TSTP Solution File: SWV268-2 by Beagle---0.9.51
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Beagle---0.9.51
% Problem : SWV268-2 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : java -Dfile.encoding=UTF-8 -Xms512M -Xmx4G -Xss10M -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/beagle.jar -auto -q -proof -print tff -smtsolver /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/cvc4-1.4-x86_64-linux-opt -liasolver cooper -t %d %s
% Computer : n011.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Aug 22 11:03:26 EDT 2023
% Result : Unsatisfiable 2.15s 1.57s
% Output : CNFRefutation 2.58s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 4
% Number of leaves : 10
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 17 ( 8 unt; 6 typ; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 14 ( 2 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of connectives : 9 ( 6 ~; 3 |; 0 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 0 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 5 ( 3 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Number of types : 2 ( 0 usr)
% Number of type conns : 5 ( 3 >; 2 *; 0 +; 0 <<)
% Number of predicates : 3 ( 1 usr; 1 prp; 0-3 aty)
% Number of functors : 5 ( 5 usr; 3 con; 0-1 aty)
% Number of variables : 8 (; 8 !; 0 ?; 0 :)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%$ c_lessequals > #nlpp > tc_set > c_Message_Oparts > v_H > v_G > tc_Message_Omsg
%Foreground sorts:
%Background operators:
%Foreground operators:
tff(v_G,type,
v_G: $i ).
tff(tc_set,type,
tc_set: $i > $i ).
tff(c_lessequals,type,
c_lessequals: ( $i * $i * $i ) > $o ).
tff(tc_Message_Omsg,type,
tc_Message_Omsg: $i ).
tff(c_Message_Oparts,type,
c_Message_Oparts: $i > $i ).
tff(v_H,type,
v_H: $i ).
tff(f_26,axiom,
c_lessequals(v_G,c_Message_Oparts(v_H),tc_set(tc_Message_Omsg)),
file(unknown,unknown) ).
tff(f_30,axiom,
! [V_H] : ( c_Message_Oparts(c_Message_Oparts(V_H)) = c_Message_Oparts(V_H) ),
file(unknown,unknown) ).
tff(f_35,axiom,
! [V_G,V_H] :
( ~ c_lessequals(V_G,V_H,tc_set(tc_Message_Omsg))
| c_lessequals(c_Message_Oparts(V_G),c_Message_Oparts(V_H),tc_set(tc_Message_Omsg)) ),
file(unknown,unknown) ).
tff(f_28,axiom,
~ c_lessequals(c_Message_Oparts(v_G),c_Message_Oparts(v_H),tc_set(tc_Message_Omsg)),
file(unknown,unknown) ).
tff(c_2,plain,
c_lessequals(v_G,c_Message_Oparts(v_H),tc_set(tc_Message_Omsg)),
inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_26]) ).
tff(c_6,plain,
! [V_H_1] : ( c_Message_Oparts(c_Message_Oparts(V_H_1)) = c_Message_Oparts(V_H_1) ),
inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_30]) ).
tff(c_26,plain,
! [V_G_5,V_H_6] :
( c_lessequals(c_Message_Oparts(V_G_5),c_Message_Oparts(V_H_6),tc_set(tc_Message_Omsg))
| ~ c_lessequals(V_G_5,V_H_6,tc_set(tc_Message_Omsg)) ),
inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_35]) ).
tff(c_37,plain,
! [V_G_7,V_H_8] :
( c_lessequals(c_Message_Oparts(V_G_7),c_Message_Oparts(V_H_8),tc_set(tc_Message_Omsg))
| ~ c_lessequals(V_G_7,c_Message_Oparts(V_H_8),tc_set(tc_Message_Omsg)) ),
inference(superposition,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_6,c_26]) ).
tff(c_4,plain,
~ c_lessequals(c_Message_Oparts(v_G),c_Message_Oparts(v_H),tc_set(tc_Message_Omsg)),
inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_28]) ).
tff(c_40,plain,
~ c_lessequals(v_G,c_Message_Oparts(v_H),tc_set(tc_Message_Omsg)),
inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_37,c_4]) ).
tff(c_50,plain,
$false,
inference(demodulation,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_2,c_40]) ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.14 % Problem : SWV268-2 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.00/0.15 % Command : java -Dfile.encoding=UTF-8 -Xms512M -Xmx4G -Xss10M -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/beagle.jar -auto -q -proof -print tff -smtsolver /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/cvc4-1.4-x86_64-linux-opt -liasolver cooper -t %d %s
% 0.15/0.37 % Computer : n011.cluster.edu
% 0.15/0.37 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.15/0.37 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.15/0.37 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.15/0.37 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.15/0.37 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.15/0.37 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.15/0.37 % DateTime : Thu Aug 3 23:16:21 EDT 2023
% 0.15/0.37 % CPUTime :
% 2.15/1.57 % SZS status Unsatisfiable for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 2.15/1.58
% 2.15/1.58 % SZS output start CNFRefutation for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 2.58/1.61
% 2.58/1.61 Inference rules
% 2.58/1.61 ----------------------
% 2.58/1.61 #Ref : 0
% 2.58/1.61 #Sup : 10
% 2.58/1.61 #Fact : 0
% 2.58/1.61 #Define : 0
% 2.58/1.61 #Split : 0
% 2.58/1.61 #Chain : 0
% 2.58/1.61 #Close : 0
% 2.58/1.61
% 2.58/1.61 Ordering : KBO
% 2.58/1.61
% 2.58/1.61 Simplification rules
% 2.58/1.61 ----------------------
% 2.58/1.61 #Subsume : 0
% 2.58/1.61 #Demod : 5
% 2.58/1.61 #Tautology : 4
% 2.58/1.61 #SimpNegUnit : 0
% 2.58/1.61 #BackRed : 0
% 2.58/1.61
% 2.58/1.61 #Partial instantiations: 0
% 2.58/1.61 #Strategies tried : 1
% 2.58/1.61
% 2.58/1.61 Timing (in seconds)
% 2.58/1.61 ----------------------
% 2.58/1.61 Preprocessing : 0.38
% 2.58/1.61 Parsing : 0.21
% 2.58/1.61 CNF conversion : 0.02
% 2.58/1.61 Main loop : 0.16
% 2.58/1.61 Inferencing : 0.07
% 2.58/1.61 Reduction : 0.04
% 2.58/1.61 Demodulation : 0.03
% 2.58/1.61 BG Simplification : 0.01
% 2.58/1.61 Subsumption : 0.03
% 2.58/1.62 Abstraction : 0.01
% 2.58/1.62 MUC search : 0.00
% 2.58/1.62 Cooper : 0.00
% 2.58/1.62 Total : 0.59
% 2.58/1.62 Index Insertion : 0.00
% 2.58/1.62 Index Deletion : 0.00
% 2.58/1.62 Index Matching : 0.00
% 2.58/1.62 BG Taut test : 0.00
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------