TSTP Solution File: SWV265-2 by Vampire-SAT---4.8
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Vampire-SAT---4.8
% Problem : SWV265-2 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : vampire --mode casc_sat -m 16384 --cores 7 -t %d %s
% Computer : n022.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Tue May 21 06:14:54 EDT 2024
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.15s 0.33s
% Output : Refutation 0.15s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 2
% Number of leaves : 3
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 5 ( 4 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 6 ( 0 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of connectives : 3 ( 2 ~; 1 |; 0 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 0 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 6 ( 2 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 2 ( 1 usr; 1 prp; 0-3 aty)
% Number of functors : 6 ( 6 usr; 4 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 3 ( 3 !; 0 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f5,plain,
$false,
inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f4,f2]) ).
fof(f2,axiom,
~ c_in(v_Y,c_Message_Oparts(v_H),tc_Message_Omsg),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_3) ).
fof(f4,plain,
c_in(v_Y,c_Message_Oparts(v_H),tc_Message_Omsg),
inference(resolution,[],[f3,f1]) ).
fof(f1,axiom,
c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(v_X,v_Y),c_Message_Oparts(v_H),tc_Message_Omsg),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_2) ).
fof(f3,axiom,
! [X2,X0,X1] :
( ~ c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(X0,X1),c_Message_Oparts(X2),tc_Message_Omsg)
| c_in(X1,c_Message_Oparts(X2),tc_Message_Omsg) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_Message_Oparts_OSnd_0) ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.09 % Problem : SWV265-2 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.08/0.11 % Command : vampire --mode casc_sat -m 16384 --cores 7 -t %d %s
% 0.10/0.31 % Computer : n022.cluster.edu
% 0.10/0.31 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.10/0.31 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.10/0.31 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.10/0.31 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.10/0.31 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.10/0.31 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.10/0.31 % DateTime : Sun May 19 07:13:37 EDT 2024
% 0.10/0.31 % CPUTime :
% 0.10/0.31 % (20071)Running in auto input_syntax mode. Trying TPTP
% 0.15/0.32 % (20075)fmb+10_1_bce=on:fmbas=expand:fmbksg=on:fmbsr=1.3:gsp=on:nm=4_470 on theBenchmark for (470ds/0Mi)
% 0.15/0.33 % (20076)dis+1_20_av=off:lcm=predicate:nm=2:nwc=2.0_396 on theBenchmark for (396ds/0Mi)
% 0.15/0.33 % (20073)fmb+10_1_bce=on:fmbas=expand:fmbksg=on:fmbsr=1.3_569 on theBenchmark for (569ds/0Mi)
% 0.15/0.33 % (20078)fmb+10_1_fmbas=off:fmbsr=1.3:nm=2:si=on:rtra=on:rawr=on:rp=on:fmbksg=on_1451 on theBenchmark for (1451ds/0Mi)
% 0.15/0.33 % (20074)dis-2_2:3_amm=sco:anc=none:bce=on:fsr=off:gsp=on:nm=16:nwc=1.2:nicw=on:sac=on:sp=weighted_frequency_476 on theBenchmark for (476ds/0Mi)
% 0.15/0.33 % (20072)fmb+10_1_fmbas=off:fmbsr=1.3:nm=2_1451 on theBenchmark for (1451ds/0Mi)
% 0.15/0.33 % (20077)dis+11_4:5_nm=4_216 on theBenchmark for (216ds/0Mi)
% 0.15/0.33 Detected minimum model sizes of [1,1,1,1]
% 0.15/0.33 Detected maximum model sizes of [1,max,1,1]
% 0.15/0.33 TRYING [1,1,1,1]
% 0.15/0.33 Detected minimum model sizes of [1,1,1,1]
% 0.15/0.33 % (20076)First to succeed.
% 0.15/0.33 Detected maximum model sizes of [1,max,1,1]
% 0.15/0.33 % (20074)Also succeeded, but the first one will report.
% 0.15/0.33 % (20077)Also succeeded, but the first one will report.
% 0.15/0.33 TRYING [1,1,1,1]
% 0.15/0.33 TRYING [1,2,1,1]
% 0.15/0.33 TRYING [1]
% 0.15/0.33 TRYING [1]
% 0.15/0.33 % (20076)Solution written to "/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/vampire-proof-20071"
% 0.15/0.33 TRYING [1,2,1,1]
% 0.15/0.33 TRYING [2]
% 0.15/0.33 TRYING [2]
% 0.15/0.33 TRYING [1,3,1,1]
% 0.15/0.33 TRYING [3]
% 0.15/0.33 TRYING [1,3,1,1]
% 0.15/0.33 TRYING [3]
% 0.15/0.33 Cannot enumerate next child to try in an incomplete setup
% 0.15/0.33 % (20075)Refutation not found, incomplete strategy% (20075)------------------------------
% 0.15/0.33 % (20075)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 3a798227e on 2024-05-03 07:42:47 +0200)
% 0.15/0.33 % (20072)Also succeeded, but the first one will report.
% 0.15/0.33 % (20075)Termination reason: Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
% 0.15/0.33
% 0.15/0.33 % (20075)Memory used [KB]: 726
% 0.15/0.33 % (20078)Also succeeded, but the first one will report.
% 0.15/0.33 % (20075)Time elapsed: 0.003 s
% 0.15/0.33 % (20075)Instructions burned: 4 (million)
% 0.15/0.33 Cannot enumerate next child to try in an incomplete setup
% 0.15/0.33 % (20076)Refutation found. Thanks to Tanya!
% 0.15/0.33 % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark
% 0.15/0.33 % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
% See solution above
% 0.15/0.33 % (20076)------------------------------
% 0.15/0.33 % (20076)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 3a798227e on 2024-05-03 07:42:47 +0200)
% 0.15/0.33 % (20076)Termination reason: Refutation
% 0.15/0.33
% 0.15/0.33 % (20076)Memory used [KB]: 728
% 0.15/0.33 % (20076)Time elapsed: 0.002 s
% 0.15/0.33 % (20076)Instructions burned: 2 (million)
% 0.15/0.33 % (20071)Success in time 0.015 s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------