TSTP Solution File: SWV244-2 by PyRes---1.5
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : PyRes---1.5
% Problem : SWV244-2 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : pyres-fof.py -tifbsVp -nlargest -HPickGiven5 %s
% Computer : n018.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu May 9 17:44:30 EDT 2024
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.49s 0.66s
% Output : Refutation 0.49s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 7
% Number of leaves : 6
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 13 ( 7 unt; 3 nHn; 7 RR)
% Number of literals : 20 ( 0 equ; 5 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 4 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 2 ( 1 usr; 1 prp; 0-3 aty)
% Number of functors : 7 ( 7 usr; 4 con; 0-3 aty)
% Number of variables : 19 ( 7 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(cls_conjecture_1,negated_conjecture,
~ c_in(v_X,c_union(c_Message_Oanalz(c_union(v_G,v_H,tc_Message_Omsg)),c_Message_Osynth(v_G),tc_Message_Omsg),tc_Message_Omsg),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_1) ).
cnf(cls_Set_OUnCI_1,axiom,
( ~ c_in(X10,X9,X11)
| c_in(X10,c_union(X9,X8,X11),X11) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_Set_OUnCI_1) ).
cnf(cls_Message_Oanalz_OInj_0,axiom,
( ~ c_in(X2,X3,tc_Message_Omsg)
| c_in(X2,c_Message_Oanalz(X3),tc_Message_Omsg) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_Message_Oanalz_OInj_0) ).
cnf(cls_Set_OUnCI_0,axiom,
( ~ c_in(X6,X4,X7)
| c_in(X6,c_union(X5,X4,X7),X7) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_Set_OUnCI_0) ).
cnf(cls_conjecture_0,negated_conjecture,
c_in(v_X,c_union(c_Message_Osynth(v_G),v_H,tc_Message_Omsg),tc_Message_Omsg),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_0) ).
cnf(cls_Set_OUnE_0,axiom,
( ~ c_in(X14,c_union(X13,X12,X15),X15)
| c_in(X14,X12,X15)
| c_in(X14,X13,X15) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_Set_OUnE_0) ).
cnf(c6,plain,
( c_in(v_X,v_H,tc_Message_Omsg)
| c_in(v_X,c_Message_Osynth(v_G),tc_Message_Omsg) ),
inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[cls_Set_OUnE_0,cls_conjecture_0]) ).
cnf(c11,plain,
( c_in(v_X,v_H,tc_Message_Omsg)
| c_in(v_X,c_union(X23,c_Message_Osynth(v_G),tc_Message_Omsg),tc_Message_Omsg) ),
inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c6,cls_Set_OUnCI_0]) ).
cnf(c90,plain,
c_in(v_X,v_H,tc_Message_Omsg),
inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c11,cls_conjecture_1]) ).
cnf(c95,plain,
c_in(v_X,c_union(X25,v_H,tc_Message_Omsg),tc_Message_Omsg),
inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c90,cls_Set_OUnCI_0]) ).
cnf(c109,plain,
c_in(v_X,c_Message_Oanalz(c_union(X32,v_H,tc_Message_Omsg)),tc_Message_Omsg),
inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c95,cls_Message_Oanalz_OInj_0]) ).
cnf(c133,plain,
c_in(v_X,c_union(c_Message_Oanalz(c_union(X78,v_H,tc_Message_Omsg)),X79,tc_Message_Omsg),tc_Message_Omsg),
inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c109,cls_Set_OUnCI_1]) ).
cnf(c229,plain,
$false,
inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c133,cls_conjecture_1]) ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.13 % Problem : SWV244-2 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.07/0.14 % Command : pyres-fof.py -tifbsVp -nlargest -HPickGiven5 %s
% 0.15/0.35 % Computer : n018.cluster.edu
% 0.15/0.35 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.15/0.35 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.15/0.35 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.15/0.35 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.15/0.35 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.15/0.35 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.15/0.35 % DateTime : Thu May 9 06:12:38 EDT 2024
% 0.15/0.35 % CPUTime :
% 0.49/0.66 % Version: 1.5
% 0.49/0.66 % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.49/0.66 % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.49/0.66
% 0.49/0.66 % Initial clauses : 6
% 0.49/0.66 % Processed clauses : 62
% 0.49/0.66 % Factors computed : 0
% 0.49/0.66 % Resolvents computed: 233
% 0.49/0.66 % Tautologies deleted: 0
% 0.49/0.66 % Forward subsumed : 13
% 0.49/0.66 % Backward subsumed : 17
% 0.49/0.66 % -------- CPU Time ---------
% 0.49/0.66 % User time : 0.287 s
% 0.49/0.66 % System time : 0.016 s
% 0.49/0.66 % Total time : 0.303 s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------