TSTP Solution File: SWV254-1 by E-SAT---3.1.00

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : E-SAT---3.1.00
% Problem  : SWV254-1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_E %s %d THM

% Computer : n014.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue May 21 05:33:50 EDT 2024

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 1.80s 1.05s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 1.80s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    7
%            Number of leaves      :   11
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   35 (  25 unt;   0 nHn;  15 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   45 (  17 equ;  14 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    4 (   2 usr;   1 prp; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    9 (   9 usr;   3 con; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   52 (  15 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(cls_Nat_Odiff__is__0__eq_H_0,axiom,
    ( c_minus(X1,X2,tc_nat) = c_0
    | ~ c_lessequals(X1,X2,tc_nat) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/MSC001-1.ax',cls_Nat_Odiff__is__0__eq_H_0) ).

cnf(cls_conjecture_0,negated_conjecture,
    c_lessequals(X1,v_x(X1),tc_nat),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_0) ).

cnf(cls_conjecture_1,negated_conjecture,
    v_x(X1) = v_nat,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_1) ).

cnf(cls_Nat_Ole__add__diff__inverse_0,axiom,
    ( c_plus(X1,c_minus(X2,X1,tc_nat),tc_nat) = X2
    | ~ c_lessequals(X1,X2,tc_nat) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/MSC001-1.ax',cls_Nat_Ole__add__diff__inverse_0) ).

cnf(cls_Nat_Oadd__leE_0,axiom,
    ( c_lessequals(X2,X3,tc_nat)
    | ~ c_lessequals(c_plus(X1,X2,tc_nat),X3,tc_nat) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_Nat_Oadd__leE_0) ).

cnf(cls_Nat_Odiff__le__self_0,axiom,
    c_lessequals(c_minus(X1,X2,tc_nat),X1,tc_nat),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/MSC001-1.ax',cls_Nat_Odiff__le__self_0) ).

cnf(cls_Nat_Oop_A_N_Odiff__0_0,axiom,
    c_minus(X1,c_0,tc_nat) = X1,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/MSC001-1.ax',cls_Nat_Oop_A_N_Odiff__0_0) ).

cnf(cls_Nat_Oadd__0__right_0,axiom,
    c_plus(X1,c_0,tc_nat) = X1,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/MSC001-1.ax',cls_Nat_Oadd__0__right_0) ).

cnf(cls_Nat_Onot__add__less1_0,axiom,
    ~ c_less(c_plus(X1,X2,tc_nat),X1,tc_nat),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/MSC001-1.ax',cls_Nat_Onot__add__less1_0) ).

cnf(cls_Nat_OlessI_0,axiom,
    c_less(X1,c_Suc(X1),tc_nat),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/MSC001-0.ax',cls_Nat_OlessI_0) ).

cnf(cls_SetInterval_Ocard__atMost_0,axiom,
    c_Finite__Set_Ocard(c_SetInterval_OatMost(X1,tc_nat),tc_nat) = c_Suc(X1),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/MSC001-1.ax',cls_SetInterval_Ocard__atMost_0) ).

cnf(c_0_11,plain,
    ( c_minus(X1,X2,tc_nat) = c_0
    | ~ c_lessequals(X1,X2,tc_nat) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[cls_Nat_Odiff__is__0__eq_H_0]) ).

cnf(c_0_12,negated_conjecture,
    c_lessequals(X1,v_x(X1),tc_nat),
    cls_conjecture_0 ).

cnf(c_0_13,negated_conjecture,
    v_x(X1) = v_nat,
    cls_conjecture_1 ).

cnf(c_0_14,plain,
    ( c_plus(X1,c_minus(X2,X1,tc_nat),tc_nat) = X2
    | ~ c_lessequals(X1,X2,tc_nat) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[cls_Nat_Ole__add__diff__inverse_0]) ).

cnf(c_0_15,plain,
    ( c_minus(X1,X2,tc_nat) = c_0
    | ~ c_lessequals(X1,X2,tc_nat) ),
    c_0_11 ).

cnf(c_0_16,negated_conjecture,
    c_lessequals(X1,v_nat,tc_nat),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_12,c_0_13]) ).

cnf(c_0_17,plain,
    ( c_lessequals(X2,X3,tc_nat)
    | ~ c_lessequals(c_plus(X1,X2,tc_nat),X3,tc_nat) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[cls_Nat_Oadd__leE_0]) ).

cnf(c_0_18,axiom,
    c_lessequals(c_minus(X1,X2,tc_nat),X1,tc_nat),
    cls_Nat_Odiff__le__self_0 ).

