TSTP Solution File: SWV268-2 by CSE---1.6
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : CSE---1.6
% Problem : SWV268-2 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %s %d
% Computer : n023.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Aug 31 21:32:35 EDT 2023
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.56s 0.63s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.56s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.12 % Problem : SWV268-2 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.07/0.12 % Command : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %s %d
% 0.12/0.33 % Computer : n023.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33 % DateTime : Tue Aug 29 10:55:40 EDT 2023
% 0.12/0.33 % CPUTime :
% 0.48/0.57 start to proof:theBenchmark
% 0.48/0.62 %-------------------------------------------
% 0.48/0.62 % File :CSE---1.6
% 0.48/0.62 % Problem :theBenchmark
% 0.48/0.62 % Transform :cnf
% 0.48/0.62 % Format :tptp:raw
% 0.48/0.62 % Command :java -jar mcs_scs.jar %d %s
% 0.48/0.62
% 0.48/0.62 % Result :Theorem 0.000000s
% 0.48/0.62 % Output :CNFRefutation 0.000000s
% 0.48/0.62 %-------------------------------------------
% 0.48/0.62 %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.48/0.62 % File : SWV268-2 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.48/0.62 % Domain : Software Verification (Security)
% 0.48/0.62 % Problem : Cryptographic protocol problem for messages
% 0.48/0.62 % Version : [Pau06] axioms : Reduced > Especial.
% 0.48/0.62 % English :
% 0.48/0.62
% 0.48/0.62 % Refs : [Pau06] Paulson (2006), Email to G. Sutcliffe
% 0.48/0.62 % Source : [Pau06]
% 0.48/0.62 % Names :
% 0.48/0.62
% 0.48/0.62 % Status : Unsatisfiable
% 0.48/0.62 % Rating : 0.00 v4.1.0, 0.11 v4.0.1, 0.17 v3.3.0, 0.14 v3.2.0
% 0.48/0.62 % Syntax : Number of clauses : 4 ( 3 unt; 0 nHn; 3 RR)
% 0.48/0.62 % Number of literals : 5 ( 1 equ; 2 neg)
% 0.48/0.62 % Maximal clause size : 2 ( 1 avg)
% 0.48/0.62 % Maximal term depth : 3 ( 2 avg)
% 0.56/0.62 % Number of predicates : 2 ( 1 usr; 0 prp; 2-3 aty)
% 0.56/0.62 % Number of functors : 5 ( 5 usr; 3 con; 0-1 aty)
% 0.56/0.63 % Number of variables : 3 ( 0 sgn)
% 0.56/0.63 % SPC : CNF_UNS_RFO_SEQ_HRN
% 0.56/0.63
% 0.56/0.63 % Comments : The problems in the [Pau06] collection each have very many axioms,
% 0.56/0.63 % of which only a small selection are required for the refutation.
% 0.56/0.63 % The mission is to find those few axioms, after which a refutation
% 0.56/0.63 % can be quite easily found. This version has only the necessary
% 0.56/0.63 % axioms.
% 0.56/0.63 %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.56/0.63 cnf(cls_conjecture_0,negated_conjecture,
% 0.56/0.63 c_lessequals(v_G,c_Message_Oparts(v_H),tc_set(tc_Message_Omsg)) ).
% 0.56/0.63
% 0.56/0.63 cnf(cls_conjecture_1,negated_conjecture,
% 0.56/0.63 ~ c_lessequals(c_Message_Oparts(v_G),c_Message_Oparts(v_H),tc_set(tc_Message_Omsg)) ).
% 0.56/0.63
% 0.56/0.63 cnf(cls_Message_Oparts__idem_0,axiom,
% 0.56/0.63 c_Message_Oparts(c_Message_Oparts(V_H)) = c_Message_Oparts(V_H) ).
% 0.56/0.63
% 0.56/0.63 cnf(cls_Message_Oparts__mono_0,axiom,
% 0.56/0.63 ( ~ c_lessequals(V_G,V_H,tc_set(tc_Message_Omsg))
% 0.56/0.63 | c_lessequals(c_Message_Oparts(V_G),c_Message_Oparts(V_H),tc_set(tc_Message_Omsg)) ) ).
% 0.56/0.63
% 0.56/0.63 %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.56/0.63 %-------------------------------------------
% 0.56/0.63 % Proof found
% 0.56/0.63 % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 0.56/0.63 % SZS output start Proof
% 0.56/0.63 %ClaNum:12(EqnAxiom:8)
% 0.56/0.63 %VarNum:6(SingletonVarNum:3)
% 0.56/0.63 %MaxLitNum:2
% 0.56/0.63 %MaxfuncDepth:2
% 0.56/0.63 %SharedTerms:8
% 0.56/0.63 %goalClause: 10 11
% 0.56/0.63 %singleGoalClaCount:2
% 0.56/0.63 [10]P1(a2,f1(a5),f4(a3))
% 0.56/0.63 [11]~P1(f1(a2),f1(a5),f4(a3))
% 0.56/0.63 [9]E(f1(f1(x91)),f1(x91))
% 0.56/0.63 [12]~P1(x121,x122,f4(a3))+P1(f1(x121),f1(x122),f4(a3))
% 0.56/0.63 %EqnAxiom
% 0.56/0.63 [1]E(x11,x11)
% 0.56/0.63 [2]E(x22,x21)+~E(x21,x22)
% 0.56/0.63 [3]E(x31,x33)+~E(x31,x32)+~E(x32,x33)
% 0.56/0.63 [4]~E(x41,x42)+E(f1(x41),f1(x42))
% 0.56/0.63 [5]~E(x51,x52)+E(f4(x51),f4(x52))
% 0.56/0.63 [6]P1(x62,x63,x64)+~E(x61,x62)+~P1(x61,x63,x64)
% 0.56/0.63 [7]P1(x73,x72,x74)+~E(x71,x72)+~P1(x73,x71,x74)
% 0.56/0.63 [8]P1(x83,x84,x82)+~E(x81,x82)+~P1(x83,x84,x81)
% 0.56/0.63
% 0.56/0.63 %-------------------------------------------
% 0.56/0.63 cnf(18,plain,
% 0.56/0.63 (~E(a2,f1(f1(a2)))),
% 0.56/0.63 inference(scs_inference,[],[10,11,9,2,12,7,6,3])).
% 0.56/0.63 cnf(26,plain,
% 0.56/0.63 (E(f1(f1(x261)),f1(x261))),
% 0.56/0.63 inference(rename_variables,[],[9])).
% 0.56/0.63 cnf(27,plain,
% 0.56/0.63 ($false),
% 0.56/0.63 inference(scs_inference,[],[10,9,26,11,18,2,12,6,7]),
% 0.56/0.63 ['proof']).
% 0.56/0.63 % SZS output end Proof
% 0.56/0.63 % Total time :0.000000s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------