TSTP Solution File: SWV273-2 by Vampire---4.8
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Vampire---4.8
% Problem : SWV273-2 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule file --schedule_file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/quickGreedyProduceRating_steal_pow3.txt --cores 8 -m 12000 -t %d %s
% Computer : n016.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Tue May 21 05:54:46 EDT 2024
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.53s 0.74s
% Output : Refutation 0.53s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 5
% Number of leaves : 8
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 19 ( 7 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 32 ( 0 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Number of connectives : 25 ( 12 ~; 11 |; 0 &)
% ( 2 <=>; 0 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 8 ( 3 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 3 ( 2 avg)
% Number of predicates : 4 ( 3 usr; 3 prp; 0-3 aty)
% Number of functors : 6 ( 6 usr; 2 con; 0-3 aty)
% Number of variables : 12 ( 12 !; 0 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f25,plain,
$false,
inference(avatar_sat_refutation,[],[f18,f21,f24]) ).
fof(f24,plain,
spl0_2,
inference(avatar_contradiction_clause,[],[f23]) ).
fof(f23,plain,
( $false
| spl0_2 ),
inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f22,f4]) ).
fof(f4,axiom,
! [X1] : c_lessequals(X1,c_Message_Osynth(X1),tc_set(tc_Message_Omsg)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_Message_Osynth__increasing_0) ).
fof(f22,plain,
( ~ c_lessequals(v_H,c_Message_Osynth(v_H),tc_set(tc_Message_Omsg))
| spl0_2 ),
inference(resolution,[],[f17,f2]) ).
fof(f2,axiom,
! [X0,X1] :
( c_lessequals(c_Message_Oparts(X0),c_Message_Oparts(X1),tc_set(tc_Message_Omsg))
| ~ c_lessequals(X0,X1,tc_set(tc_Message_Omsg)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_Message_Oparts__mono_0) ).
fof(f17,plain,
( ~ c_lessequals(c_Message_Oparts(v_H),c_Message_Oparts(c_Message_Osynth(v_H)),tc_set(tc_Message_Omsg))
| spl0_2 ),
inference(avatar_component_clause,[],[f15]) ).
fof(f15,plain,
( spl0_2
<=> c_lessequals(c_Message_Oparts(v_H),c_Message_Oparts(c_Message_Osynth(v_H)),tc_set(tc_Message_Omsg)) ),
introduced(avatar_definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl0_2])]) ).
fof(f21,plain,
spl0_1,
inference(avatar_contradiction_clause,[],[f20]) ).
fof(f20,plain,
( $false
| spl0_1 ),
inference(resolution,[],[f8,f13]) ).
fof(f13,plain,
( ~ c_lessequals(c_Message_Osynth(v_H),c_Message_Oparts(c_Message_Osynth(v_H)),tc_set(tc_Message_Omsg))
| spl0_1 ),
inference(avatar_component_clause,[],[f11]) ).
fof(f11,plain,
( spl0_1
<=> c_lessequals(c_Message_Osynth(v_H),c_Message_Oparts(c_Message_Osynth(v_H)),tc_set(tc_Message_Omsg)) ),
introduced(avatar_definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl0_1])]) ).
fof(f8,plain,
! [X0] : c_lessequals(X0,c_Message_Oparts(X0),tc_set(tc_Message_Omsg)),
inference(resolution,[],[f3,f6]) ).
fof(f6,axiom,
! [X4,X5] : c_lessequals(X5,X5,tc_set(X4)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_Set_Osubset__refl_0) ).
fof(f3,axiom,
! [X0,X1] :
( ~ c_lessequals(c_Message_Oparts(X0),c_Message_Oparts(X1),tc_set(tc_Message_Omsg))
| c_lessequals(X0,c_Message_Oparts(X1),tc_set(tc_Message_Omsg)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_Message_Oparts__subset__iff_0) ).
fof(f18,plain,
( ~ spl0_1
| ~ spl0_2 ),
inference(avatar_split_clause,[],[f9,f15,f11]) ).
fof(f9,plain,
( ~ c_lessequals(c_Message_Oparts(v_H),c_Message_Oparts(c_Message_Osynth(v_H)),tc_set(tc_Message_Omsg))
| ~ c_lessequals(c_Message_Osynth(v_H),c_Message_Oparts(c_Message_Osynth(v_H)),tc_set(tc_Message_Omsg)) ),
inference(resolution,[],[f5,f1]) ).
fof(f1,axiom,
~ c_lessequals(c_union(c_Message_Oparts(v_H),c_Message_Osynth(v_H),tc_Message_Omsg),c_Message_Oparts(c_Message_Osynth(v_H)),tc_set(tc_Message_Omsg)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_0) ).