cnf(c_0_19,axiom,
    c_minus(X1,c_0,tc_nat) = X1,
    cls_Nat_Oop_A_N_Odiff__0_0 ).

cnf(c_0_20,plain,
    ( c_plus(X1,c_minus(X2,X1,tc_nat),tc_nat) = X2
    | ~ c_lessequals(X1,X2,tc_nat) ),
    c_0_14 ).

cnf(c_0_21,negated_conjecture,
    c_minus(X1,v_nat,tc_nat) = c_0,
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_15,c_0_16]) ).

cnf(c_0_22,axiom,
    c_plus(X1,c_0,tc_nat) = X1,
    cls_Nat_Oadd__0__right_0 ).

cnf(c_0_23,plain,
    ( c_lessequals(X2,X3,tc_nat)
    | ~ c_lessequals(c_plus(X1,X2,tc_nat),X3,tc_nat) ),
    c_0_17 ).

cnf(c_0_24,plain,
    c_lessequals(X1,X1,tc_nat),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_18,c_0_19]) ).

cnf(c_0_25,plain,
    ~ c_less(c_plus(X1,X2,tc_nat),X1,tc_nat),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[cls_Nat_Onot__add__less1_0]) ).

cnf(c_0_26,negated_conjecture,
    ( v_nat = X1
    | ~ c_lessequals(v_nat,X1,tc_nat) ),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_20,c_0_21]),c_0_22]) ).

cnf(c_0_27,plain,
    c_lessequals(X1,c_plus(X2,X1,tc_nat),tc_nat),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_23,c_0_24]) ).

cnf(c_0_28,plain,
    ~ c_less(c_plus(X1,X2,tc_nat),X1,tc_nat),
    c_0_25 ).

cnf(c_0_29,negated_conjecture,
    c_plus(X1,v_nat,tc_nat) = v_nat,
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_26,c_0_27]) ).

cnf(c_0_30,axiom,
    c_less(X1,c_Suc(X1),tc_nat),
    cls_Nat_OlessI_0 ).

cnf(c_0_31,axiom,
    c_Finite__Set_Ocard(c_SetInterval_OatMost(X1,tc_nat),tc_nat) = c_Suc(X1),
    cls_SetInterval_Ocard__atMost_0 ).

cnf(c_0_32,negated_conjecture,
    ~ c_less(v_nat,X1,tc_nat),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_28,c_0_29]) ).

cnf(c_0_33,plain,
    c_less(X1,c_Finite__Set_Ocard(c_SetInterval_OatMost(X1,tc_nat),tc_nat),tc_nat),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_30,c_0_31]) ).

