TSTP Solution File: SWV244-2 by iProver---3.9
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : iProver---3.9
% Problem : SWV244-2 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_iprover %s %d THM
% Computer : n023.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Fri May 3 03:13:50 EDT 2024
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.46s 1.16s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.46s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : ERROR: Analysing output (Could not find formula named definition)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(c_49,negated_conjecture,
c_in(v_X,c_union(c_Message_Osynth(v_G),v_H,tc_Message_Omsg),tc_Message_Omsg),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_0) ).
cnf(c_50,negated_conjecture,
~ c_in(v_X,c_union(c_Message_Oanalz(c_union(v_G,v_H,tc_Message_Omsg)),c_Message_Osynth(v_G),tc_Message_Omsg),tc_Message_Omsg),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_1) ).
cnf(c_51,plain,
( ~ c_in(X0,X1,tc_Message_Omsg)
| c_in(X0,c_Message_Oanalz(X1),tc_Message_Omsg) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_Message_Oanalz_OInj_0) ).
cnf(c_52,plain,
( ~ c_in(X0,X1,X2)
| c_in(X0,c_union(X3,X1,X2),X2) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_Set_OUnCI_0) ).
cnf(c_53,plain,
( ~ c_in(X0,X1,X2)
| c_in(X0,c_union(X1,X3,X2),X2) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_Set_OUnCI_1) ).
cnf(c_54,plain,
( ~ c_in(X0,c_union(X1,X2,X3),X3)
| c_in(X0,X1,X3)
| c_in(X0,X2,X3) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_Set_OUnE_0) ).
cnf(c_80,plain,
c_union(v_G,v_H,tc_Message_Omsg) = sP0_iProver_def,
definition ).
cnf(c_81,plain,
c_Message_Oanalz(sP0_iProver_def) = sP1_iProver_def,
definition ).
cnf(c_82,plain,
c_Message_Osynth(v_G) = sP2_iProver_def,
definition ).
cnf(c_83,plain,
c_union(sP1_iProver_def,sP2_iProver_def,tc_Message_Omsg) = sP3_iProver_def,
definition ).
cnf(c_84,plain,
c_union(sP2_iProver_def,v_H,tc_Message_Omsg) = sP4_iProver_def,
definition ).
cnf(c_85,negated_conjecture,
~ c_in(v_X,sP3_iProver_def,tc_Message_Omsg),
inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_50,c_82,c_80,c_81,c_83]) ).
cnf(c_86,negated_conjecture,
c_in(v_X,sP4_iProver_def,tc_Message_Omsg),
inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_49,c_84]) ).
cnf(c_235,plain,
( ~ c_in(X0,sP0_iProver_def,tc_Message_Omsg)
| c_in(X0,sP1_iProver_def,tc_Message_Omsg) ),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_81,c_51]) ).
cnf(c_247,plain,
( ~ c_in(X0,v_H,tc_Message_Omsg)
| c_in(X0,sP0_iProver_def,tc_Message_Omsg) ),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_80,c_52]) ).
cnf(c_248,plain,
( ~ c_in(X0,sP2_iProver_def,tc_Message_Omsg)
| c_in(X0,sP3_iProver_def,tc_Message_Omsg) ),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_83,c_52]) ).
cnf(c_264,plain,
( ~ c_in(X0,sP1_iProver_def,tc_Message_Omsg)
| c_in(X0,sP3_iProver_def,tc_Message_Omsg) ),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_83,c_53]) ).
cnf(c_285,plain,
( ~ c_in(X0,sP4_iProver_def,tc_Message_Omsg)
| c_in(X0,v_H,tc_Message_Omsg)
| c_in(X0,sP2_iProver_def,tc_Message_Omsg) ),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_84,c_54]) ).
cnf(c_340,plain,
( c_in(v_X,v_H,tc_Message_Omsg)
| c_in(v_X,sP2_iProver_def,tc_Message_Omsg) ),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_86,c_285]) ).