fof(f5,axiom,
! [X2,X3,X4,X5] :
( c_lessequals(c_union(X5,X2,X4),X3,tc_set(X4))
| ~ c_lessequals(X5,X3,tc_set(X4))
| ~ c_lessequals(X2,X3,tc_set(X4)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_Set_OUn__subset__iff_2) ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.12 % Problem : SWV273-2 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.07/0.14 % Command : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule file --schedule_file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/quickGreedyProduceRating_steal_pow3.txt --cores 8 -m 12000 -t %d %s
% 0.14/0.35 % Computer : n016.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.35 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.35 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.35 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.35 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.35 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.35 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.14/0.35 % DateTime : Sun May 19 09:29:23 EDT 2024
% 0.14/0.35 % CPUTime :
% 0.14/0.35 This is a CNF_UNS_RFO_NEQ_HRN problem
% 0.14/0.35 Running vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule file --schedule_file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/quickGreedyProduceRating_steal_pow3.txt --cores 8 -m 12000 -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.53/0.73 % (2988)lrs-21_1:1_to=lpo:sil=2000:sp=frequency:sos=on:lma=on:i=56:sd=2:ss=axioms:ep=R_0 on theBenchmark for (2996ds/56Mi)
% 0.53/0.73 % (2988)Refutation not found, incomplete strategy% (2988)------------------------------
% 0.53/0.73 % (2988)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 3a798227e on 2024-05-03 07:42:47 +0200)
% 0.53/0.73 % (2988)Termination reason: Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
% 0.53/0.73
% 0.53/0.73 % (2988)Memory used [KB]: 963
% 0.53/0.73 % (2988)Time elapsed: 0.002 s
% 0.53/0.73 % (2988)Instructions burned: 2 (million)
% 0.53/0.73 % (2988)------------------------------
% 0.53/0.73 % (2988)------------------------------
% 0.53/0.73 % (2981)dis-1011_2:1_sil=2000:lsd=20:nwc=5.0:flr=on:mep=off:st=3.0:i=34:sd=1:ep=RS:ss=axioms_0 on theBenchmark for (2996ds/34Mi)
% 0.53/0.73 % (2983)lrs+1011_1:1_sil=8000:sp=occurrence:nwc=10.0:i=78:ss=axioms:sgt=8_0 on theBenchmark for (2996ds/78Mi)
% 0.53/0.73 % (2982)lrs+1011_461:32768_sil=16000:irw=on:sp=frequency:lsd=20:fd=preordered:nwc=10.0:s2agt=32:alpa=false:cond=fast:s2a=on:i=51:s2at=3.0:awrs=decay:awrsf=691:bd=off:nm=20:fsr=off:amm=sco:uhcvi=on:rawr=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2996ds/51Mi)
% 0.53/0.73 % (2985)lrs+2_1:1_sil=16000:fde=none:sos=all:nwc=5.0:i=34:ep=RS:s2pl=on:lma=on:afp=100000_0 on theBenchmark for (2996ds/34Mi)
% 0.53/0.73 % (2986)lrs+1002_1:16_to=lpo:sil=32000:sp=unary_frequency:sos=on:i=45:bd=off:ss=axioms_0 on theBenchmark for (2996ds/45Mi)
% 0.53/0.73 % (2984)ott+1011_1:1_sil=2000:urr=on:i=33:sd=1:kws=inv_frequency:ss=axioms:sup=off_0 on theBenchmark for (2996ds/33Mi)
% 0.53/0.73 % (2987)lrs+21_1:5_sil=2000:sos=on:urr=on:newcnf=on:slsq=on:i=83:slsql=off:bd=off:nm=2:ss=axioms:st=1.5:sp=const_min:gsp=on:rawr=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2996ds/83Mi)
% 0.53/0.73 % (2986)Refutation not found, incomplete strategy% (2986)------------------------------
% 0.53/0.73 % (2986)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 3a798227e on 2024-05-03 07:42:47 +0200)
% 0.53/0.73 % (2985)Refutation not found, incomplete strategy% (2985)------------------------------
% 0.53/0.73 % (2985)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 3a798227e on 2024-05-03 07:42:47 +0200)
% 0.53/0.73 % (2985)Termination reason: Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
% 0.53/0.73
% 0.53/0.73 % (2985)Memory used [KB]: 964
% 0.53/0.73 % (2985)Time elapsed: 0.002 s
% 0.53/0.73 % (2985)Instructions burned: 2 (million)
% 0.53/0.73 % (2986)Termination reason: Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
% 0.53/0.73
% 0.53/0.73 % (2981)First to succeed.
% 0.53/0.73 % (2983)Also succeeded, but the first one will report.
% 0.53/0.73 % (2986)Memory used [KB]: 963
% 0.53/0.73 % (2986)Time elapsed: 0.002 s
% 0.53/0.73 % (2986)Instructions burned: 2 (million)
% 0.53/0.73 % (2985)------------------------------
% 0.53/0.73 % (2985)------------------------------
% 0.53/0.73 % (2984)Also succeeded, but the first one will report.
% 0.53/0.73 % (2986)------------------------------
% 0.53/0.73 % (2986)------------------------------
% 0.53/0.73 % (2981)Solution written to "/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/vampire-proof-2788"
% 0.53/0.74 % (2987)Also succeeded, but the first one will report.
% 0.53/0.74 % (2982)Also succeeded, but the first one will report.
% 0.53/0.74 % (2990)lrs+21_1:16_sil=2000:sp=occurrence:urr=on:flr=on:i=55:sd=1:nm=0:ins=3:ss=included:rawr=on:br=off_0 on theBenchmark for (2996ds/55Mi)
% 0.53/0.74 % (2981)Refutation found. Thanks to Tanya!
% 0.53/0.74 % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark
% 0.53/0.74 % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
% See solution above
% 0.53/0.74 % (2981)------------------------------
% 0.53/0.74 % (2981)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 3a798227e on 2024-05-03 07:42:47 +0200)
% 0.53/0.74 % (2981)Termination reason: Refutation
% 0.53/0.74
% 0.53/0.74 % (2981)Memory used [KB]: 982
% 0.53/0.74 % (2981)Time elapsed: 0.003 s
% 0.53/0.74 % (2981)Instructions burned: 3 (million)
% 0.53/0.74 % (2788)Success in time 0.374 s
% 0.53/0.74 % Vampire---4.8 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------