls_Message_Oanalz__conj__parts_0]) ).
cnf(c_0_8,negated_conjecture,
~ c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OKey(v_K_H),c_Message_Oparts(v_H),tc_Message_Omsg),
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_5,c_0_6]) ).
cnf(c_0_9,plain,
( c_in(X1,c_Message_Oparts(X2),tc_Message_Omsg)
| ~ c_in(X1,c_Message_Oanalz(X2),tc_Message_Omsg) ),
c_0_7 ).
cnf(c_0_10,negated_conjecture,
c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OKey(v_K_H),c_Message_Oanalz(v_H),tc_Message_Omsg),
cls_conjecture_3 ).
cnf(c_0_11,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_8,c_0_9]),c_0_10])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.09 % Problem : SWV278-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.09/0.10 % Command : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.09/0.30 % Computer : n015.cluster.edu
% 0.09/0.30 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.09/0.30 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.09/0.30 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.09/0.30 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.09/0.30 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.09/0.30 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.09/0.30 % DateTime : Fri May 3 16:41:53 EDT 2024
% 0.09/0.30 % CPUTime :
% 0.45/0.62 Running first-order model finding
% 0.45/0.62 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --satauto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.JBJRFHe9Hh/E---3.1_14277.p
% 0.46/0.70 # Version: 3.1.0
% 0.46/0.70 # Preprocessing class: FMLMSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.46/0.70 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.46/0.70 # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.46/0.70 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.46/0.70 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.46/0.70 # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.46/0.70 # new_bool_1 with pid 14356 completed with status 0
% 0.46/0.70 # Result found by new_bool_1
% 0.46/0.70 # Preprocessing class: FMLMSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.46/0.70 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.46/0.70 # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.46/0.70 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.46/0.70 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.46/0.70 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.46/0.70 # Search class: FGHSM-FSLM32-MFFFFFNN
% 0.46/0.70 # Scheduled 12 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.46/0.70 # Starting G-E--_303_C18_F1_URBAN_S0Y with 25s (1) cores
% 0.46/0.70 # G-E--_303_C18_F1_URBAN_S0Y with pid 14359 completed with status 0
% 0.46/0.70 # Result found by G-E--_303_C18_F1_URBAN_S0Y
% 0.46/0.70 # Preprocessing class: FMLMSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.46/0.70 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.46/0.70 # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.46/0.70 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.46/0.70 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.46/0.70 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.46/0.70 # Search class: FGHSM-FSLM32-MFFFFFNN
% 0.46/0.70 # Scheduled 12 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.46/0.70 # Starting G-E--_303_C18_F1_URBAN_S0Y with 25s (1) cores
% 0.46/0.70 # Preprocessing time : 0.007 s
% 0.46/0.70
% 0.46/0.70 # Proof found!
% 0.46/0.70 # SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.46/0.70 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.46/0.70 # Parsed axioms : 2899
% 0.46/0.70 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 2544
% 0.46/0.70 # Initial clauses : 355
% 0.46/0.70 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.46/0.70 # Initial clauses in saturation : 355
% 0.46/0.70 # Processed clauses : 46
% 0.46/0.70 # ...of these trivial : 2
% 0.46/0.70 # ...subsumed : 3
% 0.46/0.70 # ...remaining for further processing : 41
% 0.46/0.70 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.46/0.70 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.46/0.70 # Backward-subsumed : 1
% 0.46/0.70 # Backward-rewritten : 1
% 0.46/0.70 # Generated clauses : 30
% 0.46/0.70 # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 8
% 0.46/0.70 # ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.46/0.70 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.46/0.70 # Paramodulations : 26
% 0.46/0.70 # Factorizations : 0
% 0.46/0.70 # NegExts : 0
% 0.46/0.70 # Equation resolutions : 4
% 0.46/0.70 # Disequality decompositions : 0
% 0.46/0.70 # Total rewrite steps : 18
% 0.46/0.70 # ...of those cached : 7
% 0.46/0.70 # Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.46/0.70 # Propositional check models : 0
% 0.46/0.70 # Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.46/0.70 # Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.46/0.70 # Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.46/0.70 # Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.46/0.70 # Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.46/0.70 # Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.46/0.70 # Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.46/0.70 # Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.46/0.70 # Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.46/0.70 # Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.46/0.70 # Current number of processed clauses : 39
% 0.46/0.70 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 16
% 0.46/0.70 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.46/0.70 # Negative unit clauses : 13
% 0.46/0.70 # Non-unit-clauses : 10
% 0.46/0.70 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 317
% 0.46/0.70 # ...number of literals in the above : 558
% 0.46/0.70 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.46/0.70 # Current number of archived clauses : 2
% 0.46/0.70 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 68
% 0.46/0.70 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 34
% 0.46/0.70 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 0
% 0.46/0.70 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 41
% 0.46/0.70 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.46/0.70 # BW rewrite match attempts : 1
% 0.46/0.70 # BW rewrite match successes : 1
% 0.46/0.70 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.46/0.70 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.46/0.70 # Termbank termtop insertions : 28462
% 0.46/0.70 # Search garbage collected termcells : 7905
% 0.46/0.70
% 0.46/0.70 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.46/0.70 # User time : 0.013 s
% 0.46/0.70 # System time : 0.010 s
% 0.46/0.70 # Total time : 0.023 s
% 0.46/0.70 # Maximum resident set size: 4476 pages
% 0.46/0.70
% 0.46/0.70 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.46/0.70 # User time : 0.064 s
% 0.46/0.70 # System time : 0.011 s
% 0.46/0.70 # Total time : 0.075 s
% 0.46/0.70 # Maximum resident set size: 3600 pages
% 0.46/0.70 % E---3.1 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------