TSTP Solution File: SWV244-1 by Vampire---4.8

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Vampire---4.8
% Problem  : SWV244-1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule file --schedule_file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/quickGreedyProduceRating_steal_pow3.txt --cores 8 -m 12000 -t %d %s

% Computer : n012.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue May 21 05:54:34 EDT 2024

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.60s 0.80s
% Output   : Refutation 0.60s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    6
%            Number of leaves      :    8
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   19 (   9 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   30 (   0 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   24 (  13   ~;   9   |;   0   &)
%                                         (   2 <=>;   0  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    7 (   3 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    4 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    4 (   3 usr;   3 prp; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    7 (   7 usr;   4 con; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   14 (  14   !;   0   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f1422,plain,
    $false,
    inference(avatar_sat_refutation,[],[f1412,f1415,f1421]) ).

fof(f1421,plain,
    ~ spl0_2,
    inference(avatar_contradiction_clause,[],[f1420]) ).

fof(f1420,plain,
    ( $false
    | ~ spl0_2 ),
    inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f1418,f1411]) ).

fof(f1411,plain,
    ( c_in(v_X,v_H,tc_Message_Omsg)
    | ~ spl0_2 ),
    inference(avatar_component_clause,[],[f1409]) ).

fof(f1409,plain,
    ( spl0_2
  <=> c_in(v_X,v_H,tc_Message_Omsg) ),
    introduced(avatar_definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl0_2])]) ).

fof(f1418,plain,
    ~ c_in(v_X,v_H,tc_Message_Omsg),
    inference(resolution,[],[f1417,f1326]) ).

fof(f1326,axiom,
    ! [X1,X4,X12,X13] :
      ( c_in(X4,c_union(X12,X13,X1),X1)
      | ~ c_in(X4,X13,X1) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_Set_OUnCI_0) ).

fof(f1417,plain,
    ~ c_in(v_X,c_union(v_G,v_H,tc_Message_Omsg),tc_Message_Omsg),
    inference(resolution,[],[f1414,f1377]) ).

fof(f1377,axiom,
    ! [X55,X53] :
      ( c_in(X53,c_Message_Oanalz(X55),tc_Message_Omsg)
      | ~ c_in(X53,X55,tc_Message_Omsg) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_Message_Oanalz_OInj_0) ).

fof(f1414,plain,
    ~ c_in(v_X,c_Message_Oanalz(c_union(v_G,v_H,tc_Message_Omsg)),tc_Message_Omsg),
    inference(resolution,[],[f1402,f1327]) ).

fof(f1327,axiom,
    ! [X1,X4,X12,X13] :
      ( c_in(X4,c_union(X12,X13,X1),X1)
      | ~ c_in(X4,X12,X1) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_Set_OUnCI_1) ).

fof(f1402,axiom,
    ~ c_in(v_X,c_union(c_Message_Oanalz(c_union(v_G,v_H,tc_Message_Omsg)),c_Message_Osynth(v_G),tc_Message_Omsg),tc_Message_Omsg),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_1) ).

fof(f1415,plain,
    ~ spl0_1,
    inference(avatar_split_clause,[],[f1413,f1405]) ).

fof(f1405,plain,
    ( spl0_1
  <=> c_in(v_X,c_Message_Osynth(v_G),tc_Message_Omsg) ),
    introduced(avatar_definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl0_1])]) ).

fof(f1413,plain,
    ~ c_in(v_X,c_Message_Osynth(v_G),tc_Message_Omsg),
    inference(resolution,[],[f1402,f1326]) ).

fof(f1412,plain,
    ( spl0_1
    | spl0_2 ),
    inference(avatar_split_clause,[],[f1403,f1409,f1405]) ).

fof(f1403,plain,
    ( c_in(v_X,v_H,tc_Message_Omsg)
    | c_in(v_X,c_Message_Osynth(v_G),tc_Message_Omsg) ),
    inference(resolution,[],[f1401,f1328]) ).

fof(f1328,axiom,
    ! [X1,X4,X12,X13] :
      ( ~ c_in(X4,c_union(X12,X13,X1),X1)
      | c_in(X4,X13,X1)
      | c_in(X4,X12,X1) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_Set_OUnE_0) ).

