TSTP Solution File: SWV273-2 by iProver---3.9
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : iProver---3.9
% Problem : SWV273-2 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_iprover %s %d THM
% Computer : n032.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Fri May 3 03:13:56 EDT 2024
% Result : Unsatisfiable 1.65s 1.12s
% Output : CNFRefutation 1.78s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : ERROR: Analysing output (Could not find formula named definition)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(c_49,negated_conjecture,
~ c_lessequals(c_union(c_Message_Oparts(v_H),c_Message_Osynth(v_H),tc_Message_Omsg),c_Message_Oparts(c_Message_Osynth(v_H)),tc_set(tc_Message_Omsg)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_0) ).
cnf(c_50,plain,
( ~ c_lessequals(X0,X1,tc_set(tc_Message_Omsg))
| c_lessequals(c_Message_Oparts(X0),c_Message_Oparts(X1),tc_set(tc_Message_Omsg)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_Message_Oparts__mono_0) ).
cnf(c_51,plain,
( ~ c_lessequals(c_Message_Oparts(X0),c_Message_Oparts(X1),tc_set(tc_Message_Omsg))
| c_lessequals(X0,c_Message_Oparts(X1),tc_set(tc_Message_Omsg)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_Message_Oparts__subset__iff_0) ).
cnf(c_52,plain,
c_lessequals(X0,c_Message_Osynth(X0),tc_set(tc_Message_Omsg)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_Message_Osynth__increasing_0) ).
cnf(c_53,plain,
( ~ c_lessequals(X0,X1,tc_set(X2))
| ~ c_lessequals(X3,X1,tc_set(X2))
| c_lessequals(c_union(X3,X0,X2),X1,tc_set(X2)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_Set_OUn__subset__iff_2) ).
cnf(c_54,plain,
c_lessequals(X0,X0,tc_set(X1)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_Set_Osubset__refl_0) ).
cnf(c_80,plain,
c_Message_Oparts(v_H) = sP0_iProver_def,
definition ).
cnf(c_81,plain,
c_Message_Osynth(v_H) = sP1_iProver_def,
definition ).
cnf(c_82,plain,
c_union(sP0_iProver_def,sP1_iProver_def,tc_Message_Omsg) = sP2_iProver_def,
definition ).
cnf(c_83,plain,
c_Message_Oparts(sP1_iProver_def) = sP3_iProver_def,
definition ).
cnf(c_84,plain,
tc_set(tc_Message_Omsg) = sP4_iProver_def,
definition ).
cnf(c_85,negated_conjecture,
~ c_lessequals(sP2_iProver_def,sP3_iProver_def,sP4_iProver_def),
inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_49,c_84,c_83,c_81,c_80,c_82]) ).
cnf(c_238,plain,
c_lessequals(X0,X0,sP4_iProver_def),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_84,c_54]) ).
cnf(c_240,plain,
c_lessequals(X0,c_Message_Osynth(X0),sP4_iProver_def),
inference(light_normalisation,[status(thm)],[c_52,c_84]) ).
cnf(c_241,plain,
c_lessequals(v_H,sP1_iProver_def,sP4_iProver_def),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_81,c_240]) ).
cnf(c_242,plain,
( ~ c_lessequals(X0,X1,sP4_iProver_def)
| c_lessequals(c_Message_Oparts(X0),c_Message_Oparts(X1),sP4_iProver_def) ),
inference(light_normalisation,[status(thm)],[c_50,c_84]) ).
cnf(c_245,plain,
( ~ c_lessequals(v_H,X0,sP4_iProver_def)
| c_lessequals(sP0_iProver_def,c_Message_Oparts(X0),sP4_iProver_def) ),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_80,c_242]) ).
cnf(c_261,plain,
( ~ c_lessequals(c_Message_Oparts(X0),c_Message_Oparts(X1),sP4_iProver_def)
| c_lessequals(X0,c_Message_Oparts(X1),sP4_iProver_def) ),
inference(light_normalisation,[status(thm)],[c_51,c_84]) ).
cnf(c_266,plain,
c_lessequals(X0,c_Message_Oparts(X0),sP4_iProver_def),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_238,c_261]) ).
cnf(c_295,plain,
( ~ c_lessequals(sP0_iProver_def,X0,tc_set(tc_Message_Omsg))
| ~ c_lessequals(sP1_iProver_def,X0,tc_set(tc_Message_Omsg))
| c_lessequals(sP2_iProver_def,X0,tc_set(tc_Message_Omsg)) ),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_82,c_53]) ).