cnf(c_348,plain,
( c_in(v_X,sP0_iProver_def,tc_Message_Omsg)
| c_in(v_X,sP2_iProver_def,tc_Message_Omsg) ),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_340,c_247]) ).
cnf(c_356,plain,
( c_in(v_X,sP0_iProver_def,tc_Message_Omsg)
| c_in(v_X,sP3_iProver_def,tc_Message_Omsg) ),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_348,c_248]) ).
cnf(c_357,plain,
c_in(v_X,sP0_iProver_def,tc_Message_Omsg),
inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[c_356,c_85]) ).
cnf(c_359,plain,
c_in(v_X,sP1_iProver_def,tc_Message_Omsg),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_357,c_235]) ).
cnf(c_362,plain,
c_in(v_X,sP3_iProver_def,tc_Message_Omsg),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_359,c_264]) ).
cnf(c_363,plain,
$false,
inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[c_362,c_85]) ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.10/0.12 % Problem : SWV244-2 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.10/0.12 % Command : run_iprover %s %d THM
% 0.12/0.33 % Computer : n023.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33 % DateTime : Fri May 3 00:39:54 EDT 2024
% 0.12/0.33 % CPUTime :
% 0.18/0.45 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.18/0.45 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/run_problem --schedule fof_schedule --heuristic_context casc_unsat --no_cores 8 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300
% 0.46/1.16 % SZS status Started for theBenchmark.p
% 0.46/1.16 % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark.p
% 0.46/1.16
% 0.46/1.16 %---------------- iProver v3.9 (pre CASC 2024/SMT-COMP 2024) ----------------%
% 0.46/1.16
% 0.46/1.16 ------ iProver source info
% 0.46/1.16
% 0.46/1.16 git: date: 2024-05-02 19:28:25 +0000
% 0.46/1.16 git: sha1: a33b5eb135c74074ba803943bb12f2ebd971352f
% 0.46/1.16 git: non_committed_changes: false
% 0.46/1.16
% 0.46/1.16 ------ Parsing...successful
% 0.46/1.16
% 0.46/1.16
% 0.46/1.16
% 0.46/1.16 ------ Preprocessing... sf_s rm: 0 0s sf_e pe_s pe_e
% 0.46/1.16
% 0.46/1.16 ------ Preprocessing... gs_s sp: 0 0s gs_e snvd_s sp: 0 0s snvd_e
% 0.46/1.16
% 0.46/1.16 ------ Preprocessing... sf_s rm: 1 0s sf_e sf_s rm: 0 0s sf_e
% 0.46/1.16 ------ Proving...
% 0.46/1.16 ------ Problem Properties
% 0.46/1.16
% 0.46/1.16
% 0.46/1.16 clauses 11
% 0.46/1.16 conjectures 2
% 0.46/1.16 EPR 2
% 0.46/1.16 Horn 10
% 0.46/1.16 unary 7
% 0.46/1.16 binary 3
% 0.46/1.16 lits 16
% 0.46/1.16 lits eq 5
% 0.46/1.16 fd_pure 0
% 0.46/1.16 fd_pseudo 0
% 0.46/1.16 fd_cond 0
% 0.46/1.16 fd_pseudo_cond 0
% 0.46/1.16 AC symbols 0
% 0.46/1.16
% 0.46/1.16 ------ Schedule dynamic 5 is on
% 0.46/1.16
% 0.46/1.16 ------ Input Options "--resolution_flag false --inst_lit_sel_side none" Time Limit: 10.
% 0.46/1.16
% 0.46/1.16
% 0.46/1.16 ------
% 0.46/1.16 Current options:
% 0.46/1.16 ------
% 0.46/1.16
% 0.46/1.16
% 0.46/1.16
% 0.46/1.16
% 0.46/1.16 ------ Proving...
% 0.46/1.16
% 0.46/1.16
% 0.46/1.16 % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark.p
% 0.46/1.16
% 0.46/1.16 % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 0.46/1.16
% 0.46/1.16
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------