TSTP Solution File: SWV253-2 by Z3---4.8.9.0

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Z3---4.8.9.0
% Problem  : SWV253-2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp
% Command  : z3_tptp -proof -model -t:%d -file:%s

% Computer : n013.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 29 15:10:36 EDT 2022

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.11s 0.37s
% Output   : Proof 0.11s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.06/0.11  % Problem  : SWV253-2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.06/0.12  % Command  : z3_tptp -proof -model -t:%d -file:%s
% 0.11/0.33  % Computer : n013.cluster.edu
% 0.11/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.11/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.11/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.11/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.11/0.33  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.11/0.33  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.11/0.33  % DateTime : Sun Sep  4 01:52:47 EDT 2022
% 0.11/0.33  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.11/0.33  Z3tptp [4.8.9.0] (c) 2006-20**. Microsoft Corp.
% 0.11/0.33  Usage: tptp [options] [-file:]file
% 0.11/0.33    -h, -?       prints this message.
% 0.11/0.33    -smt2        print SMT-LIB2 benchmark.
% 0.11/0.33    -m, -model   generate model.
% 0.11/0.33    -p, -proof   generate proof.
% 0.11/0.33    -c, -core    generate unsat core of named formulas.
% 0.11/0.33    -st, -statistics display statistics.
% 0.11/0.33    -t:timeout   set timeout (in second).
% 0.11/0.33    -smt2status  display status in smt2 format instead of SZS.
% 0.11/0.33    -check_status check the status produced by Z3 against annotation in benchmark.
% 0.11/0.33    -<param>:<value> configuration parameter and value.
% 0.11/0.33    -o:<output-file> file to place output in.
% 0.11/0.37  % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.11/0.37  % SZS output start Proof
% 0.11/0.37  tff(v_K_H_type, type, (
% 0.11/0.37     v_K_H: $i)).
% 0.11/0.37  tff(v_K_type, type, (
% 0.11/0.37     v_K: $i)).
% 0.11/0.37  tff(c_Message_OinvKey_type, type, (
% 0.11/0.37     c_Message_OinvKey: $i > $i)).
% 0.11/0.37  tff(1,plain,
% 0.11/0.37      (![V_y: $i] : (c_Message_OinvKey(c_Message_OinvKey(V_y)) = V_y) <=> ![V_y: $i] : (c_Message_OinvKey(c_Message_OinvKey(V_y)) = V_y)),
% 0.11/0.37      inference(rewrite,[status(thm)],[])).
% 0.11/0.37  tff(2,plain,
% 0.11/0.37      (![V_y: $i] : (c_Message_OinvKey(c_Message_OinvKey(V_y)) = V_y) <=> ![V_y: $i] : (c_Message_OinvKey(c_Message_OinvKey(V_y)) = V_y)),
% 0.11/0.37      inference(rewrite,[status(thm)],[])).
% 0.11/0.37  tff(3,axiom,(![V_y: $i] : (c_Message_OinvKey(c_Message_OinvKey(V_y)) = V_y)), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p','cls_Message_OinvKey_A_IinvKey_Ay_J_A_61_61_Ay_0')).
% 0.11/0.37  tff(4,plain,
% 0.11/0.37      (![V_y: $i] : (c_Message_OinvKey(c_Message_OinvKey(V_y)) = V_y)),
% 0.11/0.37      inference(modus_ponens,[status(thm)],[3, 2])).
% 0.11/0.37  tff(5,plain,(
% 0.11/0.37      ![V_y: $i] : (c_Message_OinvKey(c_Message_OinvKey(V_y)) = V_y)),
% 0.11/0.37      inference(skolemize,[status(sab)],[4])).
% 0.11/0.37  tff(6,plain,
% 0.11/0.37      (![V_y: $i] : (c_Message_OinvKey(c_Message_OinvKey(V_y)) = V_y)),
% 0.11/0.37      inference(modus_ponens,[status(thm)],[5, 1])).
% 0.11/0.37  tff(7,plain,
% 0.11/0.37      ((~![V_y: $i] : (c_Message_OinvKey(c_Message_OinvKey(V_y)) = V_y)) | (c_Message_OinvKey(c_Message_OinvKey(v_K_H)) = v_K_H)),
% 0.11/0.37      inference(quant_inst,[status(thm)],[])).
% 0.11/0.37  tff(8,plain,