cnf(c_0_34,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_32,c_0_33]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.04/0.12  % Problem    : SWV254-1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.04/0.13  % Command    : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.13/0.34  % Computer : n014.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.13/0.34  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.13/0.34  % DateTime   : Sun May 19 09:31:53 EDT 2024
% 0.13/0.34  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.20/0.46  Running first-order model finding
% 0.20/0.46  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --satauto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 1.80/1.05  # Version: 3.1.0
% 1.80/1.05  # Preprocessing class: FMLMSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 1.80/1.05  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 1.80/1.05  # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 1.80/1.05  # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 1.80/1.05  # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 1.80/1.05  # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 1.80/1.05  # G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with pid 18554 completed with status 0
% 1.80/1.05  # Result found by G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN
% 1.80/1.05  # Preprocessing class: FMLMSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 1.80/1.05  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 1.80/1.05  # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 1.80/1.05  # No SInE strategy applied
% 1.80/1.05  # Search class: FGHSM-SMLM32-DFFFFFNN
% 1.80/1.05  # Scheduled 13 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 1.80/1.05  # Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_RG_S0Y with 113s (1) cores
% 1.80/1.05  # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 151s (1) cores
% 1.80/1.05  # Starting G-E--_207_C01_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_S5PRR_S0Y with 113s (1) cores
% 1.80/1.05  # Starting G-E--_208_B07CMA_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 113s (1) cores
% 1.80/1.05  # Starting G-E--_208_B00_00_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_S00EN with 113s (1) cores
% 1.80/1.05  # G-E--_208_B00_00_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_S00EN with pid 18569 completed with status 0
% 1.80/1.05  # Result found by G-E--_208_B00_00_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_S00EN
% 1.80/1.05  # Preprocessing class: FMLMSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 1.80/1.05  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 1.80/1.05  # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 1.80/1.05  # No SInE strategy applied
% 1.80/1.05  # Search class: FGHSM-SMLM32-DFFFFFNN
% 1.80/1.05  # Scheduled 13 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 1.80/1.05  # Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_RG_S0Y with 113s (1) cores
% 1.80/1.05  # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 151s (1) cores
% 1.80/1.05  # Starting G-E--_207_C01_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_S5PRR_S0Y with 113s (1) cores
% 1.80/1.05  # Starting G-E--_208_B07CMA_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 113s (1) cores
% 1.80/1.05  # Starting G-E--_208_B00_00_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_S00EN with 113s (1) cores
% 1.80/1.05  # Preprocessing time       : 0.024 s
% 1.80/1.05  # Presaturation interreduction done
% 1.80/1.05  
% 1.80/1.05  # Proof found!
% 1.80/1.05  # SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 1.80/1.05  # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 1.80/1.05  # Parsed axioms                        : 2789
% 1.80/1.05  # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 0
% 1.80/1.05  # Initial clauses                      : 2789
% 1.80/1.05  # Removed in clause preprocessing      : 10
% 1.80/1.05  # Initial clauses in saturation        : 2779
% 1.80/1.05  # Processed clauses                    : 4672
% 1.80/1.05  # ...of these trivial                  : 29
% 1.80/1.05  # ...subsumed                          : 226
% 1.80/1.05  # ...remaining for further processing  : 4417
% 1.80/1.05  # Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 15
% 1.80/1.05  # Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 1.80/1.05  # Backward-subsumed                    : 5
% 1.80/1.05  # Backward-rewritten                   : 48
% 1.80/1.05  # Generated clauses                    : 2273
% 1.80/1.05  # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 706
% 1.80/1.05  # ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
% 1.80/1.05  # Contextual simplify-reflections      : 2
% 1.80/1.05  # Paramodulations                      : 2212
% 1.80/1.05  # Factorizations                       : 8
% 1.80/1.05  # NegExts                              : 0
% 1.80/1.05  # Equation resolutions                 : 53
% 1.80/1.05  # Disequality decompositions           : 0
% 1.80/1.05  # Total rewrite steps                  : 2028
% 1.80/1.05  # ...of those cached                   : 1649
% 1.80/1.05  # Propositional unsat checks           : 0
% 1.80/1.05  #    Propositional check models        : 0
% 1.80/1.05  #    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 1.80/1.05  #    Propositional clauses             : 0
% 1.80/1.05  #    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 1.80/1.05  #    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
% 1.80/1.05  #    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
% 1.80/1.05  #    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
% 1.80/1.05  #    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
% 1.80/1.05  #    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
% 1.80/1.05  #    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
% 1.80/1.05  #    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
% 1.80/1.05  # Current number of processed clauses  : 1710
% 1.80/1.05  #    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 456
% 1.80/1.05  #    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 1
% 1.80/1.05  #    Negative unit clauses             : 79
% 1.80/1.05  #    Non-unit-clauses                  : 1174
% 1.80/1.05  # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 1467
% 1.80/1.05  # ...number of literals in the above   : 3686
% 1.80/1.05  # Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 1.80/1.05  # Current number of archived clauses   : 2716
% 1.80/1.05  # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 2369147
% 1.80/1.05  # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 1420118
% 1.80/1.05  # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 110
% 1.80/1.05  # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 103718
% 1.80/1.05  # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 1
% 1.80/1.05  # BW rewrite match attempts            : 757
% 1.80/1.05  # BW rewrite match successes           : 103
% 1.80/1.05  # Condensation attempts                : 0
% 1.80/1.05  # Condensation successes               : 0
% 1.80/1.05  # Termbank termtop insertions          : 114407
% 1.80/1.05  # Search garbage collected termcells   : 4030
% 1.80/1.05  
% 1.80/1.05  # -------------------------------------------------
% 1.80/1.05  # User time                : 0.497 s
% 1.80/1.05  # System time              : 0.014 s
% 1.80/1.05  # Total time               : 0.511 s
% 1.80/1.05  # Maximum resident set size: 6768 pages
% 1.80/1.05  
% 1.80/1.05  # -------------------------------------------------
% 1.80/1.05  # User time                : 2.360 s
% 1.80/1.05  # System time              : 0.064 s
% 1.80/1.05  # Total time               : 2.424 s
% 1.80/1.05  # Maximum resident set size: 3492 pages
% 1.80/1.05  % E---3.1 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------