TSTP Solution File: SWV250-2 by Otter---3.3

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Otter---3.3
% Problem  : SWV250-2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : otter-tptp-script %s

% Computer : n010.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Jul 27 13:20:17 EDT 2022

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 1.65s 1.87s
% Output   : Refutation 1.65s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    6
%            Number of leaves      :    7
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   13 (   7 unt;   4 nHn;   7 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   20 (   2 equ;   4 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    5 (   2 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    3 (   1 usr;   1 prp; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    7 (   7 usr;   4 con; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   19 (   5 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(1,axiom,
    ~ c_in(v_x,c_union(c_Message_Osynth(c_Message_Oanalz(v_G)),c_Message_Oanalz(c_union(v_G,v_H,tc_Message_Omsg)),tc_Message_Omsg),tc_Message_Omsg),
    file('SWV250-2.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(2,axiom,
    ( ~ c_in(A,c_union(B,C,D),D)
    | c_in(A,C,D)
    | c_in(A,B,D) ),
    file('SWV250-2.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(3,axiom,
    ( ~ c_in(A,B,C)
    | c_in(A,c_union(B,D,C),C) ),
    file('SWV250-2.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(4,axiom,
    ( ~ c_in(A,B,C)
    | c_in(A,c_union(D,B,C),C) ),
    file('SWV250-2.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(7,axiom,
    c_in(v_x,c_Message_Oanalz(c_union(c_Message_Osynth(c_Message_Oanalz(v_G)),v_H,tc_Message_Omsg)),tc_Message_Omsg),
    file('SWV250-2.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(9,axiom,
    c_Message_Oanalz(c_union(c_Message_Oanalz(A),B,tc_Message_Omsg)) = c_Message_Oanalz(c_union(A,B,tc_Message_Omsg)),
    file('SWV250-2.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(11,axiom,
    c_Message_Oanalz(c_union(c_Message_Osynth(A),B,tc_Message_Omsg)) = c_union(c_Message_Oanalz(c_union(A,B,tc_Message_Omsg)),c_Message_Osynth(A),tc_Message_Omsg),
    file('SWV250-2.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(12,plain,
    c_in(v_x,c_union(c_Message_Oanalz(c_union(v_G,v_H,tc_Message_Omsg)),c_Message_Osynth(c_Message_Oanalz(v_G)),tc_Message_Omsg),tc_Message_Omsg),
    inference(demod,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[inference(back_demod,[status(thm)],[7]),11,9]),
    [iquote('back_demod,7,demod,11,9')] ).

cnf(17,plain,
    ( c_in(v_x,c_Message_Osynth(c_Message_Oanalz(v_G)),tc_Message_Omsg)
    | c_in(v_x,c_Message_Oanalz(c_union(v_G,v_H,tc_Message_Omsg)),tc_Message_Omsg) ),
    inference(hyper,[status(thm)],[12,2]),
    [iquote('hyper,12,2')] ).

cnf(19,plain,
    ( c_in(v_x,c_Message_Oanalz(c_union(v_G,v_H,tc_Message_Omsg)),tc_Message_Omsg)
    | c_in(v_x,c_union(c_Message_Osynth(c_Message_Oanalz(v_G)),A,tc_Message_Omsg),tc_Message_Omsg) ),
    inference(hyper,[status(thm)],[17,3]),
    [iquote('hyper,17,3')] ).

cnf(39,plain,
    ( c_in(v_x,c_union(c_Message_Osynth(c_Message_Oanalz(v_G)),A,tc_Message_Omsg),tc_Message_Omsg)
    | c_in(v_x,c_union(B,c_Message_Oanalz(c_union(v_G,v_H,tc_Message_Omsg)),tc_Message_Omsg),tc_Message_Omsg) ),
    inference(hyper,[status(thm)],[19,4]),
    [iquote('hyper,19,4')] ).

cnf(44,plain,
    c_in(v_x,c_union(c_Message_Osynth(c_Message_Oanalz(v_G)),c_Message_Oanalz(c_union(v_G,v_H,tc_Message_Omsg)),tc_Message_Omsg),tc_Message_Omsg),
    inference(factor,[status(thm)],[39]),
    [iquote('factor,39.1.2')] ).