% 0.11/0.37      (c_Message_OinvKey(c_Message_OinvKey(v_K_H)) = v_K_H),
% 0.11/0.37      inference(unit_resolution,[status(thm)],[7, 6])).
% 0.11/0.37  tff(9,assumption,(~(c_Message_OinvKey(v_K) = c_Message_OinvKey(v_K_H))), introduced(assumption)).
% 0.11/0.37  tff(10,plain,
% 0.11/0.37      (((v_K = v_K_H) | (c_Message_OinvKey(v_K) = c_Message_OinvKey(v_K_H))) <=> ((v_K = v_K_H) | (c_Message_OinvKey(v_K) = c_Message_OinvKey(v_K_H)))),
% 0.11/0.37      inference(rewrite,[status(thm)],[])).
% 0.11/0.37  tff(11,plain,
% 0.11/0.37      (((c_Message_OinvKey(v_K) = c_Message_OinvKey(v_K_H)) | (v_K = v_K_H)) <=> ((v_K = v_K_H) | (c_Message_OinvKey(v_K) = c_Message_OinvKey(v_K_H)))),
% 0.11/0.37      inference(rewrite,[status(thm)],[])).
% 0.11/0.37  tff(12,axiom,((c_Message_OinvKey(v_K) = c_Message_OinvKey(v_K_H)) | (v_K = v_K_H)), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p','cls_conjecture_1')).
% 0.11/0.37  tff(13,plain,
% 0.11/0.37      ((v_K = v_K_H) | (c_Message_OinvKey(v_K) = c_Message_OinvKey(v_K_H))),
% 0.11/0.37      inference(modus_ponens,[status(thm)],[12, 11])).
% 0.11/0.37  tff(14,plain,
% 0.11/0.37      ((v_K = v_K_H) | (c_Message_OinvKey(v_K) = c_Message_OinvKey(v_K_H))),
% 0.11/0.37      inference(modus_ponens,[status(thm)],[13, 10])).
% 0.11/0.37  tff(15,plain,
% 0.11/0.37      (v_K = v_K_H),
% 0.11/0.37      inference(unit_resolution,[status(thm)],[14, 9])).
% 0.11/0.37  tff(16,plain,
% 0.11/0.37      (c_Message_OinvKey(v_K) = c_Message_OinvKey(v_K_H)),
% 0.11/0.37      inference(monotonicity,[status(thm)],[15])).
% 0.11/0.37  tff(17,plain,
% 0.11/0.37      ($false),
% 0.11/0.37      inference(unit_resolution,[status(thm)],[9, 16])).
% 0.11/0.37  tff(18,plain,(c_Message_OinvKey(v_K) = c_Message_OinvKey(v_K_H)), inference(lemma,lemma(discharge,[]))).
% 0.11/0.37  tff(19,plain,
% 0.11/0.37      (c_Message_OinvKey(c_Message_OinvKey(v_K)) = c_Message_OinvKey(c_Message_OinvKey(v_K_H))),
% 0.11/0.37      inference(monotonicity,[status(thm)],[18])).
% 0.11/0.37  tff(20,plain,
% 0.11/0.37      ((~![V_y: $i] : (c_Message_OinvKey(c_Message_OinvKey(V_y)) = V_y)) | (c_Message_OinvKey(c_Message_OinvKey(v_K)) = v_K)),
% 0.11/0.37      inference(quant_inst,[status(thm)],[])).
% 0.11/0.37  tff(21,plain,
% 0.11/0.37      (c_Message_OinvKey(c_Message_OinvKey(v_K)) = v_K),
% 0.11/0.37      inference(unit_resolution,[status(thm)],[20, 6])).
% 0.11/0.37  tff(22,plain,
% 0.11/0.37      (v_K = c_Message_OinvKey(c_Message_OinvKey(v_K))),
% 0.11/0.37      inference(symmetry,[status(thm)],[21])).
% 0.11/0.37  tff(23,plain,
% 0.11/0.37      (v_K = v_K_H),
% 0.11/0.37      inference(transitivity,[status(thm)],[22, 19, 8])).
% 0.11/0.37  tff(24,plain,
% 0.11/0.37      (((~(v_K = v_K_H)) | (~(c_Message_OinvKey(v_K) = c_Message_OinvKey(v_K_H)))) <=> ((~(v_K = v_K_H)) | (~(c_Message_OinvKey(v_K) = c_Message_OinvKey(v_K_H))))),
% 0.11/0.37      inference(rewrite,[status(thm)],[])).
% 0.11/0.37  tff(25,axiom,((~(v_K = v_K_H)) | (~(c_Message_OinvKey(v_K) = c_Message_OinvKey(v_K_H)))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p','cls_conjecture_0')).
% 0.11/0.37  tff(26,plain,
% 0.11/0.37      ((~(v_K = v_K_H)) | (~(c_Message_OinvKey(v_K) = c_Message_OinvKey(v_K_H)))),
% 0.11/0.37      inference(modus_ponens,[status(thm)],[25, 24])).
% 0.11/0.37  tff(27,plain,
% 0.11/0.37      (~(v_K = v_K_H)),
% 0.11/0.37      inference(unit_resolution,[status(thm)],[26, 18])).
% 0.11/0.37  tff(28,plain,
% 0.11/0.37      ($false),
% 0.11/0.37      inference(unit_resolution,[status(thm)],[27, 23])).
% 0.11/0.37  % SZS output end Proof
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------