cnf(c_297,plain,
( ~ c_lessequals(sP0_iProver_def,X0,sP4_iProver_def)
| ~ c_lessequals(sP1_iProver_def,X0,sP4_iProver_def)
| c_lessequals(sP2_iProver_def,X0,sP4_iProver_def) ),
inference(light_normalisation,[status(thm)],[c_295,c_84]) ).
cnf(c_308,plain,
c_lessequals(sP1_iProver_def,sP3_iProver_def,sP4_iProver_def),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_83,c_266]) ).
cnf(c_344,plain,
( ~ c_lessequals(v_H,sP1_iProver_def,sP4_iProver_def)
| c_lessequals(sP0_iProver_def,sP3_iProver_def,sP4_iProver_def) ),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_83,c_245]) ).
cnf(c_345,plain,
c_lessequals(sP0_iProver_def,sP3_iProver_def,sP4_iProver_def),
inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[c_344,c_241]) ).
cnf(c_664,plain,
( ~ c_lessequals(sP0_iProver_def,sP3_iProver_def,sP4_iProver_def)
| c_lessequals(sP2_iProver_def,sP3_iProver_def,sP4_iProver_def) ),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_308,c_297]) ).
cnf(c_683,plain,
$false,
inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[c_664,c_85,c_345]) ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.05/0.11 % Problem : SWV273-2 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.05/0.11 % Command : run_iprover %s %d THM
% 0.10/0.32 % Computer : n032.cluster.edu
% 0.10/0.32 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.10/0.32 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.10/0.32 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.10/0.32 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.10/0.32 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.10/0.32 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.10/0.32 % DateTime : Fri May 3 00:40:38 EDT 2024
% 0.10/0.32 % CPUTime :
% 0.16/0.43 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.16/0.43 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/run_problem --schedule fof_schedule --heuristic_context casc_unsat --no_cores 8 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300
% 1.65/1.12 % SZS status Started for theBenchmark.p
% 1.65/1.12 % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark.p
% 1.65/1.12
% 1.65/1.12 %---------------- iProver v3.9 (pre CASC 2024/SMT-COMP 2024) ----------------%
% 1.65/1.12
% 1.65/1.12 ------ iProver source info
% 1.65/1.12
% 1.65/1.12 git: date: 2024-05-02 19:28:25 +0000
% 1.65/1.12 git: sha1: a33b5eb135c74074ba803943bb12f2ebd971352f
% 1.65/1.12 git: non_committed_changes: false
% 1.65/1.12
% 1.65/1.12 ------ Parsing...successful
% 1.65/1.12
% 1.65/1.12
% 1.65/1.12
% 1.65/1.12 ------ Preprocessing... sf_s rm: 0 0s sf_e pe_s pe_e
% 1.65/1.12
% 1.65/1.12 ------ Preprocessing... gs_s sp: 0 0s gs_e snvd_s sp: 0 0s snvd_e
% 1.65/1.12
% 1.65/1.12 ------ Preprocessing... sf_s rm: 1 0s sf_e sf_s rm: 0 0s sf_e
% 1.65/1.12 ------ Proving...
% 1.65/1.12 ------ Problem Properties
% 1.65/1.12
% 1.65/1.12
% 1.65/1.12 clauses 11
% 1.65/1.12 conjectures 1
% 1.65/1.12 EPR 1
% 1.65/1.12 Horn 11
% 1.65/1.12 unary 8
% 1.65/1.12 binary 2
% 1.65/1.12 lits 15
% 1.65/1.12 lits eq 5
% 1.65/1.12 fd_pure 0
% 1.65/1.12 fd_pseudo 0
% 1.65/1.12 fd_cond 0
% 1.65/1.12 fd_pseudo_cond 0
% 1.65/1.12 AC symbols 0
% 1.65/1.12
% 1.65/1.12 ------ Schedule dynamic 5 is on
% 1.65/1.12
% 1.65/1.12 ------ Input Options "--resolution_flag false --inst_lit_sel_side none" Time Limit: 10.
% 1.65/1.12
% 1.65/1.12
% 1.65/1.12 ------
% 1.65/1.12 Current options:
% 1.65/1.12 ------
% 1.65/1.12
% 1.65/1.12
% 1.65/1.12
% 1.65/1.12
% 1.65/1.12 ------ Proving...
% 1.65/1.12
% 1.65/1.12
% 1.65/1.12 % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark.p
% 1.65/1.12
% 1.65/1.12 % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 1.78/1.12
% 1.78/1.12
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------