cnf(45,plain,
    $false,
    inference(binary,[status(thm)],[44,1]),
    [iquote('binary,44.1,1.1')] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.02/0.11  % Problem  : SWV250-2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.02/0.12  % Command  : otter-tptp-script %s
% 0.12/0.33  % Computer : n010.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.12/0.33  % DateTime : Wed Jul 27 05:30:54 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.33  % CPUTime  : 
% 1.65/1.87  ----- Otter 3.3f, August 2004 -----
% 1.65/1.87  The process was started by sandbox2 on n010.cluster.edu,
% 1.65/1.87  Wed Jul 27 05:30:55 2022
% 1.65/1.87  The command was "./otter".  The process ID is 4124.
% 1.65/1.87  
% 1.65/1.87  set(prolog_style_variables).
% 1.65/1.87  set(auto).
% 1.65/1.87     dependent: set(auto1).
% 1.65/1.87     dependent: set(process_input).
% 1.65/1.87     dependent: clear(print_kept).
% 1.65/1.87     dependent: clear(print_new_demod).
% 1.65/1.87     dependent: clear(print_back_demod).
% 1.65/1.87     dependent: clear(print_back_sub).
% 1.65/1.87     dependent: set(control_memory).
% 1.65/1.87     dependent: assign(max_mem, 12000).
% 1.65/1.87     dependent: assign(pick_given_ratio, 4).
% 1.65/1.87     dependent: assign(stats_level, 1).
% 1.65/1.87     dependent: assign(max_seconds, 10800).
% 1.65/1.87  clear(print_given).
% 1.65/1.87  
% 1.65/1.87  list(usable).
% 1.65/1.87  0 [] A=A.
% 1.65/1.87  0 [] c_in(v_x,c_Message_Oanalz(c_union(c_Message_Osynth(c_Message_Oanalz(v_G)),v_H,tc_Message_Omsg)),tc_Message_Omsg).
% 1.65/1.87  0 [] -c_in(v_x,c_union(c_Message_Osynth(c_Message_Oanalz(v_G)),c_Message_Oanalz(c_union(v_G,v_H,tc_Message_Omsg)),tc_Message_Omsg),tc_Message_Omsg).
% 1.65/1.87  0 [] c_Message_Oanalz(c_union(c_Message_Oanalz(V_G),V_H,tc_Message_Omsg))=c_Message_Oanalz(c_union(V_G,V_H,tc_Message_Omsg)).
% 1.65/1.87  0 [] c_Message_Oanalz(c_union(c_Message_Osynth(V_G),V_H,tc_Message_Omsg))=c_union(c_Message_Oanalz(c_union(V_G,V_H,tc_Message_Omsg)),c_Message_Osynth(V_G),tc_Message_Omsg).
% 1.65/1.87  0 [] -c_in(V_c,c_union(V_A,V_B,T_a),T_a)|c_in(V_c,V_B,T_a)|c_in(V_c,V_A,T_a).
% 1.65/1.87  0 [] -c_in(V_c,V_A,T_a)|c_in(V_c,c_union(V_A,V_B,T_a),T_a).
% 1.65/1.87  0 [] -c_in(V_c,V_B,T_a)|c_in(V_c,c_union(V_A,V_B,T_a),T_a).
% 1.65/1.87  end_of_list.
% 1.65/1.87  
% 1.65/1.87  SCAN INPUT: prop=0, horn=0, equality=1, symmetry=0, max_lits=3.
% 1.65/1.87  
% 1.65/1.87  This ia a non-Horn set with equality.  The strategy will be
% 1.65/1.87  Knuth-Bendix, ordered hyper_res, factoring, and unit
% 1.65/1.87  deletion, with positive clauses in sos and nonpositive
% 1.65/1.87  clauses in usable.
% 1.65/1.87  
% 1.65/1.87     dependent: set(knuth_bendix).
% 1.65/1.87     dependent: set(anl_eq).
% 1.65/1.87     dependent: set(para_from).
% 1.65/1.87     dependent: set(para_into).
% 1.65/1.87     dependent: clear(para_from_right).
% 1.65/1.87     dependent: clear(para_into_right).
% 1.65/1.87     dependent: set(para_from_vars).
% 1.65/1.87     dependent: set(eq_units_both_ways).
% 1.65/1.87     dependent: set(dynamic_demod_all).
% 1.65/1.87     dependent: set(dynamic_demod).
% 1.65/1.87     dependent: set(order_eq).
% 1.65/1.87     dependent: set(back_demod).
% 1.65/1.87     dependent: set(lrpo).
% 1.65/1.87     dependent: set(hyper_res).
% 1.65/1.87     dependent: set(unit_deletion).
% 1.65/1.87     dependent: set(factor).
% 1.65/1.87  
% 1.65/1.87  ------------> process usable:
% 1.65/1.87  ** KEPT (pick-wt=13): 1 [] -c_in(v_x,c_union(c_Message_Osynth(c_Message_Oanalz(v_G)),c_Message_Oanalz(c_union(v_G,v_H,tc_Message_Omsg)),tc_Message_Omsg),tc_Message_Omsg).
% 1.65/1.87  ** KEPT (pick-wt=15): 2 [] -c_in(A,c_union(B,C,D),D)|c_in(A,C,D)|c_in(A,B,D).
% 1.65/1.87  ** KEPT (pick-wt=11): 3 [] -c_in(A,B,C)|c_in(A,c_union(B,D,C),C).
% 1.65/1.87  ** KEPT (pick-wt=11): 4 [] -c_in(A,B,C)|c_in(A,c_union(D,B,C),C).
% 1.65/1.87  
% 1.65/1.87  ------------> process sos:
% 1.65/1.87  ** KEPT (pick-wt=3): 6 [] A=A.
% 1.65/1.87  ** KEPT (pick-wt=10): 7 [] c_in(v_x,c_Message_Oanalz(c_union(c_Message_Osynth(c_Message_Oanalz(v_G)),v_H,tc_Message_Omsg)),tc_Message_Omsg).
% 1.65/1.87  ** KEPT (pick-wt=12): 8 [] c_Message_Oanalz(c_union(c_Message_Oanalz(A),B,tc_Message_Omsg))=c_Message_Oanalz(c_union(A,B,tc_Message_Omsg)).
% 1.65/1.87  ---> New Demodulator: 9 [new_demod,8] c_Message_Oanalz(c_union(c_Message_Oanalz(A),B,tc_Message_Omsg))=c_Message_Oanalz(c_union(A,B,tc_Message_Omsg)).
% 1.65/1.87  ** KEPT (pick-wt=16): 10 [] c_Message_Oanalz(c_union(c_Message_Osynth(A),B,tc_Message_Omsg))=c_union(c_Message_Oanalz(c_union(A,B,tc_Message_Omsg)),c_Message_Osynth(A),tc_Message_Omsg).
% 1.65/1.87  ---> New Demodulator: 11 [new_demod,10] c_Message_Oanalz(c_union(c_Message_Osynth(A),B,tc_Message_Omsg))=c_union(c_Message_Oanalz(c_union(A,B,tc_Message_Omsg)),c_Message_Osynth(A),tc_Message_Omsg).
% 1.65/1.87    Following clause subsumed by 6 during input processing: 0 [copy,6,flip.1] A=A.
% 1.65/1.87  >>>> Starting back demodulation with 9.
% 1.65/1.87  >>>> Starting back demodulation with 11.
% 1.65/1.87      >> back demodulating 7 with 11.
% 1.65/1.87  
% 1.65/1.87  ======= end of input processing =======
% 1.65/1.87  
% 1.65/1.87  =========== start of search ===========
% 1.65/1.87  
% 1.65/1.87  -------- PROOF -------- 
% 1.65/1.87  
% 1.65/1.87  ----> UNIT CONFLICT at   0.00 sec ----> 45 [binary,44.1,1.1] $F.
% 1.65/1.87  
% 1.65/1.87  Length of proof is 5.  Level of proof is 5.
% 1.65/1.87  
% 1.65/1.87  ---------------- PROOF ----------------
% 1.65/1.87  % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 1.65/1.87  % SZS output start Refutation
% See solution above
% 1.65/1.87  ------------ end of proof -------------
% 1.65/1.87  
% 1.65/1.87  
% 1.65/1.87  Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 1.65/1.87  
% 1.65/1.87  
% 1.65/1.87  Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 1.65/1.87  
% 1.65/1.87  ============ end of search ============
% 1.65/1.87  
% 1.65/1.87  -------------- statistics -------------
% 1.65/1.87  clauses given                 10
% 1.65/1.87  clauses generated             45
% 1.65/1.87  clauses kept                  39
% 1.65/1.87  clauses forward subsumed      22
% 1.65/1.87  clauses back subsumed          0
% 1.65/1.87  Kbytes malloced             1953
% 1.65/1.87  
% 1.65/1.87  ----------- times (seconds) -----------
% 1.65/1.87  user CPU time          0.00          (0 hr, 0 min, 0 sec)
% 1.65/1.87  system CPU time        0.00          (0 hr, 0 min, 0 sec)
% 1.65/1.87  wall-clock time        1             (0 hr, 0 min, 1 sec)
% 1.65/1.87  
% 1.65/1.87  That finishes the proof of the theorem.
% 1.65/1.87  
% 1.65/1.87  Process 4124 finished Wed Jul 27 05:30:56 2022
% 1.65/1.87  Otter interrupted
% 1.65/1.87  PROOF FOUND
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------