fof(f1401,axiom,
    c_in(v_X,c_union(c_Message_Osynth(v_G),v_H,tc_Message_Omsg),tc_Message_Omsg),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_0) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.05/0.10  % Problem    : SWV244-1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.05/0.11  % Command    : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule file --schedule_file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/quickGreedyProduceRating_steal_pow3.txt --cores 8 -m 12000 -t %d %s
% 0.11/0.31  % Computer : n012.cluster.edu
% 0.11/0.31  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.11/0.31  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.11/0.31  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.11/0.31  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.11/0.31  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.11/0.31  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.11/0.31  % DateTime   : Sun May 19 07:17:08 EDT 2024
% 0.11/0.31  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.11/0.31  This is a CNF_UNS_RFO_SEQ_NHN problem
% 0.11/0.32  Running vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule file --schedule_file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/quickGreedyProduceRating_steal_pow3.txt --cores 8 -m 12000 -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.60/0.79  % (25866)lrs+1011_461:32768_sil=16000:irw=on:sp=frequency:lsd=20:fd=preordered:nwc=10.0:s2agt=32:alpa=false:cond=fast:s2a=on:i=51:s2at=3.0:awrs=decay:awrsf=691:bd=off:nm=20:fsr=off:amm=sco:uhcvi=on:rawr=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2995ds/51Mi)
% 0.60/0.79  % (25867)lrs+1011_1:1_sil=8000:sp=occurrence:nwc=10.0:i=78:ss=axioms:sgt=8_0 on theBenchmark for (2995ds/78Mi)
% 0.60/0.79  % (25865)dis-1011_2:1_sil=2000:lsd=20:nwc=5.0:flr=on:mep=off:st=3.0:i=34:sd=1:ep=RS:ss=axioms_0 on theBenchmark for (2995ds/34Mi)
% 0.60/0.79  % (25868)ott+1011_1:1_sil=2000:urr=on:i=33:sd=1:kws=inv_frequency:ss=axioms:sup=off_0 on theBenchmark for (2995ds/33Mi)
% 0.60/0.79  % (25869)lrs+2_1:1_sil=16000:fde=none:sos=all:nwc=5.0:i=34:ep=RS:s2pl=on:lma=on:afp=100000_0 on theBenchmark for (2995ds/34Mi)
% 0.60/0.79  % (25870)lrs+1002_1:16_to=lpo:sil=32000:sp=unary_frequency:sos=on:i=45:bd=off:ss=axioms_0 on theBenchmark for (2995ds/45Mi)
% 0.60/0.79  % (25871)lrs+21_1:5_sil=2000:sos=on:urr=on:newcnf=on:slsq=on:i=83:slsql=off:bd=off:nm=2:ss=axioms:st=1.5:sp=const_min:gsp=on:rawr=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2995ds/83Mi)
% 0.60/0.79  % (25872)lrs-21_1:1_to=lpo:sil=2000:sp=frequency:sos=on:lma=on:i=56:sd=2:ss=axioms:ep=R_0 on theBenchmark for (2995ds/56Mi)
% 0.60/0.80  % (25870)First to succeed.
% 0.60/0.80  % (25872)Also succeeded, but the first one will report.
% 0.60/0.80  % (25865)Also succeeded, but the first one will report.
% 0.60/0.80  % (25870)Solution written to "/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/vampire-proof-25864"
% 0.60/0.80  % (25868)Also succeeded, but the first one will report.
% 0.60/0.80  % (25870)Refutation found. Thanks to Tanya!
% 0.60/0.80  % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark
% 0.60/0.80  % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
% See solution above
% 0.60/0.80  % (25870)------------------------------
% 0.60/0.80  % (25870)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 3a798227e on 2024-05-03 07:42:47 +0200)
% 0.60/0.80  % (25870)Termination reason: Refutation
% 0.60/0.80  
% 0.60/0.80  % (25870)Memory used [KB]: 1802
% 0.60/0.80  % (25870)Time elapsed: 0.005 s
% 0.60/0.80  % (25870)Instructions burned: 7 (million)
% 0.60/0.80  % (25864)Success in time 0.473 s
% 0.60/0.80  % Vampire---4.8